Post: #76

Doesn't England have a severe problem with young male immigrants harassing/raping women? I think there was a Netflix documentary called Roterdam that showed a lot of women being assaulted by invaders.

How would you stop such things? Well, you could pass a law that if women even feel uncomfortable then that'd be a misogynistic hate crime. You'd get a lot of innocents but as Mao once said, "better a hundred innocents die rather than one guilty go free." And it'd be very easy to implement and enforce; simply ask the woman how she felt and if she says badly then the man is guilty.

I imagine when these rules (and it's only a matter of when) comes to the USA then being a man could be somewhat like being a free black man living in the antebellum South; technically free but highly likely to commit an emotional crime on someone by one's mere presence.

It feels to me, purposefully or otherwise, that we as society is doing some eugenics program but instead of breeding for just looks we're also breeding for fame. By essentially making day or night game illegal, we've eliminated most men from talking to women, and online only the most attractive men get women.

What do you guys think? I feel my statements are a bit off but cannot specify exactly why.

Post: #77

Looks as if indirect game will be the way to go.

Saying that i find it easy to tell here just by a girls body language how she would receive an approach whether on the street in daylight or in the club. Can find that more difficult overseas.

Post: #78

(09-11-2016 02:13 PM)Conquerer7 Wrote:  Looks as if indirect game will be the way to go.

Saying that i find it easy to tell here just by a girls body language how she would receive an approach whether on the street in daylight or in the club. Can find that more difficult overseas.

Plausible deniability used to be merely annoying but part of the Game but now it could be the difference between you walking free and receiving a career-changing criminal charge.

As Ivan996 noted, this is from the jurisdiction that brought us Rotherham.

Quote:The force defines misogyny hate crime as “incidents against women that are motivated by an attitude of a man towards a woman and includes behaviour targeted towards a woman by men simply because they are a woman”.

This is pretty much saying that heterosexual motivations are hate crimes.

Post: #79

UK women really are the worst

Post: #80

(09-11-2016 11:27 PM)N°6 Wrote:  

Quote:The force defines misogyny hate crime as “incidents against women that are motivated by an attitude of a man towards a woman and includes behaviour targeted towards a woman by men simply because they are a woman”.

This is pretty much saying that [male] heterosexual motivations are hate crimes.

I'd say it's explicitly saying that. The whole purpose of these vague, all-encompassing laws is to put one class of people completely at the mercy of another class.

As always, hopefully those who have penned this law, have put their names to it, for the benefit and pleasure of posterity.

Post: #81

(09-11-2016 11:27 PM)N°6 Wrote:  

(09-11-2016 02:13 PM)Conquerer7 Wrote:  Looks as if indirect game will be the way to go.

Saying that i find it easy to tell here just by a girls body language how she would receive an approach whether on the street in daylight or in the club. Can find that more difficult overseas.

Plausible deniability used to be merely annoying but part of the Game but now it could be the difference between you walking free and receiving a career-changing criminal charge.

As Ivan996 noted, this is from the jurisdiction that brought us Rotherham.

Quote:The force defines misogyny hate crime as “incidents against women that are motivated by an attitude of a man towards a woman and includes behaviour targeted towards a woman by men simply because they are a woman”.

This is pretty much saying that heterosexual motivations are hate crimes.

They have defined it like that so it is classed as open-ended. Meaning if a woman feels uncomfortable with a man she can get the police onto him.

It wasn't designed with men chatting up women but more to do with cretins who stalk women at work, at home or follow her. Stalkers with expert knowledge of the law could merely state he was within the vicinity and walking that way.

Now the law is interpreted according to how a woman feels. So if you're not her type and she perceives you as a creeper, a police officer is never far away in the town centre.

Post: #82

(09-11-2016 08:20 AM)Roosh Wrote:  As was predicted, the law is going to be rolled out nationally.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016...-crackdown

Quote:Police forces across England and Wales are considering expanding their definition of hate crime to include misogyny after an experiment in one city that saw more than 20 investigations launched in two months.

"Experiment" is a lie. This is planned. It'll come to the USA too.

Ya know what's more worrying? This anti-street-harassment hysteria is at a time when "teh emp0wered womminz" want to walk naked in public.

The woman who defamed you in Canada last year supports the right for women to be topless in public, even in children's bedrooms which she appears to endorse and support.





I don't understand why would empowered women want to walk naked on the streets and have men arrested for "street harassment" even if it is unfounded allegations.

It kind of looks like the only males who are gonna get laid are from their female teachers, and as soon as the males reach 18, the males are viewed as "rapists, perverts, drunk sex advocates, rape advocates, etc).

Some real Orwellian stuff. Empowered women literally are claiming they "don't need no man" because the same women can become childcare workers and teach kids how to sex. Nasty women.

Post: #83

To quote from FoolsGo1d #81:

Quote:They have defined it like that so it is classed as open-ended. Meaning if a woman feels uncomfortable with a man she can get the police onto him.

Like this?






In Toronto, just minding your own business and walking with a camera like a GoPro can cause a half-naked woman to turn back, and then cry out how she was being followed (in a crowded Pride venue where there are few routes to walk on anyways), while she has her feminazi friends to entrap the man before trying to punch him in his face to destroy his camera.

I don't know that much about recent UK Constitutional rights because I haven't stayed there long enough to experience the surroundings, but in the USA it is not illegal to film in a public venue where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.

What these street harassment laws are doing is allowing half-naked and naked women on the streets to cry out false charges on innocent men.

