Post: #126

(06-03-2017 11:39 AM)kosko Wrote:  

(06-03-2017 08:48 AM)Ethan Hunt Wrote:  

(06-03-2017 08:32 AM)Mentavious Wrote:  

(06-02-2017 09:16 PM)ColSpanker Wrote:  So light skinned. Aren't there some hot Indian women as dark as...Indian ink?

Agreed

Half these girls posted don't even look like Indian girls.

Yeah but Indians are Caucasian it is quite easy that the hottest Indians will end up looking far more European-Caucasian than Easter-Caucasian.

That is just your opinion.

Majority of Indian girls I see have tinted or brown skin. These bleached skin girls in this thread are exceptions and are not the norm.

How many of these tinted or full brown outside of the west are hot enough for this thread?

Very low amount, the hottest are mixed with European softer facial features. The ones is this thread all appeal to the European standard anyway. The caste system their favours lighter skin, the lighter skin people tend to have more money and therefore better access to beauty products.

The best looking darker skinned Indians girls all live in the west. Their skin tones equivalents very often don't have access to products to improve their beauty.

Most of the richer folk in India are going to have European ancestry as you can bet for sure during the colonial period the European rulers would have cherry picked the best of the best to have as mistresses, from time to time they were going to have children.

Not saying that there are no full Indian hotties, cause there's plenty in this thread but they do tend to have lighter skin and softer facial features (hence why look more European).

I'm sure there would be hell of a lot more hot Indian women if there were higher access to make up or adequate hygiene cleaning.

Post: #127

(06-03-2017 03:04 PM)LastKing Wrote:  They smell like curry their attitudes are shitty and they are hairy too. No thank you.

Let's add rude as hell, very disrespectful, and talk behind your back in Hindi. They can't even cook because I'm always smelling gasoline when I leave my place. I can't wait until I leave this neighborhood.

Post: #128

I know wrong thread but didn't want to bump something really old. What's the easiest way to get "east indian" flag in Canada (or USA I suppose although indian girls are not common where I am now) ...(same day bang, not dating), have never had much luck although it's not something I really went after... and I wouldn't usually be in town for more than a day or 2, typically speaking.

Post: #129

Post: #130

I think when people talk about Indians they tend to think about the dark skinned, lower-class Southern Indian.

The Brahmin Indians, from the north, are as Indians as it can be, but they are farrr removed from the usual stereotype. These are the highest caste, traditionally the old noble / priest class in India. They can have light skin like a Boston girl and very Caucasian feature, except for the beautiful Indian eyes. These girls can be very elegant and feminine, though they do have a princess complex.

Post: #131

(06-07-2017 01:29 PM)Dalaran1991 Wrote:  I think when people talk about Indians they tend to think about the dark skinned, lower-class Southern Indian.

The Brahmin Indians, from the north, are as Indians as it can be, but they are farrr removed from the usual stereotype. These are the highest caste, traditionally the old noble / priest class in India. They can have light skin like a Boston girl and very Caucasian feature, except for the beautiful Indian eyes. These girls can be very elegant and feminine, though they do have a princess complex.

I'm a Brahmin from the South. There is honestly just a lot more physical variety in Indians than most people realize. I'm 6'2, pretty dark, with pretty sharp/Caucasian features. My cousin is extremely light skinned and could pass for an Italian. She looks whiter than some of my other cousins, who are actually half-white themselves. I have other cousins who are medium-brown skinned with blue eyes. Then I have some uncles who look straight up Central African. This is all within one family, within a group of maybe thirty people. Unlike East Asians, who don't have as much physical diversity, Indians and Middle Easterners can exhibit a massive range of looks.

South Indians aren't lower class, South India is actually a lot more prosperous and developed than the north. North India simply has a lot more input from foreign races of people. Turks, Mongols, Afghans, Persians, Arabs, and others all invaded North India. South India was a lot more isolated genetically. Even the parts of it that were conquered by Muslims were not as heavily re-settled as the North. Afghans, Pakistanis, and certain populations in North India are more attractive because of their heavily mixed composition.

