Post: #26

(02-24-2017 09:03 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(02-23-2017 11:34 PM)The Catalyst Wrote:  ...

...

BABY ROOTH!!!

Excellent work sir ha ha

Post: #27

I don't see why would any man babysit children. Taking care of children is woman's job.

Oh and WB

Post: #28

One thing is for certain.

With a heightened absence of men in her life, in 16 years time that little girl is going to be easy pickings for current and future RVF members.

Teens rebel predictably and if her mother is a man-hater then her daughter is going to become a cum-dumpster.

Post: #29

WB even if she thinks I would molest her kids.

I love the media publishing all men are evil articles!

Post: #30

As unlikely that it is for me to be married, I would dis-invite the whole family from my house permanently. If anyone can't tell that I am not a sexual predator after getting to know me, then I don't want them anywhere near my house. It is not only insulting, but also a major liability that I cant afford to have.

As alluded to before that the rubber will hit the road when she bans Muslim Men from being alone with her precious daughters. Honestly, I got to ask if a Muslim man really wants to molest one of this woman's daughters, is the wife of this Muslim man going to do anything about it? I would not hold my breath on this one.

Post: #31

Ah, good for her for understanding conditional probability!

Pr(Pedophile or Rapist or Abuser | Man) > Pr(Pedophile or Rapist or Abuser | Woman)

Thus, she also certainly understands that the probability of being a pedophile or rapist is greater for black and Muslim Arab males than for white males?

Pr(Pedophile or Rapist or Abuser | Black Male) > Pr(Pedophile or Rapist or Abuser | White Male)
Pr(Pedophile or Rapist or Abuser | Muslim Arab Male) > Pr(Pedophile or Rapist or Abuser | White Male)

She would shout this observation from the rooftops too, right?

Post: #32

I'm surprised that Fairfax Media even published this (yet not surprised they published Kasey Edwards' piece), but the stats say that indigenous women are 35 times more likely to be admitted to hospital for domestic violence because of their (fellow indigenous) partners:

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/indige...ma7f6.html

And let's remember that indigenous people are LESS likely to seek medical attention for all kinds of health issues.

So is Kasey Edwards going to say that both white and indigenous Australian women are better off not dating Aboriginal men due to their disproportionately massive rate of domestic violence?

Post: #33

She lost me at "I am determined to do everything I can to make sure my daughter is not a victim of abuse."

Not because of the content of that statement, but because of the wildly in-your-face I-can-already-picture-her-crazy-eyes delivery.

Further reading adds substance to my complaint.

Next.

Post: #34

Weird. I can understand not leaving your kid with a strange man you've never met, but a psychologically normal male relative seems fine.

I used to tutor kids in my neighborhood in my late teens (good money) and it often just became glorified babysitting. I think she's going a bit far with not letting male relatives babysit her daughter. Why would you call someone your relative if you aren't allowing them to even interact with your kid. Weird.

Post: #35

I know a couple who have a similar rule. The wife was molested as a child, so she's extremely cautious about leaving the kids unaccompanied by herself or the father (husband), with men or women. The two kids (now 11 and 8) have never spent a night away from their parents, are homeschooled by the mother, and are generally only left in the care of the father's elderly parents and only for short periods of time.

But then, she's not a feminist shrew like the author of the article. She's actually very traditional and feminine, and to all appearances a great wife and mother apart from the overprotectiveness. She also accepts that this is a problem on her part, and within her personal limits is conscientious to mitigate it by getting the kids involved in social, sports, and academic activities with other kids - just so long as she or their father are involved as well.

So I can understand and sympathize with this sort of overprotectiveness as such. If you were molested as a kid at a sleepover or camping trip or whatever, there's going to be some major damage to your ability to trust others with your kids in those circumstances. But I can't imagine any otherwise-normal mother writing attention-whoring articles and books about her paranoia like Edwards.

Which gets to Edwards' real reasons for doing so. It's not only that she's a feminist with an innovative way to lump all men together as predators and cast undeserved suspicion on all of us (her insincere disclaimer to the contrary). She's also asserting her moral superiority over other parents, especially other mothers. The subtext to her comments on the other parents "who don't have a similar policy" is plain as day: "they're not as good a mother as I am". These other mothers don't care about their children as much as she does, you see, which naturally makes her the better mother. So it's not only a tired "all men are rapists" argument but also standard-issue inter-female status competition, no different from that of the annoying "mommies" who do this on the neighborhood level except that Edwards somehow has access to a larger stage than the usual kitchen table or church social.

Post: #36

MOMMY DIDN'T LET ME HAVE ANY MALE ROLE MODELS

Post: #37

I would not hire a male babysitter, as I can't imagine a non-pedophile sinking into such a pathetic (for a male) profession.

As far as the rest of the article (all men are potential pedophiles) it is ridiculous and if I knew this woman I would cut ties completely, stay at least 50 feet away from her or her family, record any interactions and try and get a restraining order because it seems highly likely she will coach the kid into saying someone touched her, and I'll let someone else take that hit.

Post: #38

(02-26-2017 05:23 PM)godfather dust Wrote:  I would not hire a male babysitter, as I can't imagine a non-pedophile sinking into such a pathetic (for a male) profession.

As far as the rest of the article (all men are potential pedophiles) it is ridiculous and if I knew this woman I would cut ties completely, stay at least 50 feet away from her or her family, record any interactions and try and get a restraining order because it seems highly likely she will coach the kid into saying someone touched her, and I'll let someone else take that hit.

What do you suppose the odds are that she does just that sometime within the next year? Say, when the attention-whoring potential of this "policy" of hers starts to wane and she needs a new supply?

My bet is on Daddy getting the accusation - after all, her "policy" pretty well eliminates all other men as potential accusees. That dude's a sitting duck.

