Post: #26

I was present at Bill Clinton's inauguration because I was working in DC at the time. It is interesting to see once if you can make it there.

Post: #27

This is will be savoring on inauguration day:

Post: #28

In my Australian city, they tried to get a million to march and protest Trump after the election, and 80 of them showed up. Hope you get the same "massive" crowd in DC!

Post: #29

The DC police will be ready. They're basically federalizing the forces of law and order for the inauguration. If any black bandana-wearing anarchists try to "shut down" the inauguration, they're going to get smashed.

Post: #30

The Left's obsession with identity politics is already causing their Woman's March to break down

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opini...story.html

Quote:It's almost impossible to throw a good old-fashioned protest march these days. Sure, it might seem simple: choose a cause, set up a website, and get a bunch of moderately vexed, rightly concerned, permanently enraged or even slightly bored people together in the same place at the same time. Add a few random signs that have absolutely nothing to do with the topic you're marching about — or, even better, a copy of that sign that says "NOT USUALLY A SIGN GUY, BUT GEEZ" — and in most cases, you're golden.

However, it is not that easy. Just ask the organizers of the Women's March on Washington, a much-hyped, celebrity-laden event scheduled for Jan. 21 in the District of Columbia. The march — organizers are careful to call it a "rally" and not a "protest" — was originally cooked up to coincide with the inauguration of Donald Trump as president. Thanks to obsessive left-wing identity politics, it has morphed into yet another exhausting episode of "Which college-educated woman who resides in the richest country on Earth and who was also just profiled in a glowing Vogue magazine puff piece is the most oppressed person in the room?"

The feminist infighting, sometimes fierce, has begun. "If all goes as planned, the Jan. 21 march will be a momentous display of unity in protest of a president whose treatment of women came to dominate the campaign's final weeks," The New York Times reports. "But long before the first buses roll to Washington and sister demonstrations take place in other cities, contentious conversations about race have erupted nearly every day among marchers, exhilarating some and alienating others."

In other words, even though some 176,000 people have pledged to attend — that's according to the event's Facebook page — and celebrities like Scarlett Johansson, Katy Perry, Padma Lakshmi and Cher have joined the fray, the march might just manage to self-destruct from within.

The culprit: "intersectionality," a brand of feminism that's all the rage on college campuses. It's also a brand of feminism that "asks white women," as The New York Times notes, "to acknowledge that they have had it easier." There are many different types of oppression, intersectional feminism teaches — based on race, class, sexual identity and more — that layer upon each other. In the world of intersectionality, victimhood is sorted by category, tallied and ultimately ranked.

"When it comes to the upcoming march, it is important to all of us that the white women who are engaged in the effort understand their privilege," wrote Bob Bland, a New York fashion designer who helped launch the idea for the march on Facebook. Bland, along with the march's other original co-founder, is white — but "that's not OK right now," one rally organizer told Vogue, "especially after 53 percent of white women voted for Donald Trump."

After a bit of reflection — and some minor bouts of freaking out — the Women's March on Washington now boasts a diverse coalition of leaders, fights back against "cultural appropriation," and praises the latest iteration of intersectional feminism on its website, Facebook page and beyond. The movement practices "empathy with the intent to learn about the intersecting identities of each other." It supports "the advocacy and resistance movements that reflect our multiple and intersecting identities." This all sounds nice, I suppose, albeit rather vague. It also hasn't stopped the bickering.

"The sense of betrayal white women have expressed in the postelection season is at best disingenuous, since we cannot say enough about the ways they turned out at the polls," LeRhonda S. Manigault-Bryant, a Williams College professor who refuses to join the march, wrote in The New York Times. When it comes to asking so-called allies to rank themselves on the privilege scale — rather than bonding together to, I don't know, actually fight against specific policies — "sometimes you are going to upset people," shrugs Linda Sarsour, one of the march's updated slate of four co-chairwomen.

In the end, the ultimate aims of the march remain rather mysterious, if you're the type who expects words to have meaning and events to have actual goals.

"The rhetoric of the past election cycle has insulted, demonized and threatened many of us," the leaders of the march declare on their official Facebook page. To be fair, this is certainly true. The 2016 election was a flaming hot mess, on both sides, and many Americans still can't believe it actually happened. "We are confronted with the question of how to move forward," the group continues, "in the face of national and international concern and fear."

