Post: #401

This truck is part of a long history that started with the 1965 Jacob Javits US Immigration Act.

Hugh Davis Graham, a Vanderbilt PoliSci prof wrote in his 2002 book "Collision Course: The Strange Convergence of Affirmative Action and Immigration Policy in America ":

Quote:Most important for the content of immigration reform, the driving force at the core of the movement, reaching back to the 1920s, were Jewish organizations long active in opposing racial and ethnic quotas. These included the American Jewish Congress, the American Jewish Committee, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, and the American Federation of Jews from Eastern Europe. Jewish members of the Congress, particularly representatives from New York and Chicago, had maintained steady but largely ineffective pressure against the national origins quotas since the 1920s…. Following the shock of the Holocaust, Jewish leaders had been especially active in Washington in furthering immigration reform. To the public, the most visible evidence of the immigration reform drive was played by Jewish legislative leaders, such as Representative Celler and Senator Jacob Javits of New York. Less visible, but equally important, were the efforts of key advisers on presidential and agency staffs. These included senior policy advisers such as Julius Edelson and Harry Rosenfield in the Truman administration, Maxwell Rabb in the Eisenhower White House, and presidential aide Myer Feldman, assistant secretary of state Abba Schwartz, and deputy attorney general Norbert Schlei in the Kennedy-Johnson administration.

Kevin MacDonald has done very solid research pinpointing the origins of open border policies in the US there:

http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/CofCchap7.pdf

Brother Nathaniel, a Jew who has converted to Orthodox Christianity, gives a shorter summary in his flamboyant but factual style here:

http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=50

Post: #402

Their genetic destabalisation of the USA is functionally a battle already won. Now only the speed of the downfall remains to be seen.

Even if Trump built the wall yesterday and no globalist administration (D or R) ever won office, birth rates will still ensure that the US goes under as a white majority nation and it's status as a member of Western civilisation (with concurrent foundational values) also goes out the window. At that point you either get a breakup of the union, invariably along rough racial lines, or you get Brazil in perpetuity, only worse because the globalists would no longer have to constrain themselves for fear of post-enlightenment demographics catching them out in numbers and solidarity large enough to hold them to account.

Infinite slavery forever.

That's why I think it's black humor when civic nationalists clutch their pearls about the dreaded resurgence of Nazis. Ethno-nationalism and unpleasantness required to get there is utterly nothing compared to the genocidal abuses that will occur when people like Hillary Clinton or the Rothschilds are finally given a blank cheque and no accountability. They've already made it quietly clear they intent to reduce the global population by 90% and despotically rule over it ad infinitum, so heritage America will either have to choose to break away and form a white ethno-state, or an ethno-state with chocolate chips, or basically accept "retard-endorsed democratic tyranny" until the sun burns out.

To boil it down, refusal to "name the Jew" is to choose the latter. Even in a "white" ethnostate where Judaism is regarded as a religion rather than a passive-aggressive foreign tribal supremacy movement they will simply infiltrate every corner of power and before you know it you will be back to where we are now.

Post: #403

Here the caravan receiving cash aside from logistical support.

It's the same thing in Europe where countless organizations are even paying smugglers, distributing Iphones and handing out some cash.

The funny part about Brazil is that now many European-descended Brazilians are fleeing the country since it's getting worse - they recently instituted strong anti-White policies that for example limit the number of White students that they are willing to accept at universitites (ie - if the region is 25% white then only 25% of European students are going to get accepted at the medical studies - they have to fill the slots with other races even if they are significantly less qualified and don't even feel like studying). Policies like that are seen in South Africa and we see how that turns out.

Post: #404

^That is why civic nationalism is not a long term solution to the problems of Western societies grappling with so called "institutional racism".

