Post: #51

I feel no sympathy for this woman

She's 36 years old. That's the biggest deterrent there.

Most people are attracted to people of their own race than other races. It's not too surprising on an app where the majority of its users are white she'd have a harder time.

Also, too much sense of entitlement. She feels that she deserves as much sexual attention as her white friend. She doesn't.

Who cares if she white friends are getting more attention so long as decent men are responding to her? She seems to care more about the "injustice" of not getting as many matches as her white friend than she is about meeting the matches she has.

She says she gets 1-2 matches a day, that's 30-60 over the course of a month and 360-720 matches over the course of a year (on average). If only 10% of those matches lead to dates that's 36-72 dates in a year's time. How is that bad? Her white friend may get more matches but obviously she can't go on dates with all of those men. So while her white friend has a bigger pool to choose from, they still may be going on the same number of dates.

If she feels this type of indignation of perceived racial discrimination in dating, I wonder if she has felt this type of indignation about guys of over a certain height, income, racial group, body type, etc. facing discrimination? Has she engaged in equal opportunity in dating or has engaged in dating discrimination?

Discrimination in dating is a fact of life. Just find the ones that discriminate in favor of you.

Post: #52

^Bitches.

If a friend of mine was getting twice as many matches on a dating app I'd give him a high five and tell him "well done".

Women? Sheeee-IT. If her "friend" is getting noticeably more matches than her then out come the claws, because for fucking sure it's not because that bitch is prettier than her or nicer than her or better in the sack than her or superior to her in any way, shape or form.

At that point the only option for her to retain the friendship is to come up with a mildly plausible case of loser's limp, aka "deez apps raaaaacis!"

Post: #53

(03-11-2017 02:20 PM)Delta Wrote:  

(03-10-2017 08:20 PM)R_Niko Wrote:  But the anticipated flood of attention was more of a trickle: five messages in three days, and one or two messages each day thereafter.

I have all of the characteristics that are supposed to be beneficial in online dating (tall, white, late 20's, athletic physique, high income) and when I was on Tinder, I never averaged 1-2 messages/day even when I was maxing out the swiping limit. Just getting serious consideration from a mildly attractive girl once in awhile on any dating site required a level of persistence so ridiculous I'd be embarrassed to elaborate on the details.

And I'm supposed to feel sorry that a barely fertile 36-year-old (who's nothing special even for her age) doesn't receive a flood of attention that no regular man could ever dream of? Just once I'd love to see one of these mediocre women count her lucky stars that she's not a mediocre man instead.

Tfw you are are 30+ 5'9 Asian male reading that tall wealthy white guy barely cuts in on Tinder.

Post: #54

We need a stamp that says "Average at best woman who is past her prime bitter that attractive men don't find her attractive"

Or

"Mediocre woman with standards and preferences furious that attractive men have standards and preferences"

Between the micro level (articles like this) and the macro level (all of the women's marches) its astonishing how hard women think they have it.

But that's what happens when their entire belief system as enabled by society, that they're all beautiful and perfect with no responsibility whatsoever, and reality collide.

Men accept that work life isn't fair and not every member of the opposite sex is going to like us. Women couldn't be more poorly equipped to handle adversity, hence they lash out.

Until society accepts that men get to have free will to and will not have their wants and desires dictated to by women, this shall continue.

Post: #55

Weaponising the media against male sexual preference is another hint at just how fem-centric society has become.

Post: #56

Who wore it better?

Post: #57

Even ET has naturally blue eyes

Post: #58

(03-12-2017 03:39 PM)RatInTheWoods Wrote:  Weaponising the media against male sexual preference is another hint at just how fem-centric society has become.

Canadian society* I believe some western countries still have hope, and the majority of Americans tune out of the liberal bubble (look how the presidential election turned out).

Post: #59

(03-14-2017 10:36 AM)Putin Closes Wrote:  

(03-12-2017 03:39 PM)RatInTheWoods Wrote:  Weaponising the media against male sexual preference is another hint at just how fem-centric society has become.

Canadian society* I believe some western countries still have hope, and the majority of Americans tune out of the liberal bubble (look how the presidential election turned out).

The socially engineered, queer based society that is the city of Toronto does not represent Canada as a whole.

Post: #60

I thought of this bit when I read the title of this thread.

Post: #61

She's actually not bad looking. I think her photos are fucked up. The irony is that I don't think many dudes care about how dark she is. I banged a very dark-skinned British girl a week ago. Wasn't really a talking point. I think a lot of American black chicks are obsessed over skin tone in a way that makes them less attractive. I'm a fair-skinned black dude and I really don't see the problem with either tone. Not like you can do shit about it anyway.

Post: #62

PS WNB