Post: #601

(02-12-2017 09:32 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Hollywood Moca occult Gala 2016 - plenty of A-list stars present there for 25.000$ a pop.

Some actors may indeed eat human cake to get where they are.



This is not even about a show anymore - sure art can be unsettling, but this has the feel of something much much darker.

Post: #602

I think it's safe to answer the thread title now...

Post: #603

(02-12-2017 09:32 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

This is not even about a show anymore - sure art can be unsettling, but this has the feel of something much much darker.

The taboo against eating human flesh is so strong that a normal person couldn't even eat that cake even though it is just cake.

It is almost like this a conditioning to get people to overturn their natural revulsion against evil symbolically, so it will be easier later to get them to accept evil literally.

Reminds me of a psychologist who asked people whether or not they would wear a serial killer's sweater:

http://reason.com/archives/2009/06/12/wo...ial-killer

Quote:Psychologist and cognitive neuroscientist Bruce Hood has been known to brandish a cardigan belonging to the serial killer Fred West in the lecture hall. West tortured, raped, and murdered at least 12 women. Of course, a moment's reflection will reveal that his sartorial choices probably had nothing to do with his grisly hobby. And there's no possibility of catching serial killer disease from his sweater, right? Nonetheless, most people will refuse to wear the sweater once they know its provenance (false provenance, actually, the sweater Hood uses is not really West's). Odder still, in large lecture halls, members of the audience will physically recoil from the few people who say they are willing to wear the sweater. The crowds, which often consist of highly-educated, secular people, laugh nervously as this little drama is played out, says Hood, because they realize that there is something odd and illogical about their reaction.

There is a kind of a double bind to these pictures. We should recoil from people who eat this cake, but the people eating it are the stars and beautiful people we have been conditioned to worship.

There is an unholy hand behind this, pushing the boundaries of human behavior, though we do not have access to who did it or why.

Intuitively though, something really wrong is going on here.

I wouldn't eat that cake.

And I wouldn't kiss Gwen Stefani after she did either.

Post: #604

I was looking at material for the Disney thread earlier today, this one belongs on here, video done by a therapist who is familiar with treating victims:

Post: #605

(02-12-2017 05:07 PM)Sooth Wrote:  I think it's safe to answer the thread title now...

It's crazy how much difference a year makes. When I first started this thread, the idea of Satanic Hollywood was obscure, but now you see it everywhere. The power of information!

Post: #606

(03-02-2017 05:33 PM)Roosh Wrote:  When I first started this thread, the idea of Satanic Hollywood was obscure, but now you see it everywhere. The power of information!

More likely the power of deliberate social programming by engineers seeding thought constructs into the public sphere in order to undermine their enemies.

It's likely there are deliberately-placed subversives within the system encouraging the Crowleyists to be more brazen in their displays over the last couple of years to encourage their eventual fall.

Post: #607

(03-02-2017 05:58 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(03-02-2017 05:33 PM)Roosh Wrote:  When I first started this thread, the idea of Satanic Hollywood was obscure, but now you see it everywhere. The power of information!

More likely the power of deliberate social programming by engineers seeding thought constructs into the public sphere in order to undermine their enemies.

It's likely there are deliberately-placed subversives within the system encouraging the Crowleyists to be more brazen in their displays over the last couple of years to encourage their eventual fall.

Sounds interesting, but vague.
Can you elaborate on this ?

Post: #608

(03-02-2017 05:58 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(03-02-2017 05:33 PM)Roosh Wrote:  When I first started this thread, the idea of Satanic Hollywood was obscure, but now you see it everywhere. The power of information!

More likely the power of deliberate social programming by engineers seeding thought constructs into the public sphere in order to undermine their enemies.

It's likely there are deliberately-placed subversives within the system encouraging the Crowleyists to be more brazen in their displays over the last couple of years to encourage their eventual fall.

Who is the beneficiary of your theory?

Post: #609

(03-02-2017 07:14 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

(03-02-2017 05:58 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(03-02-2017 05:33 PM)Roosh Wrote:  When I first started this thread, the idea of Satanic Hollywood was obscure, but now you see it everywhere. The power of information!

More likely the power of deliberate social programming by engineers seeding thought constructs into the public sphere in order to undermine their enemies.

It's likely there are deliberately-placed subversives within the system encouraging the Crowleyists to be more brazen in their displays over the last couple of years to encourage their eventual fall.

Who is the beneficiary of your theory?