Even if all the progressives and social justice warriors vanished in the night. Even if all affirmative action and hate speech laws were struck from the books on day one. In fifty years you would still have varied levels of social success among the races and once again the West would be forced to either accept variations in racial ability or continue the eternal search for imaginary racist social forces that bizarrely hold back some minority groups while boosting outcomes of other minority groups.

Post: #405

(10-20-2018 02:22 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  That's why I think it's black humor...

#BlackHumorMatters

Post: #406

Benefit #1583 of living in a homogeneous region. You don't have to self-police everything you say and type to avoid triggering random minorities.

Post: #407

Yep, the sheer chutzpah of this operation, actually draws back the curtain of jewish control in the world.

They just casually set about transporting 4000 people across multiple country lines to invade the US.

What's new is not that such a thing is possible, but that they do such a blatant obvious display of their power.

It's also made me rethink some of how I see this time I am living in. We're more akin to Greeks or Spaniards during a long muslim occupation, than we're free citizens. We are in this to save our descendants from jewish tyranny. I doubt we will ever see it for ourselves.

Post: #408

< The Jewish Frame Games mentioned that in many states in the US all representatives and all senators have to swear allegiance to Israel. If they don't then it's fine, but then all the Jewish organization money will go fully to their opponent. Thare are 1000 Jewish organizations in the US and some are funded with tens of billions of dollars. Usually when they fund the opposition, then you lose, so almost all US politicians swear an oath of allegiance to a foreign country before getting even elected. It's really funny and insane at the same time.

So what you gonna do about this? Write to your politician and link to the picture asking him what the the greatest ally is doing south of the border? That will go over well you anti-semite!

Post: #409

(10-20-2018 07:23 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Even if all the progressives and social justice warriors vanished in the night. Even if all affirmative action and hate speech laws were struck from the books on day one. In fifty years you would still have varied levels of social success among the races and once again the West would be forced to either accept variations in racial ability or continue the eternal search for imaginary racist social forces that bizarrely hold back some minority groups while boosting outcomes of other minority groups.

Or... all of the groups would be so much better off with those malign influences banished that they literally wouldn't have the time or inclination for this eternal search anymore. Not to mention that forcing groups to fend for themselves instead of wallowing in victimhood/communism would encourage self-improvement and eventually the reduction of those differences.

Of course the cuck-civic nationalism isn't a solution to our current problems, many of which are so insane that at this point they can only be solved by harsh laws and mass deportations (and hopefully not RWDS, but if it comes to that let's just say they were warned)... but once you've restored some sanity, you might be pleasantly surprised at the natural capacity of all those groups for self-improvement, as well as their sudden increase in tolerance for different outcomes.

All that's needed is a starting point.

Post: #410

(10-20-2018 02:22 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  ...Ethno-nationalism and unpleasantness required to get there is utterly nothing compared to the genocidal abuses that will occur when people like Hillary Clinton or the Rothschilds are finally given a blank cheque and no accountability. They've already made it quietly clear they intent to reduce the global population by 90% and despotically rule over it ad infinitum ...

^
Leonard

Can you elaborate when and how this has been made clear?

To be honest the idea of a massive reduction in population has its merits IMO...objectively speaking and morality aside

Post: #411

(10-20-2018 10:23 AM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  

(10-20-2018 02:22 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  ...Ethno-nationalism and unpleasantness required to get there is utterly nothing compared to the genocidal abuses that will occur when people like Hillary Clinton or the Rothschilds are finally given a blank cheque and no accountability. They've already made it quietly clear they intent to reduce the global population by 90% and despotically rule over it ad infinitum ...

^
Leonard

Can you elaborate when and how this has been made clear?

To be honest the idea of a massive reduction in population has its merits IMO...objectively speaking and morality aside

Georgia Guidestones - plus scores and scores of globalist books as well as long-term plans of the UN. Currently they seem to have went for a long-term reduction plan that involves lots of induced infertility and later maybe more stringent measures.

The answer of the serfs:



Obviously it's all conjecture from our view as no one of them goes on TV stating clearly: "We want 90% of all of you dead! Plus - we are going to pick and choose."

