Post: #26

(07-15-2016 02:29 AM)Travesty Wrote:  Jesus, no better proof that musician game trumps all for age dating, for whatever reasons if you are a great musician or artist you can get away with some ridiculous style that other old guys couldn't possibly get away with unless they were considered a rich eccentric type.

It's called "be a legendary rockstar game". I don't see any run-of-the-mill musicians able to do this, especially with American girls, who are grossed out by older guys. 44 years is maybe record. Most times you see famous older guys the average gap is about 20 years. This guy's not just famous, he's an iconic figure.

Post: #27

Mick needs to get the snip snip.

These chicks only want a bit of money, nothing to do with game.

Post: #28

The guy's got only 10-15 years left, at this point he's got to be in YOLO mode.

The only bad part of this is this relationship with his other 7 kids and n wives. I bet his oldest kid is old enough to be the youngest' grandpa...

Post: #29

(07-15-2016 04:21 AM)72 and sunny Wrote:  

(07-15-2016 04:06 AM)Irenicus Wrote:  ...did you see the Instagram of his girl?


He (Mick) is not in a single picture!! Fuck, her dog is in like 3 pictures, while Mick is nowhere to be found.

Some of these mere-mortal-with-megastar relationships are bound to certain expectations regarding privacy, and just all around decency. I'm sure Mickey has that covered.

Besides, he's so much older that she would be trolled as goldigga, and he would be trolled as crypt-keeper cradle robber. This way she doesn't have to face any of that, while still giving off the smart, independent class vibe. This way is so much better for all involved.

I know that the OP is banned, but still, this post warrants an answer.


If his wife was an Holywood actress or something of similar caliber, this would make sense (because actors need a good PR). In all honesty, she wasn't, before she met him.

And Jagger has accumulated quite a lot of money and fame, and having a relative young pussy (of any legal age) at his side will not hurt his image.

She is nothing more than a goldigger. I hope I am wrong.

Post: #30

Mick's game is legendary, no doubt about that. But why have kids at this age? I agree completely. He probably has grandchildren out there.

Post: #31

(07-15-2016 04:06 AM)Irenicus Wrote:  I don't want to be a dick, hater or whatever...but...did you see the Instagram of his girl?


He (Mick) is not in a single picture!! Fuck, her dog is in like 3 pictures, while Mick is nowhere to be found.


Huge red fag recognized.


And she is "only" 29. Mick, what the fuck man? You can get much better than her. God knows how much bones she buried... .


Game not recognized. Goldigger game - recognized.

In her defense, when you're a big name celebrity like Jagger, any video and photographs are meticulously vetted by a publicist prior to getting released. Your main squeeze's Instagram falls under this and he most likely wants to control his media "impression" hence why you don't see any pictures of him.

At the same time, he should be in a few that have been approved.

Post: #32

I think most of the posters are missing the boat.

Jagger wants a LEGACY. How do you have a legacy without kids? You don't. Yeah he already has 7 kids (that he knows about), what what the fuck - why not have even one more! In 3 generations there's gonna be tens and tens of Jaggers running around the world and they're all going to be royalty because of Mick Jagger's celebrity.

And to those complaining about money - Jaggers worth a half billion dollars. Do you think he cares about several hundred thousand a month in child support that will help promote his legacy? Hell no.

This couple knows exactly what's what. The women I read is a dancer or something in NYC and does not want to relocate. Jagger's still touring the world and still has girlfriends in every city. They both know what the deal is here. No one's pulling the wool of either's eyes in this situation. And a 70 year old p.i.m.p. is always going to be smarter than even the most wily 29 year old female. Always.

Post: #33

Was glad to see this thread.

73 years old!

If there is a "wall" for men, it only comes at a very old age.

Post: #34

I thought of starting a thread on this. I didn't. But this was my angle with it all:

Trigger Warning: '7'.

I'm sorry, Mick Jagger – 72 is too old to be having a child

Children deserve to have parents who, at least, expect to be with them for a long time; who have the energy and health to mop up their sick

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/im-s...40826.html


Right, let's dive right in to this latest piece of anti-male invective.

The premise is this: Men who are Mick's age should do the decent thing and stop pro-creating! That's right, a female of our species (know for procreation) has suggested that what Mick is doing is just 'wrong'.

Never mind women who get impregnated with another man's sperm at the age of 50 (now that may not be so natural), let's all hunt down the Dad that can still keep it up - and I'm only talking about the mortgage repayments.

First off. I don't like Jagger. I find him to be arrogant and a bit of an arsehole. He got big, he lucked out. He's a great singer in a great band, but that is as far as me and Mick go with being good buddies.

But this cunt, and I'm sorry, I can't call her anything else, had this to say:

Rock and roll? More like pram and doll for 72-year-old Mick Jagger, who’s expecting his eighth child with his ballerina girlfriend.

What a bitter and twisted bitch you are. Who the fuck are you to question a man's age, a man that can provide like no other, and then insult his 'ballerina' girlfriend? You might as well have called her a slut you jealous little trollop.

