Post: #1

For months now I've been a little confused by the overwhelmingly negative coverage that the Brazil Olympics are receiving from the mainstream media.

Yes, Brazil is a developing country, yes, Brazil can be dangerous -- but the level to which this is being played up currently doesn't fit the media's usual pattern or narrative.

Most of you are probably already familiar with the mainstream media's typical narrative, but let's just do a quick recap of some of their pet topics:

- Globalism
- Multiculturalism
- Cultural relativism
- Criticizing "Mexicans", illegal immigrants, crime in Latin America, etc. is racist
- Criticizing Arabs and Muslims is racist, and there is nothing wrong whatsoever with the predominant culture in Arab and Muslim countries
- Terrorism is not a real threat

Does the current Brazil coverage fit this narrative? Not really.

"But there are real problems in Brazil!"

Yes, and there are even realer problems in neighboring Venezuela, a situation the mainstream media refuses to even talk about.

Yet "Brazil is a shithole" has been balls to the wall for months and is now reaching a fever pitch.

Remember, Brazil just hosted a World Cup two years ago, and it didn't receive nearly the same coverage as the Olympics are. And there weren't any significant problems during the World Cup.

Also consider that there are no statistics that show any real increase in violent crime in Brazil between 2014 and 2016 -- at least I can't find any.

If you look at any of the "violence is increasing" in Brazil stories, it's always about one or two people getting robbed or killed. But there is never a "murders have risen by x number or x% since 20xx".

But in fact, there is evidence that murder rates were increasing leading into the 2014 games. This suggests to me that there isn't any real data behind these stories, which is why they stick to anecdotal evidence.

To be clear, I'm not claiming that there are no legitimate criticisms for letting Brazil host the Olympics.

But we know that the media pushes an agenda and covers up stories that don't fit that agenda. And it's my opinion that there's a clear agenda at play here in both the nature and level of coverage.

Consider some of the recent stories, where the media is really starting to push this thing hard -- and really showing their bias, from my perspective.

The Australian Olympians reportedly "refused" to stay in their prepared arrangements -- because apparently the toilets are clogged, wiring's exposed, and the stairwells are too dark.

Now many of the guys on this forum have visited developing countries. How many times have you stayed in a high-end condo that didn't have properly working plumbing and electricity?

The idea that Brazilians (or whoever they hire to build the many condos and resorts in their country) don't know how to install a working toilet is just crazy to me, along with the suggestion that Olympic athletes are going to be mugged in the dark stairwell of their Olympic compound, which was built specifically for the athletes and who are the only ones staying there.

Are there going to be random muggers loitering in this high-end facility, which will be secured by dozens of armed guards?

Sure, the place could be at risk of a terrorist attack, and obviously there is danger present on the streets of Brazil, but no one is going to be randomly murdered inside the Olympic facility. It's absurd.

Or the story about the Chinese Olympians afraid of catching diseases. That's the same China which is one of the most polluted countries in the world, where people spit and piss and smoke cigarettes everywhere, and where there are more people living in extreme poverty than the entire population of Brazil.

Sure, Asian broads can be completely illogical, I'm not denying that. The point is that these are the stories that the media is choosing to cover.

And they're publishing them by the dozen, meanwhile they cover up REAL stories, like little girls being raped by immigrants in Idaho or the huge numbers of crimes committed by the "refugees" in Europe.

There's clearly an agenda being pushed here. But what is it? And why?

That's what I haven't completely figured out yet. But I've come across a few interesting things surrounding Brazil in recent months.

- The current president, who's not only the first female president but was literally a Marxist militant guerilla in her younger years, is in the process of being impeached and the VP is serving as the acting president.

We know that the media loves their socialists, as we see with the aforementioned lack of coverage of Venezuela. And the negative media coverage of the Olympics does roughly coincide with when the controversy began and proceedings started.

Could this be an attempt to obscure or diminish her legal difficulties?

- Brazil bought training, equipment, and security from American (specifically Blackwater) and Israeli security firms for the 2014 World Cup.

In October 2014, Brazil signed a $2.2 billion contract with one of these Israeli firms to provide security for the Olympics. But Brazil canceled the entire contract in January of this year.

A couple weeks before, they rejected Israel's appointment of a new ambassador in Brazil. And as far as I know, that seat's still vacant to this day.