In addition it's possible that this plan is 150-300 years in their future and they went for a soft method of population reduction.

Post: #412

It's always amusing when people donate five dollars here and ten dollars there or this party or that candidate.

Meanwhile a lobby group walks in with so much cash it takes two men to carry it.

It would be simple enough to ban all election donations full stop. All support should be grass roots activism. But those donations are such a sweet plum to funnel into private bank accounts via sweetheart deals and kickbacks. There's no way any major party on the planet would enact such legislation.

Post: #413

(10-20-2018 10:23 AM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  

(10-20-2018 02:22 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  ...Ethno-nationalism and unpleasantness required to get there is utterly nothing compared to the genocidal abuses that will occur when people like Hillary Clinton or the Rothschilds are finally given a blank cheque and no accountability. They've already made it quietly clear they intent to reduce the global population by 90% and despotically rule over it ad infinitum ...

^
Leonard

Can you elaborate when and how this has been made clear?

To be honest the idea of a massive reduction in population has its merits IMO...objectively speaking and morality aside

Specific quotes and their sources elude me. This is stuff I read about almost a decade ago now so I'd be left to google it same as you. I don't have a personal recording of a Bilderberg Group meeting or anything like that, no.

Objectively speaking, and morality aside, sure, there is no reason to keep populating an already overburdened planet. The problem is, who decides who goes? Who decides where the chemicals required to reduce fertility are pumped? Who decides where the next pandemic is unleashed, or where an ebola outbreak response is "botched"?

Considering the broad swathe of anti-white action by the elites I think it's fair to say that me and my people are on the chopping block, being one of the few peoples capable of standing in their way over the long run. Personally I favor a national approach to the problem because anything else is basically international genocide. The only international approach I concede to is to cease foreign food aid except in the case of temporary famine outside of common regional food production levels (crops destroyed by war, act of God, etc).

Different areas have different population capacities and should not exceed their internal food production capabilities but that's up to them. Australia for example should close the borders and usher in a steady birthrate of 1.5p/p until we're no longer exporting food. Other nations with excess population per square arable mile should seek to reduce their populations until they are in line with the carrying capacity of their lands, but that's their business.

Having said all that, the idea that a bunch of elite oligarchs want to make the decision of who lives, dies and breeds, and they want to do it behind closed doors with no accountability? It gets a fellow to thinking he better get them before they get him.

Post: #414

(10-20-2018 10:14 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

(10-20-2018 07:23 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Even if all the progressives and social justice warriors vanished in the night. Even if all affirmative action and hate speech laws were struck from the books on day one. In fifty years you would still have varied levels of social success among the races and once again the West would be forced to either accept variations in racial ability or continue the eternal search for imaginary racist social forces that bizarrely hold back some minority groups while boosting outcomes of other minority groups.

Or... all of the groups would be so much better off with those malign influences banished that they literally wouldn't have the time or inclination for this eternal search anymore. Not to mention that forcing groups to fend for themselves instead of wallowing in victimhood/communism would encourage self-improvement and eventually the reduction of those differences.

Of course the cuck-civic nationalism isn't a solution to our current problems, many of which are so insane that at this point they can only be solved by harsh laws and mass deportations (and hopefully not RWDS, but if it comes to that let's just say they were warned)... but once you've restored some sanity, you might be pleasantly surprised at the natural capacity of all those groups for self-improvement, as well as their sudden increase in tolerance for different outcomes.

All that's needed is a starting point.

We got to where we are today for a reason. The 50's led to the 60's and the 70's and so on.

It follows that the same input will result in the same outcome and it falls to someone claiming otherwise to explain specifically why things would be different this time around. The truth is that a future meritocracy would be even less kind to minorities that test poorly academically on average, because most of those basic/no education jobs no longer exist.

I don't like it, but that's reality.

