Post: #626

(09-22-2018 03:41 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Pray for a relatively soft economic collapse. The barbarian invaders are mostly just opportunists looking to piggyback on several hundred years of steady civilisation building. Several decades of grinding poverty would stop the flow and send many packing, and the cuck faggots among the native stock will no longer have the largess required to sit on their moral high horses while the poor folk battle it out against the Mohammedean hordes.

A series of cascading economic disasters that collapse the welfare state and force human normality back on the populace will be ironically far more civil than white genocide or the race war required to prevent it.

This is what I`ve been saying a long time also. They will leave on their own accord, once the money runs out! The best thing Western men can do is to avoid creating wealth and paying taxes in their homelands. This will hasten the inevitable collapse, which is a good thing.

Post: #627

(09-26-2018 06:27 PM)Johnnyvee Wrote:  

(09-22-2018 03:41 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Pray for a relatively soft economic collapse. The barbarian invaders are mostly just opportunists looking to piggyback on several hundred years of steady civilisation building. Several decades of grinding poverty would stop the flow and send many packing, and the cuck faggots among the native stock will no longer have the largess required to sit on their moral high horses while the poor folk battle it out against the Mohammedean hordes.

A series of cascading economic disasters that collapse the welfare state and force human normality back on the populace will be ironically far more civil than white genocide or the race war required to prevent it.

This is what I`ve been saying a long time also. They will leave on their own accord, once the money runs out! The best thing Western men can do is to avoid creating wealth and paying taxes in their homelands. This will hasten the inevitable collapse, which is a good thing.

No on is going to leave - when the West collapses, then their countries are pulled down with them. Africa would become a starving violent place far worse than it is now. The West would still have this better under control. Also - who told you that the globalist leaders would not prioritize the "new British" in their welfare? They already do now with council houses, scholarships, jobs, welfare system itself preferring non-Europeans and harassing them less for transgressions. They could well tighten the belt more for the Brits while giving the shitheads twice or three times as much cash.

Post: #628

(09-27-2018 02:57 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  

(09-26-2018 06:27 PM)Johnnyvee Wrote:  

(09-22-2018 03:41 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Pray for a relatively soft economic collapse. The barbarian invaders are mostly just opportunists looking to piggyback on several hundred years of steady civilisation building. Several decades of grinding poverty would stop the flow and send many packing, and the cuck faggots among the native stock will no longer have the largess required to sit on their moral high horses while the poor folk battle it out against the Mohammedean hordes.

A series of cascading economic disasters that collapse the welfare state and force human normality back on the populace will be ironically far more civil than white genocide or the race war required to prevent it.

This is what I`ve been saying a long time also. They will leave on their own accord, once the money runs out! The best thing Western men can do is to avoid creating wealth and paying taxes in their homelands. This will hasten the inevitable collapse, which is a good thing.

No on is going to leave - when the West collapses, then their countries are pulled down with them. Africa would become a starving violent place far worse than it is now. The West would still have this better under control. Also - who told you that the globalist leaders would not prioritize the "new British" in their welfare? They already do now with council houses, scholarships, jobs, welfare system itself preferring non-Europeans and harassing them less for transgressions. They could well tighten the belt more for the Brits while giving the shitheads twice or three times as much cash.

I don`t quite get your last point. (No offense) This is the situation already. The migrants/new citizens are prioritized, no doubt. This was the whole point of my argument also, when the money runs out, the welfare will not be available. And trust me, the money will run out eventually.

Most migrants have a lot more connections in there homelands, that`s why I think they will leave. I also think that climate factors into this. If you don`t have a place to stay in Northern Europe in winter you will freeze to death. Also, it`s the climate that they`re adjusted/evolved to, and probably miss I suspect. I agree that this can be debated, but I think that most migrants are here for the handouts and nothing more.

Post: #629

No - I don't trust you on that - as an economist and monterary reformer I know exactly that they can stretch that cow's hide for much much longer. When Western countries go bust, then they do bail-ins - confiscate the savings of the 40-50% who still have some in the banks. Then the game continues. They can balloon debt ratios up to 300%+ of GDP while slashing interest rates since they control the banks. This bonanza can go on for decades and decades - unless they crash it on purpose.

