Post: #26

^The thing about Austin is that there are certain places that SJWs congregate that are pretty damned easy to avoid. All the transplants from the Bay Area hang in the same places.

It's just too easy to avoid with a working knowledge of the place. And not having knowledge of the place is like going overseas and getting stuck in tourist traps.

Post: #27

1. NYC
2. Chicago
3. Las Vegas

To me everything after that is a pretty large step down. I have posted it before on other threads so I won't repeat myself, but Austin is largely coasting on reputation at this point. If you are a college aged man it is still solid. Otherwise a combination of factors have greatly diminished what was once something of a Great American Pussy Paradise. Anyone coming to Austin looking for that is a decade late to the party.

Post: #28

(08-22-2016 10:09 PM)Htownanddown Wrote:  1. NYC
2. Chicago
3. Las Vegas

If you put Chicago above Vegas. I might need to head up there ASAP.

Also disagree about Austin. It's still got another 3 years in my opinion before it goes to shit. Houston is already roping in the talent that's fleeing Austin or recently graduating. Though I see where you're coming from if your target audience isn't the 18-24 crowd.

Post: #29

Welcome to Austin, now go home.

Post: #30

NYC, Vegas and everywhere else is trailing by a lot.

Post: #31

Damn no love for boston

Post: #32

(08-23-2016 05:53 PM)Avon Barksdale Wrote:  Damn no love for boston

In what universe is Boston any sort of easy-lay paradise? Poor ratios of men to women, extremely cliquey, and a relatively severe lack of attractive talent by comparison to other metropolitan areas. There is not allure to Boston that sparks hookup culture in women. Nightlife is a drag and it's full of colleges but none of them are party schools (mostly higher tier learning institutions). The main reason people move there is for STEM jobs and high-caliber education. Aside from that some people like "the culture" of it being an old-timey city with all the old ass buildings constantly under construction/renovation and the awful roadways. It's got borderline NYC living prices without anything close to NYC lifestyle.

You can get a somewhat regular stream of pussy there with 6's and 7's using online dating.

Also I 2nd LV being right next to NYC from what I've heard/read.

EDIT: Also I'll be in Boston area end of October we ought to meetup, Avon.

Post: #33

All I know is that the last time I went to Boston I literally didn't run out of girls to swipe on bumble. All were cute and educated. In other major cities you typically run out of girls to swipe on after a few days, but Boston that wasn't the case.

Post: #34

double post, ignore

Post: #35

Bumble != casual sex. Most girls on Bumble are post-wall women that want a ring.

Post: #36

(08-23-2016 10:27 PM)Oilrig Wrote:  All I know is that the last time I went to Boston I literally didn't run out of girls to swipe on bumble. All were cute and educated. In other major cities you typically run out of girls to swipe on after a few days, but Boston that wasn't the case.

I find it hard to believe you could run out of girls to swipe on in any location where over half a million people live. Just because there are young not-busted girls living somewhere doesn't make it any kind of pussy paradise.

I mean the title of this thread is "What's the best US city for casual sex?" No "What cities do girls live in?" or "What cities can I get laid in?"

Does anyone honestly think Boston, MA or Austin, TX is the best city in the entire country of the United States of America for easy sex? Gtfo

It's all statistical really. The best places to get laid are going to be places that have the highest population, and the best culture/vibe that is conducive to quick and easy sex. In the US, it doesn't get better than NYC and Las Vegas.

Post: #37

I've lived in Austin, TX. You have one of the biggest colleges in the United States there (UT), and several other colleges in the city. Also, tx state is 25 minutes away with the sluttiest, hottest, party girls in the state. Tons of hot young professionals there as well. I wouldn't say Austin is on the same level as NYC but it's not as bad as you say it is.

Post: #38

I'm not even saying Austin is bad. I know nothing about Austin TX except that it can't hold a candle to NYC or Las Vegas in terms of getting pussy. If that were so then there would certainly be a lot more talk about it.

Post: #39

^It's the best second tier city in the States without question. But yes not NYC or Vegas level.

Which is why I find it strange someone out Chicago over Vegas, but I can't say as I haven't been.

Post: #40

Comte I'll have to come your way sometime soon and you can show me what Austin is all about. As far as tier 2 cities go, Denver is pretty decent honestly. I've heard is used to be called "Menver" and it was somewhat of a pussy wasteland, but since this city/state has gotten so popular over the past couple years it's become a pretty good place to meet girls. Good nightlife, and a seemingly never ending stream of hot young thin granola type chicks.