Apparently, at this point, the way forward involves a cavalcade of left-wing causes — abortion, as usual, is taking top billing — buckets of vague platitudes, lots of hectoring and endless, obsessive, identity-based infighting. Sounds like a prescription for victory!

Just kidding. By now it's a cliche, and we can all almost say it in our sleep: It sounds like one of the reasons why we got Donald Trump.

Post: #31

Post: #32

It would be pretty funny if Trump ended up having to send in the National Guard to keep the feminists from killing each other.

Post: #33

It really just proves that over the course of thousands of years of history women are really inept and organizing and leading on a large scale.

Post: #34

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-13...ly-unusual

D.C. National Guard Chief Fired Days Before Trump Inauguration: "The Timing Is Extremely Unusual"

"It doesn’t make sense to can the general in the middle of an active deployment," rages D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson (D) after Maj. Gen. Errol R. Schwartz, who heads the D.C. National Guard and is an integral part of overseeing the inauguration, has been ordered removed from command effective Jan. 20, 12:01 p.m., just as Donald Trump is sworn in as president.

Unlike in states, where the governor appoints the National Guard commander, in the District that duty falls to the president.

Schwartz said that he has not been told why he was asked to step down. “I’m a soldier,” he said, noting that he was following orders and has no regrets. “I’m a presidential appointee, therefore the president has the power to remove me.”

Is this just another part of Obama's "smooth" transition? Or is something even more sinister at work here, since we already know that anti-Trump activists are planning "the biggest protest in US history" on the day of the inauguration?

More at the link.



This fucking traitor Obama is trying to destroy the national guard command structure and facilitate a riot on his way out the door. 7 days to go men, stay frosty.

Post: #35

It's not clear to me that Obama ordered this. Obama stops being president on 12 noon, Jan 20. So doesn't this mean Trump did this?

Post: #36

(01-13-2017 04:31 PM)Menace Wrote:  It's not clear to me that Obama ordered this. Obama stops being president on 12 noon, Jan 20. So doesn't this mean Trump did this?

What power does Trump have to do such a thing? He's not President yet.

Post: #37

(01-13-2017 04:34 PM)Space Cowboy Wrote:  

(01-13-2017 04:31 PM)Menace Wrote:  It's not clear to me that Obama ordered this. Obama stops being president on 12 noon, Jan 20. So doesn't this mean Trump did this?

What power does Trump have to do such a thing? He's not President yet.

This was done by Trump's team. They notified him that at the first second Trump takes power that his services will no longer be needed.

That is not uncommon. ALL of the letters of resignation that are going to be accepted begin at that time.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/pub...story.html

Post: #38

(01-13-2017 05:04 PM)trian1 Wrote:  

(01-13-2017 04:34 PM)Space Cowboy Wrote:  

(01-13-2017 04:31 PM)Menace Wrote:  It's not clear to me that Obama ordered this. Obama stops being president on 12 noon, Jan 20. So doesn't this mean Trump did this?

What power does Trump have to do such a thing? He's not President yet.

This was done by Trump's team. They notified him that at the first second Trump takes power that his services will no longer be needed.

That is not uncommon. ALL of the letters of resignation that are going to be accepted begin at that time.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/pub...story.html

So when is his last day of work?

Seems sketchy to not have a plan in place when, starting Monday, Anti Trump movements are slated to hit DC.

Post: #39

(01-06-2017 07:56 PM)StrikeBack Wrote:  In my Australian city, they tried to get a million to march and protest Trump after the election, and 80 of them showed up. Hope you get the same "massive" crowd in DC!

Is more easy to click on a Facebook event page than getting out your house and really doing something.

Post: #40

We have a good crew here in Vancouver.

I rented a suite with a terrace for the night. The terrace is important, as I want to be sure to have a view of the likely protesters. Antifa and Free Speech (university associations) had a big row when antifa crashed their Christmas party and Soldiers of Odin showed up, and Soldiers of Oden retaliated and wrecked Antifa's headquarters.

Being Vancouver, I am not expecting much, but who knows. I watched Antifa hand out gas masks, crow bars and light a couple police cars on fire using some sort of white hot accelerator. They really just want to see shit get out of control, and as we all know, anything against Trump is condoned by current liberal power structures that run our city.

