Post: #1

Once in a while in person or on the TV (American shows mainly) I hear a girl talk about how she like's a guy's "cute ass".

I couldn't imagine going out with a girl that didn't have a cute ass.
Do a lot girls care about it to the extent that it's a deal breaker like it is for a lot of us?

Discuss.

Here's a video to get you thinking...prepare to laugh!It's a classic

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iYpboTjtoQ

Post: #2

Definitely not a deal breaker. A girl I was seeing a while back told me I had a nice ass but I'm not really sure what qualifications make a guy's ass nice or not. Girls wear tight clothes that show off their asses and guys wear baggier clothing where one can't see their ass. We all know girls don't care about looks as much as us and I'm positive no guy is going to care whether or not he has a good ass unless he's gay.

Post: #3

I'm glad you brought this up because, once upon a time, I spent some time investigating it. Without going into my drawn-out, unscientific methodology, I came to the conclusion that an ass is a plus to girls the same way that a strong chest or shoulders is to them, though on a smaller level. Arms, abs, chest, and back seem to rank higher on the list for them. I remember reading that, on some deep genetic level, a strong ass in a man communicates the ability to thrust more powerfully during sex and thus increase the likelihood of inseminating her successfully.

Ass is way more important to us--especially me--than it is for girls. No ass is straight up deal-breaker, maybe even a boner-killer, for me.

Post: #4

(06-28-2011 07:10 PM)wi30 Wrote:  I'm positive no guy is going to care whether or not he has a good ass unless he's gay.

LMAO!!! True. True.


Mixx

Post: #5

Mixx, your avatar pic disturbs me. LOL
That said, cute ass is welcome, but not everything.
IMO, I rather other features... lol.

Post: #6

Ass matters to women. After you bang a chick ask her what drew her attention. If your ass is sculpted from running, squats, lunges, ect. she'll tell you. They look at our butts like we look at their tits.

Post: #7

(06-28-2011 08:20 PM)Aliblahba Wrote:  Ass matters to women. After you bang a chick ask her what drew her attention. If your ass is sculpted from running, squats, lunges, ect. she'll tell you. They look at our butts like we look at their tits.

Ive heard this on many occasions. Girls seem to dig it, but its not a "im gonna go up and flirt with him" feature. They like it but it doesn't hit those "imma fuck him" buttons.

Chef In Jeans
A culinary website for men

Post: #8

Not deal breaker for them but it seems important foh shoh.

Post: #9

(06-28-2011 06:58 PM)Pilgrim37 Wrote:  Once in a while in person or on the TV (American shows mainly) I hear a girl talk about how she like's a guy's "cute ass".

I couldn't imagine going out with a girl that didn't have a cute ass.
Do a lot girls care about it to the extent that it's a deal breaker like it is for a lot of us?

Discuss.

Here's a video to get you thinking...prepare to laugh!It's a classic

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iYpboTjtoQ

What Women Prefer

Number 1

Post: #10

I have a big muscular ass, and I don't think it matters much per se. If you have one, a girl WILL notice and comment on it in due time.

Girls (and even guys) definitely notice though. My friend was dating a chick, and one time me and him were with her and friends at a bar, and I got up to get something. On my return, the girls admitted to talking about how big my ass was among their friends earlier, for half an hour. What... I had a "BMB" I was told, a "Black Man's Butt..." Most unathletic white guys have concave asses, and it looks weird. Anything more is probably just fine.

Post: #11

I think it's very important, on a subconscious level.
Your waist-to-hips ratio should be around 90%, which is supposed to indicate healthiness and draw women to you.
This means your ass circumference needs to be bigger than your gut circumference, but just a little bit bigger. A huge ass would be a drawback just like a huge gut.

Post: #12

for some..it does matter....they even want to lick it.

Post: #13

(06-29-2011 02:13 AM)K-man Wrote:  I think it's very important, on a subconscious level.
Your waist-to-hips ratio should be around 90%, which is supposed to indicate healthiness and draw women to you.
This means your ass circumference needs to be bigger than your gut circumference, but just a little bit bigger. A huge ass would be a drawback just like a huge gut.

False. A ratio of 80-90% matters, but is ultimately irrelevant, in comparison to other factors. Shoulder or Chest to waist ratio is most important, followed by BMI*. Basically, keep your waist trim and your shoulders broad.

