Post: #26

Delete

Post: #27

(04-11-2016 06:37 PM)Krivo Wrote:  Hencredible asked to be banned, and Greek Kamaki turned out to be a P4P guy. Don't know about the others.

Midwest has chosen to troll the forum under new usernames since being banned, so I don't think that there is any good argument to be made for his re-instatement.

Post: #28

Edited..

Post: #29

(04-11-2016 07:18 PM)Brian Shima Wrote:  No he hasn't..anyone with some common sense can see that those accounts are people attempting to imitate him..

Agreed. Midwest actually brought a lot of value to the forum. The problems and suspected trolling all came from his posts on the political threads, especially the Donald Trump Thread.

Post: #30

(04-11-2016 12:28 PM)Brian Shima Wrote:  The forum seems like it was more party mode years ago. Frankly we do not need that right now and I trust Roosh's judgement to ban the old vets..RVF has transformed into something more than just girls and travel. It teaches many young guys how to become Alpha men in my opinion..

How do you know Brian? Did you party on the forum years ago?

Post: #31

Watched for a while before I clicked Register..

Post: #32

I, for one, want Barabbas.

Post: #33

(04-11-2016 08:45 PM)Brian Shima Wrote:  Watched for a while before I clicked Register..

Post: #34

Why was Screwston banned?

Post: #35

Better yet, why was Little Dark banned?

Was it because of the story with the white knights?

Post: #36

I put a bid in in advance for my un-banning.

Post: #37

(04-11-2016 06:01 PM)Tupac Wrote:  

(04-11-2016 04:58 PM)The Black Knight Wrote:  Top 10 Banned Big Posters:
Screwston: 8774 posts
Aliblahba: 8017
Greek kamaki: 4676
cardguy: 4481
Hencredible Casanova: 3852
Dash Global: 3017
Nomad77: 2272
Walderschmidt: 1723
Deb Auchery: 1549
MidWest: 1458

I've been a long time lurker and been around. I think out of those guys, the ones who didn't deserve to get banned were Screwston, Hencredible and MidWest. Those guys were essentially banned for being liberals and nothing more. They were from a time when the forum was more liberal and in my opinion got the short end of the stick when it became more alternate-right.

For example, Henc was banned for trashing Putin. Henc trashing Putin essentially led to his ban. Then MidWest was the lone big member who was trashing and talking shit about Trump and that led to his banning.

So we essentially lost 3 valuable members over some bullshit.


I respect Roosh's and Tuth's decision though. But I feel like its a good thing to have a different opinions. When its just one opinion all the time, it can get quite boring.

I vote we bring back Tupac/Midwest.

(sarcasm, in case Tuth has an itchy trigger finger)

Post: #38

Most, if not all of these guys have come back under a different name and are now just less high profile. A thread containing speculation on what their new alias is would be funny.

Post: #39

(04-11-2016 10:01 PM)They Call Me Mister Tony Wrote:  Better yet, why was Little Dark banned?

Was it because of the story with the white knights?

Little Dark was causing shit in the club, so Roosh told him to 'Go home'. Then Little Dark did go home, just not in the direction he was hoping for. Now he's lost.

Post: #40

Any chance of getting a public ban reason at least for the members with a lot of posts?

Post: #41

(04-12-2016 02:39 PM)EDantes Wrote:  Any chance of getting a public ban reason at least for the members with a lot of posts?

There is a banned members' explanation thread which used to be bumped when a member with at least two hundred posts was banned. I haven't seen it bumped in quite some time.

Post: #42

(04-12-2016 02:50 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  

(04-12-2016 02:39 PM)EDantes Wrote:  Any chance of getting a public ban reason at least for the members with a lot of posts?

There is a banned members' explanation thread which used to be bumped when a member with at least two hundred posts was banned. I haven't seen it bumped in quite some time.

Maybe that thread was closed for good.

Post: #43

In fairness to Roosh with the aftermath of the Canadian Thought Police trying to Doxx Roosh and then Global Meetup Anti Roosh Nazis doxxing and threatening his family we have to deal with some insane Anti-Trump Cultural Marxist Feminist Militant LGBTQs and BLMs who have never read the constitution or about 2nd Amendment rights blatantly breaking harassment and threat laws so I appreciate the No Tolerance for Anti-Red Pill policies of the RVF forum.

I have been suspended more than once with the best of them and have modified my participation accordingly.

Our Anti-Neomasculine Anti-Red Pill enemies likely to become completely unhinged closer we get to the GOP Convention and the best way to not be Doxxed from participation on RVF is a swift and hard ban hammer.

No quarter asked and No quarter given.

Post: #44

There's at the most 2-5 banned members who have posted on his thread.

Post: #45

(04-11-2016 11:37 AM)Scorpio Rising Wrote:  One of the first things I noticed here was the high number of members banned compared to what I had been used to in the past. I realize due to the nature of the site and the fact that Roosh and other high profile members have targets on their backs, making it necessary to be extra careful. I get that. I've noticed posts mentioning or even promoting P4P, violence, or various illegal activities. When the ban hammer comes down in those cases I get it. However in some cases I can't figure out what the hell a member was actually banned for. Some make thousands of posts over a period of years, get tons of reps and then poof, they're gone. Hence my low post count and I mostly do reading. I've archived for my own files many posts and ROK articles. Lots of gold nuggets, but still I wonder and tread very carefully.

It's one of the things that makes this place so exciting.

Post: #46

I wanted to ask this in the "Banned Members Explanation" thread but it has closed. Why was Anabasis to Desta permanently banned? I saw the 7-day ban but didn't see as to when it was decided to make it a permanent ban.

Post: #47

He personally attacked Matt Forney in another thread.

Post: #48

Nah, I don't want banned guys coming back. It would undermine the power of the mods. Essentially, a high rep member could wreak havoc and then assume he could get his ban revoked by being voted back in by members who colluded with him.

The only member I would possibly consider using necromancy for would be Hencredible, but he left of his own volition and (presumably) has no desire to come back.

Everyone else earned their bans and shouldn't be forgiven in my book.

Post: #49

(04-11-2016 05:07 PM)Red_Pillage Wrote:  Is anyone still in touch with Ali, Nomad77 or Screwston?

I emailed nomad77 after he got banned to thank him for all his posts, he just said the information is already out there, basically to keep on banging. He's moved on. I think he got banned for game denialism. I'm guessing el mec is in contact with the other 2

Post: #50

I wish Anabasis were back. They were insulting eachother, it wasn't one-sided. I would think that'd be like a suspension.