Either way, I get to enjoy the night from a nice room up in the air. Probably just watch it on TV in the room then hit Drais.

Post: #41

(01-14-2017 11:53 AM)Laner Wrote:  We have a good crew here in Vancouver.

I rented a suite with a terrace for the night. The terrace is important, as I want to be sure to have a view of the likely protesters. Antifa and Free Speech (university associations) had a big row when antifa crashed their Christmas party and Soldiers of Odin showed up, and Soldiers of Oden retaliated and wrecked Antifa's headquarters.

Being Vancouver, I am not expecting much, but who knows. I watched Antifa hand out gas masks, crow bars and light a couple police cars on fire using some sort of white hot accelerator. They really just want to see shit get out of control, and as we all know, anything against Trump is condoned by current liberal power structures that run our city.

Either way, I get to enjoy the night from a nice room up in the air. Probably just watch it on TV in the room then hit Drais.

Holy shit, Soldiers of Odin has a Canada chapter? Time to look for the American one....

Post: #42

(01-14-2017 02:33 AM)Latinopan Wrote:  

(01-06-2017 07:56 PM)StrikeBack Wrote:  In my Australian city, they tried to get a million to march and protest Trump after the election, and 80 of them showed up. Hope you get the same "massive" crowd in DC!

Is more easy to click on a Facebook event page than getting out your house and really doing something.

Did they put a "flag" image on their FB page?

I'm helping!

Post: #43

Judicial Watch Report Says This Attack Linked To Inauguration

On Thursday Judicial Watch released a report stating that the attack that recently happened in Mexico where a U.S. Consular was shot as he drove in his car is linked to the ISIS-Cartel groups terrorist attack plan for Trump’s Inauguration.

From Judicial Watch:

Quote: A deadly shootout at the construction site of the new American Consulate occurred this week in a Mexican border town where Islamic terrorists and drug cartels plan to launch attacks against the U.S. during the period surrounding the presidential inauguration, high-level government sources tell Judicial Watch. An unknown number of gunmen fired multiple rounds adjacent to the new U.S. Consulate compound in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, a crime-infested city in the state of Tamaulipas that lies directly across from Laredo, Texas.

The Mexican military responded to the attack, law enforcement sources on both sides of the border confirm insisting that their identities be kept confidential for security reasons, and at least three soldiers were either killed or critically wounded in the ambush. A local newspaper in Tamaulipas reported that 13 people died during a shootout in Nuevo Laredo, referring to the deceased as heavily armed “delinquents” with an arsenal that includes 12 automatic weapons, a rocket launcher, grenade, loads of ammunition and drugs in three vehicles, one of them armored. The deceased have not been identified and Mexican authorities will continue to investigate, the article states, attributing the information to a press release issued by Mexico’s Defense Secretary.

Judicial Watch’s law enforcement and intelligence sources say the barrage outside what’s soon to be the new U.S. Consulate is connected to a broad operation between Islamic terrorists and Mexican drug cartels to send President-elect Donald Trump a message by engaging in attacks at border ports. “Cartels usually don’t work with jihadists for fear of having the border shut down,” a veteran federal law enforcement official told Judicial Watch. “But Trump is causing so much disruption in Mexico that they are partnering to send a message as to who is in control. This is as outrageous as a small group of guys crashing planes into U.S. buildings.” Another official who has worked in the region for years said “Trump is causing a huge amount of fear in Mexico throughout all sectors; private, government, business, criminal, police….”

Nuevo Laredo is among the border towns that the terrorists and narcotraffickers plan to launch attacks in, according to intelligence gathered by law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and Mexico…

…Just last week Judicial Watch reported that a Jihadi-cartel alliance in the Mexican state of Nuevo León is collaborating to carry out attacks in American cities and ports of entry along the southern border. Confidential U.S. and Mexican law enforcement sources said that, as part of the plan, militant Islamists have arrived recently at the Monterrey International Airport situated in Apodaca, Nuevo León, about 130 miles south of the Texas border. An internal Mexican law enforcement report obtained by Judicial Watch confirms that Islamic terrorists have “people along the border, principally in Tijuana, Chihuahua, Coahuila, Nuevo León and Tamaulipas.” Cartel informants tell law enforcement contacts that “they are only waiting for the order and the times to carry out a simultaneous attack in the different ports of entry or cities of the United States of America.”

