Post: #176

(12-03-2015 01:52 AM)kaotic Wrote:  

(12-03-2015 01:47 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  ^"Motive doesn't matter. All that matters is that he was able to get a gun"

Amazing stupidly.

Literally sheer stupidity this is the brain dead left.

That has to be the worst argument I've heard.

BUT...but...but he got a gun !

So ? An article just came out that Americans bought so many guns on black friday that it could arm a small nation.

You don't see those people shooting others.

It's what's behind the trigger (IE human ideology) that fucking matters, not the goddamn gun.

It could be a gun, knife, stapler or TV remote control used as a weapon, it's the cultist mentality that drives this shit.

Post: #177

(12-03-2015 08:01 AM)YossariansRight Wrote:  

(12-03-2015 01:52 AM)kaotic Wrote:  

(12-03-2015 01:47 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  ^"Motive doesn't matter. All that matters is that he was able to get a gun"

Amazing stupidly.

Literally sheer stupidity this is the brain dead left.

That has to be the worst argument I've heard.

BUT...but...but he got a gun !

So ? An article just came out that Americans bought so many guns on black friday that it could arm a small nation.

You don't see those people shooting others.

It's what's behind the trigger (IE human ideology) that fucking matters, not the goddamn gun.

It could be a gun, knife, stapler or TV remote control used as a weapon, it's the cultist mentality that drives this shit.

What I wouldn't give to see someone, anyone, incite mass panic by going on a spree with an office stapler.

Post: #178

   

Post: #179

Shooters appear to be Muslims. Meaning, this story will be quickly buried.

Post: #180

Argentine media is reporting the name and ethnicity of the two killed, but nothing of the third captured alive.

Post: #181

#victimsofjihadmatter

Post: #182

Haha, it's hilarious. I'm in Asia now so when I woke up and heard of this I went to the BBC site and at that time there were still no official announcements as to the identity of the shooters. The shooting was a huge headline on the BBC site, dwarfing all the rest.

Then, a few hours later once the identity of the shooters was released, the story was instantly dropped into one of numerous sub-lines towards the bottom of the page. That's right: by far the most important development in the life of a shooting story, the identity of the perpetrators, caused the BBC not to spike coverage of the incident, but to immediately kill it. Welcome to the gulag, comrades!

Edit: Saw this hilarious comment on another site:

Quote:Muslim gunfire eruption is a force of nature like an earthquake. You never know when and where it might erupt. We need a scale like the Richter Scale to measure it. You could name it after a Muslim scientist – maybe clock boy? Like the Richter Scale it would be logarithmic so the 200,000 dead in the Syrian Civil War would be a 6 or a 7 but yesterday’s “eruption” would only be a 2 or a 3. The person giving the international weather could announce the day’s eruptions all over the globe.

Post: #183

If they shot without shouting "allahu akbar" it doesn't count as a muslim terror attack.

Post: #184

^Shooting up a planned parenthood and being a tired old white guy with a busted up cross hanging off his shack in the woods qualifies for Christian terrorism though.

Post: #185

(12-03-2015 11:18 AM)Hades Wrote:  ^Shooting up a planned parenthood and being a tired old white guy with a busted up cross hanging off his shack in the woods qualifies for Christian terrorism though.

Of course it does, it fits the leftist/SJW narrative.

Post: #186

(12-03-2015 01:00 AM)Drazen Wrote:  Yeah, it was pretty amazing, I think I had 3 people on my facebook declare that he was white not even two hours into the shooting and how he should be named as a terrorist. After Barack and Hilary started going off about gun control they started going off about gun control. After that NY newspaper coming out tomorrow with the presidential candidates (probably their interns) tweeting prayers and condolences, they started going off about how action needs to be taken NOW.

Interestingly no mention of anything related to islam after those news stories broke. Whatsoever. Its not even worth arguing, its just funny to see. Then a bunch of their friends are talking about how gun nuts are destroying the country and other red herrings.

Say what you will about Heartiste, but his comments on the media are spot on.

Post: #187

(12-03-2015 09:30 AM)thoughtgypsy Wrote:  Shooters appear to be Muslims. Meaning, this story will be quickly buried.

Info about the suspects only will be quickly buried.

In their place will be a barrage of articles on "workplace violence" and calls for beefing up HR departments so they can prevent it. Writers and government drones will blame "lack of funding" for this tragedy, saying if only we had more office orientations and "outreach," certain workers would not feel so alienated.

