Post: #51

(06-23-2016 03:39 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  

(06-23-2016 09:02 AM)Lucario Wrote:  This woman is incredible, I just found out about her today, and she truly deserves the title of lady. WB and start family with.

Careful - she may be a good alt-right commentator, but I would not call her lady-like or marriage/mother material.

It can be easy to have eyes for a pretty girl who shares a lot of your views, but make no mistake that Lauren is a narcissistic internet media-whore just like any other female with a camera and a microphone. Roosh wrote about these sorts of women before:

http://www.rooshv.com/why-the-female-ant...n-disguise

I like what Lauren does for the most part along with the other Rebel Media crowd, but she is certainly not a girl I would consider for marriage/family. She's still surely a self absorbed attention whore who enjoys having her face in front of a camera, causing a stir, and gaining IG followers. She's in her 20's and doesn't seem to be heading towards marriage or children anytime soon.

Relevant yet again! "Jerking Off to Female Conservative Porn" by Aaron Clarey, published on Apr 21, 2014

Roosh is mentioned at 3:12

Post: #52

Lauren Southern is a women in sheep's clothing.

Post: #53

Lauren Southern attacked by Antifa:

Post: #54

I support Lauren's work, but this is her second violent encounter in just a few months. This is worse than war-time correspondents. She may be dancing too close to the sun.

Post: #55

A woman is physically attacked by masked men for what she is wearing and a feminist blames her for being provocative. She basically said, you knew exactly what you were doing wearing that.

Post: #56

(06-24-2016 06:13 PM)iop890 Wrote:  Lauren Southern attacked by Antifa:

One of my biggest gripes with activists is that they don't use common sense. Actually speaking against Lauren and her crew here.

The fact that she keeps yammering on about her right to be there and her right to wear what she wants and they she should not be the one being spoken to by the police about conduct - if she employed some common sense she would understand that the civil rights she has are not going to protect her when she wanders into a mob of people that hate her and what she stands for. That British-Indian looking girl as well as the police were trying to tell her that. They weren't saying she couldn't be there or wear what she wants, but she was (and obviously deliberately) shaking a hornets' nest and she got bitten.

And lets also be clear here - Lauren is not simply a journalist that does unbiased reporting on current events in her field. She is an activist with an agenda that she pushes and attempts to expose those who oppose her views as being in the wrong.

She's not a martyr who put herself in danger for the sake of honest journalism. She is a conflict profiteer who instigates drama.

Keep in mind I'm not disagreeing with her views. I share a lot of the same.

I think the most substantial takeaway we can get from watching her in-field work is that pretty white blond women are not as protected as we think.

Post: #57

I cringe to think of the STDs that were probably in that piss. Hope those freaks get found and slapped with a few felonies.

Post: #58

Quote:conflict profiteer

The best way for an anti-establishment figure to build their "brand" is to get attacked on camera, but that's really playing with fire. If you're purposefully putting yourself in harm's way to get clicks then you need to re-evaluate your work.

Post: #59

(06-24-2016 07:06 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Quote:conflict profiteer

The best way for an anti-establishment figure to build their "brand" is to get attacked on camera, but that's really playing with fire. If you're purposefully putting yourself in harm's way to get clicks then you need to re-evaluate your work.

WB though and offer to clean her in the shower, and then use my tongue to dry every inch of her body.

Post: #60

Something didn't seem right when the antifa protestor kept asking Lauren Southern “Who the fuck are you?”...It looks like Lauren Southern must have disrespected the political rights of the British to have pissed off a group of locals like that.

He responds: I cover up my face because we end up on racist websites (1:16)

HAHAHAHA!

I couldn't believe that a liberal British-Indian chick would conversate more cordial and polite than the “Conservative” Lauren Southern. Despite that, Lauren Southern was arguing with the British-Indian chick like how a lefty would argue in Toronto.