Now I'm not usually one to push (((Jewish))) conspiracies, but it's hard to believe that a largely Israeli-influenced media coincidentally started slamming Brazil as soon as the two countries began having both diplomatic and business disputes.

Post: #2

Honestly i'm just sick of the olympics. I don't care to watch a bunch of genetic freaks i've never heard of play in a stadium that was paid by all sorts of corrupt individuals to build.

Fuck the olmypics. Greece should be the perpetual home of the games. It's their tradition.

Post: #3

All you need to know is that the security at the Rio Olympics is being handled by an Israeli security company.

Quote:At the end of a three-year tender, the Olympic Committee and the agencies managing the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympiad have selected Israeli security company ISDS, owned by president and founder Leo Gleser, to provide security for the world's biggest sporting event. ISDS will be able to draw on a $2.2 billion budget for constructing and managing the complex security system for the event, which is expected to draw billions of spectators around the world. The news of the Israeli company's triumph in the huge tender was first published in the Israel Defense magazine.

ISDS will be an integrator for the entire security system at the various sites at which the games will be held, and will provide consultation and supply services for the various systems designed to ensure that the Olympic Games pass without incident. "We have a great challenge facing us," ISDS VP Ron Shafran said today. "We already have teams operating in Brazil, and unofficially operated there during the World Cup last summer. Since it was announced that Brazil would host the Olympic Games, we have greatly expanded our activity in the country, and competed in this long and difficult tender. Our teams are already preparing for the Olympics, designing our security concept and building technological systems to be installed at the various facilities where the competitions will take place in Rio and four other regions around the country. The games will begin on August 5, 2016, and will continue until December 2016, including the special Olympics."

http://www.globes.co.il/en/article-israe...1000980198

Rio is also home to a very strong Christian contingent. Despite proclaimed foolproof security, I strongly anticipate some 'interruptions'.

Post: #4

^ Yes, I mentioned that in my post, but I thought the contract was 'cancelled' -- or rather denied that there was ever an agreement in place, in response to protesters.

https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/cha...6-olympics

There seems to be a lot of conflicting information on the subject.

Post: #5

If their darling "Lula" was still in power the press would probably be covering the story differently, talking about the amazing progress, etc.

Post: #6

I don't think there is a political agenda in the way we in this forum know it, i.e. the way you described with marxism, progressivism, etc.

I personally believe this is being used to spread Zika throughout the world, which consequently will serve as population control.

The conditions in Rio, as we've seen a couple of years ago with the breakout of another mosquito borne virus (can't remember which), are an ideal breading ground for mosquitos.

It is an international event which will bring all of the world's population into the same city, giving a high probability of these people being infected and carrying the disease back to their respective countries.

After the games, we can be sure to see cases of Zika babies spread throughout the world.

Wouldn't surprise me the first case being in Europe, and not in Africa and India where population control is the most necessary.

Fuck (((them))).

Post: #7

"
Does the current Brazil coverage fit this narrative? Not really.
"
On the contrary i find. The only topics I've seen discussed in the MSM about Rio are:

-Russia is bad and untrustworthy.

- the crazy IOC has deferred authority to smaller groups, the sport's federations, regarding Russia. Decentralised decision making? That's bad..

There is an environmental/water disaster lurking and brewing I'm Rio, about to poison or kill all the athletes any moment now. Good thing our western countries have huge powerful EPA departments that protect us from such horror.

Individual white athletes being scolded by the media for expressing "too strong" a concern about their safety / the quality of the games. Clearly this is because of white privilege, not because the media itself is drummimg up panic.

All of these topics are globalist/big government/SJW bread and butter.

Post: #8

At the least; one would expect Olympic coverage to be a purposeful distraction from far more important matters (ala Roman gladiators).
Then if the Rio Olympics have a 'train-wreck' element on top?
All the more reason to distract the public.

Whether there's a sinister purpose in addition; who can say?
Perhaps there's going to be a terrorist strike (false flag or otherwise) to attempt to further demoralize the public.

Post: #9

Real Sports with Bryant Gumbel (HBO) had an amazing semi-documentary released just last week I believe about the Olympics, I highly recommend it.

Post: #10

If anything, the current IOC treatment of Russia is obviously politically motivated.

It's an open secret that everyone is juicing, yet they give the Russians the most hate.

They should just give up and let everyone use steroids. It'll make the games far more interesting.