You'll also get those opinion pieces where fat, white writers appear to be on their knees, crying "What did we do to make them hate us?!?!"

Never underestimate the dysfunction or the stupidity of the American media and their obsession with moral preening. However bad you think it is, it's worse.

Post: #188

"Cool rifle Syed, want to bring it to the White House?"

Post: #189

(12-03-2015 12:16 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  In their place will be a barrage of articles on "workplace violence" and calls for beefing up HR departments so they can prevent it. Writers and government drones will blame "lack of funding" for this tragedy, saying if only we had more office orientations and "outreach," certain workers would not feel so alienated.

Good call. The Muslim status in the stories I've read today keeps getting mentioned in passing and quickly brushed away. The two narratives I keep seeing are that this is unusually-disciplined, military-style 'workplace violence', and gun control.

Quote:Federal authorities say that the two assault rifles and two handguns used in the San Bernardino massacre were all purchased legally in the United States — two of them by someone who’s now under investigation.

Meredith Davis of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives says investigators are now working to make a connection to the last legal purchaser.

She says all four guns were bought four years ago but she’s not saying whether they were purchased out of state or how and when they got into the hands of the two shooters.

Davis says California requires paperwork when guns change hands privately but many other states don’t.

On social media, there was brief discussion of this event by people I know, then the moment his Muslim status was revealed, radio silence. They've moved on to other things, seemingly-even uninterested in trying to virtue signal 'Not All Muslims!' Odd.

Post: #190

What is the true motive/thinking behind this pathological need to exculpate Muslims/Islam from any blame? I just can't seem to get my head around it. It's clear that the media and the Obama administration are very sympathetic to this cause. Is this part of Roosh's thesis that the elite hate America? In-group/out-group status signalling? I dare say no one in the media has any meaningful exposure (or will have any meaningful exposure) to Muslims by virtue of the fact that they likely live near and associate with white upper middle-class people only (or upper class). It just defies all logic.

Post: #191

(12-03-2015 12:16 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(12-03-2015 09:30 AM)thoughtgypsy Wrote:  Shooters appear to be Muslims. Meaning, this story will be quickly buried.

Info about the suspects only will be quickly buried.

In their place will be a barrage of articles on "workplace violence" and calls for beefing up HR departments so they can prevent it. Writers and government drones will blame "lack of funding" for this tragedy, saying if only we had more office orientations and "outreach," certain workers would not feel so alienated.

You'll also get those opinion pieces where fat, white writers appear to be on their knees, crying "What did we do to make them hate us?!?!"

Never underestimate the dysfunction or the stupidity of the American media and their obsession with moral preening. However bad you think it is, it's worse.

Not to mention, the shooters will be classified as white. Muslims are considered a protected class when they're victims, but white when the FBI counts them in the mass shooter statistics. When the next mass shooting event occurs, talking pundits will say there is a wave of white mass shooters.

Post: #192

(12-03-2015 01:13 PM)Menace Wrote:  What is the true motive/thinking behind this pathological need to exculpate Muslims/Islam from any blame? I just can't seem to get my head around it. It's clear that the media and the Obama administration are very sympathetic to this cause. Is this part of Roosh's thesis that the elite hate America? In-group/out-group status signalling? I dare say no one in the media has any meaningful exposure (or will have any meaningful exposure) to Muslims by virtue of the fact that they likely live near and associate with white upper middle-class people only (or upper class). It just defies all logic.

Ingroup plus virtue signaling. Pretty much all human social groups either require you to do something painful to your dick or openly profess an illogical belief in order to prove your commitment. Being the "right sort of person" in upper middle class+ circles in America requires you to state that you think all races and religions are equally wonderful, except for whites and christianity.

Post: #193

White male shootings are worth more-- another example of white men getting more than their fair share.

Post: #194

(12-03-2015 01:24 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  The media narrative is already being put into place.

I noticed that at the Washington Post, and on Wikipedia, Syed Farook is only being referenced as "a health inspector for the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health."

The Boston Globe's political columnist Michael Cohen, meanwhile, sent out this Tweet, which Twitter member "graaaaaagh dot com" cleverly juxtaposed with something he Tweeted in June when there was another mass shooting.



Addendum: In the comments under a Brietbart news story, people are already saying this has been downgraded to "workplace violence." This was also the case with the Fort Hood shootings.

