Post: #1

Article Here

Quote:PIERRE, S.D. - South Dakota would be the first state in the U.S. to approve a law requiring transgender students to use bathrooms and locker rooms that correspond to their sex at birth if the governor signs a bill passed Tuesday by the state Senate.

The Senate voted 20-15 to send the bill to Republican Gov. Dennis Daugaard, who initially responded positively to the measure but said last week he'd need to study it more before making a decision.

Advocates say the bill is meant to protect the privacy of students, but opponents say it discriminates against vulnerable adolescents. CBS affiliate KELO in Sioux Falls reports that those opposed say that in addition to the likelihood it will lead to bullying, they also question the constitutionality of the bill and fear it will cost the state millions in lawsuits.

Under the plan, schools would have to provide a "reasonable accommodation" for transgender students, such as a single-occupancy bathroom or the "controlled use" of a staff-designated restroom, locker room or shower room.

Republican Sen. David Omdahl urged other legislators Tuesday to support the bill to "preserve the innocence of our young people."

Democratic lawmakers and some Republicans unsuccessfully opposed the measure in the Senate.

The American Civil Liberties Union of South Dakota and Human Rights Campaign have been vocal in their opposition to the measure and have called on Daugaard to veto the legislation.

"History has never looked kindly upon those who attack the basic civil rights of their fellow Americans, and history will not treat kindly those who support this discriminatory measure," Chad Griffin, the president of the LGBT-rights organization Human Rights Campaign, said in a statement Tuesday.

Transgender advocates have also criticized comments made by some lawmakers, including Omdahl, about transgender people.

"I'm sorry if you're so twisted you don't know who you are," Omdahl said at a recent event when asked about the bill. "I'm telling you right now, it's about protecting the kids, and I don't even understand where our society is these days."

Several states have looked at addressing gender and public facilities in the past several years. Late last year, the city of Houston was recently home to a bitter public fight over nondiscrimination rights that focused on transgender people's use of bathrooms.

But South Dakota would be the first state in the nation to put such a measure into law, said Joellen Kralik, a research analyst at the National Conference of State Legislatures.

The Legislature's passage of the bill is "shocking," said Thomas Lewis, a transgender student in his senior year at Lincoln High School in Sioux Falls, the state's most populous city.

"At this point, I'm hoping that the governor has a sense of humanity and the common sense not to write this bill into law," said Lewis, who is planning to attend college in Minnesota. "I am so glad to be leaving soon. I can escape the oppression that my home state wants to put on me."

Supporters say South Dakota's plan is a response to changes in the Obama administration's interpretation of the federal Title IX anti-discrimination law related to education. Federal officials have said that barring students from restrooms that match their gender identity is prohibited under Title IX.

It seems common sense stills prevails in at least one state.

Post: #2

Senator Omdahl on Point

Quote:A South Dakota lawmaker said transgender people are "twisted" and need psychological help.

State Sen. David Omdahl, R-Sioux Falls, told constituents at a legislative coffee event Saturday morning that he planned to vote for a bill that would bar transgender students from using bathrooms, locker rooms and shower facilities of the gender with which they identify if they don't correspond with their biological sex.

"I'm sorry if you're so twisted you don't even know who you are," Omdahl said of transgender individuals.

The audience in attendance gasped and a moderator asked that they remain quiet so Omdahl could continue.

The Republican lawmaker went on to say that some transgender people should seek psychological help because he doesn't believe someone can possess a gender identity that's inconsistent with his or her biological sex. (Watch the comments in the video above).

"They're treating the wrong part of the anatomy. They ought to be treating it up here," Omdahl said pointing to his forehead.

Rep. Steve Haugaard, R-Sioux Falls, called transgender identity a "choice of lifestyle" and said society has been too concerned about the "epidemic" of arguments coming out in favor of the self-identity.

"For us to perpetuate confusion in the lives of anyone is a disservice to them," Haugaard said.

Post: #3

Quote:"I'm sorry if you're so twisted you don't know who you are," Omdahl said at a recent event when asked about the bill. "I'm telling you right now, it's about protecting the kids, and I don't even understand where our society is these days."

Quote:"I am so glad to be leaving soon. I can escape the oppression that my home state wants to put on me."

Post: #4

Meanwhile the Department of Education is forcing California schools to do the exact opposite. Full access to girls locker rooms for any "self-identifying" girl without any accommodations or compromise.

We live in strange times.

Post: #5

I liked the idea of transgenders being able to use whichever gender bathroom they want, because it's funny trolling. When I was in school a guy walked into the girls toilets recording it on his phone and no girls complained and everyone found it funny and no teachers caught him. He's alpha as fuck.

Post: #6

Post: #7

I sense Supreme Court case in a few years on the issue.

The district court in CA will rule against and SD will rule in favor; both will have to be reconciled with a case at the Supreme Court on the federal issues.