Another thing is that the only Indians who appear in the West are computer tech FOBs. Some will be attractive obviously, but the majority will be nerds who don't give a shit about their looks. If you imported the white population of every CS department in America to another country, they would probably also have a reputation for being unattractive or weird. It's the occupation rather than race that creates this issue. I have heard that UK Indians are a lot more attractive since they come from more diverse roots -- lots are blue collar with a more redpill masculine culture. I love my South Indian culture and roots, but I will be the first to admit that it is very passive and intellectual. Most Indians in America are either South Indians, Gujaratis (similar culture), or North Indians who come from a similar tech background.

Post: #132

(06-03-2017 03:23 PM)Ethan Hunt Wrote:  Very low amount, the hottest are mixed with European softer facial features. The ones is this thread all appeal to the European standard anyway. The caste system their favours lighter skin, the lighter skin people tend to have more money and therefore better access to beauty products.

This is incorrect. Large parts of Northern India (Kashmir, Ladakh, Haryana, Punjab), Pakistan (Azad Kashmir, Khyber Pakhtunwa), and Afghanistan are filled with people who look just like you describe. Actually, they look even whiter. The Kalasha people of Pakistan, for example, frequently have red or blonde hair, which no one in Mumbai or Delhi possesses. These people are some of the poorest and most benighted in the word. The regions I listed above are incredibly poor, Kashmir and Khyber Pakhtunwa are ridden with Islamic insurgencies. The whitest-looking people in India are actually some of the most unfortunate. Black Dravidians in South India are probably richer and better-educated on average, and their states aren't nearly as fucked up.

I will agree that light skin is seen as desirable on women. It doesn't matter as much for the men. If you watch a Bollywood movie you'll notice that a lot of the big actors like Shah Rukh Khan, Abhishek Bachhan, etc are pretty standard brown and would obviously seem Indian to an objective viewer. The women are a lot more likely to have blue/green eyes and incredibly light skin.

(06-03-2017 03:23 PM)Ethan Hunt Wrote:  Most of the richer folk in India are going to have European ancestry as you can bet for sure during the colonial period the European rulers would have cherry picked the best of the best to have as mistresses, from time to time they were going to have children.

Again, incorrect. The only Europeans who really mixed extensively with the natives were the Portuguese, who were entirely centered around Goa. I will agree that these women can certainly be attractive, but the majority of Indians have a minimum of European descent. The British generally kept to their own women after the 1800's. There is a population of mixed British and Indian Anglo-Indians, but their numbers are negligible and you're unlikely to find them in America. Plenty of these people basically just look Indian anyway. Comedian Russell Peters is Anglo-Indian and I wouldn't be able to guess British descent by looking at him.

What a lot of Indians WILL have is descent from Muslim invaders. Arabs, Persians, Afghans, Turkic peoples. These people were far more numerous in India than Europeans ever were. They have been in India for over a thousand years. And India's large Muslim population would imply that a lot of them fucked the native Hindus after forcibly converting them to Islam. This explains the lighter/more Caucasian features of these hotter Indian girls. It's because they have Middle Eastern ancestry. This is also why Afghans, Pakistanis, and some North Indians basically look like an intermediate between your typical Black Dravidian and a light-skinned Persian. Islamic imperialism was a lot more impactful on India than European imperialism ever was.

(06-03-2017 03:23 PM)Ethan Hunt Wrote:  Not saying that there are no full Indian hotties, cause there's plenty in this thread but they do tend to have lighter skin and softer facial features (hence why look more European).

I'm sure there would be hell of a lot more hot Indian women if there were higher access to make up or adequate hygiene cleaning.

