Post: #1

The full 28 pages can be read here
http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/inte...spart4.pdf


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-15...911-report

While we have yet to read the full document, one section caught our eye - the use of Saudi "charitable organizations" to finance terorrism:

And then this:

That names sounded familiar, and then we remembered this WMD article:

The lawmakers noted Huma Abedin “has three family members – her late father, mother and her brother – connected to Muslim Brotherhood operatives and/or organizations. Her position affords her routine access to the secretary and to policymaking.” Last week, Republican Speaker of the House John Boehner, who admitted he hadn’t read the letters, defended Abedin, and Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., called the accusations “sinister” and “nothing less than an unwarranted and unfounded attack on an honorable woman, a dedicated American and a loyal public servant.”



* * *

Now it has emerged that Huma [Abedin] served on the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs’s editorial board from 2002 to 2008. Documents obtained by author Walid Shoebat reveal that Naseef served on the board with Huma from at least December 2002 to December 2003.

Naseef’s sudden departure from the board in December 2003 coincides with the time at which various charities led by Naseef’s Muslim World League were declared illegal terrorism fronts worldwide, including by the U.S. and U.N.

The MWL, founded in Mecca in 1962, bills itself as one of the largest Islamic non-governmental organizations. But according to U.S. government documents and testimony from the charity’s own officials, it is heavily financed by the Saudi government.

The MWL has been accused of terrorist ties, as have its various offshoots, including the International Islamic Relief Organization, or IIRO, and Al Haramain, which was declared by the U.S. and U.N. as a terror financing front.

Indeed, the Treasury Department, in a September 2004 press release, alleged Al Haramain had “direct links” with Osama bin Laden. The group is now banned worldwide by United Nations Security Council Committee 1267.

The MWL in 1988 founded the Al Haramain Islamic Foundation, developing chapters in about 50 countries, including for a time in Oregon until it was designated a terrorist organization.

In the early 1990s, evidence began to grow that the foundation was funding Islamist militants in Somalia and Bosnia, and a 1996 CIA report detailed its Bosnian militant ties.

The U.S. Treasury designated Al Haramain’s offices in Kenya and Tanzania as sponsors of terrorism for their role in planning and funding the 1998 bombings of two American embassies in East Africa. The Comoros Islands office was also designated because it “was used as a staging area and exfiltration route for the perpetrators of the 1998 bombings.”

The New York Times reported in 2003 that Al Haramain had provided funds to the Indonesian terrorist group Jemaah Islamiyah, which was responsible for the 2002 Bali bombings that killed 202 people. The Indonesia office was later designated a terrorist entity by the Treasury.

In February 2004, the U.S. Treasury Department froze all Al Haramain’s financial assets pending an investigation, leading the Saudi government to disband the charity and fold it into another group, the Saudi National Commission for Relief and Charity Work Abroad.

In September 2004, the U.S. designated Al-Haramain a terrorist organization. In June 2008, the Treasury Department applied the terrorist designation to the entire Al-Haramain organization worldwide

In other words, the US government knew about this terrorist front all the way back in 2001, even as Hillary's right hand (wo)man was working for an affiliated entity for years later?


Hillary's hand maiden worked for terrorist organizations, and was basically complicit and an accomplice in the 9/11 tragedy. Jesus Christ, how deep does the rabbit hole go? This is like some Game Of Thrones shit...the House of Saud has placed one of their top operatives as a steward in the House of Clinton, as they actively subvert our government from within.

Post: #2

NUKE MECCA

Post: #3

The document is not 100% definitive but it does show some damning connections between Saudi government institutions and wahhabi sects of islam. Prince Bandar also apparently funneled money to a source that financed the 9/11 hijackers.

The pages still leave room for Bush neocons to fill the gaps with "well - this is just speculation."

Post: #4

(07-15-2016 02:28 PM)Dark Knowledge Wrote:  NUKE MECCA

Operation GLASS PARKING LOT

Post: #5

It's not declassified. Lot of parts of blacked out. Of course this "release" was too good to be true.

Post: #6

Lmao. We will never eradicate radical Islam as long as we remain an ally with Saudi Arabia. Don't think for one second that having ISIS on the loose isn't preferable to the elites than abandoning the dear Saudis.

Post: #7

Just read it.

It's gonna help Trump bigly™.

Post: #8

Um, how many of those hijackers were from Saudi Arabia?

Post: #9

Isn't it about 15 of the hijackers from Saudi Arabia?

Post: #10

Oddly, my first thought about all of this is that "well that explains why someone as hot as Huma Abedin would bang Hillary, she is spying on her for the terrorists."

That has to be the worst job in the world, to be having sex with someone as disgusting as Hillary and make it believable. I can't help but wonder what the Saudis are giving to pay Huma for that job, is that really worth any amount of money?

And there really isn't anything in these pages that is 100% damning as verifiable proof, as far as I can tell?

Post: #11

This news got zero play due to the coup in Turkey..... business as usual.

