Post: #301

A man who hasn't experienced the Divine in his soul and who sees it in others - as who they really are - is a dangerous man. He's a soul-less man, who operates from concepts like 'egalitarianism' without understand they are anti-Nature and anti-life.

It takes great courage to be a truly masculine man - or a truly feminine woman. Neither position is comfortable in a Communist / Marxist-driven media environment, which is what the West has. You make a deal with that devil and you are constantly struggling to swim. You compromise any moral principles that are truly Pro-Life (not just in the 'anti-abortion' sense, but in favor of true individual sovereignty) and you worship the alter of intellectualism. This is one reason I greatly admire Roosh, because he is so honest in his questions, his experiences, and speaks from a continuing and growing exploration of what it means to be human, and male, and how to best create stable environments for humans moving forward. Neo-Masculinity is the only way forward, and it's not race-based, but principle-based.

Any man who doesn't feel God, Spirit, the Holy - as a lived experienced and knowing, not some vague sense - makes you rootless and unstable. You'll need drugs. And it's not through women that God enters the world, but through men. Men have the Y chromosome, the unique adaptation that evolves while the X is redundant. Men experience Divinity through contact with all of Creation - women can only experience it in the beautiful but limited way of having a child. Child-bearing is beautiful, but Man's experience of Divinity creates majestic cathedrals (literal and metaphysical) - space flight and washing machines and structures of government like our Constitution and wonders we've yet to know. Men seek to know God through loving the entire Universe, women seek to know God through loving men. Men make the world their living poem, and righteous men create a JUST world. This is the holiest physical expression of God - where men and women are treated with fairness, not feelings. A man is designed to abstract and imagine and then manifest into reality those forms of thoughts. A man also knows a woman's deep worth and beauty and celebrates that. Jordan Peterson doesn't know what it means to be a real man - he clearly lacks contact with and expression of Divinity in his life. Therefore, his relationships are inherently dysfunctional and his mental state is disordered. You can see it in his dialogues, as brilliantly as he can form ideas they lack a cohesion to make them relatable and useful to the common person.

If you don't know what God is to yourself, you need to spend more time in Nature, literally in contact with the earth, the water, the wind. Rainer Maria Rilke understood this, and wrote more eloquently about it than anyone.

Letters to a Young Poet

If you engage with the Communist, the Marxist, the Socialist on their playing field without knowing your soul, you're trying to play their game and outwit them but will actually fail. Without a clarity of morality - of what is truly Good vs. Evil - you are just dancing with the devil instead of elevating yourself above the satanic games and providing an example through your own life's example.

JP needs to clean his soul, do an ayahuasca journey, and spend a week with a survivalist. Thank God we in the United States have Donald J. Trump as President to show EVERY MAN and EVERY WOMAN an example of what a true leader is like. He is not perfect - he still cucks for women more than a truly masculine man - but by how he lives his life, I'd listen to and trust Trump far more than I would Peterson.

Post: #302

(10-29-2018 03:40 PM)griffinmill Wrote:  I loved Jordan's takedown of Cathy Newman. It was a calm rebuttal of SWJ talking points in a hostile environment by a man who was in total control.

I followed him quite religiously for a few months, but a few things have irritated me:

1) He is now ridiculously overexposed.
2) His overuse of biblical philosophy in his book and his dancing around the issue of whether he has any religious belief; no logical or rational person on the planet should be advocating or supporting any supernatural belief system.
3) Selling books; this irks me not from a socialist perspective since I'm a strict capitalist, but because self-help "gurus" who want the world to be a better place should make their wisdom more accessible by giving it away for free - they want to help us, right? It's not his only source of income. I'm sure he makes a fine amount of money at UoT.
4) You can tell just by his eyes that he's heavily medicated; and he promotes SSRIs. I remember watching him answer a viewer's question about how best to give up booze - he suggested some fucking pill!
5) As you can see from his tweet today, he's getting far too cocky now with all of this adulation and he's made a few serious missteps over the past few weeks.

2) Yes atheists are the only logical, rational people on the planet. Everyone who has religious or supernatural beliefs is dumb.

3) Yeah people should give away their knowledge for free, not write books that make money. That's bad. Roosh should give away game for free.



I don't like Peterson either, but these are badly thought out points. Like something a communist atheist would say.

Post: #303

I am glad more and more people see that Jordan Peterson is a false prophet, like I said all these months ago!

Post: #304

(10-31-2018 12:47 PM)RedPillUK Wrote:  

(10-29-2018 03:40 PM)griffinmill Wrote:  I loved Jordan's takedown of Cathy Newman. It was a calm rebuttal of SWJ talking points in a hostile environment by a man who was in total control.

