Post: #26

Still a relevant ditty.

Post: #27

South Park is becoming reality sooner than could have been expected:

Post: #28

(05-15-2016 05:31 AM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  Homeschool your kids now!!! I am not kidding. Be prepared to fight when the time comes. This is not going to stop.

This. Guys...if you have kids, this is the route to take.

Several of my friends are homeschooling their children. And they all don't have good things to say about the current public school system in America.

Also, Vox Day & his wife homeschools their children. There are "Homeschool or Die" blog posts on his website.

Post: #29

(05-15-2016 07:03 AM)EDantes Wrote:  

(05-14-2016 04:48 PM)Scoundrel Wrote:  A "transgender" child is the dream trophy/status symbol for an SJW parent — even more so than an autistic child.

Definitely makes me wonder how many of these so-called "5 year old transgenders" were actually coached into it by depraved parents.

Not only that, but they're also coached by depraved school guidance counselors who need to create problems in kids in order to justify their jobs. If kids are all well-adjusted then there is no need for them.

This is a perfect example of the harm done by the makework jobs invented for females to get them in the workplace. (Not that there aren't kids who need help. There are. But the skyrocketing amount of "diagnoses" for kids and the after-the-fact testimony of what bullshit it all was when these kids grow up makes me question whether so many of them are needed.)

That said, there is also a "fever" or "virus" mentality going on with this. It's a non-issue that's spreading because of the media. There's a book about this sort of thing, "Crazy Like Us" by Ethan Watters. It looks at how media obsessions with certain issues (anorexia, for example) cause major epidemics.

So it's like a domino effect from hell. CBS does its "special reports," guidance counselors and teachers plant seeds in the heads of boys, parents want to be trendy, and then all of a sudden little Billy is wearing a dress and dancing around like Ariana Grande.

If this were 1986, the same thing would be happening except little Billy would be drugged out of his mind on Ritalin because back then all the boys suddenly had "ADD" and "ADHD" -- even though no one had this back in the '60s and '70s.

Maybe this is all part of that "war against boys" we hear about. You can't get more warlike than convincing little Billy that his ultimate achievement in life should be chopping off his privates.

Post: #30

(05-14-2016 02:25 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  This is the modern-day version of a controversy we had back in the 1990s, when schools had kids read a book called "Heather Has Two Mommies."

As the title suggests, the book was meant to get kids to see lesbian relationships as normal. There was also one titled "Daddy Has a Roommate" (I'm not making this up!).

Here is my question: Where do schools get off telling us what to accept? This is not teaching, it's PREACHING a specific type of MORALITY.

Doing this would be fine if all sorts of moral preaching was allowed in schools, but they banned religion -- so it's only their flavor-of-the-month leftist morals that are allowed to be taught.

The state has usurped the family's role in giving its kids a moral upbringing. We now answer to the schools, not parents or churches, about what constitutes right or wrong. Say the wrong thing and you get suspended and there goes college...and your future.

How is this not a church by any other name? When you're telling people what to think and punishing them when they don't think that, you're a church, not a school.

The mistake Americans made is that when they allowed God to be taken out of the public schools, they didn't say that now that Christian morality can't be taught, NO morality at all can be taught. So that left the door open for the leftists who actively sought to replace traditional religion with their own brand of anti-religion.

Wonder what the contrived "issue" the schools will come up with in the next decade? Cross-species dating? Coming soon to a bookstore near you: "Heather loves Rover!"

Very true.

Not to be a downer, but if you look at what happened to America's public schools in the last 8 years under the current POTUS, you can see a lot of patterns in the academic environments being created by the Social Justice Warriors and/or Feminists. Whatever agenda they want to push into the public school system, they will try to achieve it with POTUS backing.

What is even worse is that they are also trying to target preschoolers at a much younger age.

Scary stuff to see innocent children and teenagers being treated like lab rats at a young age.

Post: #31

A lot of people on the right have known for a while that you need to homeschool your kids or send them to a private school.

Post: #32

Homeschooling.

"The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. To be your own man is a hard business. If you try it, you'll be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself." - Rudyard Kipling

Post: #33

I was thinking on this for a while yesterday, but didn't think I had anything to say. Socialists have always targeted education to mould minds when they're young and have been hugely-successful at it, and I've always been confused as to exactly why Parents either just don't care or are so powerless when it comes to who teaches their children.