Post: #11

There have been editorials in MSM sports pages complaining about the IOC not banning all the Russian athletes. I suspect that during the Olympics, Costas and the rest of NBC will take a slightly negative tone when talking about the Russian delegation, because of the bias against Putin in the Western MSM.

Also, now that a conservative government has replaced the leftist government in Brazil, the coverage will probably ignore Brazil's government for the most part. Otherwise, the spin on the coverage will be that the Olympics is one big, great, lovey-dovey party that shows that globalism is a great thing.

Post: #12

I really don't give a fuck about the Olympics much. I'd rather watch the winter than the summer games.

The only things alot of people understand about Rio's Olympics is how fucked up that city and country is.

Brazil is synonymous with Zika Virus, robbery, unsanitary, and unprepared.

Now I'm not talking shit on Brazil, but that's what the media is putting out.

Post: #13

Lots of politics going on, the Russia hate of course is pure spite by the neo-cons, American athletes are doped by design and have been since the 1980s, everyone knows it and China too of course, particularly swimmers and weightlifters.

The second layer is the negative focus on protests and blah blah which is driven by the impeachment of Lula who was the leftist darling in Europe.

We don't hear too much about it though because the journos are too busy getting wasted on the taxpayer dime.

Post: #14

(08-05-2016 01:34 AM)The Beast1 Wrote:  Honestly i'm just sick of the olympics. I don't care to watch a bunch of genetic freaks i've never heard of play in a stadium that was paid by all sorts of corrupt individuals to build.

Fuck the olmypics. Greece should be the perpetual home of the games. It's their tradition.

I am on the same boat, I am not into watching other people play and have fun at a level that I will never have.

The Olympics have becomes too politicized and money driven, there is not reason supposed progressive countries to allow countries with backward cultures to play in the Olympics and worst yet host it (Qatar 2020), a country where alcohol itself is banned unless some selected hotels.

Post: #15

Brazilians are fun loving Christians, the wrong kind of brown people.

Post: #16

If there's one positive thing about all this is that I seriously doubt Brazilians will put up with rapist muslims on holiday. They are going to get their asses kicked fucking around in latin-america.

Post: #17

Yes, absolutely there is. As should be expected. Google "how many people watch the Olympics", and you can find a download broadcast report from the 2012 games. The report gives an estimated world population of 6.8 billion people. An estimated 3.6 billion people saw at least one minute of the games. 74 percent of whom continued to watch for 15 minutes. 27.9 billion hours of coverage was watched globally with the average viewer watching 7.5 hours.

And that was four years ago. Even in four years there's new and improved ways for people to tune in. I would suspect the global coverage to be even greater in 2016. The Olympics is the most perfect opportunity to undertake a mass brainwashing campaign and continue to psychology induce people to accept the idea and inevitability of world government. As it is, obviously, the games is about nations coming together and uniting under one banner. No doubt the mere idea gives globalists the tingles. What more could the occultists ask for. I haven't seen the opening ceremony, nor do I care to, but no doubt it's filled with Luciferian imagery.

This advertisement, or official song, whatever popped up on my YouTube front page.
Propaganda with people singing each others anthems cherry picking sentences to make it all fit perfectly into the koombayah Marxist narrative. At the end Samsung proclaims it's a proud sponsor of a world without barriers. Should read "proud sponsor of advocating for a world with no borders."

"One World, One Anthem".





Yeah. And then one leader.

Post: #18

(08-07-2016 04:11 AM)Spectrumwalker Wrote:  Yes, absolutely there is. As should be expected. Google "how many people watch the Olympics", and you can find a download broadcast report from the 2012 games. The report gives an estimated world population of 6.8 billion people. An estimated 3.6 billion people saw at least one minute of the games. 74 percent of whom continued to watch for 15 minutes. 27.9 billion hours of coverage was watched globally with the average viewer watching 7.5 hours.

And that was four years ago. Even in four years there's new and improved ways for people to tune in. I would suspect the global coverage to be even greater in 2016. The Olympics is the most perfect opportunity to undertake a mass brainwashing campaign and continue to psychology induce people to accept the idea and inevitability of world government. As it is, obviously, the games is about nations coming together and uniting under one banner. No doubt the mere idea gives globalists the tingles. What more could the occultists ask for. I haven't seen the opening ceremony, nor do I care to, but no doubt it's filled with Luciferian imagery.