I followed him quite religiously for a few months, but a few things have irritated me:

1) He is now ridiculously overexposed.
2) His overuse of biblical philosophy in his book and his dancing around the issue of whether he has any religious belief; no logical or rational person on the planet should be advocating or supporting any supernatural belief system.
3) Selling books; this irks me not from a socialist perspective since I'm a strict capitalist, but because self-help "gurus" who want the world to be a better place should make their wisdom more accessible by giving it away for free - they want to help us, right? It's not his only source of income. I'm sure he makes a fine amount of money at UoT.
4) You can tell just by his eyes that he's heavily medicated; and he promotes SSRIs. I remember watching him answer a viewer's question about how best to give up booze - he suggested some fucking pill!
5) As you can see from his tweet today, he's getting far too cocky now with all of this adulation and he's made a few serious missteps over the past few weeks.

2) Yes atheists are the only logical, rational people on the planet. Everyone who has religious or supernatural beliefs is dumb.

3) Yeah people should give away their knowledge for free, not write books that make money. That's bad. Roosh should give away game for free.



I don't like Peterson either, but these are badly thought out points. Like something a communist atheist would say.

Roosh makes the majority of his income from books so I'm not asking him to do that for free.

Peterson makes great money, I'm sure, tenured at UoT. He could give away all his books and tickets for free from here on out and still be a very rich man.

I can't understand how smart people can believe in a supernatural entity overlord. The chance of that actually being true (and your God being the right one) is so remote to be a really unwise pursuit.

Post: #305

(11-11-2018 12:27 PM)griffinmill Wrote:  I can't understand how smart people can believe in a supernatural entity overlord. The chance of that actually being true (and your God being the right one) is so remote to be a really unwise pursuit.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religio...gnets.html

You reduce feelings of religiousness and xenophobia by shutting off the brain. Thus the religous people actually have more active brains.

I would describe it as being able to percieve things non-religious people cannot.

Post: #306

JORDAN PETERSON'S STRATEGY EXPLAINED FOR THE HARD (ARISTOCRATIC, MARTIAL, JUDICIAL) RIGHT

Peterson preserves his ability to maintain a low intensity conflict, under the illusion that it is merely a low intensity conflict, as a defensive means of CONTINUING a low intensity conflict for a long period, and thereby accumulating attrition upon the enemy by continuous, incremental, cumulative means.

THE RIGHT'S INTERPRETATION OF HIS ACTIONS

The Aristocratic (Truth Telling Warrior) and Judicial (Truth Telling Natural Law) and Defensive Function (truth as extension of disgust, purity, loyalty) of both Martial and Judicial Aristocracy ("The Right") objects to this technique - but in doing so, illustrates why Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, Darwin, Nietzsche, and Military Grand Strategy are necessary courses of study: so that we do not confuse the moral, ideal, and eternal with the scientific, the real, and the temporal: we must retain REASON and AGENCY because of the PARTICULAR CASE, and not resort to HABIT and INTUITION because of the GENERAL standards of measure we rely upon for our group strategy.

THE CORRECT CRITICISM OF PETERSON (AND HIS PEERS)

My complaint against Peterson is consistent: (1) Truth proper is enough for western civilization because it is the source of the uniqueness of western civilization, and (2) his claim that wisdom (choice) is the same as truth (decidability) in order to (3) preserve his malinvestment in middle eastern literature (intuitionism) instead of exclusively western literature (reason), because (4) he practices his method of cognitive behavioral therapy (stoicism), by using storytelling (providing the objectivity of the observer) as a means of suggestion (which does succeed), instead of action ( demonstration), and self authority. And he does this because (5) he is artful in the technique of manipulation by suggestion using narrative analogy, and *possess moral intent* - but (6) failing to grasp that the entirety of the problem facing western civilization is that by not forbidding that technique of suggestion, we leave open the MAJORITY USE OF IT, by those who have *possessed immoral intent*: the abrahamists, marxists, feminist, and postmodernists. Because (7) we evolved to be suggestable by mothers using the feminine speech pattern, and it is the weaponization of that speech pattern under Abrahamism, Marxism, postmodernism, feminism - what we call 'religious thought' that has exploited the weakness not only in the modern Marxist, Postmodernist, Feminist era, but also in the ancient Zoroastrian, Abrahamic (jewish, christian, islamic) era, that brought about the dark ages, leaving ONLY THE FAR EAST (by design) and sub-saharan africa (by cost of access) insulated from the exploitation of this vulnerability.

THEREFORE
Think of Peterson as tying some number of the enemy down in the the narrows (Thermopylae) while we (the army and navy) martial our intellectual (strategic) and physical (revolt, civil war). They cannot afford to lose this battle with him. (and they are losing it). But it is up to us to defeat them, crush the army of deceit (Abrahamic, Marxist, Postmodernist, Feminist) and to restore Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, The Rule of Natural Law, and Markets in Everything that result from all of the above, with TOTAL DENIAL OF THE ENEMY of the field of exploiting our people's weakness to suggestion by 'want of the comforting and desirable narrative of our mothers that calms us in times of stress'.

Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law of Reciprocity
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.

Post: #307

London Underground these days.

Post: #308

This was a revelation, and it should be shouted from the rooftops.

I've always hated the line in the "happy are the meek" or "the meek shall inherit the earth", how much of the Bible is being interpreted and people are acting on in ways that are wrong to its original intent, in the Roman Catholic Church we were never EVER thought meek means the exact opposite of what it means in modern times, almost like they were trying to cuck us for reasons.