*BMI is a flawed measure. I'm sure using a Lean Body Mass Index would obtain a superior result.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/art...4505000562
http://heldref-publications.metapress.co...1:119947,1
http://www.springerlink.com/content/w64m5675j6121316/
http://nbr.physiol.ox.ac.uk/~plc/pdf/lancet99.pdf

Post: #14

(06-28-2011 07:25 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  I remember reading that, on some deep genetic level, a strong ass in a man communicates the ability to thrust more powerfully during sex and thus increase the likelihood of inseminating her successfully.

I wish it were acceptable to just walk around in sweatpants showing off my bulge. I think that's a far better indicator of the thrusting they'll receive than anything else.

Post: #15

(06-30-2011 12:03 PM)CJ Wrote:  I wish it were acceptable to just walk around in sweatpants showing off my bulge. I think that's a far better indicator of the thrusting they'll receive than anything else.

Do it. When I was a corporate drone, I used to work with a guy that wore the tightest slacks I've ever seen in a respectable office-setting. They were made of some sort of space-age, iridescent, clingy material that made it painfully obvious he was rolling commando. To make matters worse, he wide-stanced 101 percent of the time, with a slight forward lean. It was like he was saying, "look at this fucking cock. I said look at it." The funniest part is that he was in the "Human Resources" department, that supposedly enforces rules of decorum and propriety.

It was revolting to me, but the women in the building called him "package man" and stared at his dick for the length of entire meetings (pun intended).

Post: #16

CJ... wear these:
http://www.underarmour.com/shop/us/en/pid1208118

with jeans that have a button fly, those UA things make your package look huge.

Post: #17

(06-30-2011 12:03 PM)CJ Wrote:  

(06-28-2011 07:25 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  I remember reading that, on some deep genetic level, a strong ass in a man communicates the ability to thrust more powerfully during sex and thus increase the likelihood of inseminating her successfully.

I wish it were acceptable to just walk around in sweatpants showing off my bulge. I think that's a far better indicator of the thrusting they'll receive than anything else.

actually I think a nice ass would imply this better. You could be over weight and out of shape with a big package and get winded in 2 minutes of good fucking.

A nice ass (and body in general) implies you work out and are fit, that means high stamina, which means you can power fuck for the long hall.

Thats assuming that female has the sense to put all that together though, which she probably doesn't.

@amistod

Yeah button fly jeans make you look like you have summer sausage in your pants, been rocking em for about a year now, me gusta.

Chef In Jeans
A culinary website for men

Post: #18

Tuth, that's a hilarious story. I used to work in an office too, but with nothing but women and one other guy (shipping man) I definitely should've tried that. Course I was "happy" in an LTR at the time and hadn't yet studied game. Oops.

(06-30-2011 04:38 PM)Chad Daring Wrote:  

(06-30-2011 12:03 PM)CJ Wrote:  

(06-28-2011 07:25 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  I remember reading that, on some deep genetic level, a strong ass in a man communicates the ability to thrust more powerfully during sex and thus increase the likelihood of inseminating her successfully.

I wish it were acceptable to just walk around in sweatpants showing off my bulge. I think that's a far better indicator of the thrusting they'll receive than anything else.

actually I think a nice ass would imply this better. You could be over weight and out of shape with a big package and get winded in 2 minutes of good fucking.

Oh that's entirely possible, but I think if it were socially acceptable to have both exposed, women would spend most of their time staring at penises.

Post: #19

well i do care a lot about the ass.. i always take a look,if is not good then it can put me a bit down but not a deal breaker

Post: #20

I think girls care a lot about the ass on a man, I've said this before but I'll say it again,

For girls, starting with the most important, non-facial physical features are ranked

1. Height
2. Shoulders/Waist ratio
3. Ass
4. Abs


On any given dance night there's like a 50% chance of a girl finding a reason to slap or touch my ass while I dance... one SNL told me "she could bounce a quarter off that ass". Girls notice and they like it a lot.


Now, how would men rank a woman's non-facial physical features?

1. Hip/Waist ratio
2. Ass
3. Breasts
4. Height


What do others think?

Post: #21

Ha! Yup, that's exactly the order of importance for me on a woman. Funny how men and women are EXTREME OPPOSITES when it comes to height: women see it as extreme high value, while men see it as low value and could care less.

Shakira is only 4'11 in height (1.5m). But I don't think that would stop any man from hittin' it!

But if you take a good looking guy, with a six-pack, broad shoulders, and only 4'11" (1.50m) in height, and he'll have lots of pushback from females.



Mixx

Post: #22

I co-sign Mixx's statement. I know some guys who are 6'8 with minimal game and scooping lots of women just on a basis of the woman being wow'ed by their giganticism.

I've been around them and these guys don't spit anything special. It's very easy to close someone who has their jaw out.

Now, my shorter spars i.e 5'8..their game has to be air-tight in order to scoop an equal amount.

Again, I've experienced similar results when I bulk up and tighten up my frame.

Now, I insist that having a strong looking muscular body helps game greatly.

Human beings are still sexual creatures regardless of this 'game' that is needed etc.

Men like a woman who has a fertile looking body (young, wrinkle free looking skin, nice ass, legs, hip to waist ratio and big tits).

Women like men who represent a fertile male. This means that if she were to reproduce for him, he would be able to protect her and his offspring would be healthy and be able to continue her gene line.

It's all about self preservation. Human beings have two basic rules on this planet.

Rule number one: Don't die. You can't fcuk if you are dead.

Rule number two: Reproduce with the best mate that can further your offspring the most.

On a biological level for women, that would be a tall, strong looking man.

Height is a great deterrent in nature. How often does a giraffe get attacked?

Strong looking doesn't mean he has to be bloated off of steroids. The steroid look isn't really natural anyway. It's the same with a woman with silicone 52 double G tits. They mesmerise you initially but there is something inside you that is turned off by that.

Strong looking just means that you have a nice strong body, broad shoulders, big chest, tight abs, big arms, good legs.

Couple that with game and you can't go wrong...in ANY country with human females.

This is tried and tested and I have gamed in several different countries, and also against many different cultures.

Post: #23

Quote:On a biological level for women, that would be a tall, strong looking man.

Height is a great deterrent in nature. How often does a giraffe get attacked?

This is debatable. If height were such an advantage for men, the planet of humans would be much taller as a result.


On the contrary, tall men are probably LESS likely to survive, for a variety of reasons:

1. Tall men are more likely to suffer health complications (i'm pretty sure this is true, and I should ask my doctor roommate why this is), require more food to survive, etc.
2. Tall men are easily singled out and attacked by other men (I bet this is the #1 reason men aren't tall)
3. In wars, being small is a genuine advantage, while being tall is a huge liability.


I think women prefer tall men because height, despite it's lower chances of survival, is still a major indicator of social status. And social status is what women are ultimately attracted to.

Post: #24

(07-28-2011 10:38 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

Quote:On a biological level for women, that would be a tall, strong looking man.

Height is a great deterrent in nature. How often does a giraffe get attacked?

This is debatable. If height were such an advantage for men, the planet of humans would be much taller as a result.


On the contrary, tall men are probably LESS likely to survive, for a variety of reasons:

1. Tall men are more likely to suffer health complications (i'm pretty sure this is true, and I should ask my doctor roommate why this is), require more food to survive, etc.
2. Tall men are easily singled out and attacked by other men (I bet this is the #1 reason men aren't tall)
3. In wars, being small is a genuine advantage, while being tall is a huge liability.


I think women prefer tall men because height, despite it's lower chances of survival, is still a major indicator of social status. And social status is what women are ultimately attracted to.

That's nonsense about health complications. Why would a tall man suffer more health complications? I've never heard that in my puff. I am talking about a man who is 6'2 here or maybe 6'1 not 7'8.
And being tall is not the same as being big. I know tall guys who eat like birds and then I know shorter guys who eat like trucks.
A guy 5'8 weighing 220 pounds of lean muscle will need more food than a 6'5 guy weighing 165 pounds of lean muscle.

It's not about social status. Height is intimidating. Put two men side by side with proportional bodies. The taller one will be more intimidating to attack than the shorter one.

Look at the evolution of man (if you believe in evolution). Men used to walk on all fours and began walking upright. It helps with foraging and finding food and it is also a deterrent to predators attacking something that is beyond eye level as opposed to something on eye level.

Again this is within reason. Being too tall can be a liability and being too short can also be a liability.

Post: #25

(07-28-2011 10:38 AM)Samseau Wrote:  I think women prefer tall men because height, despite it's lower chances of survival, is still a major indicator of social status. And social status is what women are ultimately attracted to.

We all have different theories on why women are attracted to height. Mine has more to do with taking shortcuts. Height is an easy, though often problematic, reference point for determining whether a man has strength, which is what I'd argue women are--at the very base level--attracted to, in one form or another. Social status equals strength. Money equals strength. Height is simply a quantifiable, concrete measure of a man, just like income. Girls are mentally lazy and don't want to do the work that they're supposed to do to determine whether a man is genetically superior.

This is why you see such a focus on height in the online-dating world. In the absence of the sort of nuanced social interaction needed to make a real assessment, girls fall back on the numbers.