Post: #26

Jesus christ, this is just gonna be a circle jerk until the end of time.

If you go back to Ancient Egypt I'll bet a couple of Medjay on guard duty were arguing about how hot or how overrated Cleopatra was


I think we all can agree that makeup and bras can be false advertising.

A woman whose a hottie in the morning when she wakes up is a winner.

Post: #27

Little titties, no ass, thin, cute face. I'd give her a 7. Shes safely in the girlfriend zone. This is not factoring in any of her fame and wealth which honestly should have zero bearing in how physically attractive a woman is. She is cute but no stunner. She cleans up great with makeup as most girls do. The kind of girl I would expect to find on online dating who is not a fake profile. Type of girl I would expect to see having brunch on a Sunday at 11am with her girls talking bout their cuhraaazy night.

Now what game would get her?

I think it would be great if you could be in the same coffee shop as her and be able to position yourself close without her entourage blocking you out. My game would be to spit to her direct saying I think she's cute but make it clear I have no clue who she is. I don't listen to radio or watch MTV or whatever etc. That's cool you're a singer? I love music and play guitar myself I'd love to hear some of your music sometime blah blah. Treat her like a nothing-special serendipitous pickup. Ask for her cell and text her a few days later.

You can't impress this women with any kind of status, interesting lifestyle dhv type games, or even looks really. You have to appeal to emotions. Give them feelings they can't get from other men in their lives. With a girl who has fame and wealth up into the stratosphere, just treat her like she is nothing special. I think she might be relieved to meet someone who isn't pedistalizing her and doesn't even know who she is.

Think about how agonizing it must be for a girl like that who literally can NOT meet a man she needs to chase or who won't recognize and praise her status.

Post: #28

I can't give her an 8. I get the sense her blonde hair is giving her a boost. She isn't ugly but she is not so hot or cute my attention that my attention is drawn to her. She is forgettable. I remember girls who are 8s as I on deep level want to fuck them. Girls who are 6s and 7s I would forget their names or whatever else as they are not memorable.

Taylor Swift is just like Kate Upton. Very forgettable blondes that nobody would clamering over if not famous. They would still both hold their own and have a heft of male suitors but many would not look twice if they were in a setting with other attractive girls (a club). Taylor Swift biggest feature is her height. Her long legs would get more attention in person than her face.

Post: #29

There is a good reason mediocre ho's dye their hair blond. They are hoping for the 1-2 point neogeny boost that blond hair provides in the west.

Post: #30

Someone please compile Lizard's descriptions and comments on women into a book. I would easily pay $30+ for something like that.

Post: #31

If shes an 8 then I guess I've been banging 8s all my life.

Post: #32

(08-26-2016 12:28 PM)Mentavious Wrote:  If shes an 8 then I guess I've been banging 8s all my life.

Apparently with a couple of hard nines and tens, too.
If T Swift is a hard 8 I have been banging primarily nines and tens almost exclusively.
Now her assets are clearly in the Unicorn percentile, as not only is she extremely wealthy but also was her father.

Post: #33

A lot of female celebrities are very average looks wise. I remember one night like 2-3 years ago when I was just getting into RP thinking some of my boys were drooling over Katy Perry and I was like "Fellas... you could go to Glover Park or the Golden Triangle on a Saturday night and see hundreds of girls who are more attractive than Katy Perry" but they weren't trying to hear it. Putting celebrity pussy on the pedestal is incurable for some dudes.

Post: #34

While Lizard of Oz's post was spectacular, I can't give her an 8 personally, but I can see how others would. I think she's more solidly a 7 and not really a 6. Look at the picture that weambulance posted (first one) and also JacksonRev (this is still with very light makeup I suspect):

(08-26-2016 08:46 AM)JacksonRev Wrote:  Looks like I'd wife up a 6. She reminds me of my last dance instructor.

Also keep in mind that while she has no makeup in the first picture posted by the OP, the picture is also highly blown out with way too much light. Here's a picture where she may have minimal makeup but she looks much better:



Another:


The real problem with Taylor Swift has already been pointed out. She's flat as a board front and rear. Never banged a girl's bank account, though. Maybe it adds a nice cushion for the pushin'

Post: #35

I have to be honest, 8 or not an 8 ,makeup or not makeup, I would bang her until my dick was filing for divorce from all the abuse.

Post: #36

Lot's of pointy elbows in this thread.

Post: #37

(08-26-2016 01:15 PM)AneroidOcean Wrote:  

AO knows the score. Very cute face with zero curves. Like I said, 7. I would date her and happily bang.

Post: #38

Man, guys on this thread have no love for the tall girls.

I hate shorties. To each his own, but after going tall, I can't go back.

The girls that are going to look the hottest in pictures and hit that .7 ratio will usually be 5'3 to 5'6. You'll get some outliers, but that is the sweet spot. And while they look good in pictures, they just don't do it for me in person.

Some guys are all visual, whereas I also care a whole lot about presence. And nothing beats the presence when you walk in with 5'10 woman like Taylor, or even better, a 5'10 Kate Upton with huge knockers. All the guys eyeball you like they're going to do something.