Whoever would rise in the Crowleyists' place. One organisation that springs to mind is Scientology.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #610

Well, speaking hypothetically:

If my Group was working to replace those currently in Power, and I knew part of their faggy self-congratulatory elite power games was hoary old Thelema / Crowleyism - which predates the Nazis - I'd know I'd be able to brand their kind of Gnostic 'Be Your Own God' religious code to the masses as Wooh-Scary Satanism, to poison them against them enough to want to see them overthrown. It helps that Crowley's belief in Anal Sex as the Highest Form of Sex Majick to offer one personal power plays into most people's natural revulsion with homosexuality.

Admittedly, it is hard to know just how seriously these idiots take their religious rituals, and if it has turned into child abuse, human sacrifice and cannibalism.

Either way, I'd place my agents in positions of power within the industry - probably designers / photographers / costumers and encourage pop and rap artists - the majority of whom are dumber than dogshit and believe their own hype - that since they're some kind of natural elite - perhaps telling them they have royal bloodline tied to Satanic Power - and then get them to blatantly signal their belief to the public in order to repel a large segment of the general public.

Then I'd seed the conspiracy theories of their great evils. After all, most cultures throughout history seems to love Burning Witches.

If you don't believe mass-scale social programming is that easy, note what happened last year on the Chans with little prompting:



Now, whilst I originally laughed at the idea of an 'ancient statue of kek' that was made from plastic with a spray-paint verdigris effect coating, where each section of the hieroglyph had obvious photoshop-artifacting around it, with an obviously-false construction - I'll explain in a second - I figured "Ok, it's a harmless bit of fun." I didn't think people would take it seriously as a religion and I supposed at the time that it served as a useful rallying point for people's energies.

Now that Trump has made it very clear in his speech the other night that the type of extreme polarisation of the Alt-Right isn't part of his vision of America going forward - which most of us figured out about Trump far back in his campaign - I might as well 'spoil' reveal what just ten minutes of cursory research revealed about this to me last year, but I'd ask to keep the information in-forum so not to bring down Anonymous' wrath on the men here.

I studied hieroglyphs and Egyptian Art in school in my Ancient History, and remembered that the image in the final position - called the Determinative - gives you the subject of each hieroglyph. The seated god figure on the statue above would have to be at the end of the sequence, and facing right to left, not left to right, for it to be a true one.

So with just 10 minutes with a hieroglyph dictionary - it might have even been on bloody Wikipedia - I have a rough conception of how hieroglyphs function, enough to tell you that, rather than worshipping Kek, Channers are worshipping a deliberate bastardisation of the Frog Goddess Heqet / Heket, Egyptian Goddess of Fertility and Childbirth, two forms of which are here:



Top one, from left to right: Oil Wick (H), Hillside (Q/K), Bread Bun (T) and a Frog in the Determinative. Note that the Bread Bun is also used as a symbol of Femininity.

So you read H Q/K T Feminine and the Frog is the subject, therefore = Heqet / Heket.

In the second version, the Staff (also H) symbolises a Ruler, the Hillside and the Bread Bun, Q/K T Feminine, the seated Goddess figure is in the Determinative, and the Non-Handled Basket underneath meant something like 'exalted'. (Apologies for my vagueness, this was months back).

Therefore Ruler H Q/T T Feminine Exalted Goddess = Heqet / Heket.

It's a perfectly-logical system once you understand how they work.

The images here are all Heqet / Heket.



Hence the Ankhs, the Egyptian Symbols of Life. The knives might look intimidating, but they're just Ceremonial Knives during the Egyptian Birthing Process.

This is Kek:



Basket with Handle (K) Basket with Handle (K). Determinative = Sky split by Scepter (Darkness)

K K Darkness = Kek.

Note that Kek is one of the eight gods of Primordial Egyptian existence, each with a corresponding male and female form, Kekui and Kekuit. Note the male and female Goddess forms. Also note the use of the breadbun and the egg before kekuit - both symbols of Femininity.

There's more to this though. Sure, it might be reversed so it was harder for people researching to track backwards - though no-one seemed to bother - there's also a pretty good chance that this is a deliberate Satanic Reversal.

This was a concept under Crowleyism where you write, think and speak backwards to get in touch with your 'true' mirror self, which is often thought of as being a separate entity entirely. This even comes down to reversing sexual presentations. This would be why so many of the current music stars seem fascinated with artistic alter egos like 'Sasha Fierce'.

The granddaddy of this, of course, is David Bowie, who spent most of his career signalling his Crowleyist beliefs through his art. Crowley (left), Bowie (Right).