What you envision with a full-on collapse, light going out and people starving in the street is not realistic - when that happens, then there will be almost instant war. Europeans would be at a tremendous advantage then and the current globalists would lose control - this does not make much sense. This is like all those silver-coins salesmen and dried foods companies that are giving you tools to survive the zombie apocalypse. Yes - if that happens, then they will move, but the globalists won't be in charge anymore.

Post: #630

(09-27-2018 02:20 PM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  No - I don't trust you on that - as an economist and monterary reformer I know exactly that they can stretch that cow's hide for much much longer. When Western countries go bust, then they do bail-ins - confiscate the savings of the 40-50% who still have some in the banks. Then the game continues. They can balloon debt ratios up to 300%+ of GDP while slashing interest rates since they control the banks. This bonanza can go on for decades and decades - unless they crash it on purpose.

What you envision with a full-on collapse, light going out and people starving in the street is not realistic - when that happens, then there will be almost instant war. Europeans would be at a tremendous advantage then and the current globalists would lose control - this does not make much sense. This is like all those silver-coins salesmen and dried foods companies that are giving you tools to survive the zombie apocalypse. Yes - if that happens, then they will move, but the globalists won't be in charge anymore.

I doesn`t have to get that bad for migrants to move.
The US could end up in a full on dramatic collapse as you described. Forget GDP and the national debt, look at the unfunded liabilities, silver tsunami and reduced production capacity instead. Reduce interest rates, print money etc? Not much to go on there! These measures are in effect already. I think any global financial calamity will start in the US and then effect Europe and the world, with severe consequences. It should be mentioned that future technological breakthroughs is an element that might alter a lot of these things.

As far as Western Europe is concerned, they will gradually cut back on welfare as the economy get`s worse and worse with the boomers retiring etc. But I think it will be more orderly in Europe than in the US. (But you already have camps where people are living under poor conditions, like in Calais.) Norway is cutting welfare year by year, but it`s not a collapse as of yet. But with the enormous retirement and related health costs with the boomers getting old, it just can`t end well. Many economists have done the math on this. There is no real solution. Ok, they might dump the old white folks in retirement homes and hospitals out on the streets, but I doubt that will happen. Of course they want migrants to work and pay taxes (be slaves) and replace whites at the same time. But to many of them don`t want to work. And I don`t really blame them. So they will have the choice between being low wage slaves, or returning home. (Or starving in the streets.) I think most will go home.

Post: #631

(09-27-2018 02:10 PM)Johnnyvee Wrote:  Most migrants have a lot more connections in there homelands, that`s why I think they will leave. I also think that climate factors into this. If you don`t have a place to stay in Northern Europe in winter you will freeze to death. Also, it`s the climate that they`re adjusted/evolved to, and probably miss I suspect. I agree that this can be debated, but I think that most migrants are here for the handouts and nothing more.

Are you by any chance conflating EE migrants with those from outside the EU?

Post: #632

(09-27-2018 05:13 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 02:10 PM)Johnnyvee Wrote:  Most migrants have a lot more connections in there homelands, that`s why I think they will leave. I also think that climate factors into this. If you don`t have a place to stay in Northern Europe in winter you will freeze to death. Also, it`s the climate that they`re adjusted/evolved to, and probably miss I suspect. I agree that this can be debated, but I think that most migrants are here for the handouts and nothing more.

Are you by any chance conflating EE migrants with those from outside the EU?

No, not really.

I can see that I expressed point that a bit unclearly though. I meant that non-EU, (African, Middle-eastern) migrants are used to and adapted to a different climate. In other words, they have evolved to handle a different climate, and hence are not as well adjusted to colder climates with less sunlight during the winter months etc. So that`s a negative element that they have to endure in order to reap the benefits of Western welfare and living standards.

