Post: #126

(09-19-2016 11:24 AM)Going strong Wrote:  "Secretary, do you think it can be, like... the Russians!"

^Predictably, Hillary's MSM friends are implying that behind these attacks, are... the Russians! But of course, who else!?

The media has been watching too many 80's movies where all the bad guys are Russians. This is so stupid.

Post: #127

EXCLUSIVE: Wanted New York and New Jersey bomb suspect sued his local police claiming they PERSECUTED him for being a Muslim

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...z4KisOefS0

Post: #128

I really thought DJ Khaled had more career prospects than this. Sad to watch a star fall from linguistic greatness to such violence.

Post: #129

So can that NYC Mayor eat his words or are New Yorkers too pussy to force their politicians to apologise?

Post: #130

Graduated from Edison High School, NJ in 2007



http://www.bostonherald.com/news/nationa...istan_trip

His childhood friend says that he "At one point he left to go to Afghanistan, and two years ago he came back, popped up out of nowhere and he was real religious"

Post: #131

^^^WB Maria.

Post: #132

(09-19-2016 09:29 AM)Lucky Wrote:  Anyone else notice Obama has not said a single word about the attacks?

No kind words for the victims, nothing to instill a sense of calm for the citizens.

He has, however, been out fundraising for Hillary Clinton.

Any thoughts on why?

To be fair: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/president...d=42192991

No mention of the M or T word though.

Post: #133

(09-19-2016 12:14 PM)Latinopan Wrote:  EXCLUSIVE: Wanted New York and New Jersey bomb suspect sued his local police claiming they PERSECUTED him for being a Muslim

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...z4KisOefS0

"(The terrorist's sister) Zobyedh is a student at a nearby campus of Rutgers university, studying towards a B.S. in public health .
She is a writer on the university newspaper, the Daily Targum, and had previously worked as an assistant at the Asian American Cultural Center at the university, and had posted anti-Donald Trump material on social media."

To sum it up: Dude complains of police profiling, turns out to be a bona fide terrorist. Dude's sister gets a bullshit SJW, affirmative-action job at uni, hates on the Donald: turns out her brother does make bombs in the basement. Why am I so Jack's total...

Post: #134

Did Tom Clancy's latest video game 'predict' the one Chelsea bombing?

Post: #135

(09-19-2016 11:24 AM)Going strong Wrote:  

These pictures are great!

I'm not a cop, but I've seen a lot of shows about them in New York City. Let me break down what's going on in this photo:

The FBI girl on the left with her back turned and her tight sexy uniform shirt is the Agent in charge. The one left of her is her less good looking subordinate that really envies her.

The one with her back turned woke up this morning next to a postal inspector she met last night at her captains retirement party. She threw the inspector out of her messy apartment then went in the bathroom. She opened the medicine cabinet and shook her Prozac bottle, but it was EMPTY!

Then she got to the crime scene. The girl in the grey shirt told her what was going on. Over on the right, you see three NYPD guys, one looks like Rev Run. Those guys were working the crime scenes until:

The ponytail one walked up and said "This is my crime scene detective!"

Then the detective said "Easy Agent Demarco (I bet that's her name) this is a homicide"

Then she says "well if we find any clues we'll let you know." Then the detective looked her right in the eye.

She then says "You got a problem taking orders from a woman, detective?!?!?"

Then Lenny Briscoe from law and order walked up and pulled the detective over to the side.

Then they girl in the grey shirt did that "what the fuck" gesture she's doing there.

In a little while they are going to solve the case, don't worry. That's girl power fighting terrorism.

Aloha!

Post: #136

(09-19-2016 11:07 AM)Don Pablo Wrote:  

Donald Trump's "rehtoric" is so powerful, it traveled back in time and turned this kid into a "jihadist" (not associated with Islam!)

What kind of crazy word games is this bitch playing?

Do people see through this or not?

I really can't be sure.

Post: #137

(09-19-2016 02:32 PM)Fisto Wrote:  [quote='Don Pablo' pid='1397366' dateline='1474301220']
Do people see through this or not?

