Post: #351

(08-26-2018 07:32 AM)Avadhuta Wrote:  

(08-25-2018 03:04 AM)loremipsum Wrote:  Alex Jones caught watching shemale porn.
http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/183396856#p183406763

Let the man watch what he wants but gotta admit that was hilarious.

It's not because you look into something that you are into it. Out of the 983467509346934875634 open tabs I have on my browser, there definitely is some questionable content. I'm sure AJ spends a lot of time looking at all sorts of weird shit online, which would be necessary for him to come up with material for his show, whether direct or indirectly related to what he actually talks about.

Even though I'm not an AJ supporter, I think it's reasonable to assume he was trying to figure something out rather than get off on tranny porn.

I only use Brave browser and have it set to always use private tabs. I also have it completely wipe everything whenever the home key is pushed.

Had too many close calls with opening my browser to show someone something.

He should have known better.

Post: #352

I've browsed my share of porn. But as someone not into tranny porn, I'd say stuff like that pops up in the background or accidentally....maybe once in a blue moon. 1% of porn sessions. Face it, AJ is into it.

Post: #353

I'd say if Alex Jones was looking at tranny shit it would likely be a symptom of porn addiction rather than outright homo shit.

That said, choosing to pile on the man over that shit at this point in time while posting on a controversial forum run by a guy with many of the same enemies as Jones seems a bit odd.

Post: #354

When Jack Dorsey finally shut down AJ, I think it was a critical mistake. Perhaps the worst mistake Dorsey has made in his life.

There are some intricate legal issues here, that I think will come back to bite Twitter hard.

Dorsey made a point of *not* banning AJ until what? Until AJ yelled at Dorsey on the steps of the Capital building. THEN he banned infowars.

Do we all see the legal trap here?

Dorsey just banned AJ because of an event that happened OUTSIDE of Twitter. Not because of "violation of TOS" but because he disapproved of the way AJ yelled at him and a congressman in the Capitol building. The ultimate "public" building.

In other words, Twitter now takes on itself the self-appointed role of punishing you, removing your "platform for speech in a public square" for your actions in day to day life, which have nothing to do with what you posted or didn't post on Twitter.

If AJ isn't allowed to yell at Congressmen in the Capitol building, then the first amendment is utterly broken.

Also Dorsey just proved that it's NOT an algorithm by Golly. It's just Jack Dorsey deciding he doesn't like you!

Just like China. Twitter has a scoring system that evaluates your life, your speech, your actions, and restricts your access to social media based on that. Worse than China actually, because it's not even a government bureaucracy, its one arrogant Billionaire.

Personally, Dorsey pisses me off. He is the ultimate arrogant Silicon Valley fuck. His beard is faggy. I want to see Twitter taken over by the government. He just upped the timetable for that.

Post: #355

Infowars under massive DDoS attack.

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comm...ial_media/

Post: #356

The ace in the hole is the pending lawsuits. Horrible shit.

Post: #357

I don't know how many times I'm going to have to say this. Probably a million.

There is no legal recourse against a private social media corporation banning someone, even if their stated reason falls under reasonable doubt, or even if they give a blatantly false reason, or even if they have no reason at all. Dorsey can ban Jones because he doesn't like Jones' shirt, or his shoes, or his pants. Dorsey can ban Jones just for the fun of it.

You have no First Amendment right to use Twitter or Facebook or any other social media platform, any more than you have the First Amendment right to demand your neighbor lends you his megaphone because you can't shout loud enough without it.

It may seem unfair but that is the plain and obvious legal reality of the situation.

And once again, for the people who missed it the first time around, the way to make the silicon valley social media giants come to the government begging for blanket coverage under the first amendment is to sue them for every tweet, post and google search that in any way defames you. Every Right wing celebrity in the world should be doing this (but they wont, because 'that's not cricket' and they're allergic to winning).

This is the basic principle behind it. If Jim's grocery store has a notice board and Sally asks Jim if she can put up a sign that says "Megan is a slut" and Jim says yes then Jim AND Sally can be brought to court for slander. Sally for making and posting the message and Jim for "hosting" it.

Now, Jim's only legal recourse to avoid being sued is to make the case that he has no editorial control over the board. Even if he didn't screen the messages posted on it he would still be required to remove slander in a timely manner and regardless could still be held partially liable for damages occurring in the meanwhile.