Post: #633

(09-27-2018 06:08 PM)Johnnyvee Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 05:13 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 02:10 PM)Johnnyvee Wrote:  Most migrants have a lot more connections in there homelands, that`s why I think they will leave. I also think that climate factors into this. If you don`t have a place to stay in Northern Europe in winter you will freeze to death. Also, it`s the climate that they`re adjusted/evolved to, and probably miss I suspect. I agree that this can be debated, but I think that most migrants are here for the handouts and nothing more.

Are you by any chance conflating EE migrants with those from outside the EU?

No, not really.

I can see that I expressed point that a bit unclearly though. I meant that non-EU, (African, Middle-eastern) migrants are used to and adapted to a different climate. In other words, they have evolved to handle a different climate, and hence are not as well adjusted to colder climates with less sunlight during the winter months etc. So that`s a negative element that they have to endure in order to reap the benefits of Western welfare and living standards.

Don't kid yourself. They manage to adjust pretty well with all the goodies they get. How many do you think pay their own heating bill and for their own clothes?

Post: #634

(09-27-2018 06:08 PM)Johnnyvee Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 05:13 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 02:10 PM)Johnnyvee Wrote:  Most migrants have a lot more connections in there homelands, that`s why I think they will leave. I also think that climate factors into this. If you don`t have a place to stay in Northern Europe in winter you will freeze to death. Also, it`s the climate that they`re adjusted/evolved to, and probably miss I suspect. I agree that this can be debated, but I think that most migrants are here for the handouts and nothing more.

Are you by any chance conflating EE migrants with those from outside the EU?

No, not really.

I can see that I expressed point that a bit unclearly though. I meant that non-EU, (African, Middle-eastern) migrants are used to and adapted to a different climate. In other words, they have evolved to handle a different climate, and hence are not as well adjusted to colder climates with less sunlight during the winter months etc. So that`s a negative element that they have to endure in order to reap the benefits of Western welfare and living standards.

You are granting them too much leeway and your whole scenario relies on the majority of them leaving, sons and daughters in-tow along with their entire community.

Some will, most won't.

You are also relying on the financial situation becoming completely end of days type of stuff. If we as a continent and individual nations come to a point where we cannot even support welfare then we will have bigger problems than a bloc of migrants from outside the EU.

I am talking hyper inflation, social and economic depression, sky rocketing crime rates, infrastructure degrading, lack of hope and a lack of humanity.

Granted the third world shitheads wont make it better but I've seen the ugly face of traditional British people in bad situations and I am sure other men here have, it isn't pretty and is quite scary when confronted with if you can't handle it.

What we have here now is much more than they ever would have in their home countries. If we do face a collapse of gargantuan proportions it isn't going to happen in a short period of time. It might happen in the 2020s but the more years pass the more they become accustomed to it and the more of them will come.

Post: #635

(09-27-2018 06:17 PM)Brother Abdul Majeed Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 06:08 PM)Johnnyvee Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 05:13 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 02:10 PM)Johnnyvee Wrote:  Most migrants have a lot more connections in there homelands, that`s why I think they will leave. I also think that climate factors into this. If you don`t have a place to stay in Northern Europe in winter you will freeze to death. Also, it`s the climate that they`re adjusted/evolved to, and probably miss I suspect. I agree that this can be debated, but I think that most migrants are here for the handouts and nothing more.

Are you by any chance conflating EE migrants with those from outside the EU?

No, not really.

I can see that I expressed point that a bit unclearly though. I meant that non-EU, (African, Middle-eastern) migrants are used to and adapted to a different climate. In other words, they have evolved to handle a different climate, and hence are not as well adjusted to colder climates with less sunlight during the winter months etc. So that`s a negative element that they have to endure in order to reap the benefits of Western welfare and living standards.

Don't kid yourself. They manage to adjust pretty well with all the goodies they get. How many do you think pay their own heating bill and for their own clothes?

Yes I agree. But the context of the debate was whether or not they will leave by themselves when/if the money runs out. I think that many will do just that!

