(11-19-2015 02:05 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Then, if you have to fight, you will be a position of strength and be fighting around like-minded men working towards a noble and just goal. Poland just elected the next Nazi party of Europe, and they are right next door so if you're in Germany I would sell your house before the housing market's collapse (sell it at bonus to the Gov to be turned into a refugee house if no one else is buying) and relocate your family to Poland.

This is a bit of an exaggeration. The party Poland elected, PiS, is just a regular "mainstream" rightist party. It had been in power for several years in the mid 2000s. And frankly, far from being anywhere near "Nazi," they are in fact very much cucking! on the refugees.

After the Paris attacks one of the PiS ministers spoke out of tune and said implementing the quotas was now "impossible" but was quickly shut down by the female Prime Minister, who made it clear the quotas were still very much happening albeit with "strict monitoring." Which we all know is empty words, worth less than a pile of pig shit. Poland is very much still cucked!, and their media is 100% under bolshevik control.

(11-19-2015 04:51 AM)Fast Eddie Wrote:  

(11-19-2015 02:05 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Then, if you have to fight, you will be a position of strength and be fighting around like-minded men working towards a noble and just goal. Poland just elected the next Nazi party of Europe, and they are right next door so if you're in Germany I would sell your house before the housing market's collapse (sell it at bonus to the Gov to be turned into a refugee house if no one else is buying) and relocate your family to Poland.

This is a bit of an exaggeration. The party Poland elected, PiS, is just a regular "mainstream" rightist party. It had been in power for several years in the mid 2000s. And frankly, far from being anywhere near "Nazi," they are in fact very much cucking! on the refugees.

After the Paris attacks one of the PiS ministers spoke out of tune and said implementing the quotas was now "impossible" but was quickly shut down by the female Prime Minister, who made it clear the quotas were still very much happening albeit with "strict monitoring." Which we all know is empty words, worth less than a pile of pig shit. Poland is very much still cucked!, and their media is 100% under bolshevik control.

http://www.se.pl/wiadomosci/polityka/min...28713.html

I did not follow the recent development in Poland despite living here (seldom do), but you are right.

This statement that one minister made was even lame - he just stated that seeing the dangers in other European countries, that we should open our eyes to it and make decisions accordingly. Even for that statement was he instantly criticized.

Another sign why you cannot really vote yourself out of it. PiS is certainly more right, but the actual differences to the previous PO party is tiny in terms of economic policy, slavery to the EU. They even have similar globalist NGOs and consultants like the central bank president.

Proof again, that you can vote all you want, but will still get the same crap served for dinner:



Heck - I would not be surprised that even after entire Europe has elected real Neonazis and the US managed to elect Donald Trump, that it will be business as usual and the parties will claim that migrants espouse good Aryan values.

According to Carroll Quigley the last non-globalist selected candidates in the US presidential elections were to be found in the 1850s. Everyone after that was fully controlled, while dissenters get the Kennedy treatment from multiple directions.

(11-19-2015 04:51 AM)Fast Eddie Wrote:  

(11-19-2015 02:05 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Then, if you have to fight, you will be a position of strength and be fighting around like-minded men working towards a noble and just goal. Poland just elected the next Nazi party of Europe, and they are right next door so if you're in Germany I would sell your house before the housing market's collapse (sell it at bonus to the Gov to be turned into a refugee house if no one else is buying) and relocate your family to Poland.

This is a bit of an exaggeration. The party Poland elected, PiS, is just a regular "mainstream" rightist party. It had been in power for several years in the mid 2000s. And frankly, far from being anywhere near "Nazi," they are in fact very much cucking! on the refugees.

After the Paris attacks one of the PiS ministers spoke out of tune and said implementing the quotas was now "impossible" but was quickly shut down by the female Prime Minister, who made it clear the quotas were still very much happening albeit with "strict monitoring." Which we all know is empty words, worth less than a pile of pig shit. Poland is very much still cucked!, and their media is 100% under bolshevik control.

Yeah I was just joking around with the Nazi quip. Regardless the Polish people don't want refugees, so if their new government doesn't do it the people will find someone else to do the job. I wouldn't be worried about a place like Poland. It's got protests approaching close to 100K almost already.

