Post: #51

I'm sorry if it's been addressed but how is a stem cell research and genetic "modification" looked down on as playing God but this shit is straight up endorsed.

Fuck this gay earth.gif

Edit.. I'm mostly against all three in most cases. This shit just blows my mind. I need a mentor to tell me what I can do

Post: #52

(01-03-2017 10:41 PM)Once Was Not Wrote:  Absolutely. Fucking. Disgusting. Utterly revolting.

There will come a day where this child abuse, child mutilation and experimentation, and sick pedophilic practices on children will be classified a crime against humanity, as it should be.

Actually it was considered child abuse as far back as the 1870s, and only recently is it being revived. Shows just how retrogressive and degenerate the radical left is

And hey if nothing else at least these poor kids had a potential career as opera singers, lol:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castrato

A castrato (Italian, plural: castrati) is a type of classical male singing voice equivalent to that of a soprano, mezzo-soprano, or contralto. The voice is produced by castration of the singer before puberty, or it occurs in one who, due to an endocrinological condition, never reaches sexual maturity.

Castration before puberty (or in its early stages) prevents a boy's larynx from being transformed by the normal physiological events of puberty. As a result, the vocal range of prepubescence (shared by both sexes) is largely retained, and the voice develops into adulthood in a unique way. Prepubescent castration for this purpose diminished greatly in the late 18th century and was made illegal in Italy in 1870.

Post: #53

(12-17-2016 01:33 AM)RoastBeefCurtains4Me Wrote:  

(12-17-2016 01:02 AM)Veloce Wrote:  I used to think it was only certain channels and magazines pushing an agenda.

What this year has taught me is that they're all in it together. Every single one of them. Even if I'm wrong I don't care. If I see something in written print or visual media I assume there's an agenda behind it. I'd rather presume guilty and be proven otherwise than the reverse.

I had the same revelation when the "grab her in the pussy " thing came out, and a bunch of RNC cucks announced how this was the last straw for them with Trump. It was obviously coordinated. I realized the RNC and the DNC are really two sides of the same coin. The RNC wanted Hillary. They wanted to lose, because they're cucks.

It's the same with all the MSM, including Fox, or the WSJ, that were previously considered "conservative ". They were only ever controlled opposition.

Exactly, if that stupid nothing comment was truly "the last straw" and "crossing the line" for both sides of the party, then it shows just how fake the conservatives in this country really are. Instead of being white knights to every walking vagina they should be outraged over this child abuse, THAT should be the last God damn straw for anyone in the conservative ranks. Of course it hardly even gets talked about there, even they can't touch the subject; just another topic held in some quasi-religious regard that can't be questioned. Lots of those being uncovered these days. I mean, I can think of dozens upon dozens of "the last straw" situations I've seen over the past few years, but that stupid soundbite is not one of them.

I guess that's why most of us are reactionaries like Phoenix said, and not simply conservatives.

Post: #54

(01-03-2017 11:09 PM)EDantes Wrote:  

(01-03-2017 10:41 PM)Once Was Not Wrote:  Absolutely. Fucking. Disgusting. Utterly revolting.

There will come a day where this child abuse, child mutilation and experimentation, and sick pedophilic practices on children will be classified a crime against humanity, as it should be.

Actually it was considered child abuse as far back as the 1870s, and only recently is it being revived. Shows just how retrogressive and degenerate the radical left is

And hey if nothing else at least these poor kids had a potential career as opera singers, lol:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castrato

A castrato (Italian, plural: castrati) is a type of classical male singing voice equivalent to that of a soprano, mezzo-soprano, or contralto. The voice is produced by castration of the singer before puberty, or it occurs in one who, due to an endocrinological condition, never reaches sexual maturity.

Castration before puberty (or in its early stages) prevents a boy's larynx from being transformed by the normal physiological events of puberty. As a result, the vocal range of prepubescence (shared by both sexes) is largely retained, and the voice develops into adulthood in a unique way. Prepubescent castration for this purpose diminished greatly in the late 18th century and was made illegal in Italy in 1870.