Post: #636

(09-27-2018 06:36 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 06:08 PM)Johnnyvee Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 05:13 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  

(09-27-2018 02:10 PM)Johnnyvee Wrote:  Most migrants have a lot more connections in there homelands, that`s why I think they will leave. I also think that climate factors into this. If you don`t have a place to stay in Northern Europe in winter you will freeze to death. Also, it`s the climate that they`re adjusted/evolved to, and probably miss I suspect. I agree that this can be debated, but I think that most migrants are here for the handouts and nothing more.

Are you by any chance conflating EE migrants with those from outside the EU?

No, not really.

I can see that I expressed point that a bit unclearly though. I meant that non-EU, (African, Middle-eastern) migrants are used to and adapted to a different climate. In other words, they have evolved to handle a different climate, and hence are not as well adjusted to colder climates with less sunlight during the winter months etc. So that`s a negative element that they have to endure in order to reap the benefits of Western welfare and living standards.

You are granting them too much leeway and your whole scenario relies on the majority of them leaving, sons and daughters in-tow along with their entire community.

Some will, most won't.

You are also relying on the financial situation becoming completely end of days type of stuff. If we as a continent and individual nations come to a point where we cannot even support welfare then we will have bigger problems than a bloc of migrants from outside the EU.

I am talking hyper inflation, social and economic depression, sky rocketing crime rates, infrastructure degrading, lack of hope and a lack of humanity.

Granted the third world shitheads wont make it better but I've seen the ugly face of traditional British people in bad situations and I am sure other men here have, it isn't pretty and is quite scary when confronted with if you can't handle it.

What we have here now is much more than they ever would have in their home countries. If we do face a collapse of gargantuan proportions it isn't going to happen in a short period of time. It might happen in the 2020s but the more years pass the more they become accustomed to it and the more of them will come.

You could also have a situation where welfare is deemed unsustainable, so you do away with 90 percent of Government and taxation. So there might be a collapse, or a gradual reduction of welfare that leads to this situation. This does not necessarily entail a reduction in living standards for the people that work. It might just lead to the opposite. In time that is, after some turmoil.

Post: #637

< The thing about money and technological unemployment is this - they already expect roughly 50% of the population to be eternally unemployed by 2060. The rate would be high even without any immigrants coming in - or maybe not, because the ones working would be the young ones and that would be the extent of the available advanced job market. Drivers, low-tier office clerks, cashiers, many waiting staff jobs - they will likely go out with other services and production facilities being mechanized as well. Heck - they are even replacing low-tier lawyers with software. Add to it call-centers in the future at least for some queries etc.

It's not about money for the globalists - it's about elimination of a unified European potential opposition, lowering the average intelligence of the population, splitting up the country into various religious and ethnic groups while marginalizing the native Europeans - that is the goal. Money is not the issue and can be extended for a long time at least on a low-tier level - basic maintenance - housing, TV, cable, WIFI, entertainment, video-games, weed, alcohol, maybe later more drugs legalized to appease the serfs.

Yes - they are less evolved to fight and live in the climate without central heating and modern clothing and heated cars. But this advantage was more valid in the stone age and during some military campaigns. And even then - the Muslims usually attacked in comfy summer.

Post: #638

What people don't often understand about a collapse, even a steady one, is that you can't simply compare it to the standard of living in a shithole.

If you're living in a shithole then you might not have access to free (taxpayer funded) health care but at least you can go and buy virtually whatever medicine is available without a prescription. Modern civilisation doesn't have a capacity to "go back" like this.

Odds are fair that standards of living will drop but taxation and more importantly extreme regulation will remain on track or probably get much worse, and there are aspects of this that the diversity cannot simply sidestep. You could say "they'll get their meds on the black market" but what about the food they need to eat or the water they need to drink? The cost of everything rises and the freebies everyone gets from the state start vanishing exponentially.

The natives stay because they have little to no choice, but for the muslim invaders there is a real case to go home and participate in a more Laissez-faire kind of life where the doctor might not have a certificate or a fancy office but at least you get to see him same-day instead of waiting for six months only to find out that in the meanwhile your kid's condition has gone from recoverable to terminal. Meanwhile in merry old England you might not have to work for your cash but it costs ten pounds to take the bus and the banks are charging a pound per transaction and a loaf of bread costs twice what it did last year because parliament just passed a round of new taxes that hit the farmer, the miller, the trucker and the baker. Cash has been all but banned and, believe it or not you don't actually want your kids to become jihadis or street thugs.