I think one of the reasons why these British people got pissed was because she was Canadian, and her attitude in response to the local protestors was kind of entitled and boorish though she has no legitimate connection to the Brexit unless she was a British/EU citizen and/or a relevant stakeholder.

This isn't some SJW feminist protest which pisses off the entire world..

This event which Lauren Southern crashed into was one of political and national nature for all British citizens. Thus, her intrusion and stubborn behaviour pissed off the British locals because she didn't appear to respect their country.

“I don't understand why we're getting the talking to” (4:18).....

Prolly coz you're on British soil and it's not Canada?

Lauren Southern should keep focusing on Canadian/US social justice issues, and not entangle herself with foreign politics.

Canadian women who are left-wing flock abroad to spread Toronto feminazism.
Canadian women who are right-wing go abroad to interfere with people's political system.

Lauren Southern also appeared surprised that men in the UK aren't pussywhipped like the Canadian ones too. It was also surprising how Lauren Southern tries to play “in control” by ordering one of her cameramen to escape the protesters...The UK is NOT Toronto.

Lauren Southern appeared to have pissed off and infuriated people on BOTH SIDES of the political spectrum in the UK because of that entitled Canadian woman behaviour.

After seeing that video, I see no difference between Chanty Binx and Lauren Southern excepting that one is a Lefty and one is a “Conservative”. If a leftist looking supporter in the UK is polite and argues with good manners than a “Conservative” Canadian woman, then what the crap again?!

Post: #61

(03-05-2016 07:54 AM)Roosh Wrote:  Deliberately provoking a live mob is not a good idea without a security detail. Things can go south very quickly and without warning.

As a woman, she has never had a good solid beating, and her stupid naivety was on show as she taunts and stirs up a mob without considering what could happen.

Getting piss dumped on her was a lucky outcome I think.

Post: #62

(06-25-2016 02:12 AM)RatInTheWoods Wrote:  

(03-05-2016 07:54 AM)Roosh Wrote:  Deliberately provoking a live mob is not a good idea without a security detail. Things can go south very quickly and without warning.

As a woman, she has never had a good solid beating, and her stupid naivety was on show as she taunts and stirs up a mob without considering what could happen.

Getting piss dumped on her was a lucky outcome I think.

Canada is a country which worships women, so when Lauren Southern went all the way to the UK to instigate political tensions during Brexit, she was surprised to encounter men who weren't pussywhipped, and police officers who don't take her exaggerated accusations of being "punched" seriously as if it was in Toronto where the SWAT team would have arrived.

Lauren has done some good work in anti-feminist activism, but treading on another country's political tensions is kind of insulting to the locals.

Lauren Southern reacted to the British like how Chanty Binx reacted to MRAS in Toronto= ENTITLED.

I'm very damn surprised that the British-Indian conducted herself diplomatically for a supposed leftist..I guess that British women have more manners than Canadian women.

Post: #63

(06-24-2016 07:06 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Quote:conflict profiteer

The best way for an anti-establishment figure to build their "brand" is to get attacked on camera, but that's really playing with fire. If you're purposefully putting yourself in harm's way to get clicks then you need to re-evaluate your work.

Didn't you get chased in Canada, assaulted, and had people looking to beat you up, yet continued to "play with fire" by having the talk and not cancelling it? I understand it's a little different because you had people who'd paid for your event, but the above seems a little victim blaming.

You didn't think that people would assault you and the entire media would be against you, I don't think it's that much of a stretch for her to believe that they wouldn't assault her simply for being there.

There may be more to the story that I'm missing, so I welcome more information/input on this one with an open mind.

Post: #64

(06-25-2016 01:41 AM)RBerkley Wrote:  Something didn't seem right when the antifa protestor kept asking Lauren Southern “Who the fuck are you?”...It looks like Lauren Southern must have disrespected the political rights of the British to have pissed off a group of locals like that.

He responds: I cover up my face because we end up on racist websites (1:16)

HAHAHAHA!

