Post: #1

Just created this discussion for the Wikipedia staff, but the bias on the Pizzagate article is beyond blatant in its attempts to discredit it; it's obvious some admins who might be paid MSN operatives are intentionally skewing the article, and even shut down discussion on its talk page. If anyone else wants to chime in to the discussion (not troll the website) then feel free:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:...blatant.3F

Hoping that this Wikipedia coverup gets wider attention of independent media sources.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pizzagate_...acy_theory

Post: #2

This is why Infogalatic was started. It became clear after GamerGate where Jimmie Wales priorities lie. Wikipedia has been converged.

Post: #3

(01-03-2017 10:21 PM)armenia4ever Wrote:  This is why Infogalatic was started. It became clear after GamerGate where Jimmie Wales priorities lie. Wikipedia has been converged.

Wow, never heard of it before, I'll check it out, thanks.

Post: #4

It's funny how most of Leftist thought is based on a paranoid worldview that sees a malicious conspiracy against certain large population segments as a societal fact despite near zero evidence for its existence. So therefore the United States is a white supremacist nation on the level of Nazi Germany and rife with a rape culture due to inherent misogyny. It's being kept that way due to the efforts of Russian government hackers. Proof of any of this? Right here: ......... Wait, what was the question?

Meanwhile, there are plenty of "unfounded conspiracy theories" out there that have lots of evidence that doesn't necessarily prove them 100%, but at least warrants a closer investigation into many of the claims. Instead, stuff like Pizzagate is the "deranged figment of ignorant white men's imaginations."

I'll say it again: plenty of these people want a civil war with us... and they absolutely fucking deserve one.

Post: #5

Then fight them, don't abandon the wikipedia. The_Donald didn't abandon reddit despite everything that happened there and The_Donald won that fight when reddit tried using every tool to wipe us out.

Post: #6

There's no point in trying to contribute to Wikipedia any longer. The Talmudists and retarded libertarians have formed a cabal against any other factual viewpoint. Wholesale censorship and banning are the currency of land. Better to contribute to our own wiki or this new one the OP mentions.

Post: #7

This doesn't merit it's own thread.....post this info in the pizzagate thread:

#PizzaGate - child sex ring scandal is going viral

/thread-59419.html



....

Post: #8

Getting into Wikipedia edit wars is like War Games: even if you win, you'll lose.

Think about this: there are autistic nerds/fanatical SJWs who literally have nothing to do all day than to sit at their computer and guard their chosen pet articles like hawks, endlessly debating each minute point and reverting edits to their liking. They have 24 hours per day to do that. Do you think it's a good use of your time to go up against them? Wikipedia is a lefty space, it's pointless to go against them if you actually have a life outside of the internet.

Post: #9

I'm surprised wikipedia has a pizzagte article at all

Post: #10

Wikipedia is slowly dying. Most of the site's administrators have gone inactive because it's such an unrewarding time sink. The few that are left are using the site to promote a liberal agenda or are losers on a power trip. Because there are so few admins left and most of them are agenda-driven, it means that no one is available to effectively resolve user content disputes. So, content is now controlled by however many basement dwellers are willing to camp out on an individual article and immediately revert any changes to the text.

It's likely that as much as 50% or more of the active editors in Wikipedia now, especially in certain topics, are moderately to severely autistic. I've got nothing against autistic people, but the ones in Wikipedia are seriously obsessive about guarding their articles and topics.

Post: #11

(01-04-2017 05:32 AM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  There's no point in trying to contribute to Wikipedia any longer. The Talmudists and retarded libertarians have formed a cabal against any other factual viewpoint. Wholesale censorship and banning are the currency of land. Better to contribute to our own wiki or this new one the OP mentions.

(01-04-2017 09:40 AM)C-Note Wrote:  Wikipedia is slowly dying. Most of the site's administrators have gone inactive because it's such an unrewarding time sink. The few that are left are using the site to promote a liberal agenda or are losers on a power trip.

Wikipedia is basic dead in the water and has become other tool to reinforce narrative that left/globalist want to promote. In the age of information overload and current deference to experts, Wikipedia has become an established source of information to current youth. In the culture war that majority of the forum finds ourselves in, the left ensure they control any domains of education and information. Add in the gammas and other mental insane member of the asylum that want to see Western Civilization to burn.

Infogalatic is first step for rest of humanity to regaining the knowledge that hasn't been process by leftist's worldview filter. Next 8 years of Trump Reign is going to be interesting as we see more forks in technology as SJW convergence occurs and left double downs.