There is no metric to say for sure when or why people would leave individually, but when life gets harder many of them will. There were probably a metric shitload of Eastern Europeans trapped in communist prison-states last century that would have rather been living in the "chaotic squalor" of South America where they at least had some sort of control of their destiny.

If you or a loved one has never waited a month for a doctor's appointment while suffering severe pain only to be refused a prescription for pain meds because "we've got new guidelines, now" then you probably don't understand these concepts. Neither would anyone understand if they're not familiar with what it like to have to skirt legal obligations simply to make ends meet.

Sometimes shitholes are the lesser of two evils.

Post: #639

(09-28-2018 02:36 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  < The thing about money and technological unemployment is this - they already expect roughly 50% of the population to be eternally unemployed by 2060. The rate would be high even without any immigrants coming in - or maybe not, because the ones working would be the young ones and that would be the extent of the available advanced job market. Drivers, low-tier office clerks, cashiers, many waiting staff jobs - they will likely go out with other services and production facilities being mechanized as well. Heck - they are even replacing low-tier lawyers with software. Add to it call-centers in the future at least for some queries etc.

It's not about money for the globalists - it's about elimination of a unified European potential opposition, lowering the average intelligence of the population, splitting up the country into various religious and ethnic groups while marginalizing the native Europeans - that is the goal. Money is not the issue and can be extended for a long time at least on a low-tier level - basic maintenance - housing, TV, cable, WIFI, entertainment, video-games, weed, alcohol, maybe later more drugs legalized to appease the serfs.

Yes - they are less evolved to fight and live in the climate without central heating and modern clothing and heated cars. But this advantage was more valid in the stone age and during some military campaigns. And even then - the Muslims usually attacked in comfy summer.

Well, both our proposed scenarios are quite dramatic anyhow. Either economic collapse, and massive turmoil resulting, leaders slaughtered (literally) and then a reboot of Western civilization, Spengler style. Or your scenario of (I guess) some form of outright race war. Both could happen, and we might have some combination of the two.

I feel very certain however that the US will see an enormous financial crisis in the relative near future. The asset market is now the mother of all bubbles, much worse than say 2007. It has to come crashing down at some point. The question in my mind is whether the dollar will survive this time, or will people/investors seek refuge in other currencies and assets. (gold, crypto, Yuan?) If the dollar becomes toilet paper, how will the US and the rest of the world cope? How will this effect immigration also? It`s interesting times ahead at least.

Post: #640

I don't think that there will be a race war. It's a bit more complicated than that, but a global hot war with all 2 bio. Muslims? Yes - that is definitely in the cards especially when the globalists trigger a 9/11 times 10 by detonating multiple mini-nukes in multiple Western cities and blaming an international Muslim organization for it.

When they move to ban the religion, dig out all the texts, the real texts and justifications, then a bloody civil war in the West and outright massive war against Muslim countries could be unleashed - India and Pakistan might nuke it out then with modern weaponry that might neutralize the nuclear rockets. We shall see - that is what I rather expect - or an Orwellian super-state that keeps everything in check.

I personally hope for a non-genocidal Alien invasion that wants us to add to their interstellar market, worker- and consumer base - that is what I am hoping for, because the current bunch is so far the smartest one in history as far as world conquest goes. They achieved more than any conqueror in all of known human history - just operating in the shadows.

And the worst of their plans is yet to come.

Post: #641

(09-28-2018 02:04 PM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  I don't think that there will be a race war. It's a bit more complicated than that, but a global hot war with all 2 bio. Muslims? Yes - that is definitely in the cards especially when the globalists trigger a 9/11 times 10 by detonating multiple mini-nukes in multiple Western cities and blaming an international Muslim organization for it.

When they move to ban the religion, dig out all the texts, the real texts and justifications, then a bloody civil war in the West and outright massive war against Muslim countries could be unleashed - India and Pakistan might nuke it out then with modern weaponry that might neutralize the nuclear rockets. We shall see - that is what I rather expect - or an Orwellian super-state that keeps everything in check.

