Post: #1

The chickens have come home to roost, as the saying goes.

This article was in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and is now circulating on conservative blogs. What happened was someone from the left realized she wasn't so leftist after all when her kids encountered chicks With dicks in the bathroom.

Don't you hate it when that happens?

How many other die-hard liberals will realize their ideas maybe aren't so good once they get affected personally?

***

Georgia ACLU director resigns over transgender fight

By Greg Blustein.

The head of Georgia’s ACLU chapter opened a new rift in the debate over restroom rights this week when she stepped down in protest of the civil rights group’s support for controversial efforts to let transgender people use the restroom that matches their gender identity.

Maya Dillard Smith said Thursday she resigned because she was met with hostility when she questioned the organization’s stance on the policy, adding that she risked being branded a homophobe by even raising her critique.

“There are real concerns about the safety of women and girls in regards to this bathroom debate,” Dillard Smith said in an interview. “It seems to me that instead of stifling the dialogue, we want to encourage a robust debate to come up with an effective solution.”

Many Georgia conservatives have aired similar concerns, but Dillard Smith adds a prominent liberal voice to the mix. She said she’s had misgivings about the bathroom debate since her young daughters shared a restroom in Oakland, Calif. with three transgender women with deep voices.

(Allow me: Hahahahahahahahahahahahaah. Wonder if the writer realized how funny this sentence was.)

“My kids were visibly frightened. I was scared. And I was ill-prepared to answer their questions,” she said. “I’ve been asking those same questions, and now I want to raise an honest conversation about them.”

The ACLU declined to comment on Smith’s resignation, citing personnel matters, but a top official circulated a memo to staff arguing that restroom rights are often center stage in civil rights battles. James Esseks, director of the organization’s LGBT & HIV project, said other minorities, including blacks, gays and the disabled, had to wage similar fights for equality in bathrooms.

“It’s no accident that this issue is surfacing now, as protections for transgender people increasingly become part of the national conversation,” wrote Esseks, adding: “Opponents of transgender equality are seeking to exploit the public’s lack of knowledge about transgender people to incite fear and stop any further progress for transgender rights or more broadly for LGBT rights.”

While the Georgia Legislature sidestepped the debate over transgender rights this year, some conservative lawmakers are weighing a range of proposals that could revive the debate.

And Georgia was one of 11 states to join a federal lawsuit challenging the bathroom guidelines released by the Obama administration in May that directed public schools to allow transgender students to use bathrooms that match their gender identity.

Gov. Nathan Deal said the “one-size-fits-all solution to this is totally inappropriate,” and Attorney General Sam Olens termed it a dramatic overreach that flouts local control.

Dillard Smith, meanwhile, launched a new website dubbed “Finding Middle Ground,” with a goal of hashing out a compromise over the bathroom debate. It stars her daughter, who sounds skeptical about “boys in the girls bathroom” as slides flash with sharper questions.

“How do we KEEP OUR LITTLE GIRLS SAFE and PREVENT TRANSGENDER DISCRIMINATION?” says one.

Post: #2

trans rights vs. children's rights, I think this story qualifies: /thread-55196.html

Post: #3

Post: #4

Shouldn't transgenders just use the bathroom outside anyway?

I mean... they're already freaks of nature...

Post: #5

Can't wait till Salon starts labeling fellow leftists "pedophobes" when they object to "non-violent pedophiles" leering at their 5 year old daughters in the bathroom.

Post: #6

Turns out the best way to undermine this radicalism is to force people to live with it.

Makes total sense, really.

Post: #7

I clicked on the link and thought the photo was of one of the chicks with dicks in question.

Turned out to be the concerned mother...

Post: #8

(06-02-2016 07:27 PM)Buck Wild Wrote:  Turns out the best way to undermine this radicalism is to force people to live with it.

Makes total sense, really.

I really think we're seeing the beginning of the end when they devour each other for internal strife.

We've seen SJWs turning on LGBT advocates for offending Muslims, turning on feminists for objecting to adult males being in the bathroom with their underage daughters, and seen them promoting tolerance of "non-violent pedophiles" while at the same time trying to claim that if a consenting adult woman regrets the sex 1 year later it becomes "rape".