Everything about these attacks is so far spun that its impossible to believe anything.

I swear I'm waiting for it to say "Written by: Steven Bochco" when the news goes to a commercial.

Aloha!

Post: #138

Are we throwing the MN stabbings in here too? This is a gem you won't see on the MSM amid cries for more govt to "protect" us.

Bearing Arms: MN Mall hero 3 gun shooter and NRA instructor

Bearing Arms Wrote:USPSA Shooter, 3-Gunner, and NRA-certified firearms instructor Jason Falconer has been identified as the man who shot and killed a 22-year-old Somali immigrant who went on a stabbing rampage inside a St. Cloud, (MN) Mall on Saturday.

The apparent terrorist—who apparently asked victims if they were Muslims before stabbing them—was engaged by Falconer inside the mall.

Falconer is the president and owner of Tactical Advantage LLC, a shooting range and tactical training facility with a strong focus on arming concealed carriers. He’s also a former chief of the Albany (MN) police department, and he remains a part-time officer.

But Falconer has consistently been identified in the mainstream media only as as a “former police chief” and “off-duty police officer.”

It’s almost as if the media is attempting to cover up the fact that creating and training armed citizens is a major part of the man who took out the terrorist in a MN mall this weekend.

Jason Falconer isn’t some marginally-trained big-city patrol officer with just a basic grasp of using his department-issued firearm.

He’s a firearms instructor passionate about training concealed carriers and developing the best-possible, most-realistic training for his clients. He’s part of the reason why concealed carry continues to surge in popularity, with more than 14 million Americans now choosing to carry some or part of the time.

While Mr. Falconer happened to be the armed citizen who stopped the wannabe mass killer before he could take a life, it just as easily could have been one of his students.

It just as easily could have been one of you.

Tactical Advantage LLC (no affiliation)

Post: #139

now if Falconer was a Trump supporter... would it be nice for Trump to have a rally in Minnesota and this guy gets called up to the stage to say a few words? Or is that too tacky?

Granted Minnesota is considered a pure blue D state so not much value doing a rally there, but this guy affirms the "bullet heading in the opposite direction" story which strengthens Trump's storyline... I like it.

Post: #140

Anderson Cooper either tweeted or stated on live TV that "No amount of extreme vetting on the parents could've prevented this attack." In your opinion, does this mean we outlaw Islam in America?

Post: #141

(09-19-2016 01:48 PM)Going strong Wrote:  

(09-19-2016 12:14 PM)Latinopan Wrote:  EXCLUSIVE: Wanted New York and New Jersey bomb suspect sued his local police claiming they PERSECUTED him for being a Muslim
...

...
To sum it up: Dude complains of police profiling, turns out to be a bona fide terrorist. Dude's sister gets a bullshit SJW, affirmative-action job at uni, hates on the Donald: turns out her brother does make bombs in the basement. Why am I so Jack's total...
...

No, you just don't get it. You have to look at this progressively!

He only became a terrorist because he was racially profiled.

If we'd only put all our weight behind being inclusively diverse and diversely inclusive then Mohammed Fuquad here would have never lashed out at his racist, right wing oppressors.

Post: #142

(09-20-2016 02:26 AM)MMX2010 Wrote:  Anderson Cooper either tweeted or stated on live TV that "No amount of extreme vetting on the parents could've prevented this attack." In your opinion, does this mean we outlaw Islam in America?

I agree here with Anderson. No vetting - just don't let people in from these countries. Seriously, who the hell thought it's a good idea to let in people from the worst, most backwards countries on earth like Afghanistan and Somalia? And why is it wrong to say so?

This is a country where it's literally OK to throw acid on a woman's face or kill her for reading a book. How do you vet that out?

Immigration services agent: "It's ok to throw acid in a woman's face. Agree or disagree?"

Afghan immigrant: "Agree. No wait, hehe pardon my English friend, I meant disagree."

IS Agent: "OK one green card coming up."

Post: #143

(09-19-2016 11:07 AM)Don Pablo Wrote:  

Clinton: "We must do everything we can to intercept and prevent radicalization online".