The shameless, double-faced nature of Talmudic Jews is just all-too-common. I live in Mass, and I've spoken to a very large sampling of them. My estimates are that at least 40% of them are just like our friend Mr. Cohen here. It's probably over 60% though.

This is why sayings like "The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you," were invented.

Thank God the internet allows easy documentation of these traitors.

Post: #195

(12-03-2015 01:28 PM)BortimusPrime Wrote:  

(12-03-2015 01:13 PM)Menace Wrote:  What is the true motive/thinking behind this pathological need to exculpate Muslims/Islam from any blame? I just can't seem to get my head around it. It's clear that the media and the Obama administration are very sympathetic to this cause. Is this part of Roosh's thesis that the elite hate America? In-group/out-group status signalling? I dare say no one in the media has any meaningful exposure (or will have any meaningful exposure) to Muslims by virtue of the fact that they likely live near and associate with white upper middle-class people only (or upper class). It just defies all logic.

Ingroup plus virtue signaling. Pretty much all human social groups either require you to do something painful to your dick or openly profess an illogical belief in order to prove your commitment. Being the "right sort of person" in upper middle class+ circles in America requires you to state that you think all races and religions are equally wonderful, except for whites and christianity.

Completely disagree. This self hatred is a very recent phenomenon and is completely against human nature, as it threatens the very survival of your group. We know it's recent because if it wasn't whites would have been extinct for a long time by now. I also cannot think of a single other culture that has ever purposely channeled hostility against itself rather than against outgroups. Such a behavior is simply too detrimental to survival to spontaneously occur de novo.

Rather, this is clearly a case of engineered subversion inflicted on whites by a hostile outgroup.

Post: #196

(12-03-2015 01:49 PM)Fast Eddie Wrote:  

(12-03-2015 01:28 PM)BortimusPrime Wrote:  

(12-03-2015 01:13 PM)Menace Wrote:  What is the true motive/thinking behind this pathological need to exculpate Muslims/Islam from any blame? I just can't seem to get my head around it. It's clear that the media and the Obama administration are very sympathetic to this cause. Is this part of Roosh's thesis that the elite hate America? In-group/out-group status signalling? I dare say no one in the media has any meaningful exposure (or will have any meaningful exposure) to Muslims by virtue of the fact that they likely live near and associate with white upper middle-class people only (or upper class). It just defies all logic.

Ingroup plus virtue signaling. Pretty much all human social groups either require you to do something painful to your dick or openly profess an illogical belief in order to prove your commitment. Being the "right sort of person" in upper middle class+ circles in America requires you to state that you think all races and religions are equally wonderful, except for whites and christianity.

Completely disagree. This self hatred is a very recent phenomenon and is completely against human nature, as it threatens the very survival of your group. We know it's recent because if it wasn't whites would have been extinct for a long time by now. I also cannot think of a single other culture that has ever purposely channeled hostility against itself rather than against outgroups. Such a behavior is simply too detrimental to survival to spontaneously occur de novo.

Rather, this is clearly a case of engineered subversion inflicted on whites by a hostile outgroup.

It's not self-hatred by any means. White liberals see their self-flagellation as a christ-like behavior placing themselves on a level of holiness above all others. It's the secular version of those passive agressive church ladies who make a huge display of how virtuous they were while clucking at you for every little sin.

Post: #197

San Bernardino Police Chief Jarrod Burguan said investigators were "reasonably confident" that Syed Rizwan Farook, a 28-year-old US citizen, and Tashfeen Malik, 27, were the suspects who opened fire Wednesday on a company event at the Inland Regional Center — a county organization that provides services to the disabled. Farook was born in Illinois to Pakistani parents, according to The New York Times, and he had worked at the San Bernardino County health department for five years.

The woman was his baby momma and they left their infant child with her mother...

Post: #198

WSJ (a strongly cuckservative establishment newspaper) is frantically running stories about "the motives of the attack still being a mystery" and getting slammed in the comments:

https://www.facebook.com/wsj/posts/10153863860198128

Best comment:

Quote:Workplace violence caused by climate change of course....

Post: #199

Another golden comment

Quote:Jonah Goldberg: If terrorism isn't related to Islam, how could insulting Islam create more terrorism

Post: #200

Can we consider white people who do mass shootings to be terrorists, or do you have to be a Muslim to qualify? What about the old white guy who shot up Planned Parenthood in Colorado, was he a Christian terrorist?