(11-19-2015 05:41 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Yeah I was just joking around with the Nazi quip. Regardless the Polish people don't want refugees, so if their new government doesn't do it the people will find someone else to do the job. I wouldn't be worried about a place like Poland. It's got protests approaching close to 100K almost already.

You'd be hard pressed to find a single country where the people want refugees. I thought it was well established by now that what the people want is completely and utterly irrelevant.

(11-19-2015 05:53 AM)Fast Eddie Wrote:  

(11-19-2015 05:41 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Yeah I was just joking around with the Nazi quip. Regardless the Polish people don't want refugees, so if their new government doesn't do it the people will find someone else to do the job. I wouldn't be worried about a place like Poland. It's got protests approaching close to 100K almost already.

You'd be hard pressed to find a single country where the people want refugees. I thought it was well established by now that what the people want is completely and utterly irrelevant.

No, that's not true. The people in France, Sweden, Germany, and Britain by and large are indifferent or accepting of Refugees entering the country. There is a significant minority of the population opposed to mass immigration, but I seriously doubt it goes over 40% in any one country. Still, given the way European parliament's work, a 40% vote can mean a huge readjustment that the current leftists in power do not want to deal with.

In Poland, it looks like at least 60% or more are opposed, which means they won't be able to prevent a right-wing takeover.

(11-19-2015 06:02 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(11-19-2015 05:53 AM)Fast Eddie Wrote:  

(11-19-2015 05:41 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Yeah I was just joking around with the Nazi quip. Regardless the Polish people don't want refugees, so if their new government doesn't do it the people will find someone else to do the job. I wouldn't be worried about a place like Poland. It's got protests approaching close to 100K almost already.

You'd be hard pressed to find a single country where the people want refugees. I thought it was well established by now that what the people want is completely and utterly irrelevant.

No, that's not true. The people in France, Sweden, Germany, and Britain by and large are indifferent or accepting of Refugees entering the country. There is a significant minority of the population opposed to mass immigration, but I seriously doubt it goes over 40% in any one country. Still, given the way European parliament's work, a 40% vote can mean a huge readjustment that the current leftists in power do not want to deal with.

In Poland, it looks like at least 60% or more are opposed, which means they won't be able to prevent a right-wing takeover.

This is actually a common misconception. For example, take a look at these polls, taken in 2014 before the refugee crisis ever got underway. It can only have swung even more in the anti-immigrant direction since then.
http://www.pewglobal.org/2014/05/12/chap...migration/

Or look at the USA. Not only has the majority of the population been opposed to mass immigration for decades, but this opposition holds firm across all possible demographic groups. Republican Americans don't want mass immigration. Democrat Americans don't want mass immigration. Black Americans don't want mass immigration. Hispanic Americans don't want mass immigration. The only outliers are Asians, who represent less than 5% of the population and can frankly shut the fuck up. Even with them I'd imagine it's mostly the subcontinentals that pushes it over 50%.

http://www.fairus.org/facts/public-opinion

http://www.vdare.com/posts/general-socia...immigrants

The point here is that nobody wants mass immigration. Nobody has ever wanted mass immigration. But we have been getting mass immigration for decades, nevertheless, and will continue to get it good and hard. I think it's high time to wake up to this fact. Democracy has been dead for a long, long time.

(11-19-2015 06:16 AM)Fast Eddie Wrote:  The point here is that nobody wants mass immigration. Nobody has ever wanted mass immigration. But we have been getting mass immigration for decades, nevertheless, and will continue to get it good and hard. I think it's high time to wake up to this fact. Democracy has been dead for a long, long time.

Some things maybe just happen. Still, even if something happen what nobody really wants then it need some hard actions. Thats what people lack these days. Everything has to be nice and smooth. Never offend anybody and do the "right" thing.

Sometimes you have to be strict, hard and make decisions that not please everybody. This means, send people home even when the media shows pictures of crying women and children. To protect borders when maybe some people will die at them. I mean not shoot people, just stop them at the border.
And it also need money to send to those countries that the governments there keep track that the people stay there.