Reason #2051 that homogeneous societies are better. Because your judge and your gardener both look the same. When all the judges look one way and all the gardeners look another then you will invariably end up with civil strife.

Post: #415

Haven't seen it reported here yet, but it's safe to say we can start the countdown until Trump has an aneurysm:





They've broken through the Mexican border defenses...

Post: #416

One angle that hasn't been covered here is that Obama-Hillary actively destabilized many central American nations, spurring this exodus in the first place. Countries like Honduras that were starting to gain political and economic stability were actively targeted, now it's a festering hole run by death squads, MS13-type narco-criminals and neoliberal devastation of the local economies.

https://www.democracynow.org/2016/3/11/b...es_singled

Same as in Europe, where noecons have been destabilizing the middle east and creating a massive immigration wave from places like Syria, Afghanistan, Tchad, Somalia etc.

Post: #417

(10-20-2018 12:27 PM)Dulceácido Wrote:  Haven't seen it reported here yet, but it's safe to say we can start the countdown until Trump has an aneurysm:





They've broken through the Mexican border defenses...

Quote:For Sidonius Apollinaris and his beloved native city of Clermont, the year 471 could hardly have brought more misery. Goths surrounded the proud Roman city. Morale was low. Defeat seemed inevitable. Then, quite literally, the cavalry arrived. A small group of men—just nineteen—charged across the plain to scatter the Gothic host. The sheer audacity of the surprise attack must have stunned the besieging army. The Goths, who are said to have numbered in the thousands, suffered heavy losses, and the city was delivered.

In the aftermath, the townspeople watching from behind the broken walls thronged to greet their plucky rescuers. It was an especially joyous reception because the leader of the the tiny cavalry contingent was one of their own, a certain Ecdicius, who had grown up in Clermont before returning to relieve the town with a private army he had raised entirely through his own exertions. Grateful townsfolk now kissed the dust off Ecdicius’ armor and fought for the honor of embracing their victorious native son.

Sidonius, the city’s bishop, was ecstatic. But the affair had been a close one for both Clermont and Sidonius. In his writings Sidonius might well have been justified in asking how a city in the great Roman Empire could have been left so defenseless. Ecdicius’ raid should have been unnecessary. Where was the Roman army? Sidonius never did pose that question because he already knew the answer: The Roman army had been there all along, made up of Goths.

Let's see who controls the gates now.

Trump or Soros.

Post: #418

Wow! Thousands of Central Americans pouring into Mexico???

No thank you. The good thing is is that their final destination is the U.S. and not Mexico. Mexico is not equipped to take that number of immigrants. The U.S. can have them. Good luck!

Post: #419

(10-19-2018 10:18 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  In a sane world Trump would hoover up that mob, dump them like cattle into a dozen military globemasters and drop them off in Israel.

Then he would promise to do that for every illegal immigrant that arrived until the MSM "magically" became suddenly hostile to immigration and massively pro-wall.

Post: #420

(10-20-2018 02:46 PM)Parras Wrote:  Wow! Thousands of Central Americans pouring into Mexico???

No thank you. The good thing is is that their final destination is the U.S. and not Mexico. Mexico is not equipped to take that number of immigrants. The U.S. can have them. Good luck!

Why is this a problem though? If Mexico doesn't have much of a welfare state, what's so bad for Mexico if a few thousand Central Americans arrive? They speak the same language. Those who work hard enough to make a living will settle, others will go home or... disappear.

Post: #421

(10-20-2018 12:08 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  The same input will result in the same outcome and it falls to someone claiming otherwise to explain specifically why things would be different this time around. The truth is that a future meritocracy would be even less kind to minorities that test poorly academically on average, because most of those basic/no education jobs no longer exist.