I personally hope for a non-genocidal Alien invasion that wants us to add to their interstellar market, worker- and consumer base - that is what I am hoping for, because the current bunch is so far the smartest one in history as far as world conquest goes. They achieved more than any conqueror in all of known human history - just operating in the shadows.

And the worst of their plans is yet to come.

If you are talking about (((them,))) remember that they cannot exist without European civilization. There is a symbiosis between Jews and gentiles. The parasite and the host basically. And I mean parasite in the biological context, not as a pejorative.

Many Jews realize this also and join in the fight to save Western societies. (Mark Steyn, Ben Shapiro, Ezra Levant etc.) We should also remember that gentiles benefit greatly from having Jewish intellectuals in their midts. The world would look somewhat different without Einstein, Feynman, Krebs, Warburg, Hayek, Friedman...it`s a very long list.

Post: #642

< Nope - modern civilization would have existed fine without all the examples you pointed out - Einstein is reputed to be a fraud - never talked about his real work after getting famous - only politics - he likely shared some good stuff with the elite as a patent agent, then got promoted as hero using the works of team of scientists they have at their emploi anyway, Hayek? - don't make me laugh, Milton Friedman? (he was honest but only in private stating that usury-free monetary policy would have been much better - obviously never writing it down in a major book - don't have the serfs get any ideas). With a 50% German and Euro-mixed rate of Jews and gentiles, then you will get of course some scientists, but the negative likely outweighs the positive I am afraid. And I am not for any expulsion - just Red Pilling and not being shmucks anymore - it's not that hard actually if you know what they are about. They are not that smart in aggregate - just more cunning and working in concentrated collective fashion directed from above.

I consider the Jewish tribe a mixed Euro-tribe anyway who just see themselves apart - their genome is 90% Euro (40% Anglo/German, 40% Slav, 10% Nordic, 10% Semitic). It's probably a bit more complicated than (((them))) - maybe some ancient Luciferian families joined them and created something above Jewry - I don't think that they consider themselves really Jewish at the very top.

Either way - as detailed by the likes of Carroll Quigley, Antony Sutton, Reece Commission on Foundations in the 1950s - they are incredibly far advanced in their plans. It's the best most complete takeover of the world in known history.

Frankly - only major cataclysms, a miracle or an Alien invasion could prevent the continuation of their rule - or their own collapse from within, but they are hiring the best as planners and don't interfere that much, so it's tough to break through that.

Post: #643

(09-29-2018 02:25 PM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  I consider the Jewish tribe a mixed Euro-tribe anyway who just see themselves apart - their genome is 90% Euro (40% Anglo/German, 40% Slav, 10% Nordic, 10% Semitic). It's probably a bit more complicated than (((them)))

Where did you get that from?

Post: #644

What is the best strategy to escape this shit to the best degree, in your opinion Simeon?

Post: #645

(09-30-2018 07:19 PM)lookslikeit Wrote:  

(09-29-2018 02:25 PM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  I consider the Jewish tribe a mixed Euro-tribe anyway who just see themselves apart - their genome is 90% Euro (40% Anglo/German, 40% Slav, 10% Nordic, 10% Semitic). It's probably a bit more complicated than (((them)))

Where did you get that from?

Major haplogroup tests - back in Germany in the 19th century many Rabbis lamented that almost half of their flock is German-mixed. They were a bit of a IQ-focused inbred Western tribe - the genetic markers they pick for tests are not unlike the ones if you wanted to derive Finnish, Italian, Greek or Dutch heritage. In fact you could even estimate whether someone is Finnish vs Norwegian by the looks, because the tribes look different. As even the White Nationalist Gregg Johnson put it - the Jews are one of the most interbred tribe in the world - obviously mainly with smarter gentiles in the West.

Even the old strange now memed Jewish look disappeared with greater mating options in the 20th century.