Agreed completely on the last bit. Indian women are actually becoming hotter, I'm noticing way more hot Indian girls as the girls of my generation reach adulthood in the West. Indian girls seeming unattractive is largely because of diet and not giving a fuck about their appearance. Once more of them get in the gym, dress better, learn how to apply makeup (basically improve their SMV) you'll notice a ton more hot Indian girls. This has already happened in places like Dubai, Chicago, parts of the U.K, where Indian women are seen as being just as desirable as anyone else. It will happen in other places once the FOBs get their shit together physically. Indian women are not inherently any more or less attractive, the culture just hasn't caught up to the West (and large parts of the East) in terms of grooming or appearance.

Post: #133

(06-07-2017 07:14 PM)Agastya Wrote:  This is incorrect. Large parts of Northern India (Kashmir, Ladakh, Haryana, Punjab), Pakistan (Azad Kashmir, Khyber Pakhtunwa), and Afghanistan are filled with people who look just like you describe. Actually, they look even whiter. The Kalasha people of Pakistan, for example, frequently have red or blonde hair, which no one in Mumbai or Delhi possesses. These people are some of the poorest and most benighted in the word. The regions I listed above are incredibly poor, Kashmir and Khyber Pakhtunwa are ridden with Islamic insurgencies. The whitest-looking people in India are actually some of the most unfortunate. Black Dravidians in South India are probably richer and better-educated on average, and their states aren't nearly as fucked up.

It pisses me off when I hear somebody says a light skinned Indian doesn't look Indian. The prevailing Indian stereotype for the western world is short dark nerdy guys like Aziz Ansari. I don't relate to any these nerdy short dark skinned vegetarian faggots popping up in western media.

I'm Punjabi and a lot of my family is light skinned. A lot of Punjabis look Persian. I've worked with Persians who I assumed were Indian until I found out they were Persian. It's not rare for a Punjabi to have blue or green eyes, pale skin and light brown hair.

I'm 5'10", all of my brothers are 6ft plus with the tallest being 6'3". I grew up across the road from a Sikh guy who is 6'6".

I agree, It's not true at all about higher castes being lighters skinned; A lot of low caste Punjabis are pale skinned.

There's a saying that North Indians got the looks, South Indians got the brains.

(06-07-2017 07:14 PM)Agastya Wrote:  What a lot of Indians WILL have is descent from Muslim invaders. Arabs, Persians, Afghans, Turkic peoples. These people were far more numerous in India than Europeans ever were. They have been in India for over a thousand years. And India's large Muslim population would imply that a lot of them fucked the native Hindus after forcibly converting them to Islam. This explains the lighter/more Caucasian features of these hotter Indian girls. It's because they have Middle Eastern ancestry. This is also why Afghans, Pakistanis, and some North Indians basically look like an intermediate between your typical Black Dravidian and a light-skinned Persian. Islamic imperialism was a lot more impactful on India than European imperialism ever was.

I did a DNA test a few years ago and I'm about 40% Indian according to GEDMatch. The rest is mostly Persian/Arab, then Central Asia, with a small amount of European and some from Mongolia. The European is probably from the Ancient Greeks. The Persian/Arab must be because there was a lot rape from Muslim invaders back in the day.

(06-07-2017 07:14 PM)Agastya Wrote:  Agreed completely on the last bit. Indian women are actually becoming hotter, I'm noticing way more hot Indian girls as the girls of my generation reach adulthood in the West. Indian girls seeming unattractive is largely because of diet and not giving a fuck about their appearance. Once more of them get in the gym, dress better, learn how to apply makeup (basically improve their SMV) you'll notice a ton more hot Indian girls. This has already happened in places like Dubai, Chicago, parts of the U.K, where Indian women are seen as being just as desirable as anyone else. It will happen in other places once the FOBs get their shit together physically. Indian women are not inherently any more or less attractive, the culture just hasn't caught up to the West (and large parts of the East) in terms of grooming or appearance.