They've descended into pure moral anarchy and it's only a matter of time before the savages begin devouring one another. Within a decade or so it won't surprise me when the public tide turns full force against the movement, and publicly identifying as a "SJW" becomes about as socially acceptable as identifying as a Klansman or Holocaust denier on Berekely, U campus.

(Much as the anti-war movement only really took force when people saw the bodies of Vietnam soliders on live TV, people weren't able to witness the lunacy of the SJW firsthand until the mainstreaming of social media just 1 decade ago; and just like the backlash against Vietnam, one is brewing against the entirety of this counter-culture craziness).

Post: #9

It seems to me that the ACLU has only recently become a leftist institution. Prior to about 5 years ago I always thought they were more in line with classical liberty / modern libertarian.

I don't find this surprising at all though. The left is right now leaving behind a lot of people that think of themselves as liberals and evangelical black people, you would think, will eventually speak out more loudly against this stuff

Post: #10

(06-02-2016 07:51 PM)Grodin Wrote:  It seems to me that the ACLU has only recently become a leftist institution. Prior to about 5 years ago I always thought they were more in line with classical liberty / modern libertarian.

I don't find this surprising at all though. The left is right now leaving behind a lot of people that think of themselves as liberals and evangelical black people, you would think, will eventually speak out more loudly against this stuff

I always considered them far-leftist; their main agenda seemed to be "freedom of speech" allegedly in line with the first Amendment, however I believe they interpret it to extremes which the Founders themselves never intended; such as a Muslim woman having a "right" to wear a veil on a driver's license because of "religious freedom" when anyone else would be forced to uncover their face.

Apparently they think the Founders fought, died and froze to death in Valley Forge so that perverts would have a "right" to change in the locker room with 5 year old girls.

I'm not a Constitutional scholar but I believe the the 1st Amendment was intended to be within reason and states were allowed to put reasonable public restrictions on it (e.x. obscenity laws); the ACLU seem like the kind of people who believe there's a "right" to open a heroin stand outside of an elementary school or sell bestiality porn DVDs to 3 year old kids; they're basically just anarchists.

Post: #11

(06-02-2016 07:54 PM)EDantes Wrote:  

(06-02-2016 07:51 PM)Grodin Wrote:  

Apparently they think the Founders fought, died and froze to death in Valley Forge so that perverts would have a "right" to change in the locker room with 5 year old girls.

I disagree with that. The Founder Father's probably wouldn't have cared as long as it would passed in each individual state and with the Constitution in mind. They never would have thought this would ever become an issue either.

The problem is that wouldn't passed in any state, not even California. It was forced down the throats of citizens by the media and Feds.

Post: #12

(06-02-2016 07:36 PM)EDantes Wrote:  

(06-02-2016 07:27 PM)Buck Wild Wrote:  Turns out the best way to undermine this radicalism is to force people to live with it.

Makes total sense, really.

I really think we're seeing the beginning of the end when they devour each other for internal strife.

We've seen SJWs turning on LGBT advocates for offending Muslims, turning on feminists for objecting to adult males being in the bathroom with their underage daughters, and seen them promoting tolerance of "non-violent pedophiles" while at the same time trying to claim that if a consenting adult woman regrets the sex 1 year later it becomes "rape".

They've descended into pure moral anarchy and it's only a matter of time before the savages begin devouring one another. Within a decade or so it won't surprise me when the public tide turns full force against the movement, and publicly identifying as a "SJW" becomes about as socially acceptable as identifying as a Klansman or Holocaust denier on Berekely, U campus.

It already has. How else do you explain the way that the more outrageous any Donald Trump statement is, the more support he gets?

Post: #13

Every one of these idiots is for it, till it's their own little brat.
Same goes for both tranny bowel movements and gorilla-toddler happy hours.

Post: #14

(06-02-2016 08:32 PM)realologist Wrote:  

(06-02-2016 07:54 PM)EDantes Wrote:  

(06-02-2016 07:51 PM)Grodin Wrote:  

Apparently they think the Founders fought, died and froze to death in Valley Forge so that perverts would have a "right" to change in the locker room with 5 year old girls.

