Post: #351

(01-26-2017 12:15 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Sooner or later it will die if one dominating force decides they have enough of it. After WWIII, then it is likely. Of course it will not peter out like Christianity has the chance of doing - no - it will be forced to die and will be banned.

But it is a clever medieval war cult and had a very good run. It won't be missed.

A-F'N-MEN!

   

Post: #352

(01-24-2017 10:45 AM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  What little there is to salvage about Muslim theology is already incorporated in a much more deep cannon of thought comprised in the Bible, the early Church Fathers teachings, the Saints and many other volumes of books.

The Vatican library is one of the world's most treasured vaults of books in the world

There's plenty of intellectual vigor that can be had there without looking to redeem a death cult like Islam. As we speak, ISIS continues to destroy ancient monuments in Syria and Iraq. There's nothing more anti-intellectual than Islam. The only thing it understands ultimately is the sword.

Those monuments stood there for 14 centuries when Syria was under islamic rule. Christian communities were always part of the social and cultural fiber in the region. Some of the oldest churches in the world are in Syria. The Ottomans protected Jews and Christians in the middle east, it wasn't until they were overthrown by the Rothschild-backed Young Turks/Kemalists that the genocide of Armenians and other Christians took place.

It wasn't until ISIS was pushed into Syria by foreign forces that you saw historic artifacts and churches being destroyed. Those churches had been unmolested for centuries. ISIS is an integral part of the destruction plan of that country and the region, and the people there know it and hate them for this.

Recently, the Syrian army had ISIS surrounded in the battle of Deir Zor, the USAF intervened and bombed Syrian forces "by mistake", for a whole hour, breaking their siege and killing nearly 100 syrian troops.

Post: #353

(01-24-2017 04:33 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  While I do think Islam is a violent religion, I don't think that it can't coexist with the rest of humanity. The last 40-50 years of Islamic aggression/resistance, whatever you want to call it, are at least in part a reaction to US/Israeli policies in the Middle East. We can get all choked up about 9/11 and "Never Forget" or we can look realistically at it and realize that it was a revenge attack.

The people of Iran are good and decent people. I've met them. The people of Lebanon are good and decent. I've met them as well. Sure, they may follow a religion that we find barbaric but just like all people they want to be left to their own devices.

If we are really "at war with Islam" then it is a war that we have created ourselves. Stop fucking around in the Middle East and withdraw support for Israel and all that "Islamic radicalism" will dwindle down mighty fucking quick, I tell you.

-The Khomeini regime was propped up by the US/UK deep state. Khomeini was groomed in London and sheltered in France. The Shah had outlived his purpose, Iran was becoming too strong and modern a country in Israel's backyard. Khomeini was used to wreck Iran and Iraq, so that these countries waste trillions on weapons and destroy each other.





-The Saudi regime and Gulf monarchies were set up and are still propped for the same reason, though the focus there has been more narrowly set on their oil reserves and the petrodollar system. Wahabism was created to prop up the Saudi regime, it is to islam what satanism is to christianity, according to Jean-Michel Vernochet, who is probably the best analyst on ISIS today. (Unfortunately those links are in french)

http://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/Le...43470.html

http://www.voltairenet.org/article186228.html

-Hamas was founded by Israel. Fact.

-ISIS is in the same mold, it is clearly propped by NATO/CIA/Israel/gulf monarchies.

There is a long history of the deep state propping up the most extreme and twisted forms of islam to suit their geopolitical and domestic interests. So the issue is not about reforming islam, it's about stopping the funding and propagation of its most extreme forms, or at least understanding its political origins.

Modern religions are subverted and shaped by outside forces. You see it in Catholicism in Vatican II, or in the perverted form of evangelical Christianity (christian zionism) and dispensationalism, or modern mega-churches infused with luciferian dogmas like Osteen's.

Islam has been used as a replacement for cold war era communism to prop up the war machine and security state. One of the reasons you have a resurgence in cold war style Russia-bashing today is because ISIS is starting to collapse with Trump's election, they can only survive through covert NATO backing, that plug is going to be pulled with Trump collaborating with Putin/Assad.

Post: #354

This is utter craziness - ISIS is to Islam what Satanism is to Christianity?
Come on - this is so far off.




Excellent talk by Robert Spencer who knows more Islamic verses by heart than most Imams.


Even the so-called moderate Muslims - the Ottomans had:
+ slavery up until the 1950s (among them many untold Europeans)
+ general backwardsness
+ barbaric legal system
+ honor killings

So what if the Wahhabism is more literal with the texts? The globalists did not invent the so-called Wahhabism. Salafism is the closest you get to the original 7th century sources.