Post: #12

(07-16-2016 12:00 AM)eradicator Wrote:  Oddly, my first thought about all of this is that "well that explains why someone as hot as Huma Abedin would bang Hillary, she is spying on her for the terrorists."

That has to be the worst job in the world, to be having sex with someone as disgusting as Hillary and make it believable. I can't help but wonder what the Saudis are giving to pay Huma for that job, is that really worth any amount of money?

And there really isn't anything in these pages that is 100% damning as verifiable proof, as far as I can tell?

She's either taking the strap on from Hillary, or having to break it off for Anthony Wiener. No wonder she looks so pissed off.

On a serious note, Trump needs to focus in on her involvement with a known supporter of Wahabbism.

Post: #13

The Bush and Clinton clans have looked the other way all along regarding the House of Saud. This is nothing new, but rather one more bullet in Trump's gun to use against the Cunt. Keep in mind that Trump was the only Republican with the balls to say that GWB didn't keep us safe, totally pissing off the neoconservatives and Jeb! Bush et al. Trump needs to really dial in his security. We're dealing with deep, dark skeletons.

Post: #14

Ryan Dawson from ANC Report seems pleased with the content of the 28 pages. Seems like he was pretty much right about everything.

Tomorrow he'll upload some explanations. Here's a teaser:




In case you haven't seen it yet, this is his first movie about 9/11, War by Deception:




^This is THE 9/11 Documentary to watch besides the stuff by James Corbett. It give a lot of background info and explains connections that bring a lot more clarity to this clusterfuck of a historic event.

The second one, The Empire Unmasked, which is said to have way more info, is only available for 20$ at http://www.ancreport.com/ as of now.

Post: #15

I doubt they're entirely accurate.

But that said, with this Trump has already accomplished more in one year than the cuckservatives did in 8

Post: #16

Bush classified this at the same time his minions were saying Saddam helped the 9/11 hijackers.

The whole truth about Saudi support for 9/11 was kept from the American people and our sucker allies for 15 years and after two huge wars on other people.

That is the biggest fact for me.

Post: #17

Saudi's supported it, but don't blame them entirely.

Mossad was behind the 9/11 attacks but that is something I don't have concrete citations for because I was told by someone who was, until geographic distance got in the way, a mentor of sorts with an extensive background in unconventional operations.

Look it up yourself and you can find plenty of supporting evidence however.

Post: #18

(07-16-2016 04:43 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  Saudi's supported it, but don't blame them entirely.

Mossad was behind the 9/11 attacks but that is something I don't have concrete citations for because I was told by someone who was, until geographic distance got in the way, a mentor of sorts with an extensive background in unconventional operations.

Look it up yourself and you can find plenty of supporting evidence however.

Yes, (((Mossad))) is behind everything...but that's not the issue here.

This is a smoking gun in the hand of the Saudi Royal Family, and our government knew about it the entire time while the Bushes had dinner parties with Prince Bandar. It doesn't get much more disgusting than this, it's what we all knew and expected, and yet no one else seems to care.

Post: #19

(07-16-2016 04:51 PM)DamienCasanova Wrote:  

(07-16-2016 04:43 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  Saudi's supported it, but don't blame them entirely.

Mossad was behind the 9/11 attacks but that is something I don't have concrete citations for because I was told by someone who was, until geographic distance got in the way, a mentor of sorts with an extensive background in unconventional operations.

Look it up yourself and you can find plenty of supporting evidence however.

Yes, (((Mossad))) is behind everything...but that's not the issue here.

This is a smoking gun in the hand of the Saudi Royal Family, and our government knew about it the entire time while the Bushes had dinner parties with Prince Bandar. It doesn't get much more disgusting than this, it's what we all knew and expected, and yet no one else seems to care.

Depends, Easy_C works in the government/military industry and he's posted about "conspiracy" stuff before I tend to give him the benefit of the doubt.

Post: #20

Saudi involvement is a red herring. Saudi agents didn't bring down Building 7 (47 story modern building 120 yards from the twin towers that was not hit by a plane and that fell at freefall speed in a controlled demolition pattern, and whose fall was announced 20 min before the fact, live on BBC and on other outlets).

Half of those presumed hijackers are still alive.

(07-16-2016 04:43 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  Saudi's supported it, but don't blame them entirely.

Mossad was behind the 9/11 attacks but that is something I don't have concrete citations for because I was told by someone who was, until geographic distance got in the way, a mentor of sorts with an extensive background in unconventional operations.

Look it up yourself and you can find plenty of supporting evidence however.

The best account for who was behind 9/11 is by Christopher Bollyn. His analysis was corroborated by three leading German intelligence officials.

Post: #21

They had 15 years to release this document, but they sat on it. The important question is,

Why now?

What has changed in the geopolitical climate that forced this decision?

Has Saudi Arabia threatened to begin pricing their oil in Yuan?

Mysteries, mysteries