Parents are Vigilant about teaching their children about Sexual Predators, are are quick to hunt down those who physically-abuse their children sexually.

So why are they so eager to leave their children alone for days on end with potential Psycho-sexual Predators, who seek to deliberately and systematically abuse their children mentally?

That's exactly what this is: most schools are Networks of Progressive Women with Short Hair who are True Believers and see it as their mission to 'mould' children into sharing the exact same beliefs they do.

So, take the author in this case:



Everything about her screams physical and mental dysfunction. Would you hire a woman with obvious self-identity issues - she's far too old to still be dying her hair like a teenager thinking it makes her unique and special - who can't even take care of her physical-self to take care of your child if you were going away for two weeks? No. So then why should she have access to your child's mind?

There are National Databases for Sexual Predators. Why can't there be one for Psycho-Sexual Predators? Why shouldn't parents know who exactly is in their schools and what kind of toxic crap they believe?

When I wrote that "My Teacher Is A Lefty Dyke" poem a while back, I was joking, but I'm starting to think there really need to be children's books you can use as teaching aids to teach children about Psychosexual Abuse, much in the manner of Sexual Abuse books: "Your mind is your own, and you're allowed to say who can touch it."

From Budoslavic's post earlier, here's the thoughts of Radical Teaching Reformist Linda Christensen, who celebrates trying to mould three year olds into Agents Of Change. Note the standard Globalist Agenda they're been vomiting out since the 1970's.



No surprise to me what she looked like:



Remember my rule of thumb: "Hair above the chin, subversion from within."

So, why can't she be added to a Psycho-Sexual Predator database, so parents in their region can say, "Hey, we have the right to not want this woman anywhere near our children?"

It doesn't matter if Trump gets in. Until Subversives are purged from Education, we're going to be fighting this 'mindfucking' war eternally, because I've never seen a generation as constantly-obsessed with gender and race as Millennials, almost to the point of Sexual Fixation: it seems to consumes their every waking moment in a way that thoughts of sexual love and romance used to in healthy people, which is how you end up with weird, unfunny memes like the Feminist Ryan Gosling Thread. Their sexual urges have becoming messed up with their political ones. It's like their biological urge has been moulded, so rather than trying to reproduce before they die, they're now trying to reprogram others before they die. They don't breed physically, they breed ideologically.

Man, i'm creeping myself out here. If only I knew how to meme this down to the masses.

Post: #34

I never trusted men who had an over-fascination with kids, and I no longer trust women either.

Post: #35

^^^^^^^
AnonymousBosch asked: "Parents are Vigilant about teaching their children about Sexual Predators, are are quick to hunt down those who physically-abuse their children ]sexually.

So why are they so eager to leave their children alone for days on end with potential Psycho-sexual Predators, who seek to deliberately and systematically abuse their children mentally?"

***

For the same reason parents left their kids alone with parish priests they knew damn well were a little "off." Parents are stupid. That falls under a larger category: People are stupid.

People will ignore their own instincts and sacrifice the safety and mental stability of their own kids because they're cowed by popular opinion and want to go along with the crowd.

In the old days, they didn't question their local parishes. Now they don't question the media and school systems.

Remember: The people who become parents are often the same people you knew in school who just went along with whatever was popular. No matter how bad the music was, they bopped along. No matter how shitty the TV shows and movies were (or how ugly the fashions were) they had buy into the same things as the crowd.

But, I guess, I can see why people do this when it comes to social issues. Look what happens when you go against the grain: You get outed and ostracized by the sheeple. This is why most of us are here writing under pseudonyms.

Which brings us back to The Donald. It always comes back to Trump these days, doesn't it? Sometimes all it takes for a sea change is for one man to stand up and say "This is bullshit."

Trump might not have done this about this specific issue, but he's spreading a way of thinking and speaking that will allow more and more people to speak their minds without fear of repercussion.

Post: #36

Just noticed the ring on her finger, apparently she has a husband (*barf*)

All I can say is "I pity the fool"

Post: #37

This lady looks more like somebody who should be working in a circus or a traveling carnival than a teacher.

Post: #38

(05-16-2016 05:00 PM)lemko Wrote:  This lady looks more like somebody who should be working in a circus or a traveling carnival than a teacher.

