(05-16-2016 06:00 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote: [quote='hydrogonian' pid='1300672' dateline='1463157133']
The best favor that you can do for your so-called female friendships is to treat them like women that you are considering for sex, and flirt with them accordingly, but who you nevertheless keep in a friend zone (without inviting them to bed or other silly directly sexual things). It keeps them happy and normal acting. It keeps your power with you and allows you to dictate the relationship. You are essentially distorting the unavoidably sexual into a balance and illusion of friendship; but your mastery of male / female dynamics will be what controls the balance and makes the improbable seem to happen. None of this will be possible within any normative definition of and approach to friendship.
Quote:At the time, I thought nothing of it until one day later when I realized what I did. I knew I'd have to fuck her to save the "friendship". See the position that a friendship agenda puts men in?
Quote:This isn't a personal attack, Hydro. I just need to be blunt here. Two things:
1) Always be very clear in your sexual intentions towards a woman
If you ever read my other game posts, you will read this as the centerpiece to my game. I also frequently pm men, who ask, with recommendations toward developing this mindset as their core game. I'm not only familiar with your sentiment, but I've been integrating it for about a decade now.
I was direct with her when I realized that we had to get sexual, when the given the opportunity. Read my story again. When I was trying to fuck, she knew that is what I wanted.
What she did not know is that I was trying to fuck to get the friendship back on keel. I should have probably told her that, but that would have been new territory and I'm not sure it would have gone over. Being direct works on the premise of tapping into a woman's sexual desire of an alpha man who isn't hiding behind lies and manipulation. It taps into instinct. Being direct about sex for a reason of logical social dynamics is not sexual. It's not emotional. Ironically, it wreaks of calculation that most women, although they live by what it addresses, don't and won't get nor want to talk about. They don't want to talk directly about power dynamics in relationships, and if they do they will be defensive. They just want the power dynamics to turn them on. By the end, I was ready to do that but the situation was too far gone.
Also, keep in mind the article and the point of the story. There were never any sexual end-intentions, except as a method to another goal and later on after she misread my apathy for sexual incompetence. There were only friendship intentions that, again, are the point of the story in terms of how they distort the relationship and force you into a now-hobbled sexual game anyway.
I should also note that we never, ever had any alone time except for the first night when we met at a bar and when we fell into bed each night thereafter; usually between 4-5 a.m. every night. It was always me, her, her best-friend and her friend's boyfriend as she was renting a room from the latter two and they were cool people. I was never trying to date her and so I wasn't going to ask her out on such. It was group conversation and then to bed. My direct game skills, that usually take conversations sexual, would have been socially out of place in the common environment that we found ourselves in. If we had gotten alone, I would have directly gamed her into her panties. I never had the chance. Though, my other game (social competency) was still there in general. Hence why I kept getting invited to bed but had a hard road once there. Also, I admit to hanging onto the sentiment/friendship vision for too long. I could have done better damage control if I had seen the relationship clearer, earlier. But that clarity is the entire point and lesson of the story.
I wasn't trying to fuck her on the first night, nor did I have any sexual intentions due to the ill-conceived "friendship" dynamic that is the point of the article.
Keep in mind that my story isn't about "game" nor fucking the girl as an end goal in itself.
It's about having to apply game principles in a natural dynamic that I distorted (for "friendship") in order to have an even keeled friendship with a woman, making the concept ridiculous and even destructive to the man-woman platonic relationship. That's the point of the post.
It's about me putting myself in a bad position, and trying to crawl out, because of friendship delusions. A position that I rarely-to-never find myself in otherwise.
As I stated, attempting to be "friends" felt like it set my game back 20 years. Which is the point of me writing the story out. It isn't me asking "what went wrong, guys?" I wrote the story to tell what went wrong, and to warn against it. That I didn't launch into a direct game clinic is because of the unique nuance of the situation, given my mistake, which is a lesson enough in itself. Ie: don't make my mistake in miscalculating the nature of your relationship with all women.
The story was meant to be an instructive lesson for guys who attempt friendship with females, using the time that I was hobbled by sentiment and my learning process from it. It isn't meant to be a story about how to game women successfully. It's meant to warn guys off of having any delusion about the nature of the man-woman relationship in an attempt to be friends.
Quote:For the first point, whilst women will always be wondering about my romantic intentions towards them - game 101 stuff - they will never, ever be unclear about my sexual intentions towards them.
See above. This is the root of my game.
Quote:Whilst flirting is a big part of charming women on a day to day basis, when it comes to serious 1 on 1 interaction, if you don't want to get into trouble, never flirt with what you don't intend to fuck.
Here's what I know from working with all women in an environment that requires non-sexual relationships with them: never flirting makes you creepy, unsocial, and resented because most women are insecure and are horridly instinctual socially.
Flirting too much is risky for other reasons.
Being competently social is enough for most but there are always a few who will resent you for not giving them more attention or from getting too much attention from other women.
In a non-sexual relationship with women, there is always a balance. That's also a primary lesson of my story.