A quick google image search later, see how Bowie makes presenting his mirror self as the camera focus, more important than his physical self, all throughout his career? Pics from the 70's, 80's, 90's, and '10s.



(cont')

Post: #611

(03-02-2017 05:58 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  More likely the power of deliberate social programming by engineers seeding thought constructs into the public sphere in order to undermine their enemies.

It's likely there are deliberately-placed subversives within the system encouraging the Crowleyists to be more brazen in their displays over the last couple of years to encourage their eventual fall.

I agree that the Crowleyists might be overplaying their hand and generating some pushback, but they represent the establishment's hidden religion, and they've owned popular culture, for decades now. They've undermined and subverted Christianity and have severely damaged the foundations of traditional culture (faith, family, gender roles, social fibre etc) over the past 2+ centuries.

It's true that there is growing opposition to the Crowleyist agenda, the alt-right is definitely a part of that, though few within this movement are actually aware of the true nature of the establishment and the scale of their project.

Post: #612

(cont')

This is why backmasking in music has always been such a trigger for the religious types, whilst also making it very easy to spot the Crowley devotees.

Back when I mentioned all the Esoteric Homosexuals in the Alt Right, I brought up Jack Donovan signaling with his hands to Satan's Consort, the Water Goddess:



You probably all know this as the 'Merkel'. Look who else does it:



Note that Oprah's production company is named "Harpo".

When Prince was on the verge of cracking big, he changed the name of his publishing company to 'Ecnirp Music'. For the next album, he presented himself like this, often called 'Pimp' and 'Whore' in the same body.



Much like Bowie, this 'genderfucking' greatly-raised his profile, and I could see why an artist who isn't quite all there in the head would think it was Satanic Power, and not the fact that 'Ziggy Stardust' and 'Dirty Mind' are both great records by bands right in the zone.

There followed a series of alter egos (The Kid, Jamie Starr, Christopher Tracey) until he eventually recorded an entire album as a female persona, Camille. Soon after, he had some kind of breakdown, then found claimed to have found God. ('Lovesexy'), but was soon back to the multiple personality tricks. Watch the 'Batdance' video.

See how this stuff has always been there, if you knew where to look? The difference is now deliberate light is being shone on it by someone to the masses.

What does this have to do with Fake Kek, above? Given that I previously drew attention to the fact that the Esoteric, Occultist Alt-Right would most likely be Homosexual and have an interest in Nazism, (since many of Hitler's original elite were homosexuals, before the Night Of The Long Knives, and that the Occultist / Nazi Link - including Crowelyism - was part of the 1960's seeding of New Age ideas into the SF Area, and, as such, was part of homosexual and hippie culture), and that the TRS Guys and Richard Spencer were deeply-loathed by the Channers, which eventuated in an all-out war earlier this year - I'd guess this was a deliberate Esoteric Occultist prank on the Chans by someone in that clique.

The complete reversal and gender-swap of the hieroglyph strikes me as too deliberate. I can see how it would amuse a Crowleyist to know they've tricked everyone into focusing their thoughts not the creation of new life, but its polar opposite.

Strange, hey?

Post: #613

(03-02-2017 08:43 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  ....

You lost me bro...
I don't get it.

Post: #614

(03-02-2017 06:07 PM)Mercenary Wrote:  Sounds interesting, but vague.
Can you elaborate on this ?

The communist goals were entered into the Congressional record by Albert Herlong, Jr.
(a Floridian who served in Congress from 1949-69
Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35; January 10, 1963
From "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen ).

20) Infiltrate the press. Get control of book review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

21) Gain control of key positions in radio, TV & motion pictures.

22) Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all form of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings," substitute shapeless, awkward, and meaningless forms.

23) Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."

24) Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

25) Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography, and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio and TV.

26) Present homosexuality, degeneracy, and promiscuity as "normal, natural, and healthy."

27) Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."
-------
38) Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand or treat.

39) Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40) Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41) Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

Post: #615

On the subject of Crowley and the establishment, an interesting tangent: there is a very good chance that Crowley might be George Bush's grandpa. Barbara Bush's mom Pauline was a free-spirited flapper socialite who had her Eat Pray Love phase in the Summer/Fall of 1924, leaving her husband for a long trip to Europe. She stayed with Crowley (who was then in his full sex magick phase) and her girlfriend Nellie in a south of France villa. Barbara was born nine month later in June 1925, and bears a striking resemblance to good old Aleister:





There are some allegations that Bill Clinton might have had some interesting oligarch lineage as well.