What happens when you get literal with Jesus and the New Testament? Guess you start wearing robes and become more pious, maybe a little more preachy, but you are not going to kill children of unbelievers.

Does anyone ever read the fucking Quran and the Hadiths out there? Wahhabism is Islam, and ISIS is Islam like Mohammed lived it. http://www.koran-at-a-glance.com/ hear read some - the red and purble verses are about violence and verses directed against any unbelievers (mischief creating also the Muslims who are not strict with the rules, which explains why Muslims can justify killing other Muslims).
By the way - the better translation of Usama Dakdok is even worse: https://www.amazon.com/Generous-Accurate...098241370X
And the Hadiths - various stories and historical context - those things are much worse than the Quran as well. It is better without the context and the historical accounts.

They were beheading unbelievers and heretics long before any globalists thought of enslaving the world via central banks and usury banking.
They were capturing US soldiers right until the US and the British fought back against the slavers - (only in the 19th century!!!) also long before any meddling.

Yes - the globalists are supporting the Wahhabis and yes they probably financed and created the Iranian revolution ousting the Shah who might have managed to modernize Iran tremendously. And yes - Muslims likely without the support for the "true Muslims" - aka the radicals - would have managed to reform themselves or plenty of secular strongmen would rule the Middle East.
I get that - and I also agree that the globalists do plenty of false flags that are financed, created, led by agents (while Muslims get blamed or play only the bottom executive roles) - just as ISIS might be led by secret service agents.

But the thousands who join are true believers and they read the Quran and the Hadiths. They don't read the Necronomicon and recite Satanist verses. These ARE THE HOLY WORDS OF THE RELIGION!!!! The current rapefugees who rape, plunder and kill their way through Europe and now the US are not somehow created out of thin air. They did that for 1400 years and this will continue with or without the globalists.

Also the manipulation of the Christian faith was different. They simply shifted the focus from the New Testament (which is Christanity) and focused on Old Testament making it to matriarchal SJW-Judaism light. The Council of Churches did that. They used actual texts, so that it is still Christianity, it has just moved away from the spirit.

As for radical Islam - that is the original spirit. But I get it - since no one - including most Muslims - can hardly stand this anti-life, anti-dog, anti-music, anti-progress bullshit, then they cut corners here and there and "modernize". Also the overwhelming military success of the WEst and Asia made it impossible for them to conquer the unbelievers, so that was a big bummer. Otherwise we would be all speaking Arabic and would be living in the middle ages if they had succeeded in the last centuries.

Take a nuanced way - globalists are responsible for some things, but other things were already there long before those guys started scheming.

Post: #355

Post: #356

^
@ramzpaul 5h

Quote:Looks like @AshleyJudd ex-husband is doing OK. His new wife just had a baby. Ashley said that "it's unconscionable to breed." So it goes.

Post: #357

Judd's ex husband was a racecar driver and banged her in her prime or relative prime since she was quite hot in her 30s.



But why should a husband stay with an ageing harpy who descends ever more into feminism and marxism as her only solace? She is not the mother of his children, so why bother looking at her post-wall face and listening to her feminist drivel?

She seems to be a true believer in that crap using the terms like "breeder" for women who have kids. And her justification is hunger somewhere? Cupcake - on earth someone was going without food somewhere always. Usually it was Europeans who were most hungry due to the climate. Africa was up until recently far better off than Europeans.

You gotta realize that depopulation of the useless eaters is one of the stated elite's goals out there. Feminism achieves that among other things. Crazy environmentalism and overpopulation hype does so too.

Here you have another actual hottie forsaking to have kids due to "global warming and starving kids somewhere" (Freelee successful youtuber with millions of followers):



She also became a militant vegan and espoused theories of how every meat eater should be killed.

Somehow I think that most women go simply crazy if they don't have kids up to a certain age. It also grounds the men certainly if we become fathers in our 20s, but we will likely turn out fine if we do so in our 30s. But the bitches are going crazy if they don't have this and it is likely nature which pushes all those buttons that have to go somewhere.

Post: #358

(01-27-2017 02:30 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Judd's ex husband was a racecar driver and banged her in her prime or relative prime since she was quite hot in her 30s.

I never got that one. She was 5 years older than him and already a devout feminist. He's a racecar driver who's treated like a royal/rock star in Europe. It didn't add up.