If you give Indian girls good food and raise them so that they take care of their appearance them some of them can turn out very hot. I remember seeing college girls in Punjab, and and some of them were very pretty, even though their hair was tied back and they wore no make up. These girls were village girls and raised to dress modestly. How hot would they be if they tried to look sexy?

The quality of Indians girls in the US is on average terrible, I've heard a couple of non-Indians say to me with a straight face that Indian women are ugly.

Post: #134

Tasmin Lucia-Khan - UK newsreader of Bengali descent

Post: #135

(06-07-2017 07:14 PM)Agastya Wrote:  

(06-03-2017 03:23 PM)Ethan Hunt Wrote:  Very low amount, the hottest are mixed with European softer facial features. The ones is this thread all appeal to the European standard anyway. The caste system their favours lighter skin, the lighter skin people tend to have more money and therefore better access to beauty products.

This is incorrect. Large parts of Northern India (Kashmir, Ladakh, Haryana, Punjab), Pakistan (Azad Kashmir, Khyber Pakhtunwa), and Afghanistan are filled with people who look just like you describe. Actually, they look even whiter. The Kalasha people of Pakistan, for example, frequently have red or blonde hair, which no one in Mumbai or Delhi possesses. These people are some of the poorest and most benighted in the word. The regions I listed above are incredibly poor, Kashmir and Khyber Pakhtunwa are ridden with Islamic insurgencies. The whitest-looking people in India are actually some of the most unfortunate. Black Dravidians in South India are probably richer and better-educated on average, and their states aren't nearly as fucked up.

I will agree that light skin is seen as desirable on women. It doesn't matter as much for the men. If you watch a Bollywood movie you'll notice that a lot of the big actors like Shah Rukh Khan, Abhishek Bachhan, etc are pretty standard brown and would obviously seem Indian to an objective viewer. The women are a lot more likely to have blue/green eyes and incredibly light skin.

(06-03-2017 03:23 PM)Ethan Hunt Wrote:  Most of the richer folk in India are going to have European ancestry as you can bet for sure during the colonial period the European rulers would have cherry picked the best of the best to have as mistresses, from time to time they were going to have children.

Again, incorrect. The only Europeans who really mixed extensively with the natives were the Portuguese, who were entirely centered around Goa. I will agree that these women can certainly be attractive, but the majority of Indians have a minimum of European descent. The British generally kept to their own women after the 1800's. There is a population of mixed British and Indian Anglo-Indians, but their numbers are negligible and you're unlikely to find them in America. Plenty of these people basically just look Indian anyway. Comedian Russell Peters is Anglo-Indian and I wouldn't be able to guess British descent by looking at him.

What a lot of Indians WILL have is descent from Muslim invaders. Arabs, Persians, Afghans, Turkic peoples. These people were far more numerous in India than Europeans ever were. They have been in India for over a thousand years. And India's large Muslim population would imply that a lot of them fucked the native Hindus after forcibly converting them to Islam. This explains the lighter/more Caucasian features of these hotter Indian girls. It's because they have Middle Eastern ancestry. This is also why Afghans, Pakistanis, and some North Indians basically look like an intermediate between your typical Black Dravidian and a light-skinned Persian. Islamic imperialism was a lot more impactful on India than European imperialism ever was.

(06-03-2017 03:23 PM)Ethan Hunt Wrote:  Not saying that there are no full Indian hotties, cause there's plenty in this thread but they do tend to have lighter skin and softer facial features (hence why look more European).

I'm sure there would be hell of a lot more hot Indian women if there were higher access to make up or adequate hygiene cleaning.

Agreed completely on the last bit. Indian women are actually becoming hotter, I'm noticing way more hot Indian girls as the girls of my generation reach adulthood in the West. Indian girls seeming unattractive is largely because of diet and not giving a fuck about their appearance. Once more of them get in the gym, dress better, learn how to apply makeup (basically improve their SMV) you'll notice a ton more hot Indian girls. This has already happened in places like Dubai, Chicago, parts of the U.K, where Indian women are seen as being just as desirable as anyone else. It will happen in other places once the FOBs get their shit together physically. Indian women are not inherently any more or less attractive, the culture just hasn't caught up to the West (and large parts of the East) in terms of grooming or appearance.

