Post: #1

If this isn't '2016' in a nutshell, I don't know what is.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDtw9Gb0nMQ

Post: #2

Jokes on them.
Looking like a man & being a real man, are not one & the same.

Post: #3

Hahaha
Those girls don't realize you can't replace a masculine guy with dressing like a butch lesbian and talking like a dude.

This is instance where "Fake it till you make it" doesn't apply.

Post: #4

The crazy. It burns.

Post: #5

The dyke transformation isn't even remotely sad...the sad part is how a sex feminine women is dating that dykish abomination on society rather than with a real man.

She even sounds feminine, unbelievable how she can date a dyke.

She is way more feminine than the average american woman.

Post: #6

(08-12-2016 03:52 AM)Lucario Wrote:  The dyke transformation isn't even remotely sad...the sad part is how a sex feminine women is dating that dykish abomination on society rather than with a real man.

She even sounds feminine, unbelievable how she can date a dyke.

She is way more feminine than the average american woman.

Herd mentality. I'm pretty sure an older RoK article puts that in detail. Now, on a historical context: herd mentality + Women sleep with the invaders = pre-Crusades Englishwomen, dickriding the Vikings.

Somehow, I feel grateful being born in the Year of the Tiger, much to the surprise of people who are into the Eastern Horoscope. (Yes, I did grow up without a father figure to adulthood, hence why I notice I can superstitious sometimes.) Game taught me how to have a spine and spice up communication, passing shit tests, among others.

Thanks, Game. Had not been for you, I would had ended up dead at 27.

Post: #7

People say that it's bigoted to complain about the media's endless push to celebrate all things gay. But if you're over 40, you see things differently.

People in general are cowed by peer pressure and what's popular at the time. Smoking, eating meat, listening to rap instead of rock...all of this is peer pressure and what's popular. Most people aren't that health conscious or that intelligent about the arts. They just do what other do.

Women's sexuality is more malleable than that of men's. So what happens when a society pushes lesbian TV shows, lesbian music, lesbian books, lesbian memes, and offers college courses in lesbianism?

You get this.

Having lived a while, I'd venture to say that if this was 1989 and I was in college, neither of these girls would be lesbians. Yes, the one on the left looks "butch." But some women are more masculine, just as some men are more feminine.

Give her longer hair, put her in a skirt, apply some peer pressure to be feminine and you'd have a reasonably decent '80s chick. (I'm convinced that if the tough-girl '80s metal chicks I knew came of age today they'd be dykes.)

Women like this and their ubiquity in the media (which includes social media) have a cumulatively negative effect on men since it pulls women out of the dating/LTR/marriage pool. It has the same effect as when one man has a harem and robs other men of getting a bride.

The invention of monogamy was a way around harems and a way to assure most men got wives. That way, you didn't have a violent, chaotic society of lonely, sexually frustrated men.

Which brings me to my next point: Monogamy and Christianity went hand in hand. So did the banning of homosexuality and Christianity. It's my contention that neither really had to do with "sin" per se, but with maintaining social order, especially among the most potentially violent segment of our society, young men (i.e. the Mideast).

What message does this video sent to young men? You're useless. You're redundant. You have no place here anymore.

The people who rule us aren't pushing homosexuality so we accept others. Most people already do that.

And, besides, if all of this was about "acceptance," why are they not pushing dwarf acceptance? Or wheelchair acceptance? Or bald-men acceptance? All of that would be real acceptance, right? So why is it homosexuality 24/7 on every sitcom, drama, and in every movie?

They're pushing this to purposely destablize society because Third World chaos -- and the police state that follows it -- gives them more power. In other words, they're purposely upending the social order given to the Western world by Christianity.*

I don't think it's a coincidence that along with the rise of lesbianism we've seen a rise in mass shootings by younger men.

Unlike women, (most) men can't just turn to other men for sexual satisfaction. And most can't afford hookers or feel shamed going to them. So that leave violence as an option. And the sad irony is that the one place men do manifest homosexuality is prison. So all that violence might just be a subconscious way for men to find a mate after all.

(I know this last paragraph is a stretch, and it's just a thought. But the rest of my idea, I think, is pretty factual. Maybe I'll make this into an article someday and link studies. But then liberals hate science when it does things like proves monogamy builds societies or tells us that most men can only be gay when faced with prison beatings.)

* I'm not religious in the least. This is not me pushing faith. It's an observation on how religion shapes societies, specifically Christianity and the Western World.

Post: #8

It appears in some of the strangest places. Recently, I was checking out a spiritual group that interested me. Then I found thier "women's forum" where they featured an interview with the most disgusting fat-man-in-a-dress tranny you could imagine about its "transformation".
Scratch that group off my list.

Post: #9

I have known many lesbians in my life. Every single one of them had major psychological issues / emotional control problems. I have no idea if the reason is biological or environmental (nature vs. nurture). The lesbian tenants I have had were always the most unstable. All they ever did was fight with each other.

Post: #10

Well, there you go - the apparent results of a deviant, degenerate, rotten culture. This is why we first classified homosexuality as a mental disorder in the DSM.

