Post: #376

(06-04-2017 06:00 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(06-04-2017 04:35 PM)Enoch Wrote:  I will say this for Muslims:

They figured out how to maximize their access to pussy.

Women can get killed for dating non-muslim men, the men can date/marry outside the faith.

I know a couple Muslim girls with a (supposedly enlightened) Muslim father, white mother.

Father won't let the girls date white men. Girls won't call him out on the double standard. They are traditional & hot AF by the way.

All Muslim countries have immense sexual pressure where only the top get pussy galore and multiple wives while for the rest it is easier to find a power-bottom than a woman.

Men don't marry at age 18, some wait until they are 30. So are they going to have to wait like a sexless dildo for marriage? Also there is a chronic shortage of women, polygamy squeezes the poorer men out. In the past they had sex-slaves, rape and other tools, but that is no longer the case. Muslim societies are incredibly sexually frustrated.

What you are describing are Muslim families in the West. And guess what happens when the daughter disobeys her dad? Often enough it ends in death of the daughter in order to restore honor. When killing your daughter is more honorable than her marrying a non-Muslim, then your religion is a piece of dung and Satanic and not divine.

Get it over with - the war ideology of Islam was designed for Mohammed and his top generals to get motivated soldiers, conquer as much as possible, grab as much pussy for themselves and live high on the hog raping and pillaging - all clad in religious garb.

The traditional West had it better - those that could married early - that was the majority. The others got the minority of slutty women and prostitutes - West was far less sexually frustrated than other societies. There was a gulf that separated the honorable women from the dishonorable ones, but the men fucked the dishonorable ones just as well, the low-tier ones even married some of them. There was no need to conquer the world for pussy.

Polygamy is a very marginal practice in most muslim countries today. Where it is relatively more common is in sub-Saharan Africa, in Muslim, animist and Christian countries alike:



This is not to say that your point about sexual frustration among young males being high in most muslim countries is not valid, but that doesn't come from polygamy, it comes from poverty and unemployment among young men, and is shared across a large part of the developing world (see India).

Post: #377

(06-04-2017 10:53 PM)Sherman Wrote:  Woman with veil (hijab) in the 1800s.

It was the time of Casanova where the nobility fucked like rabbits and only the rural folk were traditional. Veils and hats are not Hijabs.

The rest of the women wore this or much less and worse:

Post: #378

And that judgement day won't come when Allah comes to Earth and helps Muslims kill all unbelievers, that day will come when someone puts an end to this stupid evil shitty cult.

Post: #379

Post: #380

(06-05-2017 02:38 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(06-04-2017 10:53 PM)Sherman Wrote:  Woman with veil (hijab) in the 1800s.

It was the time of Casanova where the nobility fucked like rabbits and only the rural folk were traditional. Veils and hats are not Hijabs.

The rest of the women wore this or much less and worse:

That's a movie. Can't you tell the difference between a movie and reality?

Post: #381

(06-05-2017 08:27 AM)Sherman Wrote:  That's a movie. Can't you tell the difference between a movie and reality?

This from a guy who can't tell the difference between a European artist's c. 1800 portrait of a European and likely Catholic girl in a veil and a Muslim wearing a hijab, ladies and gentlemen.

You should look at a little more of de Blaas's work, Shermie, he paints Venetian women pretty much the same as they were represented by Zelcorpion ... and you were the guy who brought him up as a paragon of fashion accuracy for the period.

e.g.:


The Watercarrier.


Sharing the News.


Chat.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #382

(06-05-2017 08:34 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

(06-05-2017 08:27 AM)Sherman Wrote:  That's a movie. Can't you tell the difference between a movie and reality?

This from a guy who can't tell the difference between a European artist's c. 1800 portrait of a European and likely Catholic girl in a veil and a Muslim wearing a hijab, ladies and gentlemen.

You should look at a little more of de Blaas's work, Shermie, he paints Venetian women pretty much the same as they were represented by Zelcorpion ... and you were the guy who brought him up as a paragon of fashion accuracy for the period.

After the recent outburst, straight to my ignore list... good riddance!

Post: #383

(06-05-2017 08:27 AM)Sherman Wrote:  That's a movie. Can't you tell the difference between a movie and reality?

They're wearing more clothes than the average subject of a de Blaas painting(that's the name of the guy who's painting you found on Tumblr and attempted to use for kid-fucker propaganda).



WB

Post: #384

Post: #385

Hey Sherman. One of the guys over at the Hot Muslims thread posted a picture of your little sister.

You better go splash some acid in her face.

Post: #386

(06-05-2017 07:41 PM)Sherman Wrote:  

The most typical Muslim reaction to Muslim terror attacks is to do more of them.

EDIT: Idiot.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #387

Post: #388

(06-05-2017 08:34 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

(06-05-2017 08:27 AM)Sherman Wrote:  That's a movie. Can't you tell the difference between a movie and reality?

Sharing the News.

It is only now in my life that I know what has been missing - the laundry wench notch.

