Post: #76

If you guys won't study genetics (personally I think everyone should, but that's because I was good at it), atleast read "Sperm Wars" by Robin Baker. It will give you an entertaining run down of what Atlanta Man was trying to say.

Post: #77

(12-04-2016 08:56 PM)Kona Wrote:  I hear her mother-in-law hit a wall pretty early.



Aloha!

Jesus dude

^ regarding OGnorcal, dude is straight tweaking..
Disagreeing with someone has always been fine on this forum, but straight up insulting out of nowhere is a serious sign of manopause.
.

Post: #78

As a general rule, asking to be banned is something you shouldn't do if you don't want to be banned...

It was obvious he was unhappy with the general direction the forum has taken, which is fine, it's his opinion and he's free to it, and thus didn't want to be part of the community here any longer. I didn't know him, but it's always a shame to see someone well respected leave. Still, I understand the reasoning behind it. I mean, if you're literally begging for it, don't be surprised when it happens....

Post: #79

(12-04-2016 08:56 PM)Kona Wrote:  

(12-04-2016 07:24 PM)RoastBeefCurtains4Me Wrote:  

Kate is 34 now. She doesn't look like that picture anymore.

I hear her mother-in-law hit a wall pretty early.



Aloha!

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #80

Kona is the MVP of this thread followed (closely) by Atlanta man.

Post: #81

Damn, of all the things to get OG the meltdown and ban. A Prince Harry thread. Shit like this you never see coming

Post: #82

(12-05-2016 02:16 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Damn, of all the things to get OG the meltdown and ban. A Prince Harry thread. Shit like this you never see coming

Well, neither did Princess Diana.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #83

Its true that Prince Harry could have almost any women and no doubt he has had many.
He must like her.

Post: #84

I just Googled "Prince Harry's girlfriends". Looks like he mostly dated blondes.
I fully expect the Ginger Prince to go out and make White Babies.

Post: #85

Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.

Post: #86

Being the son of arch-cad James Hewitt you would expect Harry to have string of conquests.

Post: #87

This is a real ugly thread.

On a typical game forum, a senior member would drop a speculative elite social circle game datasheet.

On here, we'd rather discuss superior racial purity.

So it's okay to bash women at all costs, then get offended when people criticise our community?

Post: #88

Well, this thread reminded me how much I hate politics.

Every time you talk about politics with someone nothing good comes out of it.

Either the person has similar or pre-conceived ideas as you and you end up reinforcing them or is in the opposite camp and the discussion will get heated no matter what you say.

If you grew up in the West all your life and you have been laid off by your firm and you learned that they hired an immigrant chances are high that you will be all against immigration, if you're a refugee who escaped war 10 years ago. You will be all for it.

Every person sees the world with his own eyes and the context they lived in influences them.

With that being said, I will stay away from politics and will contribute as much as I can to improvement, travel and game threads which are the reason that brought me here in the first place.

Post: #89

I didn't really care much for Meghan Markle or the prince. Yet, the thread delivered. Rants on race happen in the darndest of threads man.

Post: #90

Even though this became a crazy race thread about a redhead banging a mixed girl and how the genetics of the kids would be, there is only one question that is important.

Wyb?

If you say no you are full of shit. It still kills me that a forum that is founded on banging chicks around the world cares about shit like this.

Post: #91

(12-05-2016 02:16 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Damn, of all the things to get OG the meltdown and ban. A Prince Harry thread. Shit like this you never see coming

Was OG an IRT? Or a Muzzie? He was always whining about white people and not "being accepted."

(12-05-2015 02:09 PM)OGNorCal707 Wrote:  Ah Donald Trump, the white man's savior! Does he accept mixed race people as well?

(12-04-2015 02:12 PM)OGNorCal707 Wrote:  For all you Islam and Muslim haters what's the solution? Should we round them up and put them in internment camps like we did to the Japanese in WWII? Also when the next mass shooter turns out to be a white guy, who are you going to point the finger at and blame?

He was also triggered by Samseau.

(02-16-2016 01:38 PM)OGNorCal707 Wrote:  Samseau you're officially going on my ignore list, I don't want to bother engaging with someone who has clear psychological issues, good luck with your impending race wars, when Donald Trump loses I'm sure you'll be on the front lines with your white supremacist buddies, hope that works out well for you!

Post: #92

I've thought Meghan has been a cutie since I started watching Suits (the show), but I always found her to be missing something worthy of any long term potential. Of course this is all without knowing actual person. She's just a bit too flat-chested / flat-assed for me.

