Post: #26

<That one is too fat and badly kept, they are usually a lot faster and slimmer.

I've had one female and she was strong against enemies and kind towards children and those who she considered family. Once I got stopped by a cop as she was sitting in the passanger seat (she had her seatbelt on). I was driving a convertible and as the cop approached she reacted so viciously that he thought otherwise of giving me a ticket and said that I should drive carefully - heh.


They are cute as a button when small - even when older as well and their white fur is self-cleaning - dirt just falls off the soft fur which is strange.

But the aggressive streak is real as well. A sister of my dog once caught a deer since they are quite fast as well. Ever since tasting that deer she was busy hunting whenever their city-folk owners went for a walk in the woods. That couple was shocked by this behavior, but other guys probably would have thought: "Great, Daisy got us some more tasty venison today." She wasn't more aggressive against humans or other dogs because of that - just deer. I think she managed to catch a couple more in her lifetime. One of the few dogs who are fast and strong enough to catch deer on their own. They were bred to ride along shephards on horses for hours in the Hungarian countryside.

Either way - a rapefugee gang would have real trouble fighting against those even if they come armed with knives. A woman jogging with two of those would likely be safe as can be even close to a asylum center. If they can catch deer, then they can catch fleeing rapefugees.

Back then I didn't appreciate the aggressiveness of this dog, but now in the West I would.

Post: #27

Folks in Texas keep Great Pyrenees. Just a quick google and looks like they are related. Except the Kuvasz doesn't have dew claws.

Magnificent animal. These Pyrenees brothers patrol my friends' parents farm at night. Guard the goats from wolves and coyotes. Amazing how much ground they can cover.

Post: #28

(03-03-2017 05:52 PM)Disco_Volante Wrote:  I can't decide who's dumber, the mohammeds coming here with 9 kids or the white people who welcome them and pay for their schools.

Whether you welcome Mohammed or not you pay for his school if you make enough to be taxed.

Mohammed and his wife/cousin have 9 kids, don't work, and yet are not losing kids to starvation. Smart or not that's a damn good deal.

The people who welcome Mohammed (either leftists or members of cucked/infiltrated churches) are scared to have kids because the extra IQ points cause some responsibility, such as thinking "how will I support the kids?" They see bimonthly Muslim terrorist attacks, yet take the establishment at it's word that they are just like us.

Based on this the supplicant whites are stupider.

I think with IQ points there's a danger zone where people vastly over estimate their intelligence. A college degree in some foolish discipline excaberbates this.

Low IQ: don't know much or pretend they do.

Low-Mid IQ: Think they know things they are actually clueless on.

High-mid+ IQ: Before forming an opinion on something, look into it deeply enough to understand it. Don't believe someone because they claim to be an authority. (Actors, talking heads etc.)

Post: #29

Am I allowed to disagree with OP here?

Not to be contrarian, but I thought this thread could use a little bit of peaceful dissent.

First, religious freedom is one of the founding principles of the United States.

Second, in my experience most immigrants are focused on paying the bills and sending their kids to good schools. I bet anyone named Mohammad who comes over to the States with 9 kids, and no savings, is so busy working that he doesn't have time to go to a mosque.

Post: #30

Polymath have you been living in a cave the past 10 years? good lord man.

Post: #31

(03-05-2017 12:47 AM)polymath Wrote:  Am I allowed to disagree with OP here?

Not to be contrarian, but I thought this thread could use a little bit of peaceful dissent.

First, religious freedom is one of the founding principles of the United States.

Second, in my experience most immigrants are focused on paying the bills and sending their kids to good schools. I bet anyone named Mohammad who comes over to the States with 9 kids, and no savings, is so busy working that he doesn't have time to go to a mosque.

Modern welfare states are an islamist's paradise.