Both the Jewish lobby as well as guys on the "old-right" don't want to have this clear, but genetic tests don't lie. Alternative Hypothesis especially dug through study after study on that. Rabbis will want to tell you that they look White, but are not White, because it fits their tribal "we are unique" narrative. But the reality is that despite blood connection, it's for many flimsy at best - Jewry now is more like a religious affiliation with a very strong indoctrination. Heck - there are even funny movies based on real stories out there were normal French families suddenly find out that they are Jewish, they change their entire view on life, immerse themselves in the culture, speak of "our people" have suffered this etc. Then they find out that it was an error and they are not Jewish - hehe. But they could have sworn and it felt so good.....

I think that one of the reason for their relative success is this massive cult-like in-group behavior coupled with strong focus on intellectual pursuit and money making. The gentiles who usually married in were either nobility or very intelligent themselves - and there were lots of them. It seems to me that this is often mistakenly viewed as inconsequential because it does not fit their narrative, but explains the difference in IQ of the Euro-mixed Ashkenazi of 108 vs 91 of the Sephardic. Essentially what went on in Europe is a constant inflow of enterprising smarter gentile blood - positive eugenics that actually continues to this day (see Trump's family). Then by next generation they take credit for the Trump family genes - heh.

Post: #646

What does anything in this thread have to do with London ? Anyone actually live in London / where ?

Post: #647

(10-09-2018 03:28 PM)Que enspastic Wrote:  What does anything in this thread have to do with London ? Anyone actually live in London / where ?

Haha, Ok, you got me. I live nowhere near the place. It's my Capital but I've never once been. I still bet it's a shit-hole though.

I promised to take the boy to the Natural History Museum so I might well go one day and see for myself. Ideally, I'd want to get off the train, go to the Museum then get back on the train and head back to safety without being acid-attacked, stabbed, bombed or run-over as I hate cities.

I have a Cockney friend who moved up north and he says London is an absolute shit-hole and his word is good enough for me. He loves it up here. But aside from that, you only have to watch old movies and stuff to see the decline. In fairness I think the thread title 'R.I.P. London' is now shorthand for 'R.I.P. Britain'.

Incidentally, if any forum members living in London know better, I'd be happy to listen to contrasting opinions. My mind isn't set in stone.

Post: #648

(10-09-2018 03:28 PM)Que enspastic Wrote:  What does anything in this thread have to do with London ? Anyone actually live in London / where ?

England is a very small place.

London to Manchester is less than 200 miles.

What happens in London spreads to the rest of the country; good or bad.

Post: #649

< I like certain areas in the City of London - but whenever I leave those areas, it's as if I entered a different country.

Post: #650

(10-10-2018 04:34 AM)Richard Turpin Wrote:  

(10-09-2018 03:28 PM)Que enspastic Wrote:  What does anything in this thread have to do with London ? Anyone actually live in London / where ?

Haha, Ok, you got me. I live nowhere near the place. It's my Capital but I've never once been. I still bet it's a shit-hole though.

I promised to take the boy to the Natural History Museum so I might well go one day and see for myself. Ideally, I'd want to get off the train, go to the Museum then get back on the train and head back to safety without being acid-attacked, stabbed, bombed or run-over as I hate cities.

I have a Cockney friend who moved up north and he says London is an absolute shit-hole and his word is good enough for me. He loves it up here. But aside from that, you only have to watch old movies and stuff to see the decline. In fairness I think the thread title 'R.I.P. London' is now shorthand for 'R.I.P. Britain'.

Incidentally, if any forum members living in London know better, I'd be happy to listen to contrasting opinions. My mind isn't set in stone.

I grew up in London. I then lived up north for a long while and returned to London last year.

I love being back in London. My preference has always been for that kind of buzzing multi-cultural metropolis. I also like the idea of having access to all the art and cultural landmarks that london has -- and all the diversity of women too.

Personally, I haven't experienced acid attacks, terrorism, gang violence or anything similar. Feels pretty safe from my perspective and just as safe as I felt when I lived in a city up norf'.

The women here aren't particularily easy to game but that's probably true of any country in the anglosphere.

This obviously is just my experience other folks may have a different one. And I'm staying out of getting involved in the politics of it on the forum