-------------------------

I remember on this same forum early 2016 members were speculation about ISIS and the Cartel working together and if Trump won they could start some sort of coordinate attack.

There has been many reports of Islamic Terrorists training with he Cartel in the jungle.

Post: #44

Bring it, sweeties.

Ut Veniant Omnes

Post: #45

That would be something incredible in the unpleasant sense of the word.

The old-media will have a hell of a time whitewashing that, though they will no doubt try their best.

Those idiots and zealots south of the border don't realise that they will be handing President Trump total and absolute power. If these attacks go ahead then there will be no sympathy for muslims and illegals whatsoever. Anyone siding with them after that will be screamed into a corner and beaten with sticks. America will consolidate utterly around *gasp* Americanism.

You'd almost think the entire thing was a psyop if it weren't for the fact that the major intelligence players all hate Trump with a passion.

Post: #46

(01-13-2017 05:04 PM)trian1 Wrote:  

(01-13-2017 04:34 PM)Space Cowboy Wrote:  

(01-13-2017 04:31 PM)Menace Wrote:  It's not clear to me that Obama ordered this. Obama stops being president on 12 noon, Jan 20. So doesn't this mean Trump did this?

What power does Trump have to do such a thing? He's not President yet.

This was done by Trump's team. They notified him that at the first second Trump takes power that his services will no longer be needed.

That is not uncommon. ALL of the letters of resignation that are going to be accepted begin at that time.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/pub...story.html

According to Breitbart, the Trump transition team offered to let MG Schwartz keep his position through the full inauguration day, but the general refused and said he would step down at noon. Then he ran off to WaPo with his bullshit story.

If true, the general is a faggot.

Source: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/...d-general/

Post: #47

Big week ahead.



Our God Emperor, The Frog Prince ascends to the throne & gets on with getting shit done.



Got my MAGA hats (red AND camo - thanks wi30!) ready & projecting all the "love & light" I can for our brothers at Ground Zero.



I propose "100 Days Of Donald Trump GIFS" challenge on RVF for the first 100 days of his presidency.

Show your support for the man who triumphed against all odds with all your GIFS for the first 100 days. It will be a great way to gather triggering GIFS to spread for the next 8 years!

Post: #48

I should make some sort of usergroup sending out email blasts to liberal mailing lists and telling them to contribute 5, 10 or 50 dollars to an anti Trump event and then just keep their money. Or a gofundme. Might as well milk these limosine liberals for all they are worth.

Post: #49

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-16...protesters

'Bikers For Trump' Vow To Form A "Wall Of Meat" To Protect Inauguration From Protesters

In 2001, disaffected, Gore-supporting snowflakes shut down various parts of the Bush inauguration after increasingly violent crowds pelted his motorcade with eggs during his procession down Pennsylvania Avenue. And while many have predicted a similar fate for the Trump administration this Friday with protesters already descending upon D.C. amid vows to "paralyze the city", Trump has one advantage that Bush did not, namely 5,000 "Bikers for Trump" who have said they will form a "wall of meat" to guard against any protesters looking to disrupt the festivities.

Chris Cox, the founder of the pro-Trump group, has said that roughly 5,000 of the club's 200,000 members will ride to Washington, D.C., and attend President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration on Friday. Appearing on Fox Friends, Cox said that attendees will be prepared to "form a wall of meat" and go "toe-to-toe with anyone that is going to break through any police barriers."

"The bikers are certainly used to being outnumbered and we are prepared to form a wall of meat. We're anticipating a celebration here. We don't anticipate any problems. We have a strict code of conduct where we don't condone violence. But again in the event that we're needed, you can certainly count on the Bikers for Trump."

"We'll be shoulder-to-shoulder with our brothers and we'll be toe-to-toe with anyone that is going to break through any police barriers, that's going to be assaulting women, spitting on them, throwing things at them. We are anticipating a peaceful transition of power."

"The backbone of the biker community is the veteran. So these are guys that aren't really used to backing down. You certainly won't see bikers out there screaming, calling for destruction of private property or the death of police officers.

Post: #50

One of my buddies is a bus driver; he is driving about 50 state troopers to DC this week as part of the crew set to defend the parade route. I can't get off of work to go with unfortunately.

They should make election and inauguration day both national holidays in my opinion.