Consider that if you amputated the cancer of SJW-ism (including race-baiting and victim propaganda, unlimited welfare and especially every single form of affirmative action) from society, the educational attainment of those poorly-performing minorities would skyrocket. Sure, there would still be race and whatever other differences leading to different outcomes, but they would be nowhere as glaring as they are today, nor would people find them so upsetting like they do today. This is how things were just several decades ago and opinions may differ, but I think the whole thing worked.

Now as to the question of would it inevitably lead to the next [current year] and [current decade] and all of the crap they brought - yes, that's a valid complaint. It probably would. That's why stopping that slippery slope would probably require fixing the previous enormous mistake, which was allowing anyone to vote. If you tie the right to vote to being a taxpayer / serving in the military as commonly suggested and never budge from it, the odds of that slippery slope will drastically reduce. That would probably be a prerequisite for preserving the paragraph above.

As for the society being less kind to poor performers, well - the society should be less kind to poor performers of every race anyway. But in such a society, believe it or not, people would be less upset about it than in today's sick victim culture simply because there would be nothing to bait them.

Quote:Reason #2051 that homogeneous societies are better. Because your judge and your gardener both look the same. When all the judges look one way and all the gardeners look another then you will invariably end up with civil strife.

I agree, but in the absence of those perfect homogenous societies we should make do with what we have. I'd prefer our societies (whether peacefully or after a civil war if it's unavoidable) to transition into the model above, perhaps like Singapore did, rather than becoming cozy, homogenous ethno-states but ignoring that model and repeating the same mistakes within their single race/nation/group.

Ethno-states are just as capable of getting eaten alive by SJW-ism and self-destructing in all sorts of disastrous ways - WW1 and WW2 serve as stark reminders of that fact.

Post: #422

Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:the educational attainment of those poorly-performing minorities would skyrocket

Also, I know this is going to ruffle some feathers so let me explain what I mean in advance.

For example, take African American representation in higher education. Currently, elite universities have what, 15% of African Americans among their students? Yet the proportion of African Americans in USA demographics is 12%, and if their (generally accepted as) dismal average high school performance was taken into account, their representation at those universities would most likely be in the single digits - say 5%. So let's say that there is triple the number of African Americans currently enrolled than it would be in a merit-based system.

However, that extra 10 percentage points of African American students that made it there is A) poorly motivated because they made it in through a quota instead of honest work/talent and B) studying mostly useless crap. So how is that really of use to anyone? It doesn't benefit the university, the society, the employers, the other students - heck, it doesn't even benefit those students themselves because in the end they will still end up either unemployable or dependent on bullshit make-believe jobs. They would be much better off if they possessed actual skills and motivation, even if it involved slightly less academic success and prestige instead of a quota-based PhD in bullshit.

To make things worse, this is not even an American thing. It afflicts whatever race/group is involved in it all over the world. For example, back in high school in Kenya, my wife knew this brilliant girl who was extremely skilled in pretty much everything, attended math classes several grades higher and scored #2 overall on the national placement exam. She was clearly a person with tremendous potential, and everyone knew it.

Do you know where that girl ended? In USA at Harvard... attending... try to guess... *drumroll*... women's studies.

One of Africa's best minds, instead of being a brain surgeon or a civil engineer, now spends her life parading around waving "Orange man bad" signs and penning idiotic essays about the "Limits of intersectionality of LGBTQIA++-friendly feminism" This is worse than the classic brain drain - at least in that case someone got a highly skilled professional out of it. In this case, the only result was ruining someone's life.

Stuff like that is why I have hope for the future. The negative impact of SJW-ism is so tremendous that it makes other societal problems look like child's play in comparison - and if one day we get rid of it, the positive impact will also be tremendous.

Post: #423

I see where you're coming from but I don't think your numbers add up.

College without the retard-degrees would be even harder to get into still. Affirmative action is made up not only of minority hires but it's also bolstered immensely by government and corporate make-work jobs requiring said retard-degrees. They're trying to implement this in colleges too, where a minority woman will be employed full time to follow an old male professor around and hector him about his problematic behavior.