I know this is not directly related to the thread, but the whole North Indians or Indians in general having a huge bunch of invader genes from Islamic Arabs to Turkic derived peoples is actually false and is not based on real genetic evidence or real actual authentic history.

India/South Asia was the most difficult to invade region in Ancient to medieval times and empires from the Assyrians to the Romans to the original Persians to the Greeks to the White Huns, to the Arabs, to the Mongols etc all faced routine defeats and humiliations when they attempted to take over India, as did the European colonials initially when they attempted to take over. Its VERY VERY VERY UNLIKELY that that they left large scale genetic imprints on the main populations there.

Ancient Indian empires had the most organized military machine and cavalry based units in the entirety of the ancient and medieval world and were world renowned for their discipline and organization. This military organization is what repelled and defeated many empires that attempted to cross into the India region as I mentioned above. Indian military units were also used as auxillary troops in various empires outside of India because of their proficiency and expertise, which continued all the way up to WWII/WWI. This military engine of Indian empires kept out foreigners and outsiders from South Asia region for centuries and kept outside admixture to a minimum in the Indian genepool, in addition to endogamous breeding practices in regional communities.

Because of this reality, it's highly unlikely that the reason why some Indians are light skinned has less to do with recent invasions as it's likely to do with indigenous genetic variation. Outside of Africa, India/South Asia has the biggest reservoir of genetic diversity in the entirety of the Eurasian continent and possibly the world. This is the real reason why you see so much diversity of body types and color variation in Southern Asia from Afghanistan to India to Sri Lanka, and its not due to invader genes.


Also the original Persians and Arabs and so called "Middle Eastern populations" were NOT WHITE OR LIGHT SKINNED, and the original Sumerian/Mesopotamian civilizations in the near-East, as well as the original Persian/Elamite civilization, was started by Indian/South Asian type peoples from Southern Asia, based on recent archeological research and skeleton based analysis.

The so called light skinned "Iranians" and "Arabs" you see today, are the result of invasions by Turks and Turkic derived peoples, Europid type peoples from the eurasian steppes regions to the "Middle East" region, and/or the result of White Eurasian/European slavery in the Middle East and North Africa regions, who's descendants later appropriated a pseudo-Islamic-Arab identity for their own assimilation and geopolitical reasons. They ARE NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ORIGINAL PEOPLE OF THE "MIDDLE EAST"!

The so called Mughals, were originally actually from Afghanistan and regions adjacent to it, and Afghanistan was controlled and part of Indic/Indian civilizations for centuries and was part of an Indian empire before the British came. A lot of the Mughal army officers and military corps actually incorporated indigenous Indian Hindu/non-Muslim units into it's ranks to rule, and many of these later Islamic empires in India had to make alliances and use indigenous Indians to actually power their military strangehold over the parts of India/south Asia they managed to take over.

So this makes admixture as reason for their being light skinned Indians in the North very very unlikely. And there were many empires and civilizations in Southern Asia that lasted longer and BIGGER then any Islamic empire in the Indian region before them. Indians/South Asians from all sectors of the sub-continent genetically overlap with each other regardless of geographic region, in comparison to outsiders.


Also the Aryan invasion/migration idea has been refuted countless times and has no real logical or scientific or historical basis, and is a pseudo-scientific concept that is still repeated as hearsay because of general ignorance of modern research, and because it's still kept alive by people parroting it over and over. There is no "Dravidian race" either, and no such references to such a race ever existed in Ancient Indian texts until the British/Euro's came to India/south Asia, which shows that they created the fictional concept and idea of it. And this is true, because the whole "Dravidian" term, was created by a British Christian evangelist named Robert Caldwell, who wanted to convert Indians to Christanity, and segment/divide India/south Asia as per the interests of the British/Euro colonial interests in the region. The term "Dravida" in Indian texts, simply refers to the place "where the three seas meet" and not an actual race of people.