WB in that exact position.

Post: #389

(06-05-2017 09:12 PM)eljeffster Wrote:  

(06-05-2017 08:34 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

(06-05-2017 08:27 AM)Sherman Wrote:  That's a movie. Can't you tell the difference between a movie and reality?

Sharing the News.

It is only now in my life that I know what has been missing - the laundry wench notch.

WB in that exact position.

I was surprised to discover how well-observed those paintings actually are. If you only got a fleeting glance you would think it was a photograph, that's how well the guy represented light and shadow. Me, I would've banged the watercarrier. Right up against that wall she's leaning on.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #390

(06-03-2017 10:15 AM)Sherman Wrote:  Here is an interesting video from Bosnia showing European Muslims. Everything looks very beautiful and traditional. And it looks like they have a strong culture and raise their women to be traditional wives. This is very positive. This is proof that Islam has created a healthy environment where Europeans can have stable lives and procreate.

It helps a lot when the country is not surrounded by other Muslims countries:

(06-04-2017 10:53 PM)Sherman Wrote:  Woman with veil (hijab) in the 1800s.

This is a false equivalence, the hijab is not everything that covers a woman's head, what covers women's head is a headscarf, the hijab is not on only a peace of clothing, is a code of rules regarding women's dress code.

Western women have been covering their heads for many reasons in time, many for weather situations, like living in a windy or rainy place, sometime a women just want to protect her hair after going to a beauty salon.

You assumption a woman with any form of head covering=hijab is pathetic.

Here is Audrey Hepburn wearing a "hijab" back in the day.

Post: #391

(06-05-2017 09:37 PM)Latinopan Wrote:  

(06-03-2017 10:15 AM)Sherman Wrote:  Here is an interesting video from Bosnia showing European Muslims. Everything looks very beautiful and traditional. And it looks like they have a strong culture and raise their women to be traditional wives. This is very positive. This is proof that Islam has created a healthy environment where Europeans can have stable lives and procreate.

It helps a lot when the country is not surrounded by other Muslims countries:

(06-04-2017 10:53 PM)Sherman Wrote:  Woman with veil (hijab) in the 1800s.

This is a false equivalence, the hijab is not everything that covers a woman's head, what covers women's head is a headscarf, the hijab is not on only a peace of clothing, is a code of rules regarding women's dress code.

Western women have been covering their heads for many reasons in time, many for weather situations, like living in a windy or rainy place, sometime a women just want to protect her hair after going to a beauty salon.

You assumption a woman with any form of head covering=hijab is pathetic.

Here is Audrey Hepburn wearing a "hijab" back in the day.

In the Victorian era, women would faint when they heard the word leg. Women in the 1800s wore multiple layers of clothing. Europeans in America were outraged that Indians ran around naked. Do we really need to argue about this?

Post: #392

(06-05-2017 09:48 PM)Sherman Wrote:  In the Victorian era, women would faint when they heard the word leg. Women in the 1800s wore multiple layers of clothing. Europeans in America were outraged that Indians ran around naked. Do we really need to argue about this?

Considering you seem to be insinuating that Westerners have always garbed themselves in hijabs, and given you're still making the ludicrous point, then yes. Idiot.

On the other hand, we could turn the subject to whether you're in favour of Muslim refugees being admitted into Mexico. Particularly given the flood of refugees through Mexico and thence into the United States.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #393

(06-05-2017 09:48 PM)Sherman Wrote:  In the Victorian era, women would faint when they heard the word leg.

Meanwhile the North Koreans were busy installing the worlds most advanced underground power lines.

Post: #394

(06-05-2017 09:54 PM)iop890 Wrote:  

(06-05-2017 09:48 PM)Sherman Wrote:  In the Victorian era, women would faint when they heard the word leg.

Meanwhile the North Koreans were busy installing the worlds most advanced underground power lines.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #395

   

Post: #396

I want to sketch those Debasse paintings. They are incredible. He even got the skin translucency effect going on. And the lighting is perfect, realistic but other worldy. The women oddly don't have pretty faces but the expressions are interesting and fleeting.

Post: #397

^^^^

Y'know, Shermie, dear, there is this thing called Google Image Search.

So to buttress your point that Westerners have always worn hijabs, you're now referring to a Russian Orthodox Church practice of women covering their heads while they're in a church?

Especially given the explicit purpose of a woman covering her head in an Orthodox Church is so there are as few distractions as possible from praying while in church, that it has nothing to do with the respect of one sex towards another, and the head coverings are removed outside church?

Idiot.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #398

(06-05-2017 10:14 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  ^^^^

Y'know, Shermie, dear, there is this thing called Google Image Search.


Idiot.

Wow. It's sad to see a high rep poster such as yourself stoop down to such a level and talk like a true faggot. You've shown your true colors, that's for sure.

Post: #399

Really makes you think...

Post: #400

What gives, TM? Is Sherman your retarded little brother or something?

The guy is plutonium and you're cuddling him.