I couldn't believe that a liberal British-Indian chick would conversate more cordial and polite than the “Conservative” Lauren Southern. Despite that, Lauren Southern was arguing with the British-Indian chick like how a lefty would argue in Toronto.

I think one of the reasons why these British people got pissed was because she was Canadian, and her attitude in response to the local protestors was kind of entitled and boorish though she has no legitimate connection to the Brexit unless she was a British/EU citizen and/or a relevant stakeholder.

This isn't some SJW feminist protest which pisses off the entire world..

This event which Lauren Southern crashed into was one of political and national nature for all British citizens. Thus, her intrusion and stubborn behaviour pissed off the British locals because she didn't appear to respect their country.

“I don't understand why we're getting the talking to” (4:18).....

Prolly coz you're on British soil and it's not Canada?

Lauren Southern should keep focusing on Canadian/US social justice issues, and not entangle herself with foreign politics.

Canadian women who are left-wing flock abroad to spread Toronto feminazism.
Canadian women who are right-wing go abroad to interfere with people's political system.

Lauren Southern also appeared surprised that men in the UK aren't pussywhipped like the Canadian ones too. It was also surprising how Lauren Southern tries to play “in control” by ordering one of her cameramen to escape the protesters...The UK is NOT Toronto.

Lauren Southern appeared to have pissed off and infuriated people on BOTH SIDES of the political spectrum in the UK because of that entitled Canadian woman behaviour.

After seeing that video, I see no difference between Chanty Binx and Lauren Southern excepting that one is a Lefty and one is a “Conservative”. If a leftist looking supporter in the UK is polite and argues with good manners than a “Conservative” Canadian woman, then what the crap again?!

Most of the people at that meeting including the ones wearing black balaclavas are middle class graduate types who live in London. I don't think her being Canadian had anything to do with it.

Post: #65

(06-25-2016 02:48 AM)AneroidOcean Wrote:  

(06-24-2016 07:06 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Quote:conflict profiteer

The best way for an anti-establishment figure to build their "brand" is to get attacked on camera, but that's really playing with fire. If you're purposefully putting yourself in harm's way to get clicks then you need to re-evaluate your work.

Didn't you get chased in Canada, assaulted, and had people looking to beat you up, yet continued to "play with fire" by having the talk and not cancelling it? I understand it's a little different because you had people who'd paid for your event, but the above seems a little victim blaming.

You didn't think that people would assault you and the entire media would be against you, I don't think it's that much of a stretch for her to believe that they wouldn't assault her simply for being there.

There may be more to the story that I'm missing, so I welcome more information/input on this one with an open mind.

There's also a difference between holding private meetings and publicly sticking a microphone and a camera in someone's face.

Neither is obviously an invitation to assault, but the expectation is higher in the latter scenario than the former.

Post: #66

Sometimes I think people forget that "free speech" isn't a right in every part of the world. We enjoy a lot of freedoms in North America but the rest of the world doesn't necessarily sing the same tune, legally or otherwise. Hope she thinks twice before going out without her security detail next time. Dumb move dismissing them.

Post: #67

(06-24-2016 06:53 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  [quote='iop890' pid='1333324' dateline='1466810003']
Lauren Southern attacked by Antifa:

Quote:One of my biggest gripes with activists is that they don't use common sense. Actually speaking against Lauren and her crew here.

The fact that she keeps yammering on about her right to be there and her right to wear what she wants and they she should not be the one being spoken to by the police about conduct

I fail to see where she is incorrect here, or where anyone would be incorrect with her opinion here.

Quote: - if she employed some common sense she would understand that the civil rights she has are not going to protect her when she wanders into a mob of people that hate her and what she stands for.

She's in the middle of common space in the middle of London, with a lot of witnesses and police around. Yes, the police were being too deferential to the antifa but she also wasn't attacked to the point where the Police were direct witnesses either. Nothing serious enough would have happened that she should have opted to restrict what she wanted to do because of the presence of some subversive faggots in masks and a low IQ, self-interested woman.