The question is..Who is funding for more police officers to be on the streets to enforce "Street Harassment" Laws? The US National debt would increase if the government had to utilize more funding to train and hire more police officers to jail productive men over vexatious and false charges of "street harassment".

Post: #84

My friends, we live in a dark time, but I believe places like this one are the striking of the match that will one day light the way forward. I am proud to finally be numbered among you in name rather than lurker.

When you combine laws like these with modern female sensitivities we are in for a rough ride ahead though. I cite the following example of why this is a bad idea

http://www.independent.ie/entertainment/...46393.html

Post: #85

^ The writer is actually "deconstructing" Rod Stewart's song lyrics?

Rod Stewart might have contributed MILLIONS OF $$$$ to his country's economy because of his worldwide fame, but all it takes is for one Tumblr Feminist to smear his name?

Talk about ungrateful people.

Speaking from an economic perspective, once all of these Tumblr activists run out of people to vilify, there wouldn't be any money to tax because all of the rich men left the country or offshored the money where it wouldn't be taxed to fund for "street harassment" legislation and enforcement....

Post: #86

Is it time to get out of The Game?

Post: #87

Ludicrous.

I'spose this means British guys who are clueless with women need to focus on improving their lifestyle before their game so that they're in good shape, have some style and can travel to practice game abroad before practicing it here so British women are more receptive to their approach.

Either way, all the more reason to move away from the UK. The sailing thread has really inspired me to build the paper needed to have that kind of life. But I do genuinely think all these laws are going to eventually wake more and more men up to the fact that these laws are screwing them over and so something has to give. I doubt something as drastic as the majority of British men getting red pilled will happen, but the mindset of how to live in Britain as a man will definitely begin to change.

Post: #88

Without reading through the whole thread, and apologies if it's being reposted, but the police don't make up laws. Parliament makes up laws.
What the police are doing is recording it as a "hate crime" on their own little database. What should be noted is that an actual crime doesn't have to be comitted, they can just record whatever they want.

In my opinion the object of the exercise is to use the data from the "hate crime" database as a tool to get parliament to pass "hate crime" laws. Wanting to shag a british bird doesn't seem all that hateful, ill advised, but not hateful. I'm not sure what's going to happen to the birth rate when no one is allowed to proposition anyone.

With regards the great British legal system generally, this is well worth a read:
http://www.libertarianview.co.uk/current...able-doubt

Post: #89

Considering this is the county Rotherham is in, this is just a law against ugly/beta men by virtue signalling cowards.

Post: #90

(09-15-2016 06:11 AM)hv123 Wrote:  I'm not sure what's going to happen to the birth rate when no one is allowed to proposition anyone.

This is how we know that feminism is a tool of the globalists to destroy the West.

Not only are our women fat, bitchy and useless, but we can be arrested for talking to them.

I'd just like to reiterate my point from earlier that she herself doesn't have to report you, any witness can. Her beta orbiter in the club will report you for talking to 'his' girl regardless of her attraction to you, in fact especially if she's attracted to you. Ultimate cock blocking.

Post: #91

Further proof that feminism/virtue signaling is a mental disease facilitated by the (((globalists))). In 100 years from now when whites (and based non-whites) are living in a Starship Troopers future, history teachers then will be calling 21st century Brits every name in the book (and cuck cowards will be too soft a reference)

Post: #92

When I saw "spitting game is now illegal..." for a second I thought PUA's had invented a new pick up method were you literally spit on women.

Post: #93

Your Thought For Today: does this law in fact have the unintended consequence of ingraining misogynistic behaviour in ethnic communities and making those communities stronger?

We know for certain minorities of the sheepfucking kind, culture comes before the law two-thirds of the time. For a nasty portion of those said minorities, culture -- that is to say, shari'a, which is essentially nothing but culture backed by God's inerrant word -- comes before the law three-thirds of the time, and that's how you get suicide bombers and the like. Anyway, point being: any insular ethnic minority that has its own language, ghettos, and belief system is basically going to ignore this law and ensure that its women also ignore it; remember, it's not the men who enforce the hijab against women, it's mainly other Muslim women. Sure, you might get some slightly three-digit-IQed Muslim woman who finally manages to get a firing neuron that says "Hey, I don't like the way he talks to me," but for the most part, so long as the culture is insular, this sort of thought-policing law will not penetrate it. At best it'll be seen as a justification for the behijabed hordes to not trust White Man's Law and use it even less. And the sort of Western woman who's so without foundation and independent thought as to willingly go under the veil is not the sort of woman who is exactly going to go crying to Scotland Yard if Ahmed says she is to shut the fuck up because she's a woman, either.

This law is basically targeted at only two groups: those who will take advantage of it, i.e. victimhood white women, and those who'll stand a chance of obeying it, i.e. compliant white men.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #94

(05-20-2017 05:30 AM)AFS Wrote:  When I saw "spitting game is now illegal..." for a second I thought PUA's had invented a new pick up method were you literally spit on women.

Only if you have an exceptionally long beard and look down on pictures of Teh Profet.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #95

(09-14-2016 03:18 PM)MKDAWUSS Wrote:  Is it time to get out of The Game?

Well, not yet depending on the state that you live. However BOLO and watch what the local/State gov does. Harassment is not exactly uniform throughout the US so one state will have more stringent laws than others. You can thank Maddison for that one.

Given that, the culture is changing for the worse, and with that the laws will eventually. Unfortunately, I don't have the kind of answers to stop this or the massive hard times ahead that will spring from it.