And then we come back to the problem of white people with their own retarded and delusional altruism, not content to merely grant equal rights (a good thing) but determined to make sure everyone get the same outcome (bad because it's delusional and ultimately destructive). In 20 years time a black woman would complain that her son couldn't become a judge "because the system is rigged against black people, just look at how few get into law school" and a certain percentage of cuck whites (with no shortage of (((fellow whites))) egging them on) would insist that if everyone is equal then the only thing preventing equal representation in all fields is systemic racism or poverty or whatever bullshit explanation they come up with.

As I eluded to before, people are better off among their own because it's one less option for explaining away personal and group failures. Blacks are right to want to be policed by black cops, judged by black judges, ordered by black mayors and senators and presidents and protected by a black military. This is the natural order for 99.99% of human history. On an inherent level nobody likes taking orders but they hate it ten times more when the guy giving the orders looks utterly different from them. The sense of occupation is inescapable. The claim of differential standards being applied is inevitable. What does a black man being arrested by a black cop in a black nation call the officer? Racist? Of course not. He is forced to grapple with the system of his own people rather than build a convenient victimhood complex (that may even be true to some extent).

Who gets to tell all the minority affirmative action hires they're all fired? Those people can't compete in the regular workforce, and they're going to live for another 20 to 50 years. They're going to vote. They're going to teach their kids and their grandkids that "racism is alive today", and they'll fight tooth and nail at the ballot box to get that cushy position back. If you don't have the numbers to stop them then they'll succeed. If you have the numbers to stop them then instead you get a population that acts like a tribe living in military-occupied lands.

This is not guesswork at this point. It's applied history and plain racial social dynamics. It upsets many because it goes against the programmed propaganda of "Americanism" which is nationalist theory, but nationalism becomes less viable the more diverse it becomes. Whites enforcing white codes of conduct on blacks or mestizos or arabs or chinese or indians or polynesians inevitably unravels. Either different standards have to be applied, or worse, the whites have to concede to standards which are inarguably more primitive than the ones they founded their nations on (roaming gangs, public drinking, wanton littering, mob violence etc).

History shows us in no uncertain terms that if you want to hold a diverse nation together you cannot do it under some kind of nansy pansy democratic system. Only brutal despotism will work in the long run. Take a look at the fate of Rhodesia to see what happened when two tribes with wildly different evolutionary backgrounds finally adopted nationalist democracy. America already has the democracy. It's just slipping to the point where the dominant tribe is no longer capable of democratically controlling the system of government.

We will see this elsewhere, manifesting in different ways too. If Australia slips into chinese majority status then our environmental protection laws will disappear, for example, and we will be back to poisoning the land to the point of it becoming uninhabitable just the way so many places in China have become. The myth that 60 million second generation Chinese Australians would be having barbecues on Australia day, playing cricket and "giving everyone a fair go" is delusional garbage.

Individuals vary, and social systems can shift things mildly for better or worse, but on average a peoples are the product of their genetics. Not just IQ but immeasurable behavioural drivers that exist the same way a bird builds a nest without having been taught how.

White capitalist America was a nice place to live. White socialist Europe wasn't so bad either. Both have been destroyed by suicidal white altruism with the notable addition of jewish subversion (virtually nobody in Germany was clamoring for an african invasion, cucks or not, they just accepted it once it started and virtue signaled afterward).

Post: #424

Honduras is now a vassal state of Israel thanks to a coup that involved Hillary. Some good digging by Black Pilled.



Skip to 33 seconds to see this Nelly tell the US it has to take the Hondurant migrants because Human Rights bla bla bla. You may need to turn on auto-translate captions as it's in Spanish.








Honduras, a country of five families.