Post: #616

(03-02-2017 08:53 PM)Mercenary Wrote:  You lost me bro...
I don't get it.

All right. Very simply, this is what I think is going on:

There's obviously a worldwide power-struggle going on between two groups: the Nationalists and the Globalists - whom I'd more-rightly call the Globo-Socialists.

Remember, first and foremost, this is about Power, and maintaining it.

The Globo-Socialists think control of the populace is best achieved by Tyrannical Oppression of the populace, ruling through fear, and using debauchery to stop anyone - even down to the familial level - bonding together to fight their power. This is why they believe in the Satanic - the concept of being your own God destroys the organising, powerful force of shared religion.

The problem is, Socialism has been repeatedly shown to eventually lead to resistance / overthrow or social collapse at worst; or in the mid-range, eventual erosion by Captialism (as is currently happening to China); or, and, at best, you rule over a struggling, shrinking, poor population leading to lesser resources on offer for the ruling class.

Eventually a different line of thought would naturally-emerge because there's no point gaining power if you're guaranteed to lose it.

Suddenly, we seem to have a world-wide rise in Nationalist thought and Isolationism, all within the last 18 months, and suddenly, the power of Globo-Socialists to shame their opponents into submission has suddenly, for the first time in my relatively-long life, ceased to work.

I'd theorise that the Nationalists are similarly about maintaining power over the populace, except they think this is best achieved through offering the populace prosperity, comfort, security, family and faith.

Most people have simple goals from life, and, no reason to revolt if those needs are met. Yes, you'll always have your subversive elements, but if you keep a close watch, control can be maintained. The idea is to strengthen and unify community, so there's a commonly-agreed upon set of standards to make society function smoothly. Faith is the grease.

If you're listening, you'll notice that's what Trump is selling. 'Make America Great Again' is a rebranding of Exceptionalism.

And, for whatever reason, he was swept into office with little true resistance - and I know that seems like a ridiculous thing to say given how 2016 seemed like a war, but given the complete subversion of every major institution in my lifetime, that was far too easy, and, bizarrely, none of their counter-attacks worked.

And they should have. This is why the Left is melting down now. They thought their control was guaranteed, and absolute. They don't understand how Hillary could possibly have lost when they were on the right side of history.

This is why I talked about the deliberate seeding of ideas to the populace to help poison them against Globo-Socialist Agencies: such as Academia, Hollywood, the Media and Democrats. These kind of Psy-Ops were a large component in the eventual collapse of the USSR. Think of the memes and outrages over the last couple of years and how there seemed to be a snowballing effect. Whilst I'm sure many were genuine events, how many were triggered by PsyOp Actors to sway moderates to the right?

Perhaps you have one of your Actors undercover in the media, and they encourage a fellow writer / writers to attack a Famous Youtube Star unjustly, in a way that turns all of his followers again the media.

Perhaps you have one of your actors in law enforcement suggest to a police chief to tell her cops to 'stand down', assault other people and let students destroy and burn private property, pushing more moderates right?

Perhaps you plant the idea within a group to manipulate footage to present a shaky story of Pedophilia against a very popular gay man, which then pisses off his fanbase and makes them even more resolute to see his attackers fall.

Perhaps you find the most appalling Human Being imaginable, and encourage her to talk loudly and proudly about her dysfunctions under the guise of Feminism, to disgust women with the concept via association.

See how these small actions have huge results, and how easily you could sway events in your favour with just little pushes by actors here and there, as all of these Obvious Injustices and Ghastly Offences only strengthen your popularity and power? This is why I brought up False Kek, to show you how damn easy it is to influence people.

This could be why my sister and her 'spiritual' friends were whispering about the Illuminati in music back in 2014, and it seemed a fringe, ridiculous idea to most, but, by now, it seems mainstream.

It'd odd. Trump's passivity and unwillingness to enact power against his both the obvious enemies outside his party and the insideous ones within it has worried me lately, given what should be his very shaky grasp on power, but, well... it's starting to read to me as if he isn't at all afraid and in no hurry to act because he's already 100% sure of the outcome of events.

It's just my best guess as to what is happening, given the level of disinformation that started flying about last year. Perhaps I'm wrong, but, at the very least, I can't shake the feeling something was decided, on a societal scale.

Post: #617

Crowley used to bang dudes FFS......I mean that alone should be enough of a red flag not to take anything serious that came out of his mouth.