Of course, most people don't have the inclination or time to actually learn ACTUAL INDIAN HISTORY AND FACTS AND THE LATEST RESEARCH IN THIS SUBJECT, so this sort of lack of awareness and ignorance in threads like this isn't surprising. Also Russell Peters is not an Anglo-Indian....

Post: #136

Japan-based model Rola is half-Bangladeshi

Post: #137

Imagine India as a compact super continent of huge variety of similar, yet different cultures, tribes and values.. way complex for even most Indians to understand and describe to themselves, forget anyone else.

Post: #138

(07-10-2017 11:26 PM)Doxacite Wrote:  I know this is not directly related to the thread, but the whole North Indians or Indians in general having a huge bunch of invader genes from Islamic Arabs to Turkic derived peoples is actually false and is not based on real genetic evidence or real actual authentic history.
...

No European mixing? What about the Indo Greek Kingdoms? (180 BC – 10AD)



There were constants invasions from the Middle East and Central Asia over the years. The Mongols attacked India many times

The Kushan empire (30AD to 375AD) was northern India and western China



The Delhi Sultans (1206–1526) were mixes of Turkish, Central Asian or Afghan



Babur, the first ruler of the Mughal empire (1526-1857)was from what is now Uzbekistan.

I'm sure a lot of these guys had fucking harems of Indian women, so there was definitely some mixing going on.

Post: #139

Euro Aryan Invasion vs Dravidian theory pushed forth by Max Mueller and British was to divide Indians against each other and associate themselves as offspring of Euros.. Debunked long back.

Post: #140

That's non-sensical. The Aryan invasian theory has not been debunked whatsoever. I don't know why so many Indian people have hang-ups about it...reminds me a lot of White Nationalists/Supremacists who take a very simplistic view of race and history.

http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-...091109.ece

Quote:Until recently, only data on mtDNA (or matrilineal DNA, transmitted only from mother to daughter) were available and that seemed to suggest there was little external infusion into the Indian gene pool over the last 12,500 years or so. New Y-DNA data has turned that conclusion upside down, with strong evidence of external infusion of genes into the Indian male lineage during the period in question.

The reason for the difference in mtDNA and Y-DNA data is obvious in hindsight: there was strong sex bias in Bronze Age migrations. In other words, those who migrated were predominantly male and, therefore, those gene flows do not really show up in the mtDNA data. On the other hand, they do show up in the Y-DNA data: specifically, about 17.5% of Indian male lineage has been found to belong to haplogroup R1a (haplogroups identify a single line of descent), which is today spread across Central Asia, Europe and South Asia. Pontic-Caspian Steppe is seen as the region from where R1a spread both west and east, splitting into different sub-branches along the way.

People should look a bit more into this. Yes, it's not as simple as Aryan vs. Dravidian. Rather Indians show a full and rich spectrum of genes. For example, all Indians have a mix of Ancestral North Indian (ANI) and Ancestral South Indian (ASI) genes, with perhaps obviously those in the South with more ASI and those in the north with more ANI. Not to mention mixing that came from the Turkic and other Invaders.

I'll say one thing though: I don't think this is the end of our understanding of Indian civilization and its people. There is no doubt in my mind that in the next decades (and beyond) we'll learn more and more about the complexity of Indian genes

I'm particularly interested in what we're learn about ancient Indian civilization (Harappana), their interactions with other societies and perhaps even the discovery of an even older civilization.

Post: #141

(06-05-2017 07:53 AM)YoungBlade Wrote:  

I dated an indian broad like this with huge boobs. Some of my finest memories! The first time I saw her in a bikini I almost passed out.