She resembles a female version of John Wayne Gacy

Post: #39

(05-15-2016 11:13 PM)Beyond Borders Wrote:  Homeschooling.

It is still legal in US, but not everywhere.
Homeschooling and gun ownership was banned in Germany by Hitler. That Hitler’s policy enforced by every German government ever since.

Post: #40

(05-16-2016 04:28 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  ...Their sexual urges have becoming messed up with their political ones. It's like their biological urge has been moulded, so rather than trying to reproduce before they die, they're now trying to reprogram others before they die. They don't breed physically, they breed ideologically.

Man, i'm creeping myself out here. If only I knew how to meme this down to the masses.

Post: #41

Big front-page, above-the-fold story in today's L.A. Times:

A transgender 9-year-old tells her story

They're really pushing the transgender kids agenda hard.

Quote:On occasion, the mother has found, T is actually thinking about how much she dislikes her penis because it reminds her of why people think she’s a boy.

I'm not sure which is more incredible — the use of the phrase "her penis" by a major mainstream newspaper, or the fact that said newspaper, in a leading front-page article, is discussing a 9-year-old's penis.

Post: #42

(05-16-2016 07:13 PM)Scoundrel Wrote:  Big front-page, above-the-fold story in today's L.A. Times:

A transgender 9-year-old tells her story

They're really pushing the transgender kids agenda hard.

Quote:On occasion, the mother has found, T is actually thinking about how much she dislikes her penis because it reminds her of why people think she’s a boy.

I'm not sure which is more incredible — the use of the phrase "her penis" by a major mainstream newspaper, or the fact that said newspaper, in a leading front-page article, is discussing a 9-year-old's penis.

These people need to be in prison. They confuse kids who don't know any better with this gender fluidity crap, then they enable their cross dressing and gay mannerisms them finally help them cut off body parts.

Just when you thought the next generation couldn't grow up any more fucked up.

Post: #43

Incoming rough and heavy this side of the planet as well:

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/the-ge...lbst8.html

We also have a state premier determined to ignore federal directives about the program that implemented the above filth:

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/federal-...676fea6fb6


Fall back, pull your kids out. Rome is lost.

Post: #44

(05-16-2016 10:54 PM)Thoroughbred Wrote:  Incoming rough and heavy this side of the planet as well:

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/the-ge...lbst8.html

Note the dysfunction of the people pushing this.

Fat Hippo Author with, what I recognise from my Catholic School Days as 'Self-Righteous Cunt Face':





Greens Senator Penny Whetton, who is pushing the book, with the predictable hairdo:



Penny's Wife, who is, I shit you not, a Transgender Climate Scientist:



As I said, a parade of Psycho-sexual Predators trying to normalise their deviancy by spreading it to others.

I don't get it. I can't drive a car, I can't own a gun, I can't vote, I can't drink, I can't buy pornography and I can't fuck until a certain age. Meanwhile, a child a quarter of my age can choose to transition their sex and the Government is pushing this hard.

Post: #45

(05-16-2016 07:13 PM)Scoundrel Wrote:  Big front-page, above-the-fold story in today's L.A. Times:

A transgender 9-year-old tells her story

They're really pushing the transgender kids agenda hard.

Quote:On occasion, the mother has found, T is actually thinking about how much she dislikes her penis because it reminds her of why people think she’s a boy.

I'm not sure which is more incredible — the use of the phrase "her penis" by a major mainstream newspaper, or the fact that said newspaper, in a leading front-page article, is discussing a 9-year-old's penis.

After reading that article I recall a couple of other instances where I've heard/ or read other similar fucked up stories. But here's a thought I've just had. We hear so much about schools and so called child experts trying to break down gender stereotypes among children. For example, there was an article someone posted a while back about a teacher that banned the boys in her class from playing with the "boy toys." They want so hard to eliminate the stereotypes of what makes a girl a girl (pink frilly dresses and barbies) and what makes a boy a boy (making guns out of legos and building shit). Yet when some confused child says they want to be a girl, the kid is encouraged to embrace every one of those stereotypes that the "experts" say is harmful for every other kid. I'm not going back to quote that article but, the parents talked about how oh he loved loved to play with the kitchen set. Buying him the frilly dresses and barbies and every other little girl stereotype under the sun.

