Post: #101

My father is one of the most redpilled men I know. He has nothing against gays, but he does not care for them. If one of his children came out it would be incredibly hard for him; but I have no doubt he would continue to love us. Why? Because he is a man who accepts the things in his life that are out of his control, and owns up to his mistakes. I believe the fact is that you have to accept them. Why? Because YOU raised him. You don't get to just throw away your children because they didn't turn out the way you wanted. If you nurture your child with love and compassion, teach him to be a man, and do a father's job you've done all you can. No amount of religious guilt, physical abuse, or electro shock therapy will undo your "failure" as a parent. If your child is gay you have only yourself to blame, and must accept this. Alienating yourself from your child is just a way to attempt to distance yourself from your perceived failure, instead of making the best of it.

Post: #102

Here's another thing to consider: lots of kids turn gay because they get molested by gay adults or older kids. If you accept a gay son, either you are promoting the spread of their degeneracy or you are not thinking clearly about what may have happened to your child.

Post: #103

(04-07-2017 11:36 PM)Lunostrelki Wrote:  Here's another thing to consider: lots of kids turn gay because they get molested by gay adults or older kids. If you accept a gay son, either you are promoting the spread of their degeneracy or you are not thinking clearly about what may have happened to your child.

This is a fair point, and allowing your childs molestation should be considered a failure as a parent. And if so too, would not accepting it be ignoring your failure? Not trying to make light of molestation. But wouldn't not accepting your child for being gay due to molestation be even worse than just refusing them for claiming homosexuality?

Curious on your opinion on this.

Post: #104

(04-08-2017 02:47 AM)Northern Wastes Wrote:  

(04-07-2017 11:36 PM)Lunostrelki Wrote:  Here's another thing to consider: lots of kids turn gay because they get molested by gay adults or older kids. If you accept a gay son, either you are promoting the spread of their degeneracy or you are not thinking clearly about what may have happened to your child.

This is a fair point, and allowing your childs molestation should be considered a failure as a parent. And if so too, would not accepting it be ignoring your failure? Not trying to make light of molestation. But wouldn't not accepting your child for being gay due to molestation be even worse than just refusing them for claiming homosexuality?

Curious on your opinion on this.

It's more like treating your son as a potential victim of the societal push for homosexual normalization, rather than automatically casting him into the active category.

I suppose a similar situation would be the case if your daughter got raped and became promiscuous and lesbian as a result of the psychological damage. She's still your daughter but you had better not "accept" her being an empowered slut or whatever nonsense the SJWs would apply to her behavior.

Post: #105

A gay son is a filial dead end and there's no use passing on important things to him. Being a sodomite breaks the practical reasoning behind many familial traditions, including and especially inheritance.

Post: #106

Look at these weaklings, i have both an African and Muslim upbringing. If my son (I do have one btw) were to become gay I would disown him he will cease to exist in my life, if the shame is too great to bear I would kill without a thought. There is no reason for him to become gay though because being gay stems from the lack of testosterone in his mother's womb as a fetus. It is also much to do with nurture and nature, a lack of certain vitamins such as Zinc, Vitamin D, etc.. will cause him many problems. Im an ardent follower of the Laws Of Nature and it goes against everything I believe for a son of mine to become gay. At best I would disown him premantely at worse I would kill him with my barehands...

Post: #107

(04-12-2017 04:44 AM)Kham Wrote:  Look at these weaklings, i have both an African and Muslim upbringing. If my son (I do have one btw) were to become gay I would disown him he will cease to exist in my life, if the shame is too great to bear I would kill without a thought. There is no reason for him to become gay though because being gay stems from the lack of testosterone in his mother's womb as a fetus. It is also much to do with nurture and nature, a lack of certain vitamins such as Zinc, Vitamin D, etc.. will cause him many problems. Im an ardent follower of the Laws Of Nature and it goes against everything I believe for a son of mine to become gay. At best I would disown him premantely at worse I would kill him with my barehands...

Given the option of being a Muslim or a faggot, which would you guys choose? I've made up my mind.

Post: #108

If I had a gay son, I would start researching homosexuality and trying to figure out the meaning and purpose of it, because I would want to know, "Is this a flaw or does it serve a useful function in society? Or both?"

One way of looking at it is that if you have a daughter, that is sort of a disappointment too because she's not going to be able to spread your genes as widely as a son could (assuming he had good game). She might have, say, seven kids if she gets married at a young age, but a heterosexual son could many times that many offspring. There's really no upper limit.

But we have daughters because if no one had daughters, the human race would go extinct. Someone has to be randomly selected to "take one for the team". (It's actually not all bad, though, because while sons can have a lot of offspring, they're also more likely than daughters to become losers who never produce any offspring at all. Sons are more of a crap shoot, while daughters are more of an insurance policy. So it's like having a portfolio of stocks and bonds.)

Now, what about gay sons? If they serve some useful purpose in society, then that's an extreme example of taking one for the team. If, on the other hand, their gayness doesn't serve a useful purpose, then maybe that's not unlike having a son with any other physical or mental abnormality that hinders survival and reproduction. Or, assuming it's a choice rather than having its origins in genetics, then that's like having a son who gets into drugs and wastes his life.

If I were the father of a gay son, I would want to research to find out the answers to all those questions as best I could. When something seemingly bad happens, I like to find out why, and what it all means so I can know what, if anything, I'm supposed to do about it.