Post: #142

Race and history discussions on a thread dedicated to hot girls, truly only on RVF (although I've enjoyed reading the back and forth, thanks for the contributions!).

I guess an interesting thing about India is how the caste system and other marriage practices and traditions preserved a huge variety in certain lines of genetic traits over incredibly long periods of time. I know south Indians who do indeed look Italian- with pale skin, colored eyes and Roman noses despite that prevailing regional darker look. Ultimately the strictures in marriage options, such as obviously marrying only within one's caste, as well as within other families with close ties to one's own ensured that phenotypical differences were not simply 'blended out' over time, possibly preserving the traits of groups whose origins can be traced outside of India from thousands of years ago (although the more historically knowledgable should feel free to correct or enlighten me on this subject).

Anyway- back to the topic at hand: as far as India goes, I find Punjabis by far the most attractive, although I think that the hottest desi girls in general tend to be Pakistani (or I guess I just tend to see a lot more attractive Pakistani girls than Indian).

Post: #143

(08-18-2017 03:06 AM)thebassist Wrote:  Anyway- back to the topic at hand: as far as India goes, I find Punjabis by far the most attractive, although I think that the hottest desi girls in general tend to be Pakistani (or I guess I just tend to see a lot more attractive Pakistani girls than Indian).

Most Pakistanis are Punjabi. As an Indian Punjabi, I see Pakistani Punjabis as the same when it comes to looks. South Indians are noticeably worse looking.

Anyway, here's a British Indian Punjabi - Jasmin Walia:

Post: #144

Not sure how to embed images but if anyone can do it on my behalf a girl like Tanu kaur gill (check her instagram by the same name) is a crisp example of a beautiful punjabi girl

Post: #145

(08-18-2017 03:37 PM)Vet-Boy Wrote:  Not sure how to embed images but if anyone can do it on my behalf a girl like Tanu kaur gill (check her instagram by the same name) is a crisp example of a beautiful punjabi girl

Tannu Kaur Gill:

Post: #146

(08-18-2017 04:23 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

(08-18-2017 03:37 PM)Vet-Boy Wrote:  Not sure how to embed images but if anyone can do it on my behalf a girl like Tanu kaur gill (check her instagram by the same name) is a crisp example of a beautiful punjabi girl

Tannu Kaur Gill:

WPWMC

Would Punjab with my Cock

Post: #147

Sadly none of these Indian girls are that hot. The only attractive ones basically look Iranian.

Strike India off my list of places to bang if this is top tier.

Give me Ukraine / Colombia / Iran / Romania / basically most of Europe and South America

Post: #148

(01-11-2017 03:39 AM)WalterBlack Wrote:  Diana Penty

Post: #149

As a North Indian myself (born and raised in the USA but north Indian descendance) , I am loving this history lesson. I took my 23andme test recently and I have 100% genes from "India". Y'all should take it and see what your genes are.

Anyways, I've been seeing lots of posters here post pics of hot Indian women and then talk about how sexy they are. I've seen all of these pics from above and the reality is that you will RARELY EVER see an Indian girl that looks like any of those. Maybe 0.01% of the time. The reality is that more than 90% of Indian chicks are just ugly.

Before my Indian brothers on here call me a self-hater and insecure or whatever, I'm just being honest with my observations. Either they have bad features by genetics (hairy, short, very very dark, dark rings around their eyes, etc.) or are just super conservative about their body - whatever the reason may be, they're just not attractive. Even some of the Indian guys on here that tout how much they love Indian girls have posted pics of very-light-skinned Indians that essentially look latina/Persian. Yes, we may have a few hotties, but given the massive population of India (1.3billion + more than a few hundred million across the world), a very, very small proportion are actually hot.

Also, the majority of the time you see an Indian girl look like those in the pictures above, they almost ALWAYS have had some kind of plastic surgery done on them. ALL the Indian supermodels have had plastic surgery done on them.

