(11-16-2015 10:56 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  ISIS huh!

http://www.zengardner.com/paris-shooting...e-flag-op/

Cover of The Economist (managed by a member of the Bilderberg ), beginning of 2015 :

lower right corner : A painting belonging to the Louvres museum (in Paris)

..painting, which is La Belle Ferronière, one of the most famous false (falsely attributed to da Vinci) painting, a painting having become a symbol of false-flags...

numbers that easily spell the date of the attacks: 11-13-15

steel arrows (arrows, the weapon of Cupid, angel of love) symbolizing the death by metal ... (angels of death metal)

a soccer ball, green from the game (the Germany-France soccer game under way during the attacks)

a rocket vehicle, similar to those built by Matra-Lagardere, the new owners of the Bataclan theater, which they bought on September eleven this year ...

all in all :

Quote:I'm sure ISIS/ Daesh is scared at this 'solidarity' but the media still wants the gates to be thrown wide open - EVEN after ISIS was honest and open