I disagree with that. The Founder Father's probably wouldn't have cared as long as it would passed in each individual state and with the Constitution in mind. They never would have thought this would ever become an issue either.

The problem is that wouldn't passed in any state, not even California. It was forced down the throats of citizens by the media and Feds.

True, I agree with you as far as the federal govt goes, I don't believe that "transgender or gay rights" would have ever been considered protected by the federal govt though, they would have been left up to the states.

The notion of equating the "separate but equal" ruling on race to gay members of the same sex who are incapable of procreation is pretty absurd; as is likewise the notion of equating having separate water fountains for blacks and whites with prohibiting a 40 year old man from showering with little girls.

Post: #15

"The head of Georgia’s ACLU chapter opened a new rift in the debate over restroom rights"

So which is it? Pedophobe? Anti-children? Racism? Anti-mother? Anti-restroom rights? Transphobic?

We just have to hit rock bottom soon. I dont have the memepower for this butthurt.

Post: #16

(06-02-2016 08:44 PM)cubanlinx Wrote:  Every one of these idiots is for it, till it's their own little brat.
Same goes for both tranny bowel movements and gorilla-toddler happy hours.

Limousine liberalism for you; the left just views "minorities / underprivileged" as noble savages. Since they reject God it just becomes their replacement for "holier than thou" religiosity, much like the Pharisees in the Bible who donated sacks of gold in the public eye to give an appearance of helping the needy, but wouldn't be seen dead in their company.

Hence often the ones who favor unrestricted immigration live in lilly white neighborhoods; the celebrities in favor of gun control have their own entourage of armed guards; the males most in favor of feminism are the ones least likely to ever be in consentual physical proximity of a female, etc.

(06-02-2016 08:51 PM)ivansirko Wrote:  "The head of Georgia’s ACLU chapter opened a new rift in the debate over restroom rights"

So which is it? Pedophobe? Anti-children? Racism? Anti-mother? Anti-restroom rights? Transphobic?

We just have to hit rock bottom soon. I dont have the memepower for this butthurt.

Honestly there's not much left before they just become Marquis de Sade, what perversions do they have left to defend now that salon is promoting pedophilia? In order for "social justice" to stay in business they'll always have to "invent" a new victim class.

Incestuophobe? (Incest) Necrophobe? (Corpses), Zoophobe? (Bestiality), Coprophobe? (Scat fetishism), Biastiophobe? (Serial rape) Erotophonophobe? (Lust murder)?

If left unchecked, they'll eventually end up having to fight for women's rights while simultaneously having to fight for Roosh's right to "promote rape" out of fear of being labeled "biastiophobes" just to be consistent.

Post: #17

(06-02-2016 07:51 PM)Grodin Wrote:  It seems to me that the ACLU has only recently become a leftist institution. Prior to about 5 years ago I always thought they were more in line with classical liberty / modern libertarian.

I don't find this surprising at all though. The left is right now leaving behind a lot of people that think of themselves as liberals and evangelical black people, you would think, will eventually speak out more loudly against this stuff

No, the ACLU has always been a Leftist front. It effectively started as the legal defense fund for the communist party in the US during the "Palmer Raid" period. While they got a great deal of attention for their involvement int the famous "Scopes Monkey Trial" in 1921, most of their activities involved political radicals. In 1931, a Congressional committee determined that 90% of their legal cases involved defending a Communists who came into conflict with the law.

While the ACLU has on occasion chose to come to the aid of some non-Leftist cause (most notably defending the right of American Nazis to march in Skokie, IL in the 1970s), such behavior is the exception to the rule, and is mainly a tool to confuse the public as to the organization's true intentions; to undermine American strength and values. The organization has been disturbingly effective and involved in virtually every major issue in American life for the last hundred years.

So, yeah, their history is basically entirely leftist. Roger Baldwin, the founder of the ACLU, wrote in 1935 "I am for Socialism, disarmament and ultimately, for the abolishing of the State itself … I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class and sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal."

Post: #18

I had an idea similar to this.

When the transgender thing was starting up, I was thinking it would be a genius idea to put together a political activist group of transgenders together and start sending them into women's restrooms and locker rooms throughout San Francisco and NYC.

