Post: #26

RaymondKertezc

Give this man, the creator of the kingswiki site, a rep point. Who else has contributed as much value to this forum after only 3 posts as this man?

Post: #27

(04-02-2016 11:58 AM)Atlanta Man Wrote:  If the trolling can be kept down that wiki site will be fucking awesome. There are young guys right now that are only 8 or 9 who don't like girls yet, when puberty kicks in at 10 or 11 they will have a resource to help them deal with the hormone rush and subsequent powerful attraction to females. This wiki would have been invaluable to me in high school if it is done right. I loved the manosphere when I found it in 2012, imagine if I had this shit in 1987- this wiki is a good thing, we cannot let it get fucked up by trolls and shit posters. All the quotes and resources gotta come from very established dudes like Roosh, Rossiey, Bone Cracker, So Suave, Jeriel, Althone , Anonymous Bosh, ect. , ect. When I say established I would not include me on that list, you gotta be years in the game with proven theory and multiple other established dudes repping your shit. This needs to be a resource I could turn my little nephew onto and have it be solid. This could be some good shit......

Trolling might not be a big problem, since those who are opposed to neomasculinity tend to also not understand it or to be familiar with its tenets, which becomes evident as soon as they start posting. Trolls therefore tend to be pretty easy to identify. It's like how if you're a Bible scholar, you can readily tell when you're communicating with another Bible scholar as opposed to a lifelong atheist with only a superficial understanding of Christianity.

Within our community, there tends to be greater unity than in other movements, probably because neomasculine guys who walk the talk tend to be strong leaders who are willing to take charge and nip nonsense in the bud. They don't tolerate a lot of drama, unlike SJWs and feminists who are so used to stirring up drama that they are constantly bickering with one another.

I decided to create a Fun namespace to accommodate joke articles like this one: http://en.kingswiki.com/wiki/Fun:Little_Dark

Post: #28

I can't believe I spent an hour and a half on this:

http://en.kingswiki.com/wiki/Fun:Little_Dark

Post: #29

(04-02-2016 01:19 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  I can't believe I spent an hour and a half on this:

http://en.kingswiki.com/wiki/Fun:Little_Dark

Nice contribution and I laughed and reminisced about old days. That was a really hilarious entry and I can't wait to see how it evolves.

Post: #30

(04-02-2016 07:49 AM)VincentVinturi Wrote:  If the goal is to present a sane point of view on the topics discussed in the manosphere then entries like this, in my opinion, don't serve that goal:

http://en.kingswiki.com/wiki/Feminists

It's funny to people already in the know but to an outside it will read like a farce.

A big part of the power of the manosphere is a commitment to objectivity, facts, and reason.

If the wiki becomes a big web of opinions, inside jokes and ad hominems it will lose credibility.

You are free to create the article that you want to see and set an example for others.

Post: #31

Post: #32

Bookmarked

Post: #33

I'm going to do some basic ones.

http://en.kingswiki.com/wiki/Friend_zone

Post: #34

(04-03-2016 02:29 PM)HankMoody Wrote:  I'm going to do some basic ones.

http://en.kingswiki.com/wiki/Friend_zone

I was going to add this line, but saw it publicly logs your IP if you don't have an account.

"These situations often result in a woman extracting some resources and gifts from the beta orbiter. The beta orbiter blindly thinks that by doing nice things for the female, he will somehow earn her affections. This orbiting behavior also occupies the beta's energy from being more productive such as pursuing women who are interested in him."

Post: #35

(04-03-2016 02:39 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 02:29 PM)HankMoody Wrote:  I'm going to do some basic ones.

http://en.kingswiki.com/wiki/Friend_zone

I was going to add this line, but saw it publicly logs your IP if you don't have an account.

"These situations often result in a woman extracting some resources and gifts from the beta orbiter. The beta orbiter blindly thinks that by doing nice things for the female, he will somehow earn her affections. This orbiting behavior also occupies the beta's energy from being more productive such as pursuing women who are interested in him."

I added it, you are even quoted as source

Post: #36

(04-03-2016 02:58 PM)Caravaggio Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 02:39 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 02:29 PM)HankMoody Wrote:  I'm going to do some basic ones.

http://en.kingswiki.com/wiki/Friend_zone

I was going to add this line, but saw it publicly logs your IP if you don't have an account.

"These situations often result in a woman extracting some resources and gifts from the beta orbiter. The beta orbiter blindly thinks that by doing nice things for the female, he will somehow earn her affections. This orbiting behavior also occupies the beta's energy from being more productive such as pursuing women who are interested in him."

I added it, you are even quoted as source

I better sign up at some point. That IP logging thing threw me off.

Post: #37

I inserted your essay on neomasculinity on the wiki, let me know if you want to see the whole article on the wiki or if you'd prefer a summary and a link to your blog.
http://en.kingswiki.com/wiki/Neomasculinity

Post: #38

I was thinking of adding a "Today's featured video" section to the main page, with an embedded YouTube widget. Does anyone have ideas for what would be good sources of Red Pill wisdom in the YouTubesphere? E.g. any favorite channels?