Post: #8

(02-17-2016 03:12 PM)tynamite Wrote:  I liked the idea of transgenders being able to use whichever gender bathroom they want, because it's funny trolling. When I was in school a guy walked into the girls toilets recording it on his phone and no girls complained and everyone found it funny and no teachers caught him. He's alpha as fuck.

They aren't trolling though. They want the planet.

Post: #9

Notice how the comments are all middle ages dykes spouting off typical liberal talking points. IE you need to get more educated, never citing sources on what you need to be more educated on. Also the favorite, "they have different brains then the sex they were born with." That point also flies in the face of feminist talking point 101 which is gender is a social construct.

Post: #10

This is a temporary victory, but just like most liberal movements, they will eventually win. Let's just hope it's not in our lifetime.

Post: #11

So, the trannies get their own 'disabled' facilities. Everyone wins.

Trannies get their victim hood facilities (& we get to snicker every time one of them enters or leaves)

We get to think of them as they are, freaks who should be segregated. And are safe knowing we are not sharing a space with the mentally ill - the last place you wanna be with your dick out.

Designers get to come up with the ultimate tranny toilet (stalls to urinal ratio will be an interesting conversation)

Women don't get to complain (more) about:
1. Getting perved on.
2. Not getting perved on.
3. More 'chicks' using the facilities & making them wait longer in line (a personal favourite of mine).
(Also, Trannies use more make-up & drugs - HA!)


Men who build shit will have more work thrown at them. 'Mate, we need to comply with all these Tranny Toilet rules. How soon can you get rid of that urinal & put in a couple of stalls & a change-table (I'm assuming they'd 'need' something like that)

Businesses benefit from now being tranny friendly... or so the school of thought goes.

Post: #12

(02-17-2016 03:12 PM)tynamite Wrote:  I liked the idea of transgenders being able to use whichever gender bathroom they want, because it's funny trolling. When I was in school a guy walked into the girls toilets recording it on his phone and no girls complained and everyone found it funny and no teachers caught him. He's alpha as fuck.

I'll buy that man a beer sometime, assuming he's 21.

Post: #13

Transexuals have to be the worst group about claiming that special priviledges are their rights.

Considering the bullshit definitions on the transexual spectrum, there's nothing stopping anyone else from using their special bathrooms. Transexuals hate to be identified as the "wrong" sex even in cases where they don't pass, so they're opening up a can of worms if they try to judge who is transexual by appearance. However, if asked to wear something that makes them immediately identifiable as transexual, they'll compare it to a yellow star patch.

Quote:"They're treating the wrong part of the anatomy. They ought to be treating it up here," Omdahl said pointing to his forehead.

That's exactly what they need to be told, but they don't like the medicine because it tastes bitter.

Post: #14

While we're at it, the Grammar NAZI in me needs clarification. I think this may benefit the group.


What does one RvFer call a group of trannies?


A bunch of sticks are a faggot.
A herd of (land)whales are a pod.
A clusterfuck(?) of trannies are a _____.


Images provided...

Post: #15

(02-18-2016 01:00 AM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  A clusterfuck(?) of trannies are a _____.

Tranvesty?

Post: #16

So what exactly is the standard for determining if someone is a "legit" trannie or not? If it's just up to the person, then what's preventing any one of us from identifying as a trans-woman and going into women's locker rooms?

The one thing I see get brought up a lot is how trans people have brain structures that resemble the gender they claim to be. So should anyone claiming to be trans be required to submit to a brain scan in order to determine if they have that condition? Of course this would mean we would need to have a male or female brain to compare the tranny's brain to and would imply that there indeed is such thing as a male or female brain and that they are different each other.

Post: #17

(02-18-2016 03:07 AM)Wutang Wrote:  So what exactly is the standard for determining if someone is a "legit" trannie or not? If it's just up to the person, then what's preventing any one of us from identifying as a trans-woman and going into women's locker rooms?

There isn't anything preventing it. That's whats fucked up about it, it's a free-for-all, damaging to innocent young kids.

Post: #18

(02-18-2016 01:00 AM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  

WNB.

Post: #19

That's good to hear, Suits

Post: #20

(02-17-2016 11:29 PM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  So, the trannies get their own 'disabled' facilities. Everyone wins.

Trannies get their victim hood facilities (& we get to snicker every time one of them enters or leaves)

No everyone loses... every new building would have to waste space, materials and costs for a bullshit room nobody almost would ever use, it's your tax many in government buildings for a transsexual bathroom. Old buildings would have to do costly reconstruction or close a mans (they sure will not touch women) bathroom on every second floor and rename it as transsexual bathroom... you want that?

Also don't misunderstand tyrannies... they don't want to be labeled as trannies by having a separate bathroom, they want to be labeled as opposite sex. They will not accept these bathrooms, will call it ghetto and try to sneak in bathrooms of opposite sex anyway using all means they can muster.