Quote:That British-Indian looking girl as well as the police were trying to tell her that.

That British Indian girl was shaking her finger in her face because she didn't like her. The Police were trying to be deferential to the antifa so that they didn't have to deal with the fallout of removing or detaining them for what Southern was accusing them of, even though they should have done it anyway.

Lauren Southern was right to speak back to both the self-interested SJW Indian girl who was was overly aggressive (at best she was apologizing for nasty behavior, but that wasn't all of it), and the Police for not doing their jobs.

Quote:They weren't saying she couldn't be there or wear what she wants, but she was (and obviously deliberately) shaking a hornets' nest and she got bitten.

Fuck the "hornets nest". It shouldn't exist in the form that it did in that scenario. That's what Southern was saying, and good for her for saying it in spite of the hostility and threats. Taking any other tactic is apologizing for it and allowing it to win.

I don't really get the "my enemies are being unduly aggressive (to the point of the aggression being illegal, at least under US law) and so its my fault if I piss them off" philosophy.

Quote:And lets also be clear here - Lauren is not simply a journalist that does unbiased reporting on current events in her field. She is an activist with an agenda that she pushes and attempts to expose those who oppose her views as being in the wrong.

What does every single mainstream journalist do to the Right? You're awfully critical of a Right wing journalist in comparison. That's simply the modern political game.

Quote:She's not a martyr who put herself in danger for the sake of honest journalism. She is a conflict profiteer who instigates drama.

It's obvious that you dislike her and that's where a lot of this comes from. Personally replace her with something better and I'll concede your points. Until then, she's filling a vacuum to a degree.

Quote:I think the most substantial takeaway we can get from watching her in-field work is that pretty white blond women are not as protected as we think.

It's her risk. She seems fine with it. I'm unsure how her relative vulnerability matters until she takes issue with it.

In all, that was a really good video. Protection or not, it's somewhat unique. Planned or not, it's valuable. Thus, it's a good document that no one else was able to produce. I' don't see the platform for criticism in this specific instance.

Post: #68

Milo has taken things so much further than she has, and he hasn't been touched yet.

I would never have predicted that she would be attacked before he was. The victim hierarchy is real.

It is shocking to me to see a group of grown (Non Muslim) men in masks physically assaulting a girl with a microphone because they don't like her.

This is the disintegration of common decency before our eyes, and I don't really get how people are nitpicking what Lauren Southern does or says.

It is the same psychological denial we see when SJWs attack Donald Trump for the heinous assaults by Bernie supporters, and I totally agree with this statement from Hydrogonian:

Quote:I don't really get the "my enemies are being unduly aggressive (to the point of the aggression being illegal, at least under US law) and so its my fault if I piss them off" philosophy.

This sort of twisted non-logic is on the level of how a Borderline or a Narcissist thinks, and yet it is now a culturally accepted norm.

If my enemy is violent, he is violent.

If my friend is violent, it is a natural response to the personality of my enemy.

This is a complete complete complete breakdown of reasoning capacity, and morality, and sense of fair play, and heart. To think like this is to be unreachable.

Accepting this frame is surrender to the irrationality of emotion. Maybe, on a practical level, Southern should be more careful in picking her battles, but these antifa thugs are the lowest of the low, and that girl in her face is too.

They are beyond hope.

Post: #69

(06-24-2016 06:15 AM)Sooth Wrote:  Lauren Southern is a women in sheep's clothing.

I'm more impressed that she is 21 than the fact that she is a woman. As a woman she doesn't look good for her age (old), has a very masculine voice and a slight overbite. I admire the fact that she's thin, wears makeup and has thick long hair as a testament to her making the best out of what she's got. Good for her, but I'm not scouring the internet in hopes of nudes or a sex tape.

However, her journalistic balls at 21 are incredible. When I was that age my accomplishments were drinking whiskey straight and supervising manual labor crews of 19 year olds.

WB but would not fawn over.

