Post: #76

(07-14-2016 06:09 AM)noseyneighbor Wrote:  

(07-14-2016 05:35 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  

(07-14-2016 05:24 AM)Perfectionist Wrote:  

(07-14-2016 02:40 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  There has been an uptick in subtle and not so subtle trolls lately. If a guys first post is silly or low value, it will rightfully get scrutiny. Actually new guys have it easy these days- a lot more low value stuff is let slide when it wouldn't be if Tuth was more active these days. Miss that guy.

The vast majority of new guys do not get hassled unless they start out with suspect stuff.

Seems clear that many of you suspect way too much... why is that?

Did you even read the text you quoted, which gives a clear answer to your question in the first line?

A new member being a snarky prick is grounds for suspicion as well.

The reason this is the best forum on the internet is because we have a high standard here.

You all take yourselves too seriously. It's a thread on vagina's and women. With medical research to back it. This information is actually very useful when taking into account women's health.

Did you two go to the same reading comprehension class?

I never said I thought you were a troll bud, I explained the legitimate reason why some might suspect that's the case.

Post: #77

(07-14-2016 06:32 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  

(07-14-2016 06:09 AM)noseyneighbor Wrote:  

(07-14-2016 05:35 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  

(07-14-2016 05:24 AM)Perfectionist Wrote:  

(07-14-2016 02:40 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  There has been an uptick in subtle and not so subtle trolls lately. If a guys first post is silly or low value, it will rightfully get scrutiny. Actually new guys have it easy these days- a lot more low value stuff is let slide when it wouldn't be if Tuth was more active these days. Miss that guy.

The vast majority of new guys do not get hassled unless they start out with suspect stuff.

Seems clear that many of you suspect way too much... why is that?

Did you even read the text you quoted, which gives a clear answer to your question in the first line?

A new member being a snarky prick is grounds for suspicion as well.

The reason this is the best forum on the internet is because we have a high standard here.

You all take yourselves too seriously. It's a thread on vagina's and women. With medical research to back it. This information is actually very useful when taking into account women's health.

Did you two go to the same reading comprehension class?

I never said I thought you were a troll bud, I explained the legitimate reason why some might suspect that's the case.

If you read what I said, you can see I never said you did say I was a troll. I said you all take yourselves too seriously.

Post: #78

Seriously now - I spent two decades in California so I can claim some pertinent exposure - ahem. In my experience it's really a crapshoot. You'll find a tall skinny blond with a snatch that feels like she previously gave birth to a soccer team, and then you'll fuck a latina who's tight as hell. Asian girls - same thing - I've come across tight and loose specimen in my field studies. Black girls love me (I've got Nordic genes) and same experience there: some super tight and others regular size all the way to storage locker.



I suspect however that this type of empirical research may keep us occupied for many years to come.

Post: #79

(07-14-2016 06:37 AM)noseyneighbor Wrote:  

(07-14-2016 06:32 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  

(07-14-2016 06:09 AM)noseyneighbor Wrote:  

(07-14-2016 05:35 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  

(07-14-2016 05:24 AM)Perfectionist Wrote:  Seems clear that many of you suspect way too much... why is that?

Did you even read the text you quoted, which gives a clear answer to your question in the first line?

A new member being a snarky prick is grounds for suspicion as well.

The reason this is the best forum on the internet is because we have a high standard here.

You all take yourselves too seriously. It's a thread on vagina's and women. With medical research to back it. This information is actually very useful when taking into account women's health.

Did you two go to the same reading comprehension class?

I never said I thought you were a troll bud, I explained the legitimate reason why some might suspect that's the case.

If you read what I said, you can see I never said you did say I was a troll. I said you all take yourselves too seriously.

You convinced me.

Post: #80

(07-14-2016 06:27 AM)noseyneighbor Wrote:  

(07-14-2016 06:17 AM)Suits Wrote:  Do you stand by your analysis?

Yes, and why does it matter?

She stands by her analysis.

Post: #81

(07-14-2016 06:38 AM)redpillage Wrote:  Seriously now - I spent two decades in California so I can claim some pertinent exposure - ahem. In my experience it's really a crapshoot. You'll find a tall skinny blond with a snatch that feels like she previously gave birth to a soccer team, and then you'll fuck a latina who's tight as hell. Asian girls - same thing - I've come across tight and loose specimen in my field studies. Black girls love me (I've got Nordic genes) and same experience there: some super tight and others regular size all the way to storage locker.



I suspect however that this type of empirical research may keep us occupied for many years to come.

It's not only down by race. As I said before its average. You need to also consider who's had children. For me I think it has less to do with race and more to do with hip size. Women with narrower hips on average tend to have tighter vaginal canals.

However, I read that black women have tilted hips. A posterior axial tilt which makes their butt jut out and rounder.

Post: #82

Just tell us your insecurities about your loose cunt OP, or brag about your tight one before you get banned. Get it off your chest.Time is precious, you understand? Same for your friend in here.

Post: #83

(07-14-2016 06:56 AM)Tex Cruise Wrote:  Just tell us your insecurities about your loose cunt OP, or brag about your tight one before you get banned. Get it off your chest.Time is precious, you understand? Same for your friend in here.

