Post: #51

Probably the new Han solo girl.. Has to be a good character, don't want to show homo characters in a bad light.

I won't be consuming any star wars material. Abrams will have to pay me to watch this garbage

Post: #52

(05-10-2016 03:44 AM)[email protected] Wrote:  Probably the new Han solo girl.. Has to be a good character, don't want to show homo characters in a bad light.

I won't be consuming any star wars material. Abrams will have to pay me to watch this garbage

well... she's white.

Post: #53

I'm puzzled. They want gay characters in the next installment? Are they trying to tell us C3PO is straight?
Because their thinking that explains a LOT...
And Darth Vader is definitely gay-wears a bondage mask and waves a giant phallic pink weapon around? Fuck off.

Seriously, boycott this crap. George Lucas is spinning in his grave while still alive. I doubt even gay people care if their cinematic heroes are gay-they want believable protagonists, not politically correct ones. Just like women want to see heroines they can identify with and aspire to imitate, men want heroes to reflect their better natures. 'The Force Awakens' was the world's worst remake of 'A New Hope' as it is, and now Disney are going from shitty writing and casting to generally shitty notions of what makes a story worthwhile. Lucas should have made everybody read some Campbell and tried to make a film that wasn't a fairytale, particularly not one with fairies in it.

Post: #54

This whole discussion of adding pro-gay propaganda messages into movies reminds me of this article...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016...mented-by/

Apparently in the new Captain America there is a scene where two of the characters reminisce about their days of running game together. This upset some writer at Vanity Fair who wrote

Quote:As if to put the nail in the coffin of speculation, Bucky and Cap paused for a moment in the middle of snowy Siberia to reminisce about their days chasing skirts in pre-War Brooklyn. It’s a sweet, human bonding moment but one that also bristles with heterosexual virility. If Disney isn’t inclined to give audiences a gay superhero, couldn’t they have at least left us the dream of Bucky and Cap? … Doesn’t ‘Captain America: Civil War’ go out of its way to “define” Bucky and Steve’s relationship when Cap smooches Sharon Carter (Emily VanCamp) while Bucky looks on approvingly? Where’s the room for interpretation in that moment?

Post: #55

^

"Room for interpretation"? Hey, why even tell a complete story at all, why not just hide all the important plot points off screen so we can all interpret the story our own way?

What a fucking moron.

Post: #56

(05-10-2016 05:38 AM)Wreckingball Wrote:  

(05-10-2016 03:44 AM)[email protected] Wrote:  Probably the new Han solo girl.. Has to be a good character, don't want to show homo characters in a bad light.

I won't be consuming any star wars material. Abrams will have to pay me to watch this garbage

well... she's white.

with blue hair?

Post: #57

Are they also going to get rid of lightsabers and put glow in the dark condoms on their dicks to fight with?

Post: #58

Some girl was having a threesome and the 2 guys brought luminous condoms and they wanted a lightsabre fight in the dark, leaving her to watch.

Post: #59

hahahaha

Post: #60

(05-11-2016 09:33 AM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  Some girl was having a threesome and the 2 guys brought luminous condoms and they wanted a lightsabre fight in the dark, leaving her to watch.

This actually happens -- in one of the funniest scenes of Blake Edwards' 1980s comedy Skin Deep starring John Ritter.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #61

(05-11-2016 08:33 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

(05-11-2016 09:33 AM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  Some girl was having a threesome and the 2 guys brought luminous condoms and they wanted a lightsabre fight in the dark, leaving her to watch.

This actually happens -- in one of the funniest scenes of Blake Edwards' 1980s comedy Skin Deep starring John Ritter.

Here it is:

Post: #62

Hah, the comments below that WaPo article about Civil War gives me hope.
Nobody wants homo bs in a film for boys or any sort of film actually.

Post: #63

(03-04-2016 02:17 PM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  The audience is being prepped for more changes to the Star Wars films. And this might mean that Rey isn't Luke's daughter. Why? Because he might be the first openly gay character in SW. Sickening the way they can't leave anything alone - everything has to be about pushing the agenda. Plot, writing, acting, etc, all of that takes a backseat.

Quote:The people have spoken. They really, really want a gay Star Wars character, and for good reason. Representation matters.

(MY NOTE: Literally no one outside of a few fags in Hollywood want that)

Last week, J.J. Abrams said, "it seems insanely narrow minded to say that there wouldn't be a homosexual character in that world." Now Mark Hamill is echoing that sentiment — and saying Luke could be the (first) one they're looking for.


“Fans are writing and ask all these questions, ‘I’m bullied in school... I’m afraid to come out’. They say to me, ‘Could Luke be gay?’ I’d say it is meant to be interpreted by the viewer," he told The Sun.

“If you think Luke is gay, of course he is," Hamill continued. "You should not be ashamed of it. Judge Luke by his character, not by who he loves.”

Hamill also reportedly answered a fan question about Luke's sexuality in January, via Twitter direct message.

A homosexual Luke may seem to disrupt the popular fan theory that Luke is Rey's father — but it doesn't need to. If these people have sentient droids, they can probably manage in vitro Fertilization. It's important not to let Jedi DNA go to waste.

Was Leia a surrogate mom to her brother's child? Is this basically that Friends storyline where Phoebe has triplets for her brother, Giovani Ribisi?

The galaxy, whether this one or one far, far away, is what you make it.

I always thought C3PO and R2D2 were gay.

Post: #64

(05-19-2016 10:40 AM)EDantes Wrote:  I always thought C3PO and R2D2 were gay.

Probably.