If we don't stand for it and make some hard decisions now, there will be no safe place left. There will be no freedom and at the end also no place to help those that really need the help. The world is not fair. The world is cruel and when you make the boat to full and it sinks to the ground. Nobody gain anything at all.

(11-19-2015 06:16 AM)Fast Eddie Wrote:  The point here is that nobody wants mass immigration. Nobody has ever wanted mass immigration. But we have been getting mass immigration for decades, nevertheless, and will continue to get it good and hard. I think it's high time to wake up to this fact. Democracy has been dead for a long, long time.

If your quoted polls are accurate, then why did the Greeks not vote in Golden Dawn? It's not like Syriza promised to curb immigration.

The fact is, even if the residents want less immigration, they do not believe immigration is less important than electing a party which guarantees them free shit. So nevermind the politicians being bought out; the people are easily bought and paid for by some shitty government jobs or welfare programs.

Also, it doesn't seem like any European countries can sustain a true left-wing totalitarian state except for France, Britain, Germany, and Sweden.

The other countries have too many problems that make such an effort impossible. Greece, for example, is bankrupt and coasting on bailout money 24/7. Once that money dries up Greece will blow up Yugoslavia style. Italy is divided between the North and South. Poland has people that actually care about each other, and Hungary has already shown it doesn't give a fuck what anyone else thinks.

Then there are places like Finland or Iceland, which are so far on the outskirts of this mess they probably will miss out on the brunt of the damage.

Regardless, the idea that the elites need to use a coercive method to kill Europe is not true. They can easily get the people to go along because the Leftists are very good with their brainwashing. And this is why I do not believe in Elites having total power; the people can technically get rid of bad leaders and the global elites will not be able to stop it unless they rig the election or throw a coup.

(11-18-2015 11:16 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  I just heard back in my hometown in Australia, with absolutely no concept of inappropriate timing, the Muslim community is expecting a land handout from the town council to build a mosque 'Islamic Centre'.

The townspeople are horrified; the council is bending over and spreading its cheeks, the head of the muslim community is stating that Islam is 'a friendly religion', and, of course, leftist women are labelling any critics as 'phobic'.

Another one in a town an hour away was just announced yesterday.

Take a camera, a spade and a dead pig.

Go on site, dig a hole, bury the pig and take photos.

Send to the media from the email "[email protected]

Hey Presto - no more mosque.

(11-19-2015 06:41 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(11-19-2015 06:16 AM)Fast Eddie Wrote:  The point here is that nobody wants mass immigration. Nobody has ever wanted mass immigration. But we have been getting mass immigration for decades, nevertheless, and will continue to get it good and hard. I think it's high time to wake up to this fact. Democracy has been dead for a long, long time.

If your quoted polls are accurate, then why did the Greeks not vote in Golden Dawn? It's not like Syriza promised to curb immigration.

The fact is, even if the residents want less immigration, they do not believe immigration is less important than electing a party which guarantees them free shit. So nevermind the politicians being bought out; the people are easily bought and paid for by some shitty government jobs or welfare programs.

Also, it doesn't seem like any European countries can sustain a true left-wing totalitarian state except for France, Britain, Germany, and Sweden.

The other countries have too many problems that make such an effort impossible. Greece, for example, is bankrupt and coasting on bailout money 24/7. Once that money dries up Greece will blow up Yugoslavia style. Italy is divided between the North and South. Poland has people that actually care about each other, and Hungary has already shown it doesn't give a fuck what anyone else thinks.

Then there are places like Finland or Iceland, which are so far on the outskirts of this mess they probably will miss out on the brunt of the damage.

Regardless, the idea that the elites need to use a coercive method to kill Europe is not true. They can easily get the people to go along because the Leftists are very good with their brainwashing. And this is why I do not believe in Elites having total power; the people can technically get rid of bad leaders and the global elites will not be able to stop it unless they rig the election or throw a coup.

