Post: #51

(11-03-2016 04:40 PM)therightcoast Wrote:  Roosh,

...

I find it hard to see that your words and thoughts are true. Are you just another Milo that comes from a foreign land looking for attention and cash? How do we know you aren't backed by foreign actors?

You waited almost five years to troll? Impressive.

Post: #52

(11-03-2016 05:47 PM)El_Gostro Wrote:  

therightcoast Wrote:You have been in Russia and Eastern Europe for some time. You have been influence*d* by their culture. I have heard you say that you don't have much attachment to the US. I find it hard that one would be so motivated in politics with all we know about you.

The gig's up, my fellow rvf comrades! Our Potemkin alt-right Forum has been exposed!

(11-03-2016 06:10 PM)ElFlaco Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 04:40 PM)therightcoast Wrote:  Roosh,

...

I find it hard to see that your words and thoughts are true. Are you just another Milo that comes from a foreign land looking for attention and cash? How do we know you aren't backed by foreign actors?

You waited almost five years to troll? Impressive.

I'm not trolling.

Why is it so wrong to ask the question? I gave a lot of support for my skepticism. I can also see why he would be political as well, but I think it good to be very skeptical with people that parade political ideas. One can see false motives in Milo or Bill O Reilly very easily. The propaganda and false motives are very transparent. Perhaps, it is not so easy to see with Roosh since many people have his trust from other subjects. I know I have learned a lot from Roosh and this forum. If someone were to jump to the conclusion that I'm trolling, wouldn't it possible that many are propagandized without knowing.

Are you we having a dialog or is this just another echo chamber?

Post: #53

Latest periscope where I answered thread questions: https://www.periscope.tv/rooshv/1YqKDjADeVDJV

Post: #54

(11-03-2016 06:32 PM)therightcoast Wrote:  I'm not trolling.

Why is it so wrong to ask the question? I gave a lot of support for my skepticism. I can also see why he would be political as well, but I think it good to be very skeptical with people that parade political ideas. One can see false motives in Milo or Bill O Reilly very easily. The propaganda and false motives are very transparent. Perhaps, it is not so easy to see with Roosh

What's obvious to me is that people like Milo and Roosh and others are working their ass off at levels way above ordinary mortals. No one can keep up a charade for that long and with that level of intensity. If you see what they're doing day in and day out, the passion they bring, yet you can't see that they're true believers, then respectfully I would say that your radar is off.

Also, you're a troll because you have six posts here and you come out swinging. That's the usual troll profile.

No more troll feeding. Back to our regularly scheduled programming.

Post: #55

(11-03-2016 06:32 PM)therightcoast Wrote:  I'm not trolling.

Why is it so wrong to ask the question? I gave a lot of support for my skepticism. I can also see why he would be political as well, but I think it good to be very skeptical with people that parade political ideas. One can see false motives in Milo or Bill O Reilly very easily. The propaganda and false motives are very transparent. Perhaps, it is not so easy to see with Roosh

Man, the only time I've seen Roosh V's motives questioned like this was in that article by Laurie Penny - and even then she called him a 'true believer':

Quote:I turn to leave, and Roosh suggests that we should start some sort of “fake fight” on the internet, because that’s “part of the game”. “I’m good,” I say, genuinely confused. There is no way I could have a fake fight with this man. We have real, profound differences. I think he’s a dangerous manchild with an army of credulous misogynists at his disposal. I cannot fight him insincerely, and I don’t want to fight him in good faith because he has already had too much of my attention. What – truly – does this extravagantly bearded sociopath think he’s playing at?

The most widely accepted definition of a troll is a provocateur – someone who says outrageous, extreme or abusive things to elicit a reaction. For them, the reaction itself is the win. The key distinction is between the attention-hustlers – the pure troll howlers who play this grotesque game for its own sake and their own – and the true believers. Roosh is a true believer, and that puts him at a disadvantage.

Roosh means what he’s saying, but he’s still aware that he’s playing a game – the same game almost everyone in this crucible of A-list internet conmen is playing. It’s the game of turning raw rage into political currency, the unscrupulous whorebaggery of the troll gone pro. These are people who cashed in their limited principles to cheat at poker. Like Trump, they channel their own narcissism to give voice to the wordless, formless rage of the people neoliberalism left behind. Welcome to the scream room. There’s a cheese plate.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016...e-internet

Is that you Laurie?

Post: #56

What do you think game will look like in 5, 10 years? Game 3.0 as some are calling it.

In some threads, guys are claiming it'll be tinder tinder tinder.

In other threads, and in my real experience, less people are using tinder by the day.

Post: #57

Now that Trump has won, do you plan on doing the meetups again in the United States ?

Post: #58

Roosh, now with Donald Trump as president of U.S., he will make America Great again.

Do you consider returning to live in US ?

Post: #59

Do you think it can be beneficial for a man to temporarily put aside the pursuit of women in order to improve other areas of his life, or is it imperative to always approach regardless of your circumstances? If a man has multiple issues he is trying to resolve in his life, do you feel that it is best to tackle them one by one or at the same time?

Post: #60

Is their any chance you will start loading your periscopes on YouTube? It would be much more convenient for the average follower.

Post: #61

I'm going to lean away from doing Periscope and focus on Youtube. Periscope gives low access for non-live viewers.

Post: #62

You had some excellent periscope videos few months ago, I hope to rewatch them up on YouTube

Post: #63

If you can manage a full scene for youtube videos just start a periscope on the side. The live stream king Martin Shkreli has multiple platforms going at once.
I've seen some news anchors do this too.

Post: #64

Also there are no persistent comments for Periscope so it's hard to know how people have responded.

Post: #65

(11-30-2016 08:54 AM)Roosh Wrote:  I'm going to lean away from doing Periscope and focus on Youtube. Periscope gives low access for non-live viewers.

You'll get more views from Youtube. Everyone's familar with the platform. You can do a Youtube live broadcast too if you want something like periscope.

Also, a minor suggestion: live stream from your living room couch instead of your bedroom. Bedrooms are personal places.

Post: #66

If your doing live either you have a fixed schedule or announce your doing it and when with some antecipation for people to know.

Post: #67

(11-30-2016 02:35 PM)chakalaka Wrote:  If your doing live either you have a fixed schedule or announce your doing it and when with some antecipation for people to know.

I think about you like a Jon Steward of the right. Where you will propel others to stardom creating more right comedians show.

Post: #68

How's that book coming? Are you still on Pace to release it in early 2018? Any plans for a tour to promote it?

How do you feel about Trump so far?