Post: #309

(12-01-2018 03:12 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  London Underground these days.

Finally putting in those extra urinals people have been asking for.

Post: #310

The last guy who told us to 'Choose Life' got arrested for hitting on a cop in a public toilet.

Post: #311

I thought you guys would appreciate that.

Post: #312

(12-01-2018 04:27 PM)Syberpunk Wrote:  



This was a revelation, and it should be shouted from the rooftops.

I've always hated the line in the "happy are the meek" or "the meek shall inherit the earth", how much of the Bible is being interpreted and people are acting on in ways that are wrong to its original intent, in the Roman Catholic Church we were never EVER thought meek means the exact opposite of what it means in modern times, almost like they were trying to cuck us for reasons.

Older videos made by him and interviews on youtube contain a bits of wisdom that a person can enjoy before he sold himself out for 30 pieces of silver via getting a agent and shilling for globalist talking points. I would advise caution with his works due to conflicting philosophy made by Peterson as stated by others.

Post: #313

Look at Peterson. He is such a pussy that he has to get this daughter!!! to shoot a gun for him!!

cuck!

Post: #314

It's standard hot-girl-shoots-gun bait. Mikhaila is his proxy sex appeal.

Post: #315

Muzzle break. And even then the report through my headphones didn't even make my ears ring.

Blatantly using watered down ammunition.

Everything about this man is fake!!1!

Post: #316

Not that anybody cares, that is a Steyr HS .50-M1. I like taking girls shooting, but I don't think that would be my go-to rifle. Nothing says love like a large bruise on her shoulder.

Post: #317

Forget about Solzhenitsyn for a moment, Peterson needs to confront the vehemently anti-Jewish views of his literary hero Fyodor Dostoyevsky as recorded in his multi-volume book 'The Diary of a Writer'.

Post: #318

A point for Jordan Peterson here. He is backing the elimination of the Ontario Human Rights Code and tribunals which essentially circumvent jurisprudence in the province of Ontario. These are the potential levers of the future leftist control system

Jordan Peterson Meets Ontario Leader Doug Ford

Post: #319

I don't know much about Peterson but what I have reviewed has raised red flags: i.e, takes Freud seriously, being promoted by the mass media, speaks in psychobabble.

I don't know if this video has been posted before, but it offers a disturbing analysis of Peterson, so I think it is worth bringing to your attention.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXYuqrO8LLo

Post: #320

(01-28-2019 01:12 PM)Sherman Wrote:  I don't know much about Peterson but what I have reviewed has raised red flags: i.e, takes Freud seriously, being promoted by the mass media, speaks in psychobabble.

I don't know if this video has been posted before, but it offers a disturbing analysis of Peterson, so I think it is worth bringing to your attention.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXYuqrO8LLo

I just posted this vid on the other JP thread.

Here is the embeded video for the lazy ones:





Dont bother reading the comments on youtube, they are tasteless & unproductive.

But the 4chan thread has a great clash of ideas:
http://boards.4chan.org/pol//thread/2012...dismantled

IMO, the first half of the video had no real substance, but then the second part was a quite serious criticism.

NB: As a fellow citizen of Canadistan, I have been a big fan of JP since the 2 podcast on Joe Rogan. Listened to it multiple times. But the individualism vs nationalism question raised in that video has to be discussed.

Post: #321

Post: #322

Western civilization isn't individualistic, its people have been artificially turned into atomized individuals so that they are easier to control. This is an example of the masonic globalist ethos being internalized and propagated by JP.

(01-19-2019 04:13 PM)rotekz Wrote:  Forget about Solzhenitsyn for a moment, Peterson needs to confront the vehemently anti-Jewish views of his literary hero Fyodor Dostoyevsky as recorded in his multi-volume book 'The Diary of a Writer'.

Great video above on Fyodor, thanks for sharing Rotekz.

The picture on the second vid with JP's faggy baggy cardigan reminds me of this:

Post: #323

I remember there was a master Jewish thread on this forum once and I asked why so many major historical figures have had nothing but bad things to say about Jews. Not just Dostoevsky, but Napoleon, Cicero, French kings, Thomas Aquinas and on and on and on.

Here's Voltaire:

Quote:The Jews are the most hateful and the most shameful of the small nations

Da fuq?

What did Jews do to piss off so many people? It really makes you think.

Post: #324

Yeah, I just noticed that the JQ thread is gone. Or can’t find it. Anybow, I would love to see someone like a Peterson go more deeply into the psyche of this successful group. The Jews. I think if more groups followed their formula of success, people would be better off. The same can be said with other cultural groups etc etc.

They are the best group imho when measuring success in education and buisness. Now, is their some sort of nepotism/members only conspiracy thing happening and to what level
Well, I’m sure we all have suspicions.

Post: #325

Well... That existed long before now.

I think Peterson is correct in his analysis of some key aspects but there's one key thing to note: his worldview is WAY too tolerant to ever compete with how leftists operate..