I disagree with not flirting as a way to approach life. Flirting competently, and regularly with most women, will give you a wide social circle and make you well loved. My grandfather, who just died at 94 years old, was the most competent flirter that I've ever met. No one here would best him even in his old age.
In his last weeks, he had the nurses doing dances as they came in the room and then he would hilariously neg them on it. Women loved him to death, and his wife loved him for it, and we was never unfaithful (you never know except for my judge of his innocent and god-fearing character - which tells me that he was faithful) in seventy years of marriage. The only thing the last nurse, a young and pretty 9, that I thanked said to me was "He was the man".
Quote:Realistically, everyone knows within a few seconds of seeing someone if they'd fuck them or not. Watch how girls size you up on the street, and how quickly you cease to exist in a matter of milliseconds if you're not their type.
Right, but this story wasn't about that. It was about what comes after that. My misjudgement was, in essence, over why she would meet with me for drinks in the first place. Women know that the relationship is sexual. I disregarded that for sentiment. That's the moral of the story.
Quote:Betas and Male Feminists never understand this basic fact. It's too harsh a reality for them to accept. So they'll creep along, using a cover of friendship to attempt to girlfriend a woman up when she realises what a 'great guy' we he is.
Don't be that guy.
Really?
Read my story again. Don't read what you want into it. Read what it says. Are you insinuating that I was hoping that she would realize what a "great guy" I was? Where in my story did I give that impression? Where did I give the impression that I was using friendship to get sexual?
I'm actually pretty much giving a version of facts that inverts that dynamic: after denying the sexual, I was reluctantly forced to use it to attempt to have a normal friendship. She wasn't interpreting it that way, though. She was interpreting it as you see it. However, my story is more nuanced then that and I think that is abundantly clear.
My story isn't about the perils of being indirect. My story is about the perils of assuming that a man's legitimate and fruitful social relationship with women peers can be functionally asexual. Thus, my story is congruent with the ROK article.
Quote:We initially got in touch under this premise of rekindling something that existed by close association, but never to any meaningful degree. She really was just a memory marker for me; a connection to a more innocent time.
Quote:Now here's the danger zone. You knew you weren't interested in her sexually, so in the initial catch up, you needed to clearly-sell your intentions towards her.
Well, probably agreed. But I generally only work that way toward the sexual. I don't, in general, feel that I need to establish boundaries with friends. However, you might have a point though I would hold it to be a non-intuitive one.
I'm not even sure that doing that would work to eliminate the sexual dynamic. If what I state is true, then the dynamic is fundamental and cannot be changed. Thus, telling her that you just want to be friends would either likely cause her to not meet with you (because no sex) or to become more sexually interested in you. The latter situation would have you balancing the dynamic constantly anyway, and thus in the same behavioral position on the "friendship".
Quote:Women are all conceited enough to think that every man they meet would readily fuck them if she offered - even obese ones suffer this delusion. Friendzone fast, friendzone hard. You don't have to be cruel: "You always felt like a kid sister to me," is a gentle statement of what you see as the boundaries of the relationship. (If friendship is looking likely with a girl, I often use "You're so much like my sister. I'll have to introduce you two sometime." Most women know exactly where that places them).
Yeah, but notice that this is also a common game tactic. I'm not so sure that this does anything but ramp up the sexual dynamic, though it would better keep you in charge.
But keep in mind that we fell into bed together on the first night. My game wasn't in question. I didn't have a problem with the dynamic until after she offered me sex and I failed to act.
Quote:So, the first night that we met up my incidental game was good enough to eventually get me invited, tired, drunk and far from home at 5 a.m., into her bed. Whereas without the "friendship" premise and thoughts of preserving the sentimental I would have gone full bore or went home, I instead felt a mixture of confusion and apathy (I'm also largely non-functional sexually after 3 a.m.).
Quote:Never share a bed with any girl you wouldn't be horrified to wake up and discover sucking your dick at 3 a.m. I learnt that lesson in my teenage years.
Agreed. But, respectfully, you telling me what never to do in this circumstance is a little off-putting after I admitted the mistake directly after I wrote that part of the story. I know it was not a good move. I stated that.
I'm not really interested in a game breakdown or game help here. I gave a full narrative from start to finish to illustrate a mistake in perception as a lesson. I'm aware of my mistakes, and we could probably continue to dissect the situation ad infinitum for further game mistakes. But that isn't why I wrote the story. I'm good on the game theory, and this experience worked to eliminate a blind spot for me. I write the story to illustrate that blind spot and to warn guys to avoid it. If you disagree with my core thesis, then let's talk about it. But please don't mistake my generous candor, given to help, as a plea for a game breakdown when small game mistakes weren't the point of my post. Even still, I already addressed this one.
Quote:Also, see my second point. What this sounds to me is ego-flattering post-experience rationalisation. Basically, that your dick was interested, but your mind wasn't, and you're trying to rationalise away that your dick has lower standards than your mind.
Respectfully, I don't know what that means.