Sadly, they'd probably still be together if she wasn't such a raging cunt. But he moved on to better women and she's seething over it.

Post: #359

It's amazing how many faggot Facebook friends I have.

I didn't know I had that many until I posted anti-Soros women's march posts and they all came out of the woodwork like roaches. My Facebook page has become a war zone, at this point I just use it to shit post and trigger all the dumb cuck beta males and lefties I have on there.

Post: #360

(01-27-2017 04:53 AM)eskimobobseal Wrote:  It's amazing how many faggot Facebook friends I have.

I didn't know I had that many until I posted anti-Soros women's march posts and they all came out of the woodwork like roaches. My Facebook page has become a war zone, at this point I just use it to shit post and trigger all the dumb cuck beta males and lefties I have on there.

Let me guess.
None of them are willing to put their money where their mouth is & move to nations devoid of 'white male patriarchy'.

IE. Yemen, Saudi Arabia & Turkey.

Post: #361

(01-27-2017 02:30 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  ...Somehow I think that most women go simply crazy if they don't have kids up to a certain age. It also grounds the men certainly if we become fathers in our 20s, but we will likely turn out fine if we do so in our 30s. But the bitches are going crazy if they don't have this and it is likely nature which pushes all those buttons that have to go somewhere.

Noting the recent comments from Chelsea Handler in regards to Melania.
What I know is.
Melania gets to dote on her son Barron.
All the while, Chelsea's womb is barren.

No guesses as to which one is actually happy in life.

Post: #362

(01-26-2017 02:34 PM)911 Wrote:  

(01-24-2017 04:33 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  While I do think Islam is a violent religion, I don't think that it can't coexist with the rest of humanity. The last 40-50 years of Islamic aggression/resistance, whatever you want to call it, are at least in part a reaction to US/Israeli policies in the Middle East. We can get all choked up about 9/11 and "Never Forget" or we can look realistically at it and realize that it was a revenge attack.

The people of Iran are good and decent people. I've met them. The people of Lebanon are good and decent. I've met them as well. Sure, they may follow a religion that we find barbaric but just like all people they want to be left to their own devices.

If we are really "at war with Islam" then it is a war that we have created ourselves. Stop fucking around in the Middle East and withdraw support for Israel and all that "Islamic radicalism" will dwindle down mighty fucking quick, I tell you.

-The Khomeini regime was propped up by the US/UK deep state. Khomeini was groomed in London and sheltered in France. The Shah had outlived his purpose, Iran was becoming too strong and modern a country in Israel's backyard. Khomeini was used to wreck Iran and Iraq, so that these countries waste trillions on weapons and destroy each other.





-The Saudi regime and Gulf monarchies were set up and are still propped for the same reason, though the focus there has been more narrowly set on their oil reserves and the petrodollar system. Wahabism was created to prop up the Saudi regime, it is to islam what satanism is to christianity, according to Jean-Michel Vernochet, who is probably the best analyst on ISIS today. (Unfortunately those links are in french)

http://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/Le...43470.html

http://www.voltairenet.org/article186228.html

-Hamas was founded by Israel. Fact.

-ISIS is in the same mold, it is clearly propped by NATO/CIA/Israel/gulf monarchies.

There is a long history of the deep state propping up the most extreme and twisted forms of islam to suit their geopolitical and domestic interests. So the issue is not about reforming islam, it's about stopping the funding and propagation of its most extreme forms, or at least understanding its political origins.

Modern religions are subverted and shaped by outside forces. You see it in Catholicism in Vatican II, or in the perverted form of evangelical Christianity (christian zionism) and dispensationalism, or modern mega-churches infused with luciferian dogmas like Osteen's.

Islam has been used as a replacement for cold war era communism to prop up the war machine and security state. One of the reasons you have a resurgence in cold war style Russia-bashing today is because ISIS is starting to collapse with Trump's election, they can only survive through covert NATO backing, that plug is going to be pulled with Trump collaborating with Putin/Assad.

Post: #363

What the leader of the march though of the anti-islam author Bridget Gabriel.

Post: #364

Pure evil.

Post: #365

^^^
It could be that she has truly reformed, but still, why did the organizers allow someone with that kind of history to even get up on the stage?

Post: #366

Utter madness unmasked. No wonder women are the first victims of indoctrination.

Post: #367

Post: #368

(01-27-2017 07:15 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

(01-27-2017 04:53 AM)eskimobobseal Wrote:  It's amazing how many faggot Facebook friends I have.