I can't go shorter than 5'8 for anything more than a bang. I just can't. I know the girl isn't going to win any instagram contests, but damn if she ain't a whole lot better in real life.

You all can keep the shorties, and I'll keep my girls a head above the rest.

Post: #39

Every guy here who thinks Taylor Swift is a six must be super-duper successful with women.
Only someone who has banged lots and lots of very beautiful girls could have such exceedingly high standards.

I am in awe of all of you badass players, who are so successful with women that this famous girl is nothing in comparison to your past conquests.

Post: #40

she got a brand new pair of titties. Can't wait to hear what the 2/10 wnb crew has to say about it. Will post pics as soon as I get to my laptop

Post: #41

I kinda like threads like this because they also illustrate the reverse: What the average girl on the street has the potential to look like with the finest MUA and style teams available.

Post: #42

Taylor is a classic example of a girl bringing something more to the table than looks alone. She has legitimate talent, is richer than most men will ever be, buys you instant credibility with future women and brings industry connections that would otherwise take a lifetime to make. That clouds the rating issue.

Without all of that, she's a normal tall, skinny model type without the ability to walk gracefully. She would be a 5.5-7 depending on how much you value boobs and an ass. My best friend - who is a devout boob man - would consider Upton (early thin days) or Charlotte McKinney a 10 and Taylor a 4. If no boobs and a flat ass are your thing, you'd probably rate her much higher.

Post: #43

To be completely fair I objectively give her a 7, but she's the kind of girl that gets bumped up to 8 status simply because she's so fuckable.

It's one thing to appreciate a work of art(like I do most women), and it's another to be fucking the ever living daylights out of them.

She's the kind of girl that would give me the hardest of boners because she is in a way bonkers. The kind of bonkers that writes up long ass songs about each of her exes.

Much in the same way I would bang the ever living hell out of Margot Robbie's Harley Quinn.



If that look doesn't make your dick furiously hard I don't know what will.

Post: #44

(08-26-2016 07:32 AM)kosko Wrote:  I promise you in any College campus you can find some quiet unassuming girls with glasses burried in a library who would blow Taylor Swift out of the water of water. All that girl would need is some better makeup and a nice dress but it would not be even close.

The problem is they don't. Thats the difference. Potential means jack shit unless it's acted upon.

Taylor Swift is just another example of how most celebrities maximize their looks on a daily basis. Obviously shes a plain nerdy girl but she's an example of what happens when you get a top hair stylist, top cloths and you take care of yourself. The problem is a lot of girls are lazy fucks that go about life in flip flops with no regard of appearance. So I personally like it when girls maximize whatever genetics they were born with.

Post: #45

Also Margot Robbie is better aesthetically than Taylor Swift on the real.







Definitely a better ass. Not by much but definitely tighter and not bony.

Post: #46

If you're a boobs and butt man, she's a 6.5. If you don't care so much for those factors, a 7.5. I think we have to take personal preferences into account and average it out at a 7. She looks fine, much better natural than overly made up. You're not going to go to bed with a 9 and wake up with a 5, put it that way, and that's always a pleasant surprise. I remember being with a girl one night, a solid 7. She came round my house a few days later without makeup, and I literally did not know who she was. I wasn't being a jerk, she just didn't look anything like she did with makeup. Don't judge a woman's beauty until you see her without makeup. I don't think you have that problem with Taylor.

Also, if you did hang with and bang Taylor Swift, paparazzi are going to be plastering photos of you all over the internet. Imagine what that's going to do for a woman's hamster when she starts probing into your past. Banging Taylor Swift would net you the 8's and 9's much easier in the future.

If she started talking about feminism though, I might just start noticing those pointy elbows...

Post: #47

(08-26-2016 02:11 PM)JacksonRev Wrote:  Man, guys on this thread have no love for the tall girls.

I hate shorties. To each his own, but after going tall, I can't go back.

The girls that are going to look the hottest in pictures and hit that .7 ratio will usually be 5'3 to 5'6. You'll get some outliers, but that is the sweet spot. And while they look good in pictures, they just don't do it for me in person.

The average white woman is right around 5'4"

Taylor Swift is 5'10" but looks a slight bit taller because she's built like a fucking rail. Further, she wears heels or a significant lift a shitload of the time so most of the time she's sitting well over 6' and her true height is already 98-99th percentile of white women which is damn high. If you want to limit yourself to girls in that height range right on, but I would think that is an incredible limit to your options.

The girl I'm dating is into the 90th percentile and I have no problem at all with it, but she has boobs/ass. I have love for tall girls, but they still gotta be attractive to me in other areas.

Source

Post: #48

as promised, here they are:





I'd creep her harder than the guy in the first pic - I'd also open her though, then, who knows...

Post: #49

Not bad, but man them new titties aren't going to help her already horrid hunchback she's got going on.

Post: #50

(08-26-2016 04:21 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  Not bad, but man them new titties aren't going to help her already horrid hunchback she's got going on.

Exactly what I was going to say.

That bitch better hit the gym and fix her posture. Do some squats too while she's at it. I don't mind the small tits--I'd rather she was natural than have implants--but I gotta have some ass on a girl.