Post: #1451

An old comics, but very good

Post: #1452

Post: #1453

   

Post: #1454

Post: #1455

(04-22-2017 10:24 AM)Dusty Wrote:  

Cover then left half of the screen and then...

Post: #1456

   

Post: #1457

Post: #1458

(04-19-2017 04:34 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  Chelsea Clinton...

Sorry... some eye bleach.

Post: #1459

Post: #1460

An Antifa got trolled pretty good.


Source
Via Jack P's tweet

Post: #1461

   

Post: #1462

Anon found this on his sister's laptop. To protect her, he'll only say it's at a University in California. The coursework is to raid /pol/.

Post: #1463

Post: #1464

Post: #1465

Post: #1466

Post: #1467

   

Post: #1468

The Anonymous Conservative Wrote:I came across this quote from him a while back, and it really twisted my brain around as I pictured being a liberal and hearing it:



I always try to examine things in the context of amygdala. What lever is something pressing, how is it triggering aversive stimulus, how is it violating expectations, why is it being flagged, and on and on.

This argument is interesting, because it first says to the leftist mind that they support something they oppose. That begins to link their position to the emotions triggered by the idea they oppose, namely owning guns. That will trigger the amygdala which will focus the leftist mind upon it, and the leftist will try to immediately deny it to gain relief.

The argument then progresses to an airtight case that they do in fact support everything they claim to oppose, cementing the emotional linkage with logic and triggering the amygdala. Leftists do support gun ownership – by the state. That will attach aversive stimulus in the leftist mind to the idea of supporting gun control. Molyneux then subtly out-groups the leftist by portraying government as the enemy of all, and associating the leftist with supporting this out-group. This will slip past right-leaning ideologues, but it hits a leftist right between the eyes. Leftists are extremely conscious of any social association that could lead the conflict with the group. Finally, the end of the argument carries a subtle air of intellectual superiority, over having corrected the leftist’s misperception, as it subtly implies that supporting gun control makes an individual appear stupid. All of that attaches further amygdala activation and aversive stimulus to the concept of being in support of gun control.

It is an incredibly brilliant argument, only made more so by the fact it seems to flow forth freely, without any need to try and technically assemble it.

I think it is useful to take these arguments made by the naturals and deconstruct their effects on the amygdala, in the hopes that understanding their effects technically may help reconstruct other arguments like this in the future.

Source: http://www.anonymousconservative.com/blo...n-control/

Post: #1469

   

Post: #1470

Post: #1471

I like the idea of making regular hand gestures look "racist" to lefties, so they whine about it and look dumb to everyone.
But what about the reverse? Can we get lefties to co-opt the "sig heil" salute as some sort of lgbt unity thing?

Post: #1472

Post: #1473

I'm not sure this is actually on track, but I like the picture, so...

Post: #1474

Post: #1475