Next verse:

The older dads are coming; and they’re coming hard (pun intended). Across celebrity circles, unprecedented numbers of men are shunning the easy life for one of Pampers, stress and sleepless nights. From Elton John, to Rod Stewart, to Bruce Willis, to sixty-nine year old Ronnie Wood, it’s gonads are go.

What a sad fuck you are. "coming hard (pun intended)". "gonads are go". Stop using a computer you cunt, you are retarded.

Basically, this cunt has done a demolition job on Jagger, accusing him of being irresponsible or perhaps of low morals or I don't know what. It's just clever-clever-cunt language.

She is attacking a man for having a baby. A man that can provide far more than any other of the other 99 percent of males on planet earth. Poor deprived child.

Her bitterness and envy is on display for all to see. She will soon be barren (is that the term?) and won't be dropping any sprogs at all. The desiccated cunt. If wimmins ain't allowed to do it, why should men have all the fun, especially when they are in the top of the top 1 percent on earth.

Lordy lordy. Someone put this beauty down for a brain transplant. Or a soul transplant. Or better, a gender transplant (not talking trans here) - let her live a day in the life of a man. Instead of a bitter, hate-spewing cunt.

Read the article for yourselves. Pretty obvious what her angle is.

Every day I read shit like this. I don't even bother putting it up. I should. We all should. It's a fucking compendium of anti-male rhetoric that isn't even so subtle these days.

I didn't read all the replies, but this one caught my eye:

When women act like feckless, selfish, irresponsible idiots with their reproductive systems, to point this out is to be accused, in feminist parlance, of 'shaming'.

Jagger is a multi-millionaire and can give the child the works. If he dies when it's six months old, so what? Much better than some slapper producing a child after a quick bunk up with a stranger and making the State the kid's ersatz father.

Charlotte Gill, there is definitely something very fishy about you, and it's not your unwashed pussy.

Not sure if she wrote this article for money (prostitution) or just out of male-envy. But boy did she mark herself out as one seriously damaged human being. I wouldn't let my wife or my children anywhere near this cunt.

Leave Mick Jagger alone (insert ironic Britney video)! He's a bloody wrinkly old English fart that is lucky to be alive, let alone lucky enough to be having children.

I had no time for him before, but now he is my best buddy. It's called solidarity, bitch, you might have heard of it?

Whatevs.


And the Independent spews forth this rubbish, all the while, informing me I am using an ad-blocker!

They just don't see it do they?

When it comes, it will be swift and brutal and totally unsuspected, even though they were warned. Just one big game to them. That they think they are winning. All the while...

Post: #35

(07-16-2016 06:17 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  Was glad to see this thread.

73 years old!

If there is a "wall" for men, it only comes at a very old age.

There is no wall for male celebrities. Regular guys? Sure.

Post: #36

Just saw the Mick's baby has been born now. I'll have to say, Mick is doing something right.



WBAIA73 (Would Bang and Impregnate at 73)

Post: #37

Post: #38

Off topic, but that reminds me of Russian chess grandmaster and pianist Mark Taimanov, who recently died at the ripe old age of 90.

He became the father of twins at the age of 78, with his then 43 year old fourth wife, who's 14 years younger than his first child (57 at the time the twins were born).
The twins are 27 years younger than his granddaughter, although they are her aunt and uncle.

Something about those musicians!

Post: #39

A local wheeler dealer impregnated a lawyer at age 80. This was discovered to have happened when he died and the money was divided up in the will. Turned out she was his lawyer too. I guess she found a way to keep representing him 20 years after he died.

Post: #40

Personally, I don't see anything wrong with it. If you're talented and wealthy enough to be porking women of childbearing age at 73, I say more power to you. I'd rather have another Jagger in the world than some welfare queen crapping out another wannabe rapper's bastard children.

Post: #41

Having children is the most fundamental existential decision we make, far more than suiciding or not ( which only varies the time of an inevitable event). I see it as the most sincere statement of whether you think life is worth living or not.

It is a person's private choice, and if it pisses some people off that your seed is living while theirs is so far not; so they pontificate on their moral soapbox, as far as I'm concerned that's more reason to do it.

Post: #42

The Rolling Stones' Mick, 74, is pictured for the first time with sexy film producer Noor Alfallah, 22, after 'a string of romantic Paris dates'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/art...ve-22.html

Quote:Putting the moves on again, Jagger? The Rolling Stones' Mick, 74, is pictured for the first time with sexy film producer Noor Alfallah, 22, after 'a string of romantic Paris dates'
The Rolling Stones legend and the glamorous film producer - who's 52 years his junior - were spotted on a date in the French capital this month
He's said to have had a 'twinkle in his eye' after taking Noor on multiple dates in the city, while he's on the No Filter tour with the band
However, Mick's spokesperson has confirmed to MailOnline that he is still with girlfriend, Melanie Hamrick - the mother of his 10-month-old daughter Deveraux
The rocker has eight children, the eldest of which are 46 years old, as well as three grandchildren and one great-grandchild

Would bang furiously.

Post: #43

Fucker's trying to break his own record. That's some drive, may we all learn from it.