THIS. IS. HOW. SOCIAL. MEDIA. WORKS.

People can screech and cry all they like but they have no legal grounds to demand a platform on a private service.

BUT. Because these social media giants choose who may contribute and what is allowed to be posted it makes them partially liable for everything that remains.

The ONLY way to drag them to the table of free speech is to force them to stop having it both ways. If they censor and ban then you sue them for everything that's left until THEY THEMSELVES demand the government give them publisher protections for user created content if they relinquish editorial rights.

This has been done successfully against Google merely for content that turned up when someone searched their name and the first results page dredged up slanderous text. Another man successfully sued Google because when he searched Google Images about a murderer there was a picture of him in on the first page. Initially Google had altered their algorithm at his request to make this stop happening (at what cost of time?) but it didn't stick and the resultant law suit was found in the plaintiff's favor.

The Right is screaming like a pack of idiots about losing something they never actually owned. The Right has the means to get it, though, and make a shitload of money in the process, but they are allergic to legal warfare, and as such they choose to lose instead and bitch about it all the way home.

Post: #358

The one thing that they can be smashed with is Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act:

Quote:No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider

Now, if they start behaving like publishers instead of common carriers/platforms then they can be treated as liable for anything posted there.

But really this needs some regulation. The public square is now online.

Post: #359

(09-10-2018 12:40 PM)Malone Wrote:  The one thing that they can be smashed with is Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act:

Quote:No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider

Now, if they start behaving like publishers instead of common carriers/platforms then they can be treated as liable for anything posted there.

But really this needs some regulation. The public square is now online.

The Republican Congress had a bunch of these guys in front of them and decided the pressing issue was "Russian bots." They are gutless pussies cowards and traitors. There will be no legislation from the current legislators. Executive order at best.

Post: #360

Both parties work for the same people. It's likely that the majority of Republican Senators have already been given marching orders from the elites to stymie Trump until he can be gotten out of office.

This issue would be a slam dunk for any and every Republican senator to rant and rave about all day long.

Their silence on the issue speaks volumes about who they really work for, and it's not their constituents.

Post: #361

Alex talks about Roosh at 1:00. I haven't watched the whole show yet.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/FGETnLtYydaB/

Post: #362

(09-11-2018 03:29 PM)Castelnau Wrote:  Alex talks about Roosh at 1:00. I haven't watched the whole show yet.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/FGETnLtYydaB/

This censorship attempt may end up backfiring. . .

Post: #363

(09-08-2018 02:36 AM)RawGod Wrote:  I've browsed my share of porn. But as someone not into tranny porn, I'd say stuff like that pops up in the background or accidentally....maybe once in a blue moon. 1% of porn sessions. Face it, AJ is into it.

That's totally normal, the algorythm is trying to make you slide to some new kind of depravity, just to "open your mind", the same goes on youtube...

Post: #364

(09-11-2018 03:29 PM)Castelnau Wrote:  Alex talks about Roosh at 1:00. I haven't watched the whole show yet.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/FGETnLtYydaB/

Just a heads up to anyone paying attention who might be at the same level of tech literacy as me (or lower).

Bitchute works as a torrent based system, so the more people that load it the better it streams for everyone. This is particularly important for videos by smaller players that don't get the same kind of instant attention that Jones level participants get.

For bitchute to take a serious chunk out of Youtube it has to reach a basic level of support that allows content to achieve a critical mass of users that are supporting the torrents.

I'm open to correction on any of this but if you have a shitload of bandwidth to spare then you might consider opening these videos even if you don't intend to watch them. Every person who clicks on a bitchute video and gets frustrated at the lag time is a person that might decide to just go back to Youtube.

The more people that use the service, the better it will become.

Post: #365

Very long interview with Alex Jones.

Post: #366

With the speed at which Jones material is being deleted, this video can't last long. And with lines like this:

Quote:I mean, David Brock is basically George Soros' toilet. So whatever George Soros craps out on him is into David Brock... Brock is just a toilet bowl. I'm more worried about the bloated belly of George Soros.

mediamatters minions will be blowing their censor nuts.

Post: #367

(09-14-2018 12:53 PM)renotime Wrote:  Very long interview with Alex Jones.