???

I'm a man. I have no friends in here either. Tbh you all sound super paranoid for no reason.

Post: #84

Why did OP leave out Aboriginal women? They always get left out of game discussions.

Post: #85

(07-14-2016 07:45 AM)Pride male Wrote:  Why did OP leave out Aboriginal women? They always get left out of game discussions.

Or Eskimos?

I don't know about tightness but I hear Eskimo pussy is mighty cold.

Aloha!

Post: #86

(07-14-2016 07:51 AM)Kona Wrote:  

(07-14-2016 07:45 AM)Pride male Wrote:  Why did OP leave out Aboriginal women? They always get left out of game discussions.

Or Eskimos?

I don't know about tightness but I hear Eskimo pussy is mighty cold.

Aloha!

Full Metal Jacket!

Post: #87

(07-14-2016 07:57 AM)Dantes Wrote:  

(07-14-2016 07:51 AM)Kona Wrote:  

(07-14-2016 07:45 AM)Pride male Wrote:  Why did OP leave out Aboriginal women? They always get left out of game discussions.

Or Eskimos?

I don't know about tightness but I hear Eskimo pussy is mighty cold.

Aloha!

Full Metal Jacket!

Post: #88

By the way OP,

did you posted this thread on /pol or did you steal it from /pol?

Post: #89

And if OP posted it on /pol/ why then post it again here?

Post: #90

(07-14-2016 08:21 AM)Aquiles_Baesta_Parada Wrote:  By the way OP,

did you posted this thread on /pol or did you steal it from /pol?

I think Aquiles_Baesta_Parada has just cracked this case

Post: #91

(07-14-2016 08:21 AM)Aquiles_Baesta_Parada Wrote:  By the way OP,

did you posted this thread on /pol or did you steal it from /pol?

What the hell is /pol? I never got it from there. I already said I saw the study on another thread. But if you look at the date it couldn't have been me. I posted this on July 13th. The userid for the other person says July 14th. So whoever it was stole it from me

Post: #92

All women are tight for me.

Post: #93

(07-14-2016 09:02 AM)noseyneighbor Wrote:  

(07-14-2016 08:21 AM)Aquiles_Baesta_Parada Wrote:  By the way OP,

did you posted this thread on /pol or did you steal it from /pol?

What the hell is /pol? I never got it from there. I already said I saw the study on another thread. But if you look at the date it couldn't have been me. I posted this on July 13th. The userid for the other person says July 14th. So whoever it was stole it from me

It was a question not an accusation and you being extremely defensive would suggest that it probably was you who posted in both places.

Post: #94

$200,000,000 government study to give what is essentially an opinion or junk science. I have differing data that cost less to find, and I need more samples before I publish the findings.

New Troll type:
"Government Study Troll"

Post: #95

(07-14-2016 09:02 AM)noseyneighbor Wrote:  What the hell is /pol? I never got it from there. I already said I saw the study on another thread. But if you look at the date it couldn't have been me. I posted this on July 13th. The userid for the other person says July 14th. So whoever it was stole it from me

Tuth -where are you ?
We need you now.

Post: #96

(07-14-2016 09:14 AM)Ethan Hunt Wrote:  

(07-14-2016 09:02 AM)noseyneighbor Wrote:  

(07-14-2016 08:21 AM)Aquiles_Baesta_Parada Wrote:  By the way OP,

did you posted this thread on /pol or did you steal it from /pol?

What the hell is /pol? I never got it from there. I already said I saw the study on another thread. But if you look at the date it couldn't have been me. I posted this on July 13th. The userid for the other person says July 14th. So whoever it was stole it from me

It was a question not an accusation and you being extremely defensive would suggest that it probably was you who posted in both places.

No, it wasn't me. The fact that the others quickly assumed I was some kind of troll and it was me as if I'm some kind of troll like they've been accusing me of being since start, made me get annoyed however.

I posted a thread I saw from another site, which wasn't /pol. No seriously what is /pol?

Again you all take yourselves way too seriously.

Post: #97

(07-14-2016 09:17 AM)Off The Reservation Wrote:  $200,000,000 government study to give what is essentially an opinion or junk science. I have differing data that cost less to find, and I need more samples before I publish the findings.

New Troll type:
"Government Study Troll"

Ok, well become a gynecologist, sleep with or examine over 70,000 women of all races and then report back.

Post: #98

(07-14-2016 07:45 AM)Pride male Wrote:  Why did OP leave out Aboriginal women? They always get left out of game discussions.

I didn't leave them out, the studies did.

Post: #99

this thread is a fascinating example of social dynamics at play.

new guy comes in, acting like he is already part of the group -> gets amogged really bad.

OP, fight for us newposters! don't lose frame and you may come out of this alive.

in the meantime

Post: #100

(07-14-2016 09:33 AM)Il Sorpasso Wrote:  this thread is a fascinating example of social dynamics at play.

new guy comes in, acting like he is already part of the group -> gets amogged really bad.

OP, fight for us newposters! don't lose frame and you may come out of this alive.

in the meantime

Why is this site so clicky? I feel I'm on the movie Mean Girls.