Funny then how the average person would likely describe the 1870s as a time of *copy pasted list of labels* and how much we are better than them in current year. They would most likely use that as an example as to how this is good, and all deviation from the evil pre-current year times is good and just. I mean for fucks sake man, the 1800s were all about that evil colonialism and imperialism, how could anything from that time be OK? I can hear it now.

As for Castrati, yeah...definitely an odd subject. The kids chosen for that were usually really poor and underclass right? Like they were essentially taken by the elites as they belonged to no one or for profit by their poor parents and turned into a tool for the Opera. Could be wrong though, that's about as far as my extremely limited knowledge of them goes.

Post: #55

(12-18-2016 02:25 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(12-18-2016 12:30 AM)kbell Wrote:  The pose is creepy too. Everything in that shot was arranged and lit for the image. So nothing is unplanned including the pose. Something bothers me about it.
...

I took another look and, Christ, you're absolutely right.

The reason it's creepy is because they have posed the boy as if he were an adult female presented for the cover of something like Vogue. Or, with no clothes, a porn spread. Hand in crotch, sitting side-saddle on a chair, one arm draped thoughtlessly down. Never mind that 9 year old boys don't sit like this, 9 year old girls don't sit like this either -- and there are even comparator 9 year olds right there in the same issue of the magazine.

They have even replicated the jaw-lifted, dead-from-the-soul-down expression present in most modern female glamour photography, the expression that says "Look how dominant I am, no way you can have this." In a post about halfway down this page, Latinopan points out the difference between modern fashion photography and old-school 1960s Playboy photography but compare:







See?

A supreme irony: National Geographic, the magazine about nature and prized for its candid photography of natural subjects in high definition, portraying something that is completely unnatural in every way.

This is a specifically sexualised image in order to bring on controversy. The only difference is that now they are sexualising a possibly mentally ill boy. The part that would be amusing if it wasn't so disturbing is that this is the sort of thing the women running National Geographic think men find sexy...which is basically because they've been brought up on homosexual men determining for them what is sexy. They think the only way to highlight the fact it's a boy posing as a girl is to make him pose like a porn star ... asserting the supposedly natural by what is a highly unnatural, does-not-conform-with-any-biological-reality shot. But at the end of the day, the shot was composed with these elements to make you look at it and remember, i.e. to sell magazines. They didn't give a shit about the kid or about showing the truth of him; they posed him like this to cause you revulsion and to give them free publicity.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #56

It's amazing how mainstream they try to make the freaks look. Of course, we know otherwise. Just look at the protesters showing up at Trump rallies, they're lucky to get a few dozen people - and they have to pay them to show up. And Trump never would have won in the first place if freaks were the new normal.

Anyone see this John Cena "patriotism" ad? Sickening to see even the WWE pander to the fag crowd.

Watch at 1:45

Post: #57

How trans activists are unethically influencing autistic children to change genders

Quote:Has the transgender movement gone too far?

It began, commendably, as activism for the rights of that very small number of people who experience persisting discomfort with their biological gender. But it has evolved into an ideological movement to normalize the practice of changing genders — and in the process is crossing ethical lines with a particularly vulnerable subset of young people struggling with issues of gender identity.

A recent article by Elise Ehrhard in Crisis Magazine, a Catholic periodical, addresses the aggressive approach by adult trans activists in recruiting adolescents with Asperger’s Syndrome or other types of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) to their cause.

Ehrhard has Asperger’s. As is typical among Asperger’s girls in their adolescence, she preferred the company of boys, with whom she identified cerebrally, a tendency encouraged by the bullying she experienced from other girls.

Ehrhard is not transgender — she doesn’t see herself as a male — but, citing a social media campaign featuring the hashtag #AutisticTransPride, she can see why Asperger’s and other ASD adolescents nowadays come to believe they are. This disturbs her. Adolescents struggling to deal with their quirky cerebral wiring do not need to be told they are “a girl trapped in a boy’s body” or vice versa, she says. Nevertheless, Ehrhard notes, many parents are buying into this completely unscientific hypothesis.