I didn't know I had that many until I posted anti-Soros women's march posts and they all came out of the woodwork like roaches. My Facebook page has become a war zone, at this point I just use it to shit post and trigger all the dumb cuck beta males and lefties I have on there.

Let me guess.
None of them are willing to put their money where their mouth is & move to nations devoid of 'white male patriarchy'.

IE. Yemen, Saudi Arabia & Turkey.

This is true.

A common leftist debate tactic is straw-man the other side and misrepresent opposing worldviews, then fain outrage.

Beta cucks on Facebook have been telling me the march was about basic women's rights so I must be a horrible person for opposing it. Of course, they're completely ignoring the fact this march was basically an anti-Trump protest organized by feminists who are primarily man hating pro-abortion, pro-sexual promiscuity, anti-family cult members masquerading as women's rights advocates.

It was funded by George Soros, a known Nazi collaborator and evil human being, for the sole purpose of gender-based division. The speakers were disgusting, foul-mouthed degenerates and their rhetoric was abhorrent, yet I have to log onto Facebook and read comments from cucked leftists shaming ME for daring to oppose them.

I'm sick of these people.

They should all permanently move to Saudi Arabia.

Post: #369

A little pro-life women's rally - note how cute and happy those women are.

Contrast them to this:



Tough choice for any man. By the way - they are singing Allahu Akbar, because everyone knows that this is the internationl multicultural LGBTQXYZ progressive catchphrase.

Post: #370

^
Careful what you wish for...

Post: #371

(01-28-2017 03:29 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  ...

A little pro-life women's rally - note how cute and happy those women are.

Contrast them to this:

...

Tough choice for any man. By the way - they are singing Allahu Akbar, because everyone knows that this is the internationl multicultural LGBTQXYZ progressive catchphrase.

Exactly my thoughts and analysis. It is amazing to see such a huge contrast between these two groups. One group is bitter and angry while another group is happy and vibrant.

Came across this interesting Conservative Review post about some of the stories that the girls and women shared.

Quote:<snipped>
...
1. Conceived from rape. I love my life


Rebecca Kiessling, 47, Mich. President of Save the 1, a pro-life organization
“My birthmother was abducted at knifepoint by a serial rapist and tried to end my life with two illegal abortions, but backed out for fear of her own safety. I literally owe my birth to the law being there to protect me, to pro-life legislators protecting me – even in cases of rape.”

2. Love doesn't count chromosomes. I stand with the 90% of people with Down syndrome who are unwanted


Sheila Hamill, 28, Milwaukee, Wis.
“You need to realize that so many parents of kids with Down Syndrome are the happiest parents in the world, and they’ll tell you that!”

3. I'm marching for those in my generation gone missing


Michaela, 8, Virginia
When asked what her sign means she said: “A lot of babies died.”

4. Your 1st safe space was your mother's womb


Taken from the crowd. Enough said.

5. Thankful my mother chose adoption


Brianna Roberts, 21, Reading, Penn.
“My birth mother was very young and not able to support a child, so she was faced with many tough decisions and her whole family was pushing her to abort me; she chose life, which is why I’m pro-life."

6. 1/3 of my generation is missing


Peton Welch, 16, Olney, Md.
“I think it is a really strong message. It opens a lot of peoples’ eyes and hearts to how effective abortion is and how much of an impact it’s had on our generation.”

7. I miss my child


Megan Rhoades, 37, Decatur Ill.
“I got an abortion in 2005 but have since realized that it was a horrible decision.”

"It probably came once I really understood what abortion was and what it actually did, what the ramifications of it were. I took my child’s life, which means no in-laws, no grandchildren, no great-grandchildren and the affect it will have on my family. I have other children now and I love watching them grow, but I know there’s someone missing from our family."

When asked what she would say to mothers who are on the fence about abortion she said: “Never make decisions when you’re afraid … it’s something that you can never ever reverse. I regret [my abortion], I know other women who do as well. It’s something you can never undo, so choose life.”
</snipped>

Post: #372

The (((elite's))) intentional decimation of our economy has also ruined the traditional family. Most men in their mid twenties cannot afford to raise families. Men in their mid to late thirties aren't red pilled enough to settle down with a woman 10+ years younger, so they marry almost expired women their own age.

Post: #373

(01-24-2017 09:10 AM)Cadders Wrote:  These marches are a lesson in the importance of frame control.