Post: #70

Observe the video more carefully. Observe how Lauren Southern behaves compared to the rest of females filmed in the footage.

That British-Indian chick, although appearing to be a leftist, was way more polite than the typical Canadian woman in any political spectrum.

The typical Lefty Canadian woman would go all Chanty Binx, and even deny their opponents from visiting their premises.

Roosh clearly had that experience in Canada when hoardes of feminazis and beta knights were chanting “Get the Fuck out of Here!” “How dare you fucking come to Canada?”, and those Montreal feminazis are not considered as extremist as the Antifa far-left groups.

The difference between Milo and Lauren is that Milo does not have that female privilege that Lauren has to play the damsel in distress card.

As soon as I saw Lauren ending up in a confrontation with these Antifa guys, the damsel in distress tradcon alert became apparent...She is just like any other “empowered” Canadian woman, except she goes for the tradcon side.

If a 4/10 British-Indian lefty sympathizing with Antifa extremists conduct herself more rationally, polite and cordial than a lefty females from Canada, then Roosh was damn right how the majority of Toronto women attitude sucks.

I couldn't stand Lauren's self-righteous tone as if she has more authority than the British police. If a right-wing Canadian woman sounds obnoxious in Britian around a bunch of lefty British women, then what is really going on with Canada? No wonder men complain how Canada is considered hard to get laid in..The attitudes of the women.

Post: #71

(06-25-2016 04:39 AM)Constitution45 Wrote:  

(06-25-2016 01:41 AM)RBerkley Wrote:  QUOTED

Most of the people at that meeting including the ones wearing black balaclavas are middle class graduate types who live in London. I don't think her being Canadian had anything to do with it.

It's surprising that British far-left Antifa extremists and their sympathizers contain women who appear to be less obnoxious than these typical Canadian women.

Feminazis in London petitioned to ban Page 3 Sunshine Girl last year, and they recently sided with an Islamic Mayor to ban visual adverts of skinny women, but trust me on this: The UK is not a shithole compared to Toronto in terms of masculinity and dating.

Toronto got women who confront men and give nasty stares looking for a fight.

When Roosh held his speech in England, the BBC only sent that closet fudger Reggie Yates to try and spread feminist propaganda, without that much success.

It was only after Roosh's experience with the Canadian establishment that everyone started to use violence against Roosh and his supporters.

I have little knowledge of the leftist culture of the UK, but that five minute video of Lauren Southern attempting to play damsel in distress around Britians clearly showed that the Brits, even if lefties, tend to have caused Lauren Southern to stand out as some entitled brat trying to force her values on another country, as typical of Toronto-ized women who believe that they have moral superiority over other people.

If Lauren Southern was a white man, and gone up to a muscular and physicially fit black British man, and caused him to fight because he felt he was "wacist", I doubt that anyone would show sympathy if a man got punched.

Post: #72

Speaking as a British-Indian, now living in the US...

I can't comment on Canadian women because thankfully I've met very few, but on the whole UK women are a lot better mannered than American women. Unless they're very trashy, they don't get in people's faces unlike an American women.

A lot of American women are basically aggressive men with vaginas, who think they can get away with getting in people's faces on account of having a pussy.

Canadian women are worse than American women aren't they?

I think Lauren Southern is attention whoring...the average British would think, "what the fuck is she doing there, she should mind her own business"...how would the average American react if I tried to start shit at a Trump or Bernie rally in southern California?

Contrast Lauren Southern's attitude vs the British journalist Stacey Dooley.

Stacey is willing to fight her corner and and stand up for her beliefs - not act like a smug know it all victim like Lauren Southern.





It would be interesting to see how how Lauren Southern would react in the above situation.

Post: #73

^^^ "In Islam doesn't it say that you have to respect the law of the land that you're living in?"

"No, it doesn't."

Post: #74

Lauren Southern is the truth.

Feminism only hurts people.

Post: #75

Lauren eviscerates a NY liberal on gun control here: