Post: #51

(12-30-2016 05:32 PM)Repo Wrote:  3). I have literally eaten the ass of girls with butts like hers,

Post: #52

(12-30-2016 05:13 PM)911 Wrote:  One of the most damning clues in the Williams brothers case is the fact that their father took them out of circulation for a long period when they were transitioning from preteen into mid/late puberty, where they must have received deep hormonal treatment and surgical sex change procedures.

This is all just conjecture. You have no evidence supporting this claim.

Quote:In every preteen picture of them they looked like boys in drag with girl hair and girl dress (not the case with Michelle Obama, who just looked like an ugly duckling dorkette).

Like I said in an earlier post, Venus and Serena were (are) just very unfortunate in the looks department.

Quote:Normally, the teen stage is a crucial period in the athletic development of tennis players, in a very technical sport where young talent can break through pretty early, it is pretty weird that their father took them off the circuit for that long a period. He did so because he knew that they would still physically overwhelm their competition post-op, more than making up for development time lost off competition.

Post hoc fallacy. There could be a number of reasons for why he did that. For example, this is what is written on Richard Williams' Wikipedia page:

Quote:He took tennis lessons from a man known as "Old Whiskey" and decided his future daughters would be tennis professionals when he saw Virginia Ruzici playing on television.[1] Williams says that he wrote up a 78-page plan, and started giving lessons to Venus and Serena when they were four and a half, and began taking them to the public tennis courts. (He now says he feels like he took them too early, and six is a better age.)[3] Soon he got them into Shreveport tennis tournaments. In 1995, Williams pulled them out of a tennis academy, and coached them himself.

Further investigation shows the reason why he decided to coach them himself was because

Quote:... [H]e hoped to avoid subjecting his daughters to competitive pressures, including an undertone of racial hostility. Serena and Venus were sent to the Florida tennis academy of teaching pro Ric Macci, who had also worked with teenage standouts Jennifer Capriati and Mary Pierce ...

Quote:The picture you posted doesn't properly show the demarcation between Carmouche's waist indent point and her navel, it is masked by her high-riding baggy boxing shorts and gloves. Here's a better shot, you can clearly see that it's still the torso and midsection of a (albeit very athletic) woman. Compare with the Williams brothers drag queen bodies, their indent waist gap is a lot wider:

So I just Googled "waist indent point" and this page came up as a result. Curiously, I clicked it, and waddya know, I found a video claiming Justin Bieber is actually a female by the same YouTuber who claims Michelle Obama and Serena Williams are actually men.







I also find it strange that this person has also disabled others from commenting on his/her videos. This is clearly a troll job and you're falling for the bait hard. Believe whatever you want but I'm not buying it until I see solid evidence.

Post: #53

(12-30-2016 05:32 PM)Repo Wrote:  I'll just point out a couple things, then agree to disagree.

1). A video which claims Michelle Obama is a tranny loses all credibility of everything in my eyes. Hell even you said you disagree with them on that point, so suddenly the testimony of plastic surgeons isn't sufficient for you? *Morpheus voice* What if I told you people lie on the internet for views?

2) The pics are not telling at all, they are all easily explained by camera angles and the way clothing fits

3). I have literally eaten the ass of girls with butts like hers, and can assure you they are real. Plenty of other forum experts who have experience with black chicks can also tell you they are real and out there.

4). Nobody called you racist, you are just plain wrong.

1) Yes they are most likely wrong about Michelle, though we don't have the full picture on her. Their work on Williams was more thorough. And the plastic surgeon actually said she did have butt surgery.

2) More before and after pics, do you not see the difference here?










3) The question is not about whether black girls can't have freakishly big butts, we know they can,, it's about (a) if they can grow freakishly large butts overnight. You would have the same doubts if a 30 year old woman suddenly went from a B cup to a D in a few months, and (b) it's about how that butt fits with the rest of the body (monster butt sitting low, well below six pack abs and flat back?)

This is what a normal bigassed girl looks like, the bottom bulge will be more integrated into womanly curves:



as opposed to:



The second point about the shape relative to the rest of the body is more subtle, but the first one about overnight change is quite damning.

I'm done here, sick of looking at Williams' tranny butt, so effin gross.

Eye bleach:

Post: #54

(12-30-2016 06:19 PM)Huey Wrote:  So I just Googled "waist indent point" and this page came up as a result. Curiously, I clicked it, and waddya know, I found a video claiming Justin Bieber is actually a female by the same YouTuber who claims Michelle Obama and Serena Williams are actually men.







I also find it strange that this person has also disabled others from commenting on his/her videos. This is clearly a troll job and you're falling for the bait hard. Believe whatever you want but I'm not buying it until I see solid evidence.

This is a classic case of poisoning the well: the discrediting of a true story in the general pubic's eye by associating it with an outrageously stupid story or element. David Icke is the most notorious example of poisoning the well, he drops massive truth bombs about child abuse rings in the UK involving cabinet ministers (or even prime ministers like Ted Heath), but he also raves about insane narratives like shape-shifting reptilians ===> the whole package is instantly discredited as loony tinpot conspiracy talk. It's a most effective way to get rid of the baby along with the bathwater.

The general public doesn't like going against the grain when it comes to the basic set of beliefs they grew up with, so they will look for reasons to remove the cognitive dissonance they experience when exposed to unsettling narratives that go completely against their basic cultural and political beliefs. That's why there is a whole industry dedicated to keeping them on the rails, from the fact-checking industry (often well-funded), to the MSM, to controlled opposition like David Icke (and to a lesser extent, Alex Jones).

There is for example a sizeable group online pushing the flat earth conspiracy, arguably the most retarded conspiracy, producing slick videos, getting nudged forward by algorithms online and entrapping the dumbest elements among those who don't trust the official narrative. Their main purpose is to poison the well by associating their fabrication with viable conspiracies like JFK or 9/11. Funding for those professional shills has stepped up after Cass Sunstein's '08 initiative:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cass_Sunst...filtration

Quote: "The existence of both domestic and foreign conspiracy theories, we suggest, is no trivial matter, posing real risks to the government's antiterrorism policies, whatever the latter may be... The best response consists in cognitive infiltration of extremist groups",[35] where they suggest, among other tactics, "Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action."[35] They refer, several times, to groups that promote the view that the US Government was responsible or complicit in the September 11 attacks as "extremist groups."

The authors declare that there are five hypothetical responses a government can take toward conspiracy theories: "We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories. (3) Government might itself engage in counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories. (4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counterspeech. (5) Government might engage in informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help." However, the authors advocate that each "instrument has a distinctive set of potential effects, or costs and benefits, and each will have a place under imaginable conditions. However, our main policy idea is that government should engage in cognitive infiltration of the groups that produce conspiracy theories, which involves a mix of (3), (4) and (5)."

As you can see in your case above, poisoning the well works. Not that every well poisoner is a professional government shill, that Bieber dude is more likely to be a tabloid-style clickbaiter, or sometimes a genuine retard, than a professional shill.

Post: #55

(12-30-2016 08:22 PM)911 Wrote:  This is a classic case of poisoning the well: the discrediting of a true story in the general pubic's eye by associating it with an outrageously stupid story or element. David Icke is the most notorious example of poisoning the well, he drops massive truth bombs about child abuse rings in the UK involving cabinet ministers (or even prime ministers like Ted Heath), but he also raves about insane narratives like shape-shifting reptilians ===> the whole package is instantly discredited as loony tinpot conspiracy talk. It's a most effective way to get rid of the baby along with the bathwater.

The general public doesn't like going against the grain when it comes to the basic set of beliefs they grew up with, so they will look for reasons to remove the cognitive dissonance they experience when exposed to unsettling narratives that go completely against their basic cultural and political beliefs. That's why there is a whole industry dedicated to keeping them on the rails, from the fact-checking industry (often well-funded), to the MSM, to controlled opposition like David Icke (and to a lesser extent, Alex Jones).

There is for example a sizeable group online pushing the flat earth conspiracy, arguably the most retarded conspiracy, producing slick videos, getting nudged forward by algorithms online and entrapping the dumbest elements among those who don't trust the official narrative. Their main purpose is to poison the well by associating their fabrication with viable conspiracies like JFK or 9/11. Funding for those professional shills has stepped up after Cass Sunstein's '08 initiative:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cass_Sunst...filtration

Quote: "The existence of both domestic and foreign conspiracy theories, we suggest, is no trivial matter, posing real risks to the government's antiterrorism policies, whatever the latter may be... The best response consists in cognitive infiltration of extremist groups",[35] where they suggest, among other tactics, "Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action."[35] They refer, several times, to groups that promote the view that the US Government was responsible or complicit in the September 11 attacks as "extremist groups."

The authors declare that there are five hypothetical responses a government can take toward conspiracy theories: "We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories. (3) Government might itself engage in counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories. (4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counterspeech. (5) Government might engage in informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help." However, the authors advocate that each "instrument has a distinctive set of potential effects, or costs and benefits, and each will have a place under imaginable conditions. However, our main policy idea is that government should engage in cognitive infiltration of the groups that produce conspiracy theories, which involves a mix of (3), (4) and (5)."

As you can see in your case above, poisoning the well works. Not that every well poisoner is a professional government shill, that Bieber dude is more likely to be a tabloid-style clickbaiter, or sometimes a genuine retard, than a professional shill.

I couldn't care less about the Williams sisters' gender. I also have no problem abandoning deeply held beliefs if challenged with sound arguments. The arguments you've presented however are unconvincing so I have no reason to believe otherwise.

That YouTube channel you're citing as a source for your arguments has a history of publishing ridiculous videos with fallacious reasoning as "irrefutable PROOF" for their claims. Call it poisoning the well if you want, but I refuse to take that channel seriously when I can't even like or dislike their videos nor comment on them. What's the point of posting these videos when you don't even want to engage in open dialogue with the public?

Post: #56

(12-30-2016 06:19 PM)Huey Wrote:  

(12-30-2016 05:13 PM)911 Wrote:  One of the most damning clues in the Williams brothers case is the fact that their father took them out of circulation for a long period when they were transitioning from preteen into mid/late puberty, where they must have received deep hormonal treatment and surgical sex change procedures.

This is all just conjecture. You have no evidence supporting this claim.

What do you see here, two sisters, or two young cross-dressing brothers? Can you manage to look at those pictures afresh, with an unbiased critical eye (tall order)?











Smiles and a somewhat effete expression, along with the beads, help soften their masculine features. It's hard to find pictures of them as boys (or even as adults) not smiling. Those masculine features really pop out when Serena is not smiling though:

Quote:

Quote:In every preteen picture of them they looked like boys in drag with girl hair and girl dress (not the case with Michelle Obama, who just looked like an ugly duckling dorkette).

Like I said in an earlier post, Venus and Serena were (are) just very unfortunate in the looks department.

They're actually pretty good looking, masculine boys. They would have grown up to be handsome, virile black men. Unfortunately for them, masculine men make for very ugly trans women.

Quote:

Quote:Normally, the teen stage is a crucial period in the athletic development of tennis players, in a very technical sport where young talent can break through pretty early, it is pretty weird that their father took them off the circuit for that long a period. He did so because he knew that they would still physically overwhelm their competition post-op, more than making up for development time lost off competition.

Post hoc fallacy. There could be a number of reasons for why he did that. For example, this is what is written on Richard Williams' Wikipedia page:

Quote:He took tennis lessons from a man known as "Old Whiskey" and decided his future daughters would be tennis professionals when he saw Virginia Ruzici playing on television.[1] Williams says that he wrote up a 78-page plan, and started giving lessons to Venus and Serena when they were four and a half, and began taking them to the public tennis courts. (He now says he feels like he took them too early, and six is a better age.)[3] Soon he got them into Shreveport tennis tournaments. In 1995, Williams pulled them out of a tennis academy, and coached them himself.

Further investigation shows the reason why he decided to coach them himself was because

Quote:... [H]e hoped to avoid subjecting his daughters to competitive pressures, including an undertone of racial hostility. Serena and Venus were sent to the Florida tennis academy of teaching pro Ric Macci, who had also worked with teenage standouts Jennifer Capriati and Mary Pierce ...

Yes, he lays out the racism card, very convenient here. That's always been a key firewall in their narrative, and if you question it, you're a racist, and a sexist too.

Richard Williams has already been caught lying on a key aspect of his background, selling the notion that he was straight out of Compton, when in fact he was a middle class tennis coach (as was his ex). IIRC his salary back then was in the $50k range, hardly chump change in the 1980s/90s. So we know that at least part of their story (an important part at that) has been fabricated.

So he took them out of circulation for 3-4 years, right when puberty kicked in in full swing (and when their masculine features would have become too obvious), out of concern for their upbringing. Nice alibi, but his story doesn't ring true; they live in SoCal and FL, they could have played in the occasional local tournament or just focused on their middle school tennis teams without disrupting their personal growth or becoming depraved druggies.

In fact that would have actually helped them stay focused, and helped them get scholarships at academically solid schools. That was their golden ticket out of the ghetto, for a family that was supposed to struggle in gangland. That's actually the classic route for concerned inner city parents with athletically gifted kids. Williams' explanation doesn't hold water; he took them out for those years to manage their hormonal transformation and sex change process.

Look, I'm not even 100% sure that they are transgendered, I'm around 70%-80%, confident enough to lay the foundations for the case. And if neither sister becomes pregnant in the next decade, those odds inch up a bit higher.


PS: do you still think that Obama's real father was a goat herder from Kenya?

Post: #57

(12-30-2016 09:11 AM)TheOllam Wrote:  I'm sorry that Atlanta Man didn't swoop Serena to cash in on a divorce-bux master plan.

Now i'm wondering about Reddit-nerd's motivation.

He planning on trying to produce super athlete jock children?



Meanwhile this dude Drake plus a behind-the-scenes line up of athlete-bros hit that between her tournament victories. She is going to be BORED AS SHIT with this guy. Odds on Ohanian getting his Pelvis broke during honeymoon? 100% when she tops.

There are limits to what money can motivate, that woman is too masculine for me, wealth be damned. Not my type, family not connected enough, too ugly-WNB.

Post: #58

(12-30-2016 09:10 PM)Huey Wrote:  I couldn't care less about the Williams sisters' gender. I also have no problem abandoning deeply held beliefs if challenged with sound arguments. The arguments you've presented however are unconvincing so I have no reason to believe otherwise.

That YouTube channel you're citing as a source for your arguments has a history of publishing ridiculous videos with fallacious reasoning as "irrefutable PROOF" for their claims. Call it poisoning the well if you want, but I refuse to take that channel seriously when I can't even like or dislike their videos nor comment on them. What's the point of posting these videos when you don't even want to engage in open dialogue with the public?

Fair enough, Huey. Yes, that Youtube channel does look like a mixed bag, with a low ratio of baby to bathwater.

Post: #59

The pearing of weak effeminate man with masculine woman reminds me of the spotted hyena matriarchy.

Post: #60

1) RE: Black ass, black women are known to store fat there so, yes, they can demolish a crate of twinkies and grow an ass overnight. Hell, I knew a white girl who's upper body bmi and lower body bmi functioned completely independently. If she lapsed on diet and exercise she would end up with total ghetto ass/thighs but if you saw her from the other side of a counter you'd think she was a size zero.

2) RE: Beta bitch husband. He's a rich tech guy hooking himself to a black amazon.

James Bond villain confirmed.

Post: #61

First of all, Serena Williams is 35 years old. Are they going to be having children? If not, why get married?

Also, unless this guy is secretly a weightlifter or an athlete, I would assume she is probably stronger than him. That's got to be emasculating as fuck. How is she even attracted to him? Female athletes usually marry male athletes.

This is clearly not an "alpha-fux beta-bux" situation, since Serena is far richer than this dude. She doesn't need his money. But I still don't understand how she can be attracted to a man who is (I assume) so much smaller and weaker than her.

PS: All this talk about Serena (and Michelle Obama) being a tranny just shows how far the left as been able to push its narrative and crazy ideas. It is not physically possible for a man to change into a woman like that, and make it look so realistic. Even the most "passable" trannies still have somewhat masculine faces, gay-dude voices, and gay-dude mannerisms. The only possible exception are dudes who "transitioned" before going through puberty.

Female-to-male trannies tend to be a bit more passable, but only because they grow beards. Shave off the beard, and it would be pretty obvious that you're looking at a woman.

Post: #62

Assuming there is genuine attraction between the two of them, maybe she actually likes his really nerdy brain. Some women have a thing for geeks. Maybe she is done with jocks? Maybe this dude has a thing for ultra-masculine women? Who knows? Just seems like an odd paring. I agree that her more natural (at least intuitively) mate would be a professional sports star.

Post: #63

Maybe there were no professional sports stars willing to date her. That seems more plausible. Most male sports stars aren't gonna settle for a 35-year-old ultra-masculine woman.

Post: #64

(12-31-2016 01:22 AM)Rob Banks Wrote:  First of all, Serena Williams is 35 years old. Are they going to be having children? If not, why get married?

Also, unless this guy is secretly a weightlifter or an athlete, I would assume she is probably stronger than him. That's got to be emasculating as fuck. How is she even attracted to him? Female athletes usually marry male athletes.

This is clearly not an "alpha-fux beta-bux" situation, since Serena is far richer than this dude. She doesn't need his money. But I still don't understand how she can be attracted to a man who is (I assume) so much smaller and weaker than her.

PS: All this talk about Serena (and Michelle Obama) being a tranny just shows how far the left as been able to push its narrative and crazy ideas. It is not physically possible for a man to change into a woman like that, and make it look so realistic. Even the most "passable" trannies still have somewhat masculine faces, gay-dude voices, and gay-dude mannerisms. The only possible exception are dudes who "transitioned" before going through puberty.

I can't blame you for not reading the long debate above, but that is precisely the case for the Williams. Their dad took them out of circulation just before they hit full-blown puberty, and he kept them out of the public eye for 3 to 4 years.

Post: #65

If this was all an elaborate plot by their dad to change their gender to get rich then he's borderline genius. It's like the parents who hold their kid back a year in kindergarten so they'll be bigger for highschool sports, except he said fuck it and went all in for the pot of gold. It's like bluffing in poker, he's always had pocket aces but has to pretend like 'gee I hope my daughter can win today' while laughing to himself.

I tried to find young pictures of their mother, Oracene Price, to compare to what she looked like at that age, but couldn't find any.

Post: #66

(12-31-2016 09:03 AM)911 Wrote:  

(12-31-2016 01:22 AM)Rob Banks Wrote:  First of all, Serena Williams is 35 years old. Are they going to be having children? If not, why get married?

Also, unless this guy is secretly a weightlifter or an athlete, I would assume she is probably stronger than him. That's got to be emasculating as fuck. How is she even attracted to him? Female athletes usually marry male athletes.

This is clearly not an "alpha-fux beta-bux" situation, since Serena is far richer than this dude. She doesn't need his money. But I still don't understand how she can be attracted to a man who is (I assume) so much smaller and weaker than her.

PS: All this talk about Serena (and Michelle Obama) being a tranny just shows how far the left as been able to push its narrative and crazy ideas. It is not physically possible for a man to change into a woman like that, and make it look so realistic. Even the most "passable" trannies still have somewhat masculine faces, gay-dude voices, and gay-dude mannerisms. The only possible exception are dudes who "transitioned" before going through puberty.

I can't blame you for not reading the long debate above, but that is precisely the case for the Williams. Their dad took them out of circulation just before they hit full-blown puberty, and he kept them out of the public eye for 3 to 4 years.

Yeah, except the problem with what you're saying is that if a boy "transitions" before puberty, his physical strength will not develop like it's supposed to (which would kind of defeat the whole purpose, considering that Serena is a professional athlete who relies on physical strength).

You really didn't think this through, did you?

Post: #67

Well I think we know who's going to be wearing the strap-on in that relationship.

Probably just wanted to prove to his progressive pals to prove how tolerant he is by marrying a black lesbian.

Post: #68

(01-01-2017 02:12 PM)Rob Banks Wrote:  

(12-31-2016 09:03 AM)911 Wrote:  

(12-31-2016 01:22 AM)Rob Banks Wrote:  First of all, Serena Williams is 35 years old. Are they going to be having children? If not, why get married?

Also, unless this guy is secretly a weightlifter or an athlete, I would assume she is probably stronger than him. That's got to be emasculating as fuck. How is she even attracted to him? Female athletes usually marry male athletes.

This is clearly not an "alpha-fux beta-bux" situation, since Serena is far richer than this dude. She doesn't need his money. But I still don't understand how she can be attracted to a man who is (I assume) so much smaller and weaker than her.

PS: All this talk about Serena (and Michelle Obama) being a tranny just shows how far the left as been able to push its narrative and crazy ideas. It is not physically possible for a man to change into a woman like that, and make it look so realistic. Even the most "passable" trannies still have somewhat masculine faces, gay-dude voices, and gay-dude mannerisms. The only possible exception are dudes who "transitioned" before going through puberty.

I can't blame you for not reading the long debate above, but that is precisely the case for the Williams. Their dad took them out of circulation just before they hit full-blown puberty, and he kept them out of the public eye for 3 to 4 years.

Yeah, except the problem with what you're saying is that if a boy "transitions" before puberty, his physical strength will not develop like it's supposed to (which would kind of defeat the whole purpose, considering that Serena is a professional athlete who relies on physical strength).

You really didn't think this through, did you?

Your line of thought here is too simplistic Rob, it's not really a binary thing or an on/off switch.

Transitioning at age 11 is going to limit her ability to do things like grow a beard, but it's not going to scrap baseline genetics, or fundamentally alter things like bone structure, at least not to the extent that it would make her less capable of physically overwhelming her opponents.

The Williams sisters have probably taken a hormone cocktail that gave them female attributes (like small breasts and some thigh fat) while not completely shutting down their bodies' masculine resources, the same way men could experience breast swelling from high doses of estrogen while still retaining a masculine baseline.

Post: #69

(12-31-2016 12:10 PM)Disco_Volante Wrote:  If this was all an elaborate plot by their dad to change their gender to get rich then he's borderline genius. It's like the parents who hold their kid back a year in kindergarten so they'll be bigger for highschool sports, except he said fuck it and went all in for the pot of gold. It's like bluffing in poker, he's always had pocket aces but has to pretend like 'gee I hope my daughter can win today' while laughing to himself.

I tried to find young pictures of their mother, Oracene Price, to compare to what she looked like at that age, but couldn't find any.

Their father did have a master plan, very early on, he has stated as much (though of course he didn't divulge his secret weapon). As I've said above, he lied about key details of his background, like his middle class standing, pushing the inner city narrative.

The question is how much help he's received from the PTB, whose interest is in breaking gender roles by promoting a very masculine ideal for women. Williams is a perfect vehicle for this. I think a lot of people high up know, starting with the Olympic Committee officials who have tested her. The Russian delegation knows:

http://hollywoodlife.com/2014/10/20/will...suspended/

Also, the Williams sisters have never had a long term, steady relationship in their 20 year dating windows, just a bunch of spotty dates with other celebrities, the type that are arranged for the public eye by agents and handlers. Not a smoking gun by itself, but a relevant data point.

If you want to travel further down this rabbit hole - there is also evidence of Serena Williams having a multiple personality disorder (with at least six different egos), the type of mental fracturing that is closely associated with MK-Ultra trauma-based mind control conditioning:

https://youtu.be/N49ZZgORBPQ?t=4m32s

https://youtu.be/oGG0rnAMm78?t=8m20s

Post: #70

911 bruh, you are sperging out again. It's time to stop posting.

Don't make me post the Rudebwoy avatar on you.

Post: #71

Two words for you Kai: cognitive dissonance.

Post: #72

Ain't enough money to get with that beast.

Post: #73

I don't really have hate for the Williams sisters. They were groomed from youth to be tennis stars. I believe that they're women. They're obviously on steroid regimens to maintain muscle mass, and are also talented tennis players.

The only relevant mark against them is that they are just not physically attractive. They may have feminine personalities in private, but it does not save their otherwise masculine looks.

Post: #74

(12-30-2016 09:44 PM)911 Wrote:  

I was shocked when did I hear about the dead of one of the Kris Kross kids.

Post: #75

Seriously wtf is this guy thinking... he's relatively rich and not terrible looking, he could marry a 8-9 no problem. If he likes black chicks he could probably marry a black 10. This has to be about money/status.