So sad to see a feminine woman wasted on that freak.

Post: #11

Jim Goad wrote a good essay on dykes in Portland after he got out of prison. His take was men finally started acting sensitive like women said they wanted, and because of that, the women started going lesbo.

http://jimgoad.net/pdf/sex/lesbians.pdf

Post: #12

(08-12-2016 06:34 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  The invention of monogamy was a way around harems and a way to assure most men got wives. That way, you didn't have a violent, chaotic society of lonely, sexually frustrated men.

Which brings me to my next point: Monogamy and Christianity went hand in hand. So did the banning of homosexuality and Christianity. It's my contention that neither really had to do with "sin" per se, but with maintaining social order, especially among the most potentially violent segment of our society, young men (i.e. the Mideast)

This is actually what brought me back to Christianity after being in the military and seeing the world. Christianity is in your blood, and mine.

I'm not worried about what creation myth says what, I'm worried about a society that functions, and we've had over a thousand successful years in Christian society, with the main hangups being when we've introduced other religions and pretended they were the same.

Post: #13

(08-12-2016 06:34 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Women like this and their ubiquity in the media (which includes social media) have a cumulatively negative effect on men since it pulls women out of the dating/LTR/marriage pool. It has the same effect as when one man has a harem and robs other men of getting a bride.

Absolutely but there are two perspectives here. One is ours which you have already expressed, in that it pulls women out of our dating pool. The other is that it ruins women from ever bonding or forming a healthy relationship with a man and as a result produce sufficient offspring (i.e. 2.3+ children).

There is a lot more going on here, much of it has already been covered across various threads on this board. It all basically boils down to lowering population growth across Western populations, and in particular among whites. One more lesbian is another woman who has abandoned her genetic privilege of reproduction, which is insane if you think about it as it is the biggest core instinct among women.

This right here, gentlemen, is how you destroy a civilization.

Post: #14

(08-12-2016 11:37 AM)redpillage Wrote:  One more lesbian is another woman who has abandoned her genetic privilege of reproduction, which is insane if you think about it as it is the biggest core instinct among women.

This right here, gentlemen, is how you destroy a civilization.

I have seen a number of lesbian couples that go the IVF route to have kids. The weird thing is every one I have seen they have had a boy (you can pick the sex with IVF).

I feel sorry for the kid. Ever lesbian I have known has had serious emotional control issues and their relationships almost always go up in flames. In 20 years we find out lesbians have an 80%+ divorce or separation rate, I won't be the least bit surprised.

Post: #15

(08-12-2016 06:34 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Which brings me to my next point: Monogamy and Christianity went hand in hand. So did the banning of homosexuality and Christianity. It's my contention that neither really had to do with "sin" per se, but with maintaining social order, especially among the most potentially violent segment of our society, young men (i.e. the Mideast). Christianity and the Western World.

I don't mean to nitpick your good post, but the above is only true for Southern Europe and elsewhere.

Tacitus the Roman historian praised the Germanic tribes for their monogamy compared to the Roman orgies and sexual liberty.

In addition, homosexuality was essentially so unheard of in pre-Christian Germanic society, that in the Icelandic sagas for example, there simply isn't anything mentioned or said about it, unlike in Christianity, Jewry and Islam.

Post: #16

IVF and civilisation gonna get alot more worst if it improves like this

(08-12-2016 11:43 AM)Hell_Is_Like_Newark Wrote:  

(08-12-2016 11:37 AM)redpillage Wrote:  One more lesbian is another woman who has abandoned her genetic privilege of reproduction, which is insane if you think about it as it is the biggest core instinct among women.

This right here, gentlemen, is how you destroy a civilization.

I have seen a number of lesbian couples that go the IVF route to have kids. The weird thing is every one I have seen they have had a boy (you can pick the sex with IVF).

I feel sorry for the kid. Ever lesbian I have known has had serious emotional control issues and their relationships almost always go up in flames. In 20 years we find out lesbians have an 80%+ divorce or separation rate, I won't be the least bit surprised.

Post: #17

(08-12-2016 11:43 AM)Hell_Is_Like_Newark Wrote:  

(08-12-2016 11:37 AM)redpillage Wrote:  One more lesbian is another woman who has abandoned her genetic privilege of reproduction, which is insane if you think about it as it is the biggest core instinct among women.

This right here, gentlemen, is how you destroy a civilization.

I have seen a number of lesbian couples that go the IVF route to have kids. The weird thing is every one I have seen they have had a boy (you can pick the sex with IVF).

I feel sorry for the kid. Ever lesbian I have known has had serious emotional control issues and their relationships almost always go up in flames. In 20 years we find out lesbians have an 80%+ divorce or separation rate, I won't be the least bit surprised.

I met one of these IVF babies running gutter game in a nightlife area a few months back. Two lesbian parents, at least one of whom teaches feminism at a well-known liberal arts college. Extremely smart, but extremely crazy. She brought up the "one in four women get sexually assaulted" statistic within about twenty minutes. Literally, everything that we stand against around here. Chick had more red flags than North Korea.

I saved her in my phone as Nemesis.