As a child psychiatrist with experience in both ASD and gender discomfort, I share Ehrhard’s concern and can substantiate her claim. In her account I see a familiar story of a youth with ASD who feels socially isolated, and confused about sexual feelings as she moves into adolescence. As I well know, involvement in internet chat sites offers adolescents with ASD a sense of belonging, but also can lead to foreclosure of reflective thinking about their own feelings and situation.

Related
Are autistic children more likely to believe they’re transgender ? Controversial Toronto expert backs link
Over the last few years I have been asked to consult around three biologically female teens with no prior history of cross gender wishes. In adolescence, these three individuals became aware of homoerotic feelings, but were uncomfortable about them. After searching the internet to find others like themselves, they began to feel that the issue was not their sexual orientation, but that they were in fact “trans.”

In interviewing them, their history revealed prolonged and intense feelings of rejection and loneliness and a sense of “not fitting in” with their female peers. As with many girls and women with ASD, they pretended to conform socially, but failed to have close confiding relationships and had often felt bullied and rejected. Some were depressed by adolescence and often had suicidal thoughts, if not overt behaviours. Further assessment in all three cases led to my diagnosing these high-functioning individuals as having ASD.

Their parents felt confused at what appeared to them to be a sudden change in their daughters. Fearful of the risk for suicide, they struggled with their own responses. In two cases parents expressed anxiety over the speed with which the gender professionals involved accepted their teenagers’ self-diagnosis, demonstrated by recommendations for puberty blocking agents after a single visit. Their experiences align with accounts by parents of “trans” kids on the blog, 4thwavenow.com, described as “a community of parents and friends skeptical of the ‘transgender/child/teen’ trend.”

In my work with the Child and Adolescent Gender Identity Clinic at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), we regularly did a very thorough assessment with these teens to ensure that the path they seemed to be choosing had been thought through, sometimes a difficult task for ASD teens because of their difficulty with self-reflection and abstract thinking.

When a sex change seemed the only realistic option, we referred them to an endocrinologist for assessment regarding puberty blockers; if prescribed, we continued monitoring their progress to ensure their ongoing safety. (Even so, we had qualms, given a lack of evidence of long-term impact.)

However, we also felt strongly that irreversible medical intervention such as hormones and surgery should be postponed until we could be certain that the individuals were fully able to understand that there would be no going back. We were quite willing to accept that individuals might change their mind or wish to slow the process down. In short, we did what is considered best practice in the field of ASD and gender discomfort.

Activists would have the public believe that anyone who expresses a wish to be the other gender should be allowed and encouraged to do so. Credulous politicians have translated their demands into law. To date, however, there is no evidence that there is such a thing as a “true” trans, just as there is no marker that would identify a “false” trans. To accept the thinking and wishes of those with ASD at face value, without understanding why they feel the way they do, is not a kindness, and may in fact be extremely damaging.

http://news.nationalpost.com/full-commen...ge-genders

Post: #58

Susan Goldberg was on The Daily Show recently and (((Trevor Noah))) wasn't able to keep his tongue out of her asshole about this transgender issue.

http://www.cc.com/video-clips/dsf18x/the...-interview

This shit really made my blood boil but it's important to understand the fucked up nature of the degenerates we're dealing with here.

Post: #59

Susan Goldberg sounds like she is bordering on very sexually deviant tendencies. Only a sick fucking pervert thinks that it's "beautiful" of a nine-year-old boy to pose as a girl posing in a sexually innuendo way.

It wouldn't be surprising if Susan Goldberg thinks that 18-year-old chicks who strip for a living are "not able to consent until they are 100 years of age", but yet, nine-year-old boy posing like a girl for the magazine, & Susan is thrilled with that freaky biz.

Post: #60

(12-16-2016 09:08 PM)Kona Wrote:  I bought my nephew a subscription last year and the year before for Christmas. I was gonna do it again but I guess not. It looks like the tranny issue will be the last one he gets.

My grandpa bought them for me up until he died. I remember how awesome I thought this one was, and I still have it:


Aloha!

Its funny because Rupert Murdoch owns NatGeo now, and fired almost all of the people there when he took it over a few years ago. NatGeo dalready ied a few years back.