There is no winning trying to live with insane degeneracy, it's either severed out with ruthless law and force or it is allowed to turn everything around into ruin.

Post: #21

(02-18-2016 05:14 AM)Mage Wrote:  There is no winning trying to live with insane degeneracy, it's either severed out with ruthless law and force or it is allowed to turn everything around into ruin.

The law, and its democratic state author and enforcer, is actually the cause of the degeneracy. In normal countries, lacking anti-discrimination laws and other supports, degenerates are naturally pushed to the outskirts of society. Kind of like how a body excretes waste. It's the effects of democracy that prevent this excretion from polite society.

Try putting up an apartment for rent with the following tag:
"No homosexuals or transvestites need apply". You'd probably be arrested the next day. 100 years ago people would just see that and say "oh dear, why do they need to add that? I hope these types aren't trying to move here!".

Post: #22

(02-18-2016 06:10 AM)Phoenix Wrote:  

(02-18-2016 05:14 AM)Mage Wrote:  There is no winning trying to live with insane degeneracy, it's either severed out with ruthless law and force or it is allowed to turn everything around into ruin.

The law, and its democratic state author and enforcer, is actually the cause of the degeneracy. In normal countries, lacking anti-discrimination laws and other supports, degenerates are naturally pushed to the outskirts of society. Kind of like how a body excretes waste. It's the effects of democracy that prevent this excretion from polite society.

Try putting up an apartment for rent with the following tag:
"No homosexuals or transvestites need apply". You'd probably be arrested the next day. 100 years ago people would just see that and say "oh dear, why do they need to add that? I hope these types aren't trying to move here!".

You are right, good correction!

I have observed that the more laws are issued by the government the more people lose their natural sense of morality, of right and wrong.

Instead of laws, these degenerates should be made free targets - not necessarily to violence, just to shaming, ridicule and also to discrimination from entering positions that would allow them to push their degeneracy to children and having any authority over sane people. This would be enough to keep them forever marginalized, low in numbers, non threatening and not annoying.

Post: #23

At this point I should just say "fuck college" and walk into a Chili's women's restroom, get thrown out and sue them for millions of dollars for being bigots because I identify as a woman.

I wouldn't even have to dress up or anything because anyone can be anything they want to without following the "stereotypical characteristics" of it.

Our society is a fucking carnival.

Post: #24

If you thought using the opposite gender's bathroom was crazy, despite toilets being inside locked cubicles and no chance of seeing any sexual parts, wait until you hear this.

Quote:Man cites 'gender identity' rule after stripping in women's washroom, returns as young girls change for swim practice

These 'progressive' ideas are blowing up in the faces of the Liberals who came up with them and it's downright embarrassing.

A man undressed in a woman's locker room and said he was allowed to do so because of the 'gender identity' rule.

The issue is the first being faced by Seattle Parks and Recreation.

On February 8 at Evans Pool, a man wearing board shorts entered the women's locker room and began to strip. When females alerted staff they asked the man to leave.

“The law has changed and I have a right to be here,” the man told them, citing the transgender rule.

RELATED: Transgender washrooms at Humber College: What do students think?

No one was arrested and police weren't called, according to King5.

Even more disturbing, the man returned a second time while young girls were changing for their swim practice.

Pool regular Aldan Shank said this rule, “sort of works against the point they're trying to make. They're causing people to feel exposed and vulnerable with the intention of reducing people feeling exposed and vulnerable.”

Click the link for the article and video.
http://www.therebel.media/naked_man_allo...m_practice

Post: #25

(02-18-2016 03:31 PM)tynamite Wrote:  If you thought using the opposite gender's bathroom was crazy, despite toilets being inside locked cubicles and no chance of seeing any sexual parts, wait until you hear this.

Quote:Man cites 'gender identity' rule after stripping in women's washroom, returns as young girls change for swim practice

These 'progressive' ideas are blowing up in the faces of the Liberals who came up with them and it's downright embarrassing.

A man undressed in a woman's locker room and said he was allowed to do so because of the 'gender identity' rule.

The issue is the first being faced by Seattle Parks and Recreation.

On February 8 at Evans Pool, a man wearing board shorts entered the women's locker room and began to strip. When females alerted staff they asked the man to leave.

“The law has changed and I have a right to be here,” the man told them, citing the transgender rule.

RELATED: Transgender washrooms at Humber College: What do students think?

No one was arrested and police weren't called, according to King5.

Even more disturbing, the man returned a second time while young girls were changing for their swim practice.

Pool regular Aldan Shank said this rule, “sort of works against the point they're trying to make. They're causing people to feel exposed and vulnerable with the intention of reducing people feeling exposed and vulnerable.”

Click the link for the article and video.
http://www.therebel.media/naked_man_allo...m_practice

This is a perfect example of "social justice" creating a loophole for perverts to demand "rights".