This advertisement, or official song, whatever popped up on my YouTube front page.
Propaganda with people singing each others anthems cherry picking sentences to make it all fit perfectly into the koombayah Marxist narrative. At the end Samsung proclaims it's a proud sponsor of a world without barriers. Should read "proud sponsor of advocating for a world with no borders."

"One World, One Anthem".





Yeah. And then one leader.

I really like how there was a chick singing the Malay anthem in Paris, and a bus full of brown refugees driving somewhere in the boondocks singing the German anthem, and some black school in what seemed like Africa singing the US anthem, then people in Berlin waving German flags singing the Tunisian anthem.... and then the kicker: "Samsung: Proud sponsor of a world without borders". The propaganda is becoming way to blatant

Post: #19

I saw one hell of a race baiting ad on youtube over the olympics. Was some montage of a carmenjello athlete pole vaulting while his white mother narrates about how hard it was for him growing up in rural Oregon where jeering packs of racists would chase them in pickup trucks. (Sort of like the bullies chasing Forrest Gump home from school every day because he was differently-abled)

Then I got to thinking, olympic athletes are like 20 years old, right? So these jeering packs of racists were chasing him around in 2005? I guess now every year prior to the current year is retroactively imagined to have been like 1850 for black people or something.

Post: #20

(08-08-2016 08:11 PM)BortimusPrime Wrote:  I saw one hell of a race baiting ad on youtube over the olympics. Was some montage of a carmenjello athlete pole vaulting while his white mother narrates about how hard it was for him growing up in rural Oregon where jeering packs of racists would chase them in pickup trucks. (Sort of like the bullies chasing Forrest Gump home from school every day because he was differently-abled)

Then I got to thinking, olympic athletes are like 20 years old, right? So these jeering packs of racists were chasing him around in 2005? I guess now every year prior to the current year is retroactively imagined to have been like 1850 for black people or something.

Not to mention 2005 would be middle school for a 20 year old Olympian.

Name one kid who didn't get in some fights in middle school with some other asshole kid.

It's a ridiculous victim culture these days. I bet nothing exceptional happened with this guy and he probably even had it better than other people because he was probably athletic.

Post: #21

I'm sure he got a mean nickname like "coco" or something. THE HORROR... kids calling each other names! WE MUST ELECT SHILLARY TO END SYSTEMIC RACISM

Post: #22

I would expect to hear a lot about the number of US golds won by female athletes (USA outpaces many countries in this respect), shilling for Title 9, etc., as that has been a theme in recent Olympics coverage.

It will be interesting when more trannies start winning.

Post: #23

Most definitely, my facebook news-feed was filled with late 20s women posting some viral video complaining about how women are objectified during the Olympics and how the focus is on how they look, not their achievements.

One guy took on the masses and single-handedly owned them.

It's a facebook video, by some cuck channel called ATTN.

Couldn't find it on YT.

Post: #24

The coverage is designed with one aim, to keep soccer moms tuned in. That's why the coverage is non-stop human interest stories in female-friendly events. Diving and gymnastics have earned primetime coverage on this basis, not because the events themselves are so interesting. The network can package the athlete's story into a dramatic arc resembling a Lifetime movie, which play to huge audiences of weeping mothers. Then, the homegrown little miss USA, whose story of sacrifice and hardship had played not 20 minutes before, takes a medal. It's quite the rollercoaster for our female audience, who will return diligently for as long as the supply of drama lasts.

In the middle, the commercials roll. They're pushing soda, cars, and cleaning products. Since it's a live event (well, at least sometimes), the audience won't be skipping it, so each 30-second block will command a higher price.

So the agenda of the Olympics is to sell consumer goods.

The rest of story about the 2016 Rio Games gets drowned out by human-interest stories because soft news plays better to the demographic. Corruption and poverty endemic to Brazil, Dilma's failings as a leader, and failing infrastructure do not sell ads to soccer moms. Instead you get stories about how female athletes are brave.

Post: #25

(08-08-2016 08:31 PM)Samseau Wrote:  I'm sure he got a mean nickname like "coco" or something. THE HORROR... kids calling each other names! WE MUST ELECT SHILLARY TO END SYSTEMIC RACISM

I'm guessing if anything it was the mother that convinced herself that every stranger that walked by was giving her a stinkeye for race mixing or something. Kids these days are too busy with their pokeymons and homosexual experimentation to come up with creative racial slurs.