There may still be places in Europe which are more resistant to the leftist infection than others, however, even countries like Hungary still hang in the balance. Don't forget that Lukacs was one of the founding fathers of the Frankfurt School - his influence and his disciples are still numerous and influential within Hungary. Orban was elected because the current voting generation recognises that the alternative is frightful. However, the structures, people, and ideology of the left still has plenty of potential in Hungary, and any disillusionment with Orban could easily see a dramatic swing in the opposite direction. All these European countries, even the supposedly right wing Christian ones like Hungary and perhaps even Poland (as the generation that remembers the horrors of Soviet oppression die out, it is possible a more 'moderate' (I use the term pejoratively) voting block could come through) are balancing on a knife edge.

(11-19-2015 02:56 AM)JWLZG Wrote:  Make Love not War really took off.

Quote:A Muslim man stood blindfolded in the middle of Paris with a sign saying "I'm Muslim, but i'm told i'm a terrorist. I trust you, do you trust me? If yes, hug me". What happens next is beautiful. (Video credit: Ruptly) ‪#‎Today9‬

Another 68'er old fuck (in the thumbnail). That is a propaganda video. Don't think too much of it.

Regarding Poland, the PM said she would "honor the commitments" made by the previous government but would not accept any more "migrants."

http://www.dw.com/en/poland-turns-agains...a-18853820
http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com...nt-crisis/

@Samseau: I'm hearing turnout in the recent Greece election was very low.

And Eddie is right. The overwhelming majority in every EU country but Sweden was against more third world immigration. But as ramzpaul noted, most people think of politics as the weather. If they don't turn out, or if they vote the other way for other reasons, don't be surprised.

But that was all before the current stampede began, immigration is now the number one issue.

I respectfully disagree with the notion that many European people do in fact want/accept the refugees. Speaking only for Germany: I'd say 70% aren't happy with it and it will only show when you get them alone with a beer and they trust you.

The thing is these people are too brainwashed to make the connection between their voting choices and what they get out of it. There is no "Well, less immigrants, but everything else stays the same - party" in Germany.

You're either a right-wing, neonazi, low-life, selfhating scumbag or you welcome immigrants. That's the choice you got. (According to the narrative)
People aren't clever or informed enough to recognize that that is obviously not true. Because then they would have the option to save face (and job, kids and reputation) in public but then vote alt right in the booths. (I'm actually blessed with ONE family member who does exactly that) However, when you DON'T see through that charade there is a sort of cognitive dissonance going on, where they can't bring themselves to vote differently from what they make others (and themselves eventually) believe.

Don't underestimate the fear that is being instilled into Germans about voting right. Not only because of public opinion but because of what might actually happen when these parties gain power. (And dare I say, those concerns aren't completely baseless...)

I imagine the very same thing happening in Greece. I would love the insight of any Greek members here on what they are selling the public over there.
My guess is, that the narrative goes something like: "If you vote for golden dawn, we will lose the Euro, go bankrupt and people will be starving on the streets 4 weeks after that"

I don't think there is a single country in Europe with a majority which actually, honestly and with all mental clarity says: "Yes, let them all in. This is a good idea. Nothing bad will come from this."

It's just that they are being cleverly manipulated by means that have been discussed here at length. And that's why the opinion of the majority is not being translated into political action.

Don't forget the red pill - with politics as with women - is not about adding something to what you know. It's about forgetting and ignoring things that have been taught to you. So it is with the majority of Europeans. Deep inside they are fully rational, functional and healthy human beings. But they've been corrupted and indoctrinated an entire lifetime to act against their true nature. That's why they admit their concerns and fears to me only 6 beers deep and in privacy. But the next morning they wake up and vote for Merkel, because by then their inhibitions are back and they return to doing what they've been taught. Being a "good" citizen.

French President Francois Hollande Welcomes Refugees Despite Paris Attack

According to Hollande:

Quote:30,000 refugees will be welcomed over the next two years. Our country has the duty to respect this commitment,” explaining that they will undergo vigorous security checks.

Hollande noted that “some people say the tragic events of the last few days have sown doubts in their minds,” but called it a “humanitarian duty” to help those people

Watching my countrymen get slaughtered execution style would "sow doubts in my mind" too about the wisdom of letting more of these people into the country...