Exhibit A:




Pretty face and a WB though, no doubt.

Post: #93

(12-05-2016 09:20 AM)Dusty Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 02:16 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Damn, of all the things to get OG the meltdown and ban. A Prince Harry thread. Shit like this you never see coming

Was OG an IRT? Or a Muzzie? He was always whining about white people and not "being accepted."

You do realize we have a few respectable "Muzzie" members on here right ?

Lothario is one for example.

OG asked for it, he got banned.

What he stated wasn't wrong about the forum, to me he was nostalgic and was missing how it was all about game back then. Then Trump happened, which changed the forum immensely and brought in a new type of members.


You have to adapt, politics plays a yuge part of this forum now and it bleeds into the game forum, that's just how it is.

It's still pretty funny that this thread turned out the way it did.

As for IRT's, automatic bans !

Post: #94

I have to add that I very much agree with Roosh on this one rather strongly disagree with Atlanta man. I agree there are advantages and disadvantages either way however I do feel that the narrative is strongly biased towards mixed-breeding.

I don't agree that the expression of recessive diseases is a problem, as it rather is a mechanism to "weed out" the bad genes. Let us take an example. Below we have four individuals, two from each group, with the two from one group carrying a recessive disorder (01, 1 being the problem variant)

Inbreeding
01 01 | 00 00
00 01 10 11 | 00 00 00 00 = 2 carriers, 1 "weeded out", 5 non-carriers

Outbreeding
01 00 | 00 01
00 01 10 00 | 00 10 10 00 = 4 carriers, 0 weeded out, 4 non-carriers

It be seen that inbreeding produces a healthier subsequent population than out-breeding. 2 carriers vs 4 carriers and 5 non-carriers vs 4 non-carriers.

OUtbreeding has the effect of 'hiding' the problem variant and allowing it to spread through the population. Inbreeding however, exposes the problem variant and pushes it into lines that will not reproduce (1,1), thereby eliminating a certain amount of bad genetic material, and 'purefying' the remainder. Outbreeding simply kicks the can down the road.

Everyone is aware of the term hybrid-vigor, yet funnily enough very few people would be aware of the following.

Mixed race people (atleast in the UK) suffer greater overall health problems

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/

"Objectives. This study compared the health and risk status of adolescents who identify with 1 race with those identifying with more than 1 race."

"Conclusions. Adolescents who self-identify as more than 1 race are at higher health and behavior risks. The findings are compatible with interpreting the elevated risk of mixed race as associated with stress."

The researchers attribute the poor results of the mixed-race people to "identity issues" yet this does not make a lot of sense given mixed-race children in the UK are rarely persecuted and well represented and accepted into society, for instance Craig David, Jessica Ennis, David Haye, Rio Ferdinand to name a few prominent mixed-race celebrities.

A US study with similar results

http://www.unc.edu/news/archives/oct03/u...02003.html

"A new study that involved surveying 90,000 adolescent U.S. students showed that those who considered themselves to be of mixed race were more likely than others to suffer from depression, substance abuse, sleep problems and various aches and pains."

Post: #95

Why are < 250 post noobs, and in the case of the above, SINGLE POST NOOBS not being chastised for commenting on race?

Post: #96

(12-05-2016 03:15 PM)Rhyme or Reason Wrote:  Why are < 250 post noobs, and in the case of the above, SINGLE POST NOOBS not being chastised for commenting on race?

Did you report them? If not, there's no guarantee the mod team will see it. And when we do act, we don't typically announce suspensions.

Post: #97

Look, I think Roosh probably DOES have a little something personal against OGNorCal707 (or at least someone whose been banned at some point), but as much as I hate to see long-time established members go (especially who have provided some good ideas/info), the links Roosh provided show clearly how ridiculous OG has been in the past.

The snark on free speech is palpable. Note he's not offering any solutions or questioning a rule to see if it makes sense to change it, he's just whining:

Quote:For game, travel, and lifestyle the golden age was around 2010-2014, for right wing politics the golden age is right now, that's part of the reason why you don't see guys like Speakeasy, BasilRansom, Parlay44, Caligula, etc. posting on here. Shit half the guys on here probably don't even recognize or remember those names, I've been a member since 2009 so I've seen the changes first hand. I'm not trying to complain, it is what it is, it's Roosh's forum, always was and always will be. I will say that it's too bad that so many guys got the ban hammer, or willingly decided to put themselves into "exile".