All of those women are incredibly white and essentially look like Irani/Persian/Middle Eastern/Latina girls. If that's the look you like, then why not just go for those type of girls instead of targeting Indian girls that look like them? it seems like almost all the pics from above are white-skinned or very-slightly-tan women with black hair...you can literally find that all over the Middle East and South America.

From my experience, it's really hard to bang an Indian girl for a ONS unless she has some extreme emotional issues. I've had a few ONS but ended up that these girls were batshit crazy. The majority of Indian women will require a ton of dating, buying expensive dinners, and drama to get a bang.

Don't waste your time gaming an Indian girl. It's not worth it if you're just looking for the bang. For a relationship though, it may be worth it.

I'd rather just spend my time with a Latina - has very similar looks to a light-skinned Indian girl but way less bullshit that I have to go through.

Post: #150

(08-25-2018 02:18 AM)Crash_Bandicoot Wrote:  As a North Indian myself (born and raised in the USA but north Indian descendance) , I am loving this history lesson. I took my 23andme test recently and I have 100% genes from "India". Y'all should take it and see what your genes are.

Anyways, I've been seeing lots of posters here post pics of hot Indian women and then talk about how sexy they are. I've seen all of these pics from above and the reality is that you will RARELY EVER see an Indian girl that looks like any of those. Maybe 0.01% of the time. The reality is that more than 90% of Indian chicks are just ugly.

Before my Indian brothers on here call me a self-hater and insecure or whatever, I'm just being honest with my observations. Either they have bad features by genetics (hairy, short, very very dark, dark rings around their eyes, etc.) or are just super conservative about their body - whatever the reason may be, they're just not attractive. Even some of the Indian guys on here that tout how much they love Indian girls have posted pics of very-light-skinned Indians that essentially look latina/Persian. Yes, we may have a few hotties, but given the massive population of India (1.3billion + more than a few hundred million across the world), a very, very small proportion are actually hot.

Also, the majority of the time you see an Indian girl look like those in the pictures above, they almost ALWAYS have had some kind of plastic surgery done on them. ALL the Indian supermodels have had plastic surgery done on them.

All of those women are incredibly white and essentially look like Irani/Persian/Middle Eastern/Latina girls. If that's the look you like, then why not just go for those type of girls instead of targeting Indian girls that look like them? it seems like almost all the pics from above are white-skinned or very-slightly-tan women with black hair...you can literally find that all over the Middle East and South America.

From my experience, it's really hard to bang an Indian girl for a ONS unless she has some extreme emotional issues. I've had a few ONS but ended up that these girls were batshit crazy. The majority of Indian women will require a ton of dating, buying expensive dinners, and drama to get a bang.

Don't waste your time gaming an Indian girl. It's not worth it if you're just looking for the bang. For a relationship though, it may be worth it.

I'd rather just spend my time with a Latina - has very similar looks to a light-skinned Indian girl but way less bullshit that I have to go through.

Hahah bro I feel you. Loving replying to this since I personally met you & you are definitely a cool dude. I'll vouch a bit for your post here.

All the power to those guys that wanna go for Indian girls. I will echo your post to some degree by declaring it the Indian Telemundo effect. Just like when you turn on the TV down in Latin America, who do you see when you turn on the TV out in Mumbai (India) or turn on some Bollywood programming? I totally hear you on this man.

As for Indian chicks and their general demeanor & behavior..... Let us just say that it is largely the result of similar upbringings that yielded the ABCD editions of IRT's. A lot of the more attractive ones or extremely ABCD ones might be spoiled Indian American Princesses (the Indian equivalent to the Jewish American Princess).

But before going completely doom & gloom I will say that all of you guys should just go out & hit on the types of girls that strike your particular fancy. Don't mind what any of us think on this forum. Be aware of cultural nuances, but feel free to act on your caveman instincts.