We could also have a "Today's featured list" section, if we can come up with enough lists, and/or a "Today's featured image" if people can contribute enough suitable images. They could be funny memes, hot chicks, etc.

Post: #39

(04-03-2016 03:57 PM)Caravaggio Wrote:  I inserted your essay on neomasculinity on the wiki, let me know if you want to see the whole article on the wiki or if you'd prefer a summary and a link to your blog.
http://en.kingswiki.com/wiki/Neomasculinity

I need to learn how to do all that fancy shit. Great article.

Post: #40

What should we call our wiki's forum? Wikipedia calls theirs the "village pump"; RationalWiki calls theirs the "saloon bar"; ED calls theirs "Thizzlehat Junction Center"; etc.

How about "village pump-and-dump"?

Post: #41

(04-03-2016 11:38 PM)RaymondKertezc Wrote:  What should we call our wiki's forum? Wikipedia calls theirs the "village pump"; RationalWiki calls theirs the "saloon bar"; ED calls theirs "Thizzlehat Junction Center"; etc.

The Petshop.

Post: #42

(04-03-2016 11:38 PM)RaymondKertezc Wrote:  What should we call our wiki's forum? Wikipedia calls theirs the "village pump"; RationalWiki calls theirs the "saloon bar"; ED calls theirs "Thizzlehat Junction Center"; etc. http://en.kingswiki.com/wiki/Project:Forum

The Round Table? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Round_Table)
Little Darks Hallway?
Wall Victim Research Center?

It is fun thinking about these things, creative too!

Post: #43

(04-03-2016 11:51 PM)Guriko Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 11:38 PM)RaymondKertezc Wrote:  What should we call our wiki's forum? Wikipedia calls theirs the "village pump"; RationalWiki calls theirs the "saloon bar"; ED calls theirs "Thizzlehat Junction Center"; etc. http://en.kingswiki.com/wiki/Project:Forum

The Round Table? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Round_Table)
Little Darks Hallway?
Wall Victim Research Center?

It is fun thinking about these things, creative too!

What should we call the sysops and bureaucrats? Sysops have access to block users, delete pages, etc. while bureaucrats have access to add and remove sysops through user rights management.

We could call sysops "knights" because they defend the wiki against spammers, vandals, etc. What would we call bureaucrats, who outrank sysops? Lords, or earls, or barons or something?

We can create intermediate ranks as well, but that'll usually be unnecessary on a small wiki.

There are also techs (such as myself); we could call them "wizards" if we're going to continue with the feudal analogy. Of course, "wizard" has unfortunate connotations in the manosphere.

Actually, though, "knights" also has unfortunate connotations to the extent that they're white knights. At any rate, I think we should go with "petshop" instead of "round table".

Post: #44

(04-03-2016 11:38 PM)RaymondKertezc Wrote:  What should we call our wiki's forum? Wikipedia calls theirs the "village pump"; RationalWiki calls theirs the "saloon bar"; ED calls theirs "Thizzlehat Junction Center"; etc.

How about "village pump-and-dump"?

There is a whole generation of really intelligent and motivated (but blue pill) men waiting to be divorce raped, or cheated on by their girlfriends, or to spend months (or years) sexless.

The only way these men will come to our side is by always being serious about who we are and what we do.

Titles like this will drive away potential future male allies to our cause rather than pull them in.

Post: #45

I'd call it "The club". Short and simple.

Post: #46

What a bloody great idea!!

Post: #47

(04-03-2016 07:01 PM)RaymondKertezc Wrote:  I was thinking of adding a "Today's featured video" section to the main page, with an embedded YouTube widget. Does anyone have ideas for what would be good sources of Red Pill wisdom in the YouTubesphere? E.g. any favorite channels?

Here are some relevant sites:

Paul Joseph Watson
Red Pill Philosophy
Undoomed
The Alex Jones Channel
Matt Forney

Post: #48

Quote:We could call sysops "knights" because they defend the wiki against spammers, vandals, etc. What would we call bureaucrats, who outrank sysops? Lords, or earls, or barons or something?

Problem with "knights" is the connotation to "white knights". Maybe lords or nobles instead.

Post: #49

Royal, noble and
chivalric ranks
Coronet of mediatised prince of the HRE:

Emperor
King
Archduke
Grand Duke
Grand Prince
Prince / Infante
Duke
Sovereign Prince / Fürst
Marquess / Marquis /
Margrave / Landgrave
Count / Earl
Viscount / Vidame
Baron
Baronet
Hereditary Knight
Knight
Esquire
Gentleman


Take your pick!

This needs to be a resource for blue pillers, written by red pillers. No need to preach to the choir, or it could end up like Enyclopedia Dramatica. Absolutely brilliant project, though - hopefully enough people will have their eyes opened with this.

Post: #50

I just learned through KingsWiKi about the branch-swinging term! Excellent, very true, and will use this term in the future!

http://en.kingswiki.com/wiki/Branch_swinging

We need to create a KingsWiKi page related to that, page called: Hypergamy

Meanwhile, I'm creating the carousel-rider page...

http://en.kingswiki.com/wiki/Carousel_rider