Post: #109

Perhaps there are different scenarios.

A. What if your son says he is gay, comes to your house dresses like a girl with a boyfriend, and speaking like a girl?

B. Your son acts like a man, but he comes to you saying that he realizes he likes men, but he refused to be with one. That happend to a friend when he was like 25. Nobody suspected.

C. Your daughter is 20, tell you that she likes girls (still virgin), she never mentioned anything to you, so you were not upset, and because of that she decides to become a nun and live far from you.

Would you react in the same way?

Post: #110

A) Degenerate. No inheritance for you.

B) That's fine I guess, but I want grandkids.

C) Monastic life is honorable. Monastics have no use for inheritance, so no inheritance.

Post: #111

A) While I could deal with an homosexual kid having a good job / business and bringing something to society minus kids, a tranny has no place in society. I'd tell him to come back once he comes to his senses, and never agree to address a man as "her". If he doesn't change, inheritance will go to aunts / cousins / other.

B) If he stays single and decides to not embrace the gay lifestyle, I'd probably accept it and he'd get inheritance.

C) I have a high level of respect for religious leaders, be it a son who becomes a monk or a daughter becoming a nun. I'd be disappointed to not have kids, but I'd let her go this route and she'd get inheritance from me, although a bit less. We need people who "sacrifice themselves" to preserve religion and culture. Same thing would apply for my son who'd become a monk.

Post: #112

I don't know what makes a man go homosexual.

I do know the idea of some other man mounting my son for sexual pleasure, is a hard pill for me to swallow.

A better man than me could be "liberal" enough to accept that.

Post: #113

as a father I don't want to think about my son's sexuality, either it is a hetero or homo sexuality. who wants to imagine his son in such a context ? if he's straight it will be easier to ignore that part of his life.

but if he turns out to be gay I will still be his father, he will still be my son and his sex life will still be none of my business.

strangely if I had a girl and she turns out to love women I'd be very happy with it and celebrate the good news with champagne

Post: #114

(04-03-2017 04:22 PM)Uruz Wrote:  

(04-01-2017 09:34 PM)Thrill Jackson Wrote:  I would accept him.

But as far as accepting him wearing short shorts, makeup, lipgloss, thats a different story...

Also, I still expect him to have kids. If he has to adopt so be it, but we are keeping this family tree alive damn it.

I don't know what is worse, to accept him or to except faggot to "father" fucking children. I am surprised that this shit is even legal. Just make another son, it should not be that hard, just people talk shit.

I don't understand reasoning of most people above, its quite clear that most would accept a faggot but would not accept a faggot that wants to cut his dick of. Too liberal and the worst part is that you guys don't even know about it.

If he carries all of the neomasculinity characteristics with the exception he slips it in a man's ass for pleasure, it won't make much of a difference when he raises kids of not. He would be a better father than 90% of the fathers in the United States of Cucks.

Post: #115

I have been thinking about this due to the Australian vote and funnily enough, found this thread. It might be natural in some living species but not in humans. It is an absolute no for me.

Post: #116

(05-03-2017 10:54 AM)Thrill Jackson Wrote:  

(04-03-2017 04:22 PM)Uruz Wrote:  

(04-01-2017 09:34 PM)Thrill Jackson Wrote:  I would accept him.

But as far as accepting him wearing short shorts, makeup, lipgloss, thats a different story...

Also, I still expect him to have kids. If he has to adopt so be it, but we are keeping this family tree alive damn it.

I don't know what is worse, to accept him or to except faggot to "father" fucking children. I am surprised that this shit is even legal. Just make another son, it should not be that hard, just people talk shit.

I don't understand reasoning of most people above, its quite clear that most would accept a faggot but would not accept a faggot that wants to cut his dick of. Too liberal and the worst part is that you guys don't even know about it.

If he carries all of the neomasculinity characteristics with the exception he slips it in a man's ass for pleasure, it won't make much of a difference when he raises kids of not. He would be a better father than 90% of the fathers in the United States of Cucks.

No he wouldn't. His children wouldn't be his, which would automatically makes him a cuck, and his children wouldn't have a mother. A child needs a father and a mother for a proper upbringing, not one or two sexually promiscuous gay stepfathers.

Post: #117

(05-03-2017 09:37 AM)Rawmeo Wrote:  A) While I could deal with an homosexual kid having a good job / business and bringing something to society minus kids, a tranny has no place in society. I'd tell him to come back once he comes to his senses, and never agree to address a man as "her". If he doesn't change, inheritance will go to aunts / cousins / other.

Turns out it was "other", as in Thai police chiefs. Because most of Rawmeo's money seems to be unaccounted for?, and I could bet his arresting officers (and prison warden) are parading in Maseratis on BKK roads. Sad, come to think of it.

Post: #118

Hypothetically (don't have kids), I wouldn't have the slightest problem accepting and respecting him if he chose to be a chaste gay, and I know my own father would feel the same way, but chaste homosexuals are almost an oxymoron.

Post: #119

(11-17-2017 06:05 PM)Laska Wrote:  Hypothetically (don't have kids), I wouldn't have the slightest problem accepting and respecting him if he chose to be a chaste gay, and I know my own father would feel the same way, but chaste homosexuals are almost an oxymoron.

-Are you Jewish?
-Yes, but I'm a non-practicing Jew
-Then I am an non-practicing virgin