Acording to the DailyMail this was the female suicide bomber, a "well integrated inmigrant girl" nicknamed "The cowgirl".



According to some reports she yelled "help me" before exploding, so either was an unwilling human bomb, or was trying to get more policeman near her before exploding.

And last, the most important question....Would you bang?

Terrorist game must be similar to pimp game, and yet on another level entirely.

----------------------------------------

(11-19-2015 10:40 AM)Mekorig Wrote:  Acording to the DailyMail this was the female suicide bomber, a "well integrated inmigrant girl" nicknamed "The cowgirl".



According to some reports she yelled "help me" before exploding, so either was an unwilling human bomb, or was trying to get more policeman near her before exploding.

And last, the most important question....Would you bang?

Awwhh yeah. I can see how they thought she was blonde!

(11-19-2015 10:40 AM)Mekorig Wrote:  

According to some reports she yelled "help me" before exploding, so either was an unwilling human bomb, or was trying to get more policeman near her before exploding.

And last, the most important question....Would you bang?

"Would you bang" takes on a whole new meaning in this case.

I just saw the following on Unz.com

I think we all remember Charlie Hebdo, the leftist French "satirical" magazine that was targeted by Islamists earlier this year and sparked the inane "Je suis Charlie" posturing.

Well, it appears that shortly after the recent terrorist attack on the Russian plane that killed over 200, these motherfuckers published the following cartoons:



This obviously goes beyond mere satire and enters the territory of sheer gloating over a fresh tragedy. There is no "point" being made by this tasteless garbage.

So the Russians responded in kind:



Basically the captions say "Laughter extends life!” “Not in your case Gerard.”

Et voila, Paris happens a few days later. No comment.

(11-19-2015 06:02 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(11-19-2015 05:53 AM)Fast Eddie Wrote:  

(11-19-2015 05:41 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Yeah I was just joking around with the Nazi quip. Regardless the Polish people don't want refugees, so if their new government doesn't do it the people will find someone else to do the job. I wouldn't be worried about a place like Poland. It's got protests approaching close to 100K almost already.

You'd be hard pressed to find a single country where the people want refugees. I thought it was well established by now that what the people want is completely and utterly irrelevant.

No, that's not true. The people in France, Sweden, Germany, and Britain by and large are indifferent or accepting of Refugees entering the country. There is a significant minority of the population opposed to mass immigration, but I seriously doubt it goes over 40% in any one country. Still, given the way European parliament's work, a 40% vote can mean a huge readjustment that the current leftists in power do not want to deal with.

In Poland, it looks like at least 60% or more are opposed, which means they won't be able to prevent a right-wing takeover.

errr no.

There is a difference between being nice, believing our idiot politicians on migrant quotas and being indifferent.

You will find the city slickers being indifferent, the regular joe hateful of them and country folk being nice and welcoming. Farmers like to employ cheap labour, city slickers can hide from them but regular joe gets put through shit creek.

Most people are blissfully ignorant of immigration and then wonder why things become expensive, there are no-go zones, fewer jobs, more barriers to entry and crime.

Even now they're blissfully ignorant of this new migrant wave even with the recent events staring them right in the bloody face. It is ignorance and not an open arms welcome for the most part which can be attributed to the UK.

Can't say the same for the soft headed Europeans and their idiotic social policies. Namely France.

(11-19-2015 11:20 AM)Horus Wrote:  "Would you bang" takes on a whole new meaning in this case.

That was the idea. XD

WNB suicide girl. So sick and tired of girls doing that shit with their fingers in pics.