Considering Roosh is all about free speech, it's kind of interesting that he's alienated so many guys who disagree with the mainstream thought on the board. I myself have received "warnings" when I spoke out on various threads. A lot of guys just got sick of it and decided to leave....

Gets all emotional when someone asks him to provide examples of non-banned members who say a race is superior:

Quote:Dude I have a brain, I'm sorry but all this I back up my arguments with facts is a load of shit. There's lots of white supremacist rhetoric constantly being spouted on this forum, I'd have more respect for guys if they just outright admitted it instead of trying to mask it with veiled pseudo-intellectual bullshit. Then again maybe some of you guys are so confused that you are in denial of it in the first place.

Anger, hatred, negativity, and xenophobia are really toxic to one's mental, spiritual, and emotional health.

Feel free to call me a libtard, SJW, or whatever buzzwords are convenient to levy at those you disagree with.

Rambling about the forum changing and wanting to have RvF be a safe space for game and travel talk only (it still has one of if not the strongest game/game-related travel on the internet). Again complaining about his warning level being upped despite conveniently leaving out why it did not violate the forum rules (hint: it probably violated the rules):

Quote:Yeah it's funny how I will agree with some guys on here 100% when it comes to women and game, but disagree 100% when it comes to their social and political views, such is life though I suppose.

When I first joined this forum over 5 years ago it was pretty much just about gaming women and traveling, now it seems like political/social commentary has taken over. There are some guys who post on every political thread who are high repped, but I can't recall ever once seeing them post on any of the other sub forums, (game, travel, lifestyle), etc.

I guess this is just a natural byproduct of Roosh's views, writing, outlooking, etc., since he seems to mostly be shifting his focus to the political, social, cultural arena. This is his forum with his namesake after all. Maybe I'm just nostalgic of the old days of RVF, but sometimes I wish that all the political, social, etc. discussion could be moved to a different site/forum all together, maybe ReturnofKings?

Any how after having my warning level go up for questioning the mainstream thought on here, I have basically decided to forgo participating in a lot of the political threads, and I have a feeling I'm not the only one.

To be thorough I looked at his most recent posts:

Equating the alt-right with white supremacy

Implies kaotic is an Uncle Tom (and then doesn't appear to ever address it despite responding further)

Hypocritically asking for "proof" from a poster when it comes to the topic of putting urine on your face (it's certainly disgusting sounding, but I'd put it at less disgusting than the topic of white supremacists and his unwillingness to substantiate his claims)

Anyone who thinks this place should be completely free speech is missing the forest for the trees.

Nearly any forum worth it's salt online has a solid rule-set and reasonable moderators. Without this, the forum would devolve into massive trolling, race-baiting, and all kinds of disrespectful chatter bringing the signal to noise ratio into unusable territory.

Free speech is for public discource/platforms, not for private platforms like this forum, but even that said I've seen a lot of room for dissenting opinions here given that they are well-researched/supported and stated well without violating the forum rules.

I see no indication that OGNorCal707 should not have been banned simply looking at the rule-set, his posts, and his apparent desire to have a meltdown/get banned. It's unfortunate when long-time members who have made significant contributions get banned, but all of the ones I've researched were for cause, not because of pettiness or personal reasons. Some of them may have had some component of personal reasons but they were not without cause by the rule-set. The rule-set here is fair and clear. Instead of being selfish and wanting certain sections of the forum or certain posters to not exist, it's simple to post in the sections you find relevant and can benefit from (or give back in) and stick to those. There's also the ignore feature which works very well.

Post: #98

(12-05-2016 03:15 PM)Rhyme or Reason Wrote:  Why are < 250 post noobs, and in the case of the above, SINGLE POST NOOBS not being chastised for commenting on race?

Thats barely a race post. The first half is a perfectly fine population genetics example that could apply to a plant or animal population. The second post was sharing articles about mixed race health without any derogatory slants.

Poster wasn't being derogatory in his post in any way or claiming that skin color X was superior or inferior. He did a good job of 'walking the line'

I'd like to be able to read posts about genetics (Atlanta Man has more human genetics knowledge to share I'm sure) without other forum members getting scared that people are plotting a race war or eugenics program.

Post: #99

This just goes to show you that being born into status doesn't guarantee genuine alphaness. Being a masculine man is about mindset first and foremost, not just pure status. What an embarrassment for the Royal Family. We need to get this guy a RVF account.

Post: #100

WNB Meghan Markle