Post: #41

I'll have to get in touch with my local friends ahead of time, but I'd be more than happy too. As I haven't explored it enough myself besides the trips I take to hang with friends. Houston on the other hand is still my city.

Post: #42

Some people keep saying Dallas is a good lay, but I'm not buying it.

Post: #43

Vegas isn't as easy as alot of you would think. Advanced guys can do well there but most guys won't do as well there as they would do in other large cities for a variety of circumstances.

Post: #44

What^^

I went to Vegas two months ago. I averaged 2 new chicks a night. It's so easy out there it's ridiculous.

Post: #45

Must have really advance game what's your laycount? I know alot of good guys who have gone to Vegas including a 500+ instructor and none have averaged two a night, the best I have seen is one a night average for short spurts. Vegas has logistical problems with chicks not wanting to leave the strip or their best friends on their big Vegas event, numbers means very little since the chicks will be gone in a couple days, stiff competition with tables and whatnot, the game is really high energy which takes get use to if that's not your style.

Post: #46

I've layed 100+ chicks in my life easily and I'm 26. Vegas is a numbers game playa. I holla'd at every good looking chick I seen out there. Vegas is all about having fun and getting laid. There was rarely last minute resistance out there. I'd be at the club and tell the chick my hotel is down the street and it would be on and poppin. Also I fucked a girl in the stairwell of a club. One of the craziest places I've had sex at. I had so much fun that weekend (which was in May) that I am going back next weekend.

Post: #47

Like I said most guys wont do as well but for advance guys they can do very well. My friend who is at 100+ at 26 also splits time between Austin and vegas, really high energy and plays numbers, bangs most chicks in his car because he ramps their state up and doesn't want to risk it dropping by pulling somewhere else. When he lives in Vegas he would go out 5 nights a week and average 2.5 lays a week he works remote and can stay out all night another key aspect if you want to bang alot in Vegas but then last weekend he was there got 3 in a 24 hour period. It can happen in short spurts but if you got a place on the strip it helps alot.

Post: #48

(08-22-2016 10:12 PM)Comte De St. Germain Wrote:  

(08-22-2016 10:09 PM)Htownanddown Wrote:  1. NYC
2. Chicago
3. Las Vegas

If you put Chicago above Vegas. I might need to head up there ASAP.

Also disagree about Austin. It's still got another 3 years in my opinion before it goes to shit. Houston is already roping in the talent that's fleeing Austin or recently graduating. Though I see where you're coming from if your target audience isn't the 18-24 crowd.

You should check Chicago out. Chicago during the summer at least. I will say upfront I tend to like midwestern girls more than some other players I know. To me the accents are cute, tits are big, bitch shields are low. To some of my friends they're chubby, annoying, and unsophisticated. To each their own. I usually get an Airbnb in River North, and long boozy debaucherous weekends ensue. Add in great unpretentious food, incredible architecture, solid public transport, 4 am closing times, great downtown logistics, to me equals 2nd to NYC.

I'll throw down my thoughts on Vegas at #3 when I get a little more time. Also I don't mean to hate on Austin. I love the city and the girls. It has been my home base for a long time, its just hard not to notice the dynamics in motion here. It is still great a place for females, but the Bay Area has crept its way into the culture. There is also something of a regression to the mean happening with the ratios. Having said that it is still a great tier 2 city for gaming.

Comte, hit me up next time your in Austin. We will hit the town.

Post: #49

I've been to Chicago and Vegas for very short periods. In Chicago some of the girls were very, very easy. I'm used to being taken home, but not to the extent I saw there. In Vegas, I guess it's all about clubs, and that's always a good enviornment to meet girls that want it. However, before I shack up there for a while I'd want to check some other places out.

I'm in Miami right now. If anyone wants to show me around and have beers, let me know.

Post: #50

Stalin is dropping truth bombs on Boston.

There is no undiscovered paradise in the US. The top towns are well known.

The five major factors are game, logistics, looks, calibration to the locals, and cash burn. Combine this with winner-take-most - you get a disproportionate benefit to being in the top percentiles.

If you do better in NYC or Vegas than in your town, then congratulations, you're in the top tier and your main problem is one of access to large numbers. And if you get more love outside of NYC or Vegas...you're a guy who ranks higher when outside of the first tier.