Quote:Although everyone calls them "Turks" they are actually families of Jewish origin who came from Arab countries during the 40s and 50s away from the desert and conflicts. They are the Rosenthal, the Facussé, the Larach, the Nasser, the Kafie or the Goldstein. Five surnames that control maquilas (assembly industries), thermal energy, telecommunications, tourism, banking, finance, media, cement and commerce, airports or the congress. Practically everything. They are the hard core of that 3% of Hondurans that controls 40% of the national production. They are the elect of a country with 70% of the poor.

Characters like Jaime Rosenthal, presidential candidate in 4 elections and owner of banks, airport, breweries, soccer teams and media. It has investments in cement, telephone companies, meat exports and insurance and telecommunications. Or the Facussé, related to the Nassers and who have spread their influence between politics and business for decades. They are the capos of the textile sector in a country dedicated to making many of the branded garments that later travel to the US. They also control chemical companies or precious woods. From these two families many ministers have left and there is no decision in the country that does not pass through their hands.

Most did not know how to read and did not speak Spanish when they arrived, but they prospered behind a counter, creating newspapers, mining or bringing electricity and telephone to the country. They married each other, sent their children to American universities, displaced the traditional bourgeoisie (of Spanish and German origin) and three generations later continue to control the country without admitting anyone to their club of 'powerful'.

Honduras and Israel: A New Special Relationship





Hard choices: Hillary Clinton admits role in Honduran coup aftermath

Quote:In “Hard Choices,” Clinton describes her role in the aftermath of the coup that brought about this dire situation. Her firsthand account is significant both for the confession of an important truth and for a crucial false testimony.

First, the confession: Clinton admits that she used the power of her office to make sure that Zelaya would not return to office. “In the subsequent days [after the coup] I spoke with my counterparts around the hemisphere, including Secretary [Patricia] Espinosa in Mexico,” Clinton writes. “We strategized on a plan to restore order in Honduras and ensure that free and fair elections could be held quickly and legitimately, which would render the question of Zelaya moot.”

This may not come as a surprise to those who followed the post-coup drama closely. (See my commentary from 2009 on Washington’s role in helping the coup succeed here, here and here.) But the official storyline, which was dutifully accepted by most in the media, was that the Obama administration actually opposed the coup and wanted Zelaya to return to office.

The high-powered hidden support for Honduras' coup
The country's rightful president was ousted by a military leadership that takes many of its cues from Washington insiders.

Quote:Powerful special interests have flexed their muscles and confronted President Obama on the most important legislative priorities of his domestic agenda. But this kind of politics-by-influence-peddling doesn't stop at the water's edge. And in foreign policy, the consequences can be more immediate, violent and deadly.

Meet Lanny Davis, Washington lawyer and lobbyist, former legal counsel to President Clinton and avid campaigner for Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential bid. He has been hired by a coalition of Latin American business interests to represent the dictatorship that ousted elected President Manuel Zelaya of Honduras in a military coup and removed him to Costa Rica on June 28.

Davis is working with Bennett Ratcliff, another lobbyist with a close relationship to Hillary Clinton who is a former senior executive for one of the most influential political and public relations firms in Washington. In the current mediation effort hosted by Costa Rican President Oscar Arias, the coup-installed government did not make a move without first consulting Ratcliff, an unnamed source told the New York Times.

Davis and Ratcliff have done an amazing public relations job so far. Americans, relying on media reports, are likely to believe that Zelaya was ousted because he tried to use a referendum to extend his term of office. This is false.

………………..

Almost all of the Latin American governments -- which are mostly left of center -- also sympathize with Zelaya because he is a reform president fighting against a corrupt (((oligarchy))). In one of the poorest countries in the hemisphere, he raised the minimum wage by 60% and increased teachers' salaries and public pensions, as well as access to education.

Obviously that is my highlighting in the quote above.

It seems clear to me that the Cabal have handed Honduras over to the Israelis. If they are not getting saddled with far-left Marxist governments Latin Americans now suffer Zionist 'special relationships' aka (((tyranny))).

Post: #425

The sun never sets on the jewish empire.