I never heard of this guy Patrick Bet-David before, but he seems really smart and sharp and red pilled. (Heritage from Iran & Armenia, just like Roosh) He's quick thinking and asks really good questions and weaves his own personal life into the discussion bringing a more human element to everything. He also tries to reign in Alex Jones' crazy talk by getting him to calm down and give more direct answers and stop straying off topic, which Jones does all the time. The example of water contamination that Bet David gives which explains Jones's crazy talk at minute 37:09 is hilarious. Then he goes over the top and asks Jones how does he know if frogs are gay....does he watches gay frog porn? My sides were splittling from laughter. (I think they had to edit and & cut the interview cause both of them were about to crack up from laughter as well.)

Then 10 minutes later it goes super serious and quiet when Jones talks about being ready to die and his mission from now on. Jones saying "The spirit of humanity manifests itself in resistance." (minute 49:10) was suprising. No idea he could be so deep & sensitive in his thoughts. You can see him fighting off tears at minute 56:38.

Excellent interview.
Best one I have seen in many years.

Also, I love that they are at a table, mixing drinks, chomping on apples and talking like real men.

The best part is the end where Jones says
"It's an honor to be banned and cast out of hell by the forces of Satan."

Post: #368

Alex and his fans are not allowed to post Infowars content on Youtube but leftwing channels are still allowed to cherrypick Infowars clips to make fun of him.

Post: #369

Quick update: ordered the B12 stuff from InfoWars, and I'm pretty satisfied with it. It's a pretty common supplement but so far it's the best B12 product I've used.

I downloaded the app, and it's pretty good, especially because you can skip the commercials. The Alex Jones show is ok, relatively funny. I can only take small doses of it though because he repeats himself ad nausea on many issues, and doesn't really push the ball forward. Still, regularly he can be really entertaining. Really too bad about that tranny porn stuff, although he has strong streaks of shallow showmanship, so not entirely surprised.

However, I've become a fan of "Real News with David Knight", one of the sister programs of InfoWars David is extremely articulate and covers many new topics. He still gets a bit whacky with some conspiracy stuff, but most of the time it's pretty good when he covers the topical news.

Post: #370

That is a horrible interview. The guy doesn't even know the basics he just keeps asking the same questions "Aren't you sensationalizing things?". Alex isn't great at these types of interviews, he doesn't give and take he's just in propoganda mode 24/7.

As a fan I'd say yes he does sensationalize but that's like prosecuting the one petty thief out of one milllion criminals 999,999 of which are convicted serial killers. What about the people who lied about WMDs or the media who went along with it, Syria, the Antifa beating up Trump supporters, all the hatred on Twitter and outright calls for violence esp by bluecheckmarks on Trump supporters, gun owners, whites, Christians, males?

Post: #371

That just came up on my YT - surely no one out there still believes this guy's legit?))

Post: #372

Re: MrLemon and Leonard

Excellent points, big reason why if there truly is a blue wave this midterm we can kiss America goodbye. The establishment right would rather lose at least 2 Supreme Court Justices, a Presidency, and everything President Trump has done because he's not conservative enough. Twitter is and should be a PRIME TARGET!!!!! Dorsey (who's boyfriend is Deray from BLM) should be getting pounded in the ass in prison!!!!!

I'll be voting this midterms but if President Trump becomes a lame duck all we have is the cuckservatives to blame. Maybe we should just tune out of politics in 2020 if the right would rather lose.

Post: #373

PayPal have cut ties. Damn.

Post: #374

With PayPal cutting ties, now things will get interesting. I read that something like 60% of their online sales are from PayPal, especially from first time visitors.

Infowars still has an incredibly huge online following. They also get a large portion of their revenue from online sales. The question will be how do they make up for it?

If they decide to finally get into the crypto game, they may have the gravitas to convert a lot of people to that method.

There was a great article on ZeroHedge about how PayPal is screwed over long term anyway, since they basically don't do anything you can't already do with crypto - except that vendors have to pay a ridiculous fee with PayPal. Whether or not people make the big switch en mass is anyone's guess. I'm more or less dependent on PayPal since I use a hosting platform that uses it to pay me, but I'd be happy to switch when the opportunity allows.

Post: #375

Where paypal has a massive advantage is that everyone is already on it, and it has the trust factor. It would take a lot to get the normies to move to something as foreign as crypto, then yet again, someone with as much heft as Jones could help pioneer that method, given he's being forced practically to sink or swim with this non-stop platforming. It will be interesting to see where he goes from here.