He can take 4 wives and have 4 children with each but since the state only recognises one wife (or none if they only marry under a well-screened imam) then each mother can collect a huge welfare cheque and he can collect unemployment himself. They can all live under the same roof and literally pull well over 100k in combined pensions while enjoying the benefits of economy of scale re:feeding and clothing the kids. Hell, three of the "single mothers" can get work and still retain a lot of benefits while the fourth "single mother" babysits the 16 kids. And not only will you pay for their unemployment and other benefits but you'll pay for other "minority only" special programs AND all their maternity costs and medical issues in general.

And if anyone in the welfare department says anything about it they get told to shut up. Push the issue and they'll be fired for islamophobia or some other hastily constructed bullshit.

Meanwhile, this is entirely in keeping with their faith, which states that the kuffar (us) is the servant of the muslim and exists for his benefit only. Welfare in that light is seen as just another form of Jizya (kuffar/infidel tax).

So 5 muslims become 21 muslims, and they all have a lot of time on their hands to engage in what we might term "community activism".

Post: #32

(03-05-2017 12:47 AM)polymath Wrote:  Am I allowed to disagree with OP here?

Not to be contrarian, but I thought this thread could use a little bit of peaceful dissent.

First, religious freedom is one of the founding principles of the United States.

Second, in my experience most immigrants are focused on paying the bills and sending their kids to good schools. I bet anyone named Mohammad who comes over to the States with 9 kids, and no savings, is so busy working that he doesn't have time to go to a mosque.

Yes and no - they had restricted Muslim from entering the US. Also back in the 1960s they had severe restrictions on immigration in terms of race and heritage. The US was not founded on some mystical "free-for-all-everyone-welcome". That is an utter misconception.

Post: #33

Quote:First, religious freedom is one of the founding principles of the United States.

Is Communism a religion? Because Islam is no different. It is a political ideology. Calling it a religion is misleading.

Post: #34

Post: #35

(03-05-2017 10:31 AM)Roosh Wrote:  

That video shows us that the marxist-feminists are so brainwashed that when a Caliphate comes and tells them to put on a Burka, then they will comply out of fear for being called racist:


Swedish feminist government - walk of shame

True female empowerment looks like this - Iran 1979 - women demonstrating against the Hijab enforcement of the Islamists. Those women know that if you give the Mullahs this, then worse things will come after that - and they were right:



Even now Iranian cuties post pics of their uncovered hair:


WB by the way, but who wouldn't.

http://www.boredpanda.com/mandatory-hija...y-freedom/

Quote:Last year, 3.6 million women in Iran were warned, fined or arrested for not wearing hijabs

And the worst thing is that those women above would be viewed as racists by current-day-marxo-feminists.

The propaganda has truly done a number on those.

Post: #36

In Canada, out of 250,000 immigrants a year, about 57,000 are Arab or Islamic.

These 57,000 cost Canadians more than the others all combined. My friends retired SAS father is obsessed with the growing threat of Islam, and has been since the 70's. Most of his SAS life was spend in places like Yemen, and he has no illusions to the bullshit that the government is pushing on the people, and for what purpose.

Like Australia, Muslims here make over $100k a year milking the system. I mentioned the two ex Muslim friends I have, and how they had to quit mosque when they got a job. They were ostracized by their peers for working. Smarter politicians in Canada and especially in Denmark - along with Trump! - are saying that work should be required for immigration. This is to combat Islam. Once young muslims start to work, they often make native friends who by contrast are much more friendly, open and interesting than those from their mosque/family.

Post: #37

(03-04-2017 03:22 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Dogs!



More dogs! The bigger the better!



Walk 'em past the mosque every day.



Teach 'em to be violently wacist against anyone wearing a stupid muslim outfit.



They can be nutritionally sustained on muslim tears.



And don't give up on that issue regarding the 5am call to prayer. Start a god-damned community action group if you have to.

There needs to be something for the sake of the poor dogs tortured and killed by Iranians. I keep seeing dogs online for adoption that were horribly abused from Teheran. Poor dogs. Dogs are bros. Why? Why hurt dogs? What kind of society likes to harm dogs that just want to love us and spend time with us?

I've seen more and more muslims in my general area with each passing year. We don't have large neighborhoods of them nearby now far as I know. But yeah I think the plan is to settle the 'refugees' all over the place, a small town is not immune and when I go into the city and school there are a fair amount especially at school in the hijab. Before 2001 I never saw one of them. Now there's as sizable amount, noticeable in some places.

Post: #38

Yeah dain_bramage if someone doesn't like my dogs or vice versa I view them with suspicion. How can you not like dogs?

Cats on the other hand are barely above the rodents they hunt. Can't stand the sneaky bastards.

Post: #39

< Cats are of equal consciousness as dogs - even of quite similar evolutionary level and intelligence. They are just different in character.

Islam creates hatred of dogs because they are seen as impure. When Muslims touch dogs, then they need to wash again before prayer, also there are some passages of impurity and dogs etc.

It is all fueled by the ideology.

Anyone who knows cats knows that those animals are equally loving as dogs - just different in temperament. I would compare it more between introverts and extroverts.

Post: #40

Cats are the welfare pet.

With dogs you help with food and shelter you get loyalty til death, they warn about anything suspicious, defend you physically, make you feel good etc.

Cats you provide food and shelter they go do whatever the fuck they do.

Post: #41

Cats and dogs!

This thread is not going in the direction OP hoped for.

Post: #42

I talked to an Iranian once about dogs. He lived in a rural town and because of the Muslim prohibition on owning dogs, the only dogs encountered were feral and would eat a person if they could, and were considered quite dangerous. Since he and his family were Baha'i ( a small religion heavily persecuted in Muslim states) they did own dogs, but as working animals for a farm and less so as pets.

Post: #43

Maybe Islam would be actually good for "degenerated" America.
I live in Europe. Most muslims, especially those who were born here are pretty westernized. Even the girls. Wearing a head scarf means nothing nowadays.

Post: #44

(03-05-2017 10:31 AM)Roosh Wrote:  

At the danger of repeating myself but this once again proves everything that was ever said about the true nature of women on ROK and in this forum.

Post: #45

(03-05-2017 03:28 PM)godfather dust Wrote:  Yeah dain_bramage if someone doesn't like my dogs or vice versa I view them with suspicion. How can you not like dogs?

Cats on the other hand are barely above the rodents they hunt. Can't stand the sneaky bastards.

Cats are awesome especially if you raise them outside and they hunt down those pests for you. Yes, they aren't dogs but they are excellent night prowlers and if you ever owned a farm who had a rat problem you will very much appreciate having them around.

Post: #46

Someone deport these immigrant dogs :tard:

We'll hire American for our home defense, thank you.





(yes, Australian shepherds are actually an American dog breed)

Post: #47

(03-05-2017 06:32 PM)redpillage Wrote:  

(03-05-2017 10:31 AM)Roosh Wrote:  

At the danger of repeating myself but this once again proves everything that was ever said about the true nature of women on ROK and in this forum.

Fucking hideous.

Post: #48

The Muslims will dominate the Feminists. No doubt about it.

Post: #49

This is an interesting topic.

If you take Yuri Bezmenov's speech about communist subversion of the US and replace communism with Islam, it would certainly explain a lot of things.

Post: #50

(03-06-2017 09:37 AM)VincentVinturi Wrote:  This is an interesting topic.

If you take Yuri Bezmenov's speech about communist subversion of the US and replace communism with Islam, it would certainly explain a lot of things.

Well, the Marxist Left has been using active measures very effectively over the past few decades and their globalist policies have been enabling Islam to plant its roots across Western Europe. Therefore implicitly Islam is following that same playbook. I'm not certain that it was intended at first but at minimum the practice of conquering via slow motion migration is part of the Quran as well as the Hadith.