ETA: I would never hire a male babysitter, either (an adult or a teenager). I'm not a feminist so I don't automatically assume every male is a potential predator. But I'm not stupid, either. What on earth would draw a boy or a man to the job of babysitting?

Post: #39

You forget the thirst.

A beta WK doing some sitting for a hot, mentally unstable, single mom while she's out getting some alpha dick. It happens all the time and the spiral of degeneracy continues.

Post: #40

The woman is misguided silly for a great many reasons.
That being said, I do agree with her instinct to protect her children. I have never allowed a male babysitter or au pair with my children when they were small. When I married my second wife, she agreed wholeheartedly to that policy. She has taken care of my children as if they were her own from day one. Of course, we allowed coaches and scout leaders, but always with the understanding that our kids were never one-on-one alone with adults we did not know extremely well.
I just don't think you can be too careful with your children, and it's a father's responsibility to make sure that is handled.

Post: #41

Your second statement qualifies "adults you don't know extremely well".

Why would you filter by gender?

Throughout history, it has been some who are accused of having the mire malicious nature, much more prone to harm those where i) there's no emotional attachment & ii) there appears to be no repercussions.

The evil step mither trope exists for a reason.

70% of child abuse happens at the hands of a woman happens for a reason.

Post: #42

(02-26-2017 05:23 PM)godfather dust Wrote:  I would not hire a male babysitter, as I can't imagine a non-pedophile sinking into such a pathetic (for a male) profession.

As far as the rest of the article (all men are potential pedophiles) it is ridiculous and if I knew this woman I would cut ties completely, stay at least 50 feet away from her or her family, record any interactions and try and get a restraining order because it seems highly likely she will coach the kid into saying someone touched her, and I'll let someone else take that hit.

The availability of easily employable, part time jobs for American (I know the woman is Australian) boys in middle and high school have taken a huge hit with the influx of illegals. If a 15-year-old wants to bring in $60 a night to make sure an 8-year-old doesn't burn the house, more power to him (though I do feel for his position, I wouldn't want to do it). Besides, statistics show fags and women are more likely to molest a small child than your typical JV basketball player.

Post: #43

Hmmm, let's see:
- Male babysitter who is aware that if there's so much a hint that he touched a kid inappropriately will be arrested, prosecuted and jailed (let alone be killed by the childs father)
- Female babysitter who is aware that there will be 0 consequences for touching the kid however she wants, even it's in an inappropriate way ("he was just playing"). Heck, the kid is more likely to be scolded when he / she tells then that the girl will be fired. Unless she does some friday the 13 shit, no-one will care and no-one will notice

I can't think of a situation where a "pussy card" applies more then when it comes to babysitting. There are 0 consequences for a female, as long as she doesn't leave any marks or does not get caught penetrating the kid with a pair of scissors.

Granted, that might be rare. But same with male babysitters.
Isn't it weird to have "some questions" for a man who wants to babysit, but just let any random female come into your house to look after your kids without giving it a second thought? You don't know her. Maybe she has five dead babies buried in her backyard. Or will let her boyfriend plow her on your couch while eating cheetos. Or will give your kid a lesson in female anatomy by showing her cooch.

What worries me more is that normal females will have 0 fear of consequences if they impulsively decide to touch the kid inappropriately. It has not been ingrained in them that this is wrong. No-one will judge them for it, so they won't even consider the possibility that she's hurting the childs development.

But yeah, all male babysitters are potential rapists and should be deemed guilty until proven innocent. We should warn all our kids and explain them what sexual indecency by a man looks like when they are 5 years old. And then let some woman we don't know babysit, and basically say to the kids: "Oh, she is a woman, she is safe." That's Russian molestation-roulette.

Post: #44

I babysat kids when I was a teenager.

Easy money, get to play with kids. Certainly beat working other shitty part time jobs at 16 to make gas money.

This woman is a cunt and everyone who says teenage boys can't babysit kids are idiots.
All part and parcel of the antimale agenda. All men are rapists. So far, i've noticed that most female teachers happen to be rapists too. That just seems to get swept under the rug.

Post: #45

^This.

Normal men don't have any sexual interest in kids. They want to protect them. These impulses couldn't be more different.

Only if I'd have a 15-year old daughter who hit puberty early and who looks like she's 21 I would prefer to hire a woman. But pre-pubescent kids... Come on.

Post: #46

She's just projecting.

Probably a disgusting whore who cannot control herself.

If it had been 40 year ago she would be in a straight jacket and rightly so.

Now women like her a free to ruin generations of the young.

Post: #47

Quote:Ridiculous Australian feminist

Lotta redundancy in that title....

Post: #48

(04-11-2017 03:42 AM)asdfk Wrote:  Only if I'd have a 15-year old daughter who hit puberty early and who looks like she's 21 I would prefer to hire a woman. But pre-pubescent kids... Come on.

Anything 9 and below is too young to be left home alone. Get a sitter. 10 and 11 you're fine to let them stay home alone if they come home from school and you get home at say 5 or 5:30.

I'd say 12+ year old kids are perfectly capable of being left home alone on their own for an evening. You don't need a baby sitter after this point.

Post: #49

A good friend of mine is a single dad. One time he asked me to watch his two boys, seven and nine at the time. They had a few of their friends over, we organized a football game, I got to play permanent quarterback. While by no means am I a pro athlete, I'm more of a sports guy than him, he's more of a mechanic/motorcycle type, so he likes having me around. His kids are good kids, everyone had a good time.

Anyway, this woman's book should be titled (followed by subtitle):

I Hate Men And Need Attention
- How I can't deal with being an adult and why you shouldn't either by becoming an awful feminist