We all know that women need to be led. Over the years the liberal left, mostly via feminism, has worked to reduce the power of male leadership, especially as husbands and fathers - and it has been phenomenally successful in this, not only weakening the respect these roles carry but actually denying millions of the younger generations a father or husband at all. The frame of masculine leadership has been diminished to such an extent that much of Game is simply the discovery / rediscovery of male frame and the understanding of how to create and use it.

The liberal left achieved this level of devastation simply because instead of setting women 'free' from 'patriarchal oppression' (which was how it was sold) they substituted their own frame in the place of men's. Big Daddy Government replaced the father and the 'corporate boyfriend' replaced the husband. The women themselves were never really without a frame to submit to, they simply segued from a patriarchal frame into a liberal left one.

The biggest losers here of course, were men, especially traditional men who, broadly, were forced to assume the beta role to the Liberal Left's alpha. And this has been the status quo for most of the last 50 years. The women, on the other hand, believed themselves to have become independent, empowered and emboldened on their own account - that their new power was the result of their own awesome talents and efforts. In reality these things were and are mostly an illusion, enabled by the frame the liberal left had created around them to keep them safe and corralled.

But then on June 28th 2016, the frame of the liberal left was rattled for the first time in decades. The Brexit vote was the first meaningful indication that perhaps the liberal left frame was not quite as strong as was thought. The liberal left were dismissive of the result of the referendum, mocking and shaming the Brexiters - but no matter; the seed of doubt of liberal left omnipotence had been planted. Maybe the liberal left frame was not quite so alpha after all. Women's social antennae, always way ahead of men's, started twitching.

Nov 8 2016. If Brexit shook the liberal left frame, the US election result destroyed it. Trumps victory was so comprehensive that the liberal left lost control of the narrative. Women's social antennae stopped twitching and started flashing red alert. The alpha had fallen. But unlike the move from the patriarchal to the liberal left frame, there is no new, ready-made frame for women to submit to. And without such a frame, many women, especially single women, are lost, leaderless and scared. And when women are lost, leaderless and scared they instinctively start to herd.

This is why these women attended these rallies in such numbers and why they could not articulate whey they were there. The multitude of contradictory, nonsensical and sometimes outright insane reasons they offered for attending along with the bizarre and inconsistent behaviors they exhibited are perhaps the best example of how women behave when they have no frame to work in. I have heard it reported that many women could not give a reason why they had attended but just that it 'felt better' to come together with other women. Safety in the herd.

And that's about the limit of what they will actually do. I see no sign that they are building a new frame for themselves and nor do I expect to. They will drift until someone creates a frame for them. This is what women look like when they are truly naked - for a lack of frame is far more terrifying to them than a lack of clothes. The frame they will submit to is no longer decided by the liberal left - it is ours to define as we see fit. The alpha is there for the taking.

Without lead women are useful idiots

[b]EXCLUSIVE: Women who marched for equality unwittingly [b]handed their personal data to the Communist Party and Free the Nipple - via non-profit run by millionaire power station lobbyists[/b][/b]

Quote: Hundreds of thousands of women who went on marches on Saturday were asked by celebrities including George Tekei to take part in text 'census'
They were never told that it was being gathered by a non-profit different from the march organizers and that it therefore held the rights to the data gathered
Now it says it will share with the 'march organizers' - who include extreme-left parties and a Muslim body scrutinized over terror link claims
Census was run by 'It's Time Network' which promotes women's equality and claims that building bio-gas power stations is crucial to advancing it
It is run by Betsy McKinney and her husband John, the millionaire scion of a wealthy Pennsylvania family who got rich from oil
As well as being a director of the It's Time Network, he runs a company trying to develop bio-gas power stations in Oregon

Census backers: Betsy McKinney's It's Time Network now holds the cell number of everyone who registered for their 'census'. She is the wife of millionaire John McKinney, a biogas power station developer. Her manifesto for women's equality says biogas generation will help equality. His family made its fortune in oil

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...Party.html

Post: #374

^ that is utter genius.

Everyone should be thinking about how to organize and profit from these rallies.

Hire a couple of dozen students to hold huge banners with "send me your email to make your voice heard", asterisk, fine print: "allows us to send you relevant targeted messaging based on your activism". Pay "activists" for every valid email address who opts in to a mailing list. Etc.

Affiliate market pussy hats, anti-Trump gear, and cat food to the email lists, and solicit donations to a PAC you create - something like "Safer America PAC", (which would just happen to be pro-Trump but would have a pro-lefty sounding name).

Post: #375

(01-28-2017 12:46 AM)budoslavic Wrote:  

I think I know whats in their future.