This is the kind of shit you say when you're already President and you're about to ram through some new Orwellian cybersecurity bill.

I've said it before. Hillary is running her campaign as if she was elected 6 months ago.

Post: #144

Quote:And why is it wrong to say so?

Because unfair ("That's not who we are") and the 14th ammendment must apply to the entire world.

The number of Muslims in the US looks to be rapidly increasing under Obama. He's been turning up the spigot.

I don't blame people for suspecting him of being a crypto-Muslim. Even if he's not, his sympathies are clearly there.

Post: #145

(09-20-2016 03:39 AM)AFS Wrote:  I agree here with Anderson. No vetting - just don't let people in from these countries. Seriously, who the hell thought it's a good idea to let in people from the worst, most backwards countries on earth like Afghanistan and Somalia? And why is it wrong to say so?

This is a country where it's literally OK to throw acid on a woman's face or kill her for reading a book. How do you vet that out?

Immigration services agent: "It's ok to throw acid in a woman's face. Agree or disagree?"

Afghan immigrant: "Agree. No wait, hehe pardon my English friend, I meant disagree."

IS Agent: "OK one green card coming up."

I'm not opposed to a total ban on immigration from extremely volatile areas. It's no different than a quarantine, except in this case, the disease is of the mind.

Having said that, you can vet by using police methods. If the police were limited to bureaucratic questionnaires, they'd never get any confessions. If they can improvise and socially manipulate people into admitting criminal actions or intent against their own self-interest, then immigration officials can manage the same.

Post: #146

Banning Islam in America would be as easy as banning any groups that seek seditious behavior against the constitution and the bill of rights. No need to mention it outright, just let Sharia law be known as a seditious legal system and be done with it.

Heck such a law would take care of some anti gun groups and a few NGOs as well.

Post: #147

I'm currently reading Ann Coulter's book Adios America and this sentence from chapter 6 really stuck out:

"Our official policy is to turn away astrophysicists in order to make room for illiterate Afghan peasants who will drop out of high school to man coffee carts until deciding to engage in Jihad against us."

Post: #148

(09-20-2016 08:17 AM)The Beast1 Wrote:  Banning Islam in America would be as easy as banning any groups that seek seditious behavior against the constitution and the bill of rights. No need to mention it outright, just let Sharia law be known as a seditious legal system and be done with it.

Heck such a law would take care of some anti gun groups and a few NGOs as well.

The precedent already exists for banning the importation of undesirable ideologies, and people who cite the first amendment in protest are missing the point entirely.

Congress cannot pass laws to stop American citizens from being nazis or communists. But both nazis and communists are explicitly denied the right to immigrate into the USA.

Congress cannot pass laws to stop American citizens from practicing Islam*. But Islam should not be imported into the USA.

It really is that simple, and people need to be reminded of this as often as possible, so that the Overton Window can shift from discussions of the ethics and legality of stopping Islamic immigration, to the pragmatic issues: is Islam harmful enough to proscribe its importation.

* although it absolutely can interfere with the Islamic proclivity for child brides, polygamy, genital mutilation, honour killings, killing unbelievers, killing homosexuals and blowing shit up every time someone offends you. Using machetes as a conflict resolution tool is not protected under the first amendment.

Post: #149

^Once you cut off the flow of islamist immigrants then you can go after the imams with a vengeance.

Hire Christian Arabs to go undercover to mosques and as soon as they hear word one about jihad roll up the imam and mosque itself under conspiracy law. When you inevitably find weapons then go after the co-conspirators.

Islam only thrives here because it's treated with the kind of kid gloves reserved for the cultural wrecking crews of the left.

Post: #150

You can add to Ocelot's idea by referencing, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;" - and then asking who was fighting over religion so fiercely that the First Amendment needed to be made.

Were Jews, Christians, Muslims, Buddhists and Zoroastrians arguing over lunch on 1777? Or was it just a bunch of White Christ-worshipping branches trying to dominate each other? Once you establish that it was the latter, Muslims can't cite the First Amendment any more.