As for pizzagate, the carrying capacity of corruptions and satanic abuse reach it limited in the general population. People know that something is wrong. Deluge of cases and deaths are going to interesting.

Post: #12

(01-04-2017 09:40 AM)C-Note Wrote:  Wikipedia is slowly dying.

From Quora-- they might be liberals too, so should be doubted.:
Business Insider estimated it at $4 billion in 2011, were there to be ads on Wikipedia.
The 100 Most Valuable Startups In The World, Revamped And Revised!
I haven't seen anything newer, outside of the Dr. Evil estimate here

Maybe if I save up my pennies I could buy .001% of it if they go public. Someone should tell them they're losers.

Post: #13

(01-04-2017 10:24 AM)iknowexactly Wrote:  

(01-04-2017 09:40 AM)C-Note Wrote:  Wikipedia is slowly dying.

From Quora-- they might be liberals too, so should be doubted.:
Business Insider estimated it at $4 billion in 2011, were there to be ads on Wikipedia.
The 100 Most Valuable Startups In The World, Revamped And Revised!
I haven't seen anything newer, outside of the Dr. Evil estimate here

Maybe if I save up my pennies I could buy .001% of it if they go public. Someone should tell them they're losers.

Wikipedia's credibility probably peaked around 2009 and it has slowly declined since then. People still look at it as a quick reference, but, in my experience, they'll almost always say, "I got this from Wikipedia so I don't know if it's true."

Post: #14

Metapedia has articles without leftist bias. There is right-wing bias, but as long as you have both sources available, this should even it out to provide a clearer view of things. In any event, thus you can avoid outright censorship.

Maybe one of our experts here can contribute to its Pizzagate article: http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Pizzagate

The German version of Metapedia is magnificent, by the way. Totally different language as opposed to German p.c. culture. I recommend it to any German-speaker.

Post: #15

Could anybody say what is Rationalpedia? Seems to insult everything and everyone!?

Post: #16

(01-04-2017 04:05 PM)sterling_archer Wrote:  Could anybody say what is Rationalpedia? Seems to insult everything and everyone!?

RationalWiki is the opposite of Conservapedia. Some of its members have been banned from Wikipedia, or are there because they were too loony for any other wiki.

Post: #17

(01-04-2017 09:40 AM)C-Note Wrote:  It's likely that as much as 50% or more of the active editors in Wikipedia now, especially in certain topics, are moderately to severely autistic. I've got nothing against autistic people, but the ones in Wikipedia are seriously obsessive about guarding their articles and topics.

This is the real issue behind that claptrap a while ago about Wikipedia being 'unfriendly to women'. The real truth is that women and autistic men are almost incapable of communication with each other. They're the opposite of each other, autism is basically an extreme male psyche, that was the opinion of Simon Baron-Cohen, who's one of the worlds leading experts on Autism.

In my last company the IT guy was a classic Aspergers case, I've watched him and the women of the office try to talk to each other but it just ends in one or both of them being offended. They literally cannot understand each others intentions.

Post: #18

I've gotten used to the fact that Wikipedia is super-biased when it comes to social and political topics. I only use it for geography and history.

Post: #19

^Ditto, its best to use it for that, and for example looking for animals, plants and maybe some technical information (engines, trains, etc.)

Post: #20

The only good articles on Wikipedia are science and math. Even history articles are full of SJW revisions which distort the truth.

Post: #21

I still have my set of encyclopedias, with about a decade of updates (where they send a book a year with revisions on the original set). The updates don't come any more, so editing involves a lot of cutting and pasting with scissors and glue.

Post: #22

I have a set of encyclopaedias from 1975.

It's always amusing to flip through them on anything topical, like communism for example.

I also have a guide to Africa written about 100 years ago. If I can dig it up I might just scan it.

Post: #23

Mine are from 1975 too, 27 volumes, then the "yearbook" for each year after that until 1999.

Post: #24

Even history on Wikipedia has a bias. Check out the article on the Umayyad Caliphate before the reconquiesta took place. Lots of sympathatic writings from a singular source about how Muslims were tolerant and this lead to a golden age until the evil Christians Ferdinand and Isabella took over.

Post: #25

Time to start using Infogalactic as your go-to information source. It's actually pretty good considering how new it is, and will grow by leaps and bounds. This is a new era. We are creating our own institutions and infrastructure, and are now numerous enough that it matters.