Note that my story is abundantly revealing in an attempt to add value through radical honesty on this forum. I don't need to make myself this vulnerable. I do it so that other guys can learn.
In that spirit, what I state is exactly true as I perceived it in the moment. I wouldn't go to all of this trouble in being honest only to insert ego preserving rationalizations. There is no post-situation editing of my feelings or intentions as I acted on them. Though, I'm also not stating that my feelings were unmuddied. They were muddied in no small part due to alcohol, but still strongly in favor of a platonic relationship. If anyone states that they have monk like control over the sexual feelings while in-bed with a warm female at 5 a.m. and drunk then I call b-u-l-l-s-h-i-t. The takeaway, though, is that I did not act on any sexual stirrings. Which is ironically what caused issues down the road. I could have fucked her that night and then stopped fucking her (theoretically) and had a better relationship then after doing what I did.
Quote:The greatest power a man can have over women is to have firm control over his libido. Once you're able to refuse sex and walk away from it rather than compromise your principles, women lose the greatest weapon they have against you.
Again, the monk thing. Feelings are rarely that on and off, there or not there. If they were, I wouldn't have met with her. The point of the story, about the relationship always being sexual, works in the direction of the man too if often less so. But it is still there. I did not see her as asexual. Not being an animal, I made a logical decision to treat her as a friend in spite of human feeling that were not completely black and white (but also not compelling at first for anything but friendship). Refusing sex in spite of having testosterone is control of the libido.
I did refuse sex, but the situation is more nuanced then that. The story is not about me losing power to a sexual conquest. The story is about friendship being distorted and subject to sexual dynamics. Hence why it was posted under this ROK article.
Quote:Be warned: this always unleashes narcissistic viciousness, but hold fast. "When you accept I'm right, then maybe we'll fuck."
If more younger men could do this, Fourth Wave Feminism would be dead in a year.
I'm unsure of your broader conversational context for this line.
Quote:[quote]At the time, I thought nothing of it until one day later when I realized what I did. I knew I'd have to fuck her to save the "friendship". See the position that a friendship agenda puts men in?
Quote:No.
No.
No.
This is male hamstering. Be aware of this kind of thinking. You're a man. If you have a choice of free action, you don't have to do anything don't want to do.
To some unconscious degree, you wanted to bang this chick you were neither fully hot or cold on, and your rationalising it heroically as 'saving the friendship'.
Well, you say that and I will half agree.
The part that disagrees: What you "want" (what you imagine) has nothing to do with the reality of a relationship that another person is a part of. You have to behave in a manner that forms the relationship to how you want it. The mistake of the first night made the relationship one way. I was trying to amend it.
The part that agrees: After I resolved to having to get a BJ, have sex, whatever, I can't deny looking forward to it. After all, I'm a man and not a robot. I wouldn't fuck at all if I didn't like fucking. Your models are a little too model like and not really representative of how men and women feel in the real world. Though, I appreciate your overall game philosophy.
Quote:This kind of 'denial of sexual desire' is why women have so much trouble navigating the sexual marketplace. Particularly if the experience is less than they desired, they'll start reaching for reasons why they didn't really want to do it rather than simply making a poor choice and owning the responsibility for it.
Unless you are wholly interpreting my trying-to-be-helpful parable in a completely different manner in the way in which it was stated and intended, I don't know how this applies to me. Though, I'm having trouble interpreting it at all.
Quote:"I wasn't that into her, but I was horny, and she was there," might be an uncomfortable truth about yourself to accept -
The opposite of what occurred on the first night.
Quote:and you might have moved past that kind of thing as your confidence and skill has increased anyway - but it's better to not kid yourself because then it shows you ways to improve and more forward
I'm unsure as to your point on this. Again, it seems like you are using a model that holds sexual feelings to either be present or not. In the end, it isn't your "horniness" but the decision that you make in regard to it. Though, again, I'm unsure as to how this applies to my story.
Quote:Remember, you always have the power to say no. Quintus Curtius has a podcast saying, if you don't want people using you, cease to hang out a sign of invitation.
How does this apply to my story and more importantly my point in telling it?
Quote:So, if they try and put you in an emotional tampon position, as Quintus said don't hang out a welcome sign.
Okay, but the point was about the danger of sentiment in a male-female "friendship". My core thesis seems like it may have addressed your warning, insofar as I am interpreting you correctly.
Quote:Female friendships really aren't that hard to navigate, and have enjoyable benefits within the realistic limitations - because I don't expect them to have the depth and loyalty of male friendships, I'm not disappointed when they don't. As mentioned earlier in the thread by others, what's a greater sign of masculine power than having other women working on my behalf to get me laid? "Oh... i know this amazing guy."
All female-male friendships have an underlying sexual dynamic OR they see you as asexual omega furniture. If they see you as this, all women will likely see you as this. Being attractive is not something that you can turn on and off if it is a core part of who you are. This is my experience. That doesn't mean that men don't have female "friendships" that happen to be subject to the right tension to maintain the relationship. It just means that the dynamic is easy to disturb if you start playing a game other than the true one being played.