If the locals start complaining accuse them of being racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, bigoted backwards people who can't simply understand other people's lifestyles.

Keep doing this on repeat until it becomes completely obvious how hypocritical these progressives are.

Post: #19

4chan should encourage "shit-ins" of transgenders protesting bathroom laws.

Post: #20

Watch as this jackhole "defects" to the soft right and then rebounds back to their natural inclinations, urging conservatives to find a "sensible middleground" on a whole range of non-transvestite issues.

You are looking at someone who claims to be cured while acting as a carrier for the disease.

Post: #21

(06-02-2016 07:29 PM)StrikeBack Wrote:  I clicked on the link and thought the photo was of one of the chicks with dicks in question.

Turned out to be the concerned mother...

Oy vey.
You're not far off the mark...

As for the matter at hand. This is why I frequently state regressives should put their money where their mouths are.

Until they've actively demonstrated their 'tolerance' in person, they're all just yelling out hyperbole.
Of course such a thing results in the regressives frequently being murdered by migrants & the like, yet I digress...

Post: #22

I cannot resist this. I am going to put on a Tommy Sotomayor hat.

Well well! What do we have here?! A "liberal" Democrat black woman (possibly a lawyer at that), not wanting grown ass men going to the bathroom with her little girls? The irony is thick. Black women are the biggest tools of the Democrats and Liberals. Black women are almost 99% Democrat, while the men are rapidly switching sides and are in the low 80s last time I checked. Funny because when I go to church I see more black women in there than black men easily. Even if I go visit a local megachurch it's the same. They are in there deep compared to the men. Pray, Eat, and Loving themselves into arms of the enemy like lambs to the slaughter. If they love God so much, why are their heads so empty? White women are more evenly divided on their beliefs and values whereas black women are zombies for liberals. Why is that?

Did they honestly think being affiliated with these people was going to end well? The writing was on the wall back in 2008, when the liberal collective trashed us for torpedoing their gay bill. They shitted on us for being homophobic and religious. Did black women get the memo of what they really thought about us? Nah. They kept on being liberal and Democrat because they thought Obama is our boy and the other side is too racist to vote for or join.

Serious question time. Hate crimes are supposedly against the law right? Safeguards like EEOC exist right? We are allowed to get education right? What is the worst thing a racist can do to a black person in 2008+? Say something ugly is pretty much the only real thing! Here is my question: Would you rather have a faggot legally raping or exposing your children to homosexuality in their school or bathrooms or be called a nigger out loud in the street? This is a serious question because, last time I checked we all live on planet Earth. It's never been fair to anyone, but what is mission number 1 on planet Earth? Survive.

You cannot survive as a family or a generation of people living in a "System of Sodom". It's like unchecked incest. It's an abomination and works against God's design and nature.

Bring up points like this to some educated black women and you get howls about racism, Trump this, Trump that, etc. As if you outright asked them to vote for him. They reason like little children. Trump supports the same things the liberals do in the bathroom. It's not about team Red or Blue. At least stop supporting the evil in the first fucking place! This woman should be vomiting in a toilet right now. She willingly helped Satan get a double grip on her children and her country. It took her girls seeing a 50 year old grunting and waving his old penis in their little faces, while wearing a dress, for the mother to snap out of the stupid?

Hey I got an idea for some Red Pill Evangelism fellas! Let's go to every liberal state and just start using the women's bathrooms and start grunting and shaking our dicks wildly, while we urinate! Too many men out there are too pussy to swallow the red pill, maybe we can wake up retarded minority women instead and create a new coalition to add to the Manosphere/Neo-Masculinity movement! We don't need that traitor Christina Hoff Sommers anymore! We can step our game up, and get +2 points up on women in positions of power like this lady was.

Let's do it.

Post: #23

Post: #24

(06-03-2016 04:59 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Watch as this jackhole "defects" to the soft right and then rebounds back to their natural inclinations, urging conservatives to find a "sensible middleground" on a whole range of non-transvestite issues.

You are looking at someone who claims to be cured while acting as a carrier for the disease.

This is true. These people are very astute at discourse poisoning, as the constant leftward shift in the cultural narrative has shown us.