A Dutch article (I will give a brief summary under the copied text):

Op verschillende scholen in Nederland hebben leerlingen maandag de minuut stilte voor de slachtoffers van de aanslagen in Parijs verstoord. Ze riepen bijvoorbeeld 'Allahu akbar' (Allah is groot) of ze praatten respectloos door de herdenking heen. De Stichting School en Veiligheid, een organisatie die scholen kan adviseren, zegt dat vandaag na een bericht van het Reformatorisch Dagblad. Het is niet bekend of de verstoorders de aanslagen steunden of alleen baldadig waren.
De stichting kreeg verscheidene meldingen van leraren. Precieze aantallen kan de stichting niet geven. Omdat leraren verstoringen niet hoeven door te geven, kan de organisatie ook geen conclusies trekken over heel Nederland. Wel zegt de stichting dat de meldingen "niet alleen uit de Randstad en niet alleen van moslimscholen'' kwamen. Andere leerlingen vroegen zich af waarom er wel een minuut stilte was voor de slachtoffers in Parijs en waarom die er niet was bij andere bloedbaden.

De stichting raadt leraren aan om met leerlingen in gesprek te gaan. "Probeer hun wereldbeeld te verbreden. Vraag ze welke bronnen ze hebben gebruikt. Vraag door over hun standpunten en laat zien dat er ook andere standpunten zijn. Dan kun je ze kritischer maken'', zegt een woordvoerster. Ze voegt er aan toe: "Weinig mensen hebben goed zicht op wat er om een leerling heen gebeurt. Wat er thuis gebeurt, in de geloofswereld, in de wijk, op sociale media, waar jongeren onderling over praten. Dat geldt niet alleen voor leraren, maar bijvoorbeeld ook voor ouders. Als je het gesprek aangaat, krijgt je zicht op de invloeden op leerlingen.''

Nederlandse scholen hebben een brief gekregen met een uitleg wat ze moeten doen als ze denken dat hun leerlingen worden geronseld voor de jihad. "Er is geen reden voor paniek of iets anders. Scholen zijn alert, net als de hele samenleving. Mensen wilden weten wat ze zouden moeten doen als er vermoedens zijn. Het antwoord: meld het bij politie en gemeente, die nemen het over'', zegt een woordvoerster van de organisatie.

Translation (of the first paragraph):

On different schools in The Netherlands students have disturbed the minute of silence for the victims of the attacks in Paris. They screamed for example "Allahu Akbar" or they talked disrespectful throughout the the commemoration/minute of silence. This is being said by the organisation 'De Stichting School en Veiligheid', who advise schools.

It is not known whether the spoilers (=the students) supported the attacks or were just rowdy. The foundation received several reports of teachers. Because teacher aren't required to file these complaints, they can't draw a conclusion for the whole country.

The foundation said these reports didn't come solely from muslims schools en "de Randstad" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randstad). Other students wondered why there was a minute of silence for the victims in Paris and why there wasn't one for other massacres.

From then, the next 2 paragraphs, it's the usual thing about the fact that schools/teachers need to educate these students etc

I just wanted to show you guys another fine example of the "average", "moderate" and "non-extreme" muslims.
-------------
Another pic about our beloved moderates:

(11-19-2015 10:59 AM)Dan Woolf Wrote:  

(11-19-2015 06:41 AM)Samseau Wrote:  And this is why I do not believe in Elites having total power; the people can technically get rid of bad leaders and the global elites will not be able to stop it unless they rig the election or throw a coup.

The company that counts the votes in Finland is owned by Goldman Sachs.

That sucks, but don't you have election observers? Even my ragtag political party with zero funds was able to field a few hundred of them and they verified that any stealing that took place changed the vote by no more than 1-2% (significant enough to affect some seats, but surely not a whole election).

It's way easier to just manipulate the retarded public through the mass media than to rig elections.

(11-19-2015 01:15 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

(11-19-2015 10:59 AM)Dan Woolf Wrote:  

(11-19-2015 06:41 AM)Samseau Wrote:  And this is why I do not believe in Elites having total power; the people can technically get rid of bad leaders and the global elites will not be able to stop it unless they rig the election or throw a coup.

The company that counts the votes in Finland is owned by Goldman Sachs.

That sucks, but don't you have election observers? Even my ragtag political party with zero funds was able to field a few hundred of them and they verified that any stealing that took place changed the vote by no more than 1-2% (significant enough to affect some seats, but surely not a whole election).

It's way easier to just manipulate the retarded public through the mass media than to rig elections.

Or you could do both. Why? Because you can.