And the likes of Lavey & Marilyn Manson Satanism...... If you are going to go down that route at least have some edge like the Norwegians and burn down a church or commit a murder....
Not dress up like a woman on stage and plant fake hecklers in the crowd for more youtube hits.

Post: #618

Thanks for the explanation.
1 follow up question on something you said.

(03-02-2017 10:04 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  I'd theorise that the Nationalists are similarly about maintaining power over the populace, except they think this is best achieved through offering the populace prosperity, comfort, security, family and faith.

Do you see this as a BAD thing ?
I was not sure from the way you wrote it.

Post: #619

(03-02-2017 10:55 PM)Mercenary Wrote:  Do you see this as a BAD thing ?
I was not sure from the way you wrote it.

Since stability would involve keeping as unified a monoculture as possible, the danger is it turning to to xenophobia and racial divisions, whereas I've thought it's possible to get different populations unified if you remove the Socialists stoking fires of division first.

Trump seems genuinely-interested in elevating the black community, rather than pretending to, and seems to have little time for the more racist parts of the alt-right, given his statements about the killing of the Indians the other week.

The speech the other night was brilliant for its unifying tone - damn aspirational, hence the Left freaking out over it. He doesn't have an easy job ahead of him, but, like I said, he seems oddly-sure it's happening.

Post: #620

Dmitry Orlov's got a theory on the women fighting Trump:

https://www.facebook.com/dmitry.orlov.94...nref=story

Quote:Looks like Washington has just developed its own cult of Vestal Virgins. "The Vestals were freed of the usual social obligations to marry and bear children, and took a vow of chastity in order to devote themselves to the study and correct observance of state rituals that were off-limits to the male colleges of priests." [Wikipedia]

Post: #621

(02-12-2017 09:32 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

This is not even about a show anymore - sure art can be unsettling, but this has the feel of something much much darker.

1972:



1880:

Post: #622

(03-02-2017 10:04 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(03-02-2017 08:53 PM)Mercenary Wrote:  You lost me bro...
I don't get it.

All right. Very simply, this is what I think is going on:

There's obviously a worldwide power-struggle going on between two groups: the Nationalists and the Globalists - whom I'd more-rightly call the Globo-Socialists.

.

I'd theorise that the Nationalists are similarly about maintaining power over the populace, except they think this is best achieved through offering the populace prosperity, comfort, security, family and faith.
...

...

It'd odd. Trump's passivity and unwillingness to enact power against his both the obvious enemies outside his party and the insideous ones within it has worried me lately, given what should be his very shaky grasp on power, but, well... it's starting to read to me as if he isn't at all afraid and in no hurry to act because he's already 100% sure of the outcome of events.

.

Frankly the globalists have as good as won. They control the money power for centuries now - in some countries like the US only 2 centuries, other longer.

The communist conquest and collapse was all a ruse - check out Antony Sutton and Carroll Quigley. It was all controlled.

I am 99% sure that Putin works for them too. If he were truly powerful enough, then he could enact simply an interest-free money reform in Russia, he could stop paying compound interests to the globalist money-men. Why should the globalist never lose control (except maybe shortly during Stalin's time) for the entire duration of the USSR and then lose it all in the Soviet collapse? They also certainly control China - no one is so dumb as to transfer his entire technology and most of the productive capacity to a country if you don't control it fully.

So who are the nationalists? Orban and the few European states who have seized power and gave it to Brussels? Trump who is just a president within an entire massive power-structure? If he does anything resembling Andrew Jackson, Lincol or JFK then we might start talking real change. A Southern Wall won't change much, better trade deals and some jobs returning won't change the big plan either. The globalist will at worst take it as a setback and continue in 8 years.

So who are the remaining nationalists? Assad and a few failed African states I guess. Japan is certainly nationalistic as well as China or Israel, but those states work within the globalist frame, under the auspices of the money masters.

The elite is likely Satanic and I don't think there is any real competition between the Eyes Wide Shut society. Those guys hate competition at the top. They have kept that bond sacred for centuries now. At the lower levels they accept competition and one party or presidential candidate can fight for the glory to represent them.

Their system will collapse one day, but this won't happen via any of the current elections. I know that guys have high hopes for Trump, but he is at best someone who will only slow down the Orwellian march to the Brave New World. At worst he may have to make way more concessions than we would like to see. And I don't blame him - those boys are currently too powerful for one man to oppose them.

Personally I think that times will become darker in the next decades, but then lighter afterwards. Humanity will go on and civilization will advance. The globalits and their eternal super-controlled Brave New World system will not manifest as they are planning to do.

Not that this matters anyhow for each and everyone of us individually in this lifetime.

Post: #623

(03-03-2017 05:26 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  The elite is likely Satanic and I don't think there is any real competition between the Eyes Wide Shut society.

This is why faith is important.
It's the only thing that can help you stay sane & motivated in the face of so much evil.

Post: #624

(03-03-2017 05:26 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Frankly the globalists have as good as won. They control the money power for centuries now - in some countries like the US only 2 centuries, other longer.

My belief is more the Nationalists would have come from within the Globo-socialist Elite. Say they had been controlling money and power for centuries, why would their actions stay static? Why wouldn't their be arguments over best how to keep control? Wouldn't there be power struggles, and dethronements? Wouldn't there be generational schisms where the younger set scoff at the outdated traditions of the elder caste?

This is why I also find the concept of (((tribes))) being all on the same political and idealogical page overly-simplistic. I've seen even Lawn Bowls Clubs descend into bitter factional wars. People seem created to disagree by nature, and I don't see wealth, privilege and power changing this.

Post: #625

(03-03-2017 08:50 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(03-03-2017 05:26 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Frankly the globalists have as good as won. They control the money power for centuries now - in some countries like the US only 2 centuries, other longer.

My belief is more the Nationalists would have come from within the Globo-socialist Elite. Say they had been controlling money and power for centuries, why would their actions stay static? Why wouldn't their be arguments over best how to keep control? Wouldn't there be power struggles, and dethronements? Wouldn't there be generational schisms where the younger set scoff at the outdated traditions of the elder caste?

This is why I also find the concept of (((tribes))) being all on the same political and idealogical page overly-simplistic. I've seen even Lawn Bowls Clubs descend into bitter factional wars. People seem created to disagree by nature, and I don't see wealth, privilege and power changing this.

From what I understood is that they meet regularly in the following power structure:

1) Money power elite - set out the initial plan, decide major steps only combined - as soon as plans are made, they stick to it or face the wrath of other families

2) Scientific elite - those guys are tasked with the design, implementation and surveillance of the big plan - some of them can be upstarts, but most are from specific families - Huxleys, Darwin, Galtons, Wells, Bernays etc. - some of them now are also corporate bosses

3) Political elite - they are well down the ladder and are paid to take the tomatoes and rotten eggs while following orders

The system is in addition controlled by various lodges and organizations that ostracize everyone stepping out of line.

Actually it is a very ingenius creation that first took control of the money power and then the secret services. If you have those two you can cotrol anything - money and the license and ability to kill anyone.

The system is quite elaborate, but also simple. The only opposition coming would have to be one of the very top leading families, but I see no way one family could move on their own.

I frankly don't see any real infighting except for low-tier local politicians or stooges like Gaddafi, Saddam, Assad etc.

Especially if you read Antony Sutton and then the Reece Commisson on Foundations in the 1950s (available through americandeception.com - also a good site http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/) then you find out that the globalists have worked extremely well together - most of their work being done by the ambitious scientific elite. It is not so easy to control the entire world, destroy natural mindsets as one might believe. I remember reading the speech of Julian Huxley - first UNESCO president who claimed in 1945/46 that now the world will become a One World Government soon and people will abandon the nation state. Then they realized quickly that the people were not ready yet.

As for the Reece Commission - the young intelligent female Wallstreet lawyer let into the archives of the Ford foundation was so shocked by what she saw that she had to be hospitalized later on:





She did not believe in any conspiracy and Norman Dodd picked her specifically because she was certain that the foundations were benevolent rich people. But when she saw letters of some foundation elders writing commands to the US president to keep the WWI going for more than 2 years, she lost her marbles.

And as a reminder: THE STATED GOAL OF THE FOUNDATIONS WAS TO COMFORTABLY MERGE THE MARXIST STATES WITH THE US AND WEST! They knew of those plans well before the 1950s - those statements are on paper. We are already there since the youth now is more marxist than the former marxist states.

China is already existing in the future system that is desired by the big boys - though it will become even more totalitarian.

Either way - when you have trillions at your disposal then you can make it happen if you hire the best people, ensure control and adjust the plans continually.

Carroll Quigley - the mentor of Bill Clinton and history professor not only of Georgetown but also the CFR said that he marvelled at their system and was all for it. His books paint us an entirely different history than the mainstream view.

He said that there haven't been a presidential candidate they did not approve of since the 1860s. I guess some opposed them later on and we know how this ended.

But we will see how far they can push it.