Post: #46

(05-16-2016 11:17 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(05-16-2016 10:54 PM)Thoroughbred Wrote:  Incoming rough and heavy this side of the planet as well:

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/the-ge...lbst8.html

Note the dysfunction of the people pushing this.

Fat Hippo Author with, what I recognise from my Catholic School Days as 'Self-Righteous Cunt Face':

I couldn't help it, but just noticed the title of the book that the Fat Hippo Author was holding, "The Gender Fairy".



From her FAQ page:

Quote:FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

1. Aren’t we just talking about ‘tom boys’ and ‘girlie boys’?

No. It’s normal for ALL children to choose many different toys, playing companions and clothing. What is different about children in this book, is that they are determined that the gender they have been assigned does not fit.

Being forced into that role, can cause significant and sometimes serious distress. A child forced to suppress their gender identity, can also be so clouded with anxiety, they are unable to process everything in the classroom, or can cut themselves off socially, because they ‘don’t feel right’. Alternatively, when a child is allowed to socially transition to their true gender, they can come out of their shells, and thrive.

2. Is there a right age to introduce this book to children?

Children can learn about gender identity at any age. This book is designed for children from the ages of 4 and up. Although it is simple, it is still relevant for older children.

3. Will this book make my child question their gender identity?

Children know who they are. This book just helps them understand others who may be a little different.

4. What about gender fluid children?

The Gender Fairy is about two transgender children who are not fluid and make the choice to socially transition. It's up to children to decide where they are on the gender spectrum. As the Gender Fairy says, "No one can tell you. "

All children need to know that they do not need to change their gender identity in order to wear clothing and play with toys that are associated with either ends of the spectrum. They need to feel supported with their creativity and exploration and not be forced to choose. Some children will not always identify as male, or always as female. They may choose a pronoun that fits their gender identity. (for example, ‘they’).

My next book will explain the gender spectrum to young children.

5. Should I wait until I meet a transgender child / have a transgender child in my class, before I read this book to my child / students?

No, not at all. Apart from teaching children about respecting diversity, if children have already read the book before they meet someone who is gender diverse, acceptance and understanding are already in place.

6. Why a fairy?

Often it's the parents who first notice the child’s discomfort in trying to fit the gender role assigned at birth. However, this is not always the case. It could be a doctor, a health professional, teacher, or other trusted adult. Using The Gender Fairy meant there were no assumptions about who that person would be. It also gave the chance to introduce a non-binary character (that is, someone who is not exclusively masculine or feminine).

7. How can I buy this book?

The Gender Fairy is available to purchase on this website. If you live in Australia, The Gender Fairy will soon be coming to selected bookstores near you.

Post: #47

One thing that hasn't been brought up is that in this age group (3-9) kids naturally go through several psychological stages and each stage has a component related to identity and shaping their identity with imagination and play acting.

Which is normal and healthy. A little boy playing with their mothers jewelry or makeup is about how it is shiny or because they ran out of finger paint, not because they identify as a girl. That is unless they have sick activist parents or guardians pushing them in that direction.

Hell, I remember being 6 or 7 and getting into both of my parents closets. My dads ties became headband and I put my moms high heel shoes on my hands and feet and ran around on all fours saying, "look grandma, I'm a horse"...clink..clink...clink.

If you give some kids a refrigerator box they will turn it into a castle or fort or a place to hide their toys. It doesn't mean they sexually identity as a skyscraper. Shit, what is so difficult about that?

Post: #48

I predict that before 2025, all boys will be required to dress as girls for at least 1 day every week in school

Post: #49

^^^

Damn. I bet you are right. Walk a mile in her shoes during recess. At this rate it will probably be 2020.

Post: #50

I'm glad I won't ever be teaching this book or have anything like it in the classroom, as an international school teacher in Latin America. The sick trend happening in sex ed, and seeping into all other subjects, at schools is counter-balanced by the need to be "culturally sensitive" to the norms, traditions, customs, and even gender roles of the host country.

I am having a hard time finding any website/forum for teachers who are against this crap. Does anyone know of any? I can't believe that a majority of teachers believe in "purple penguins," gender fluidity, and the like. Most just go along to get along. One more reason to vote for Trump. I think that, with the end of the federal department of education and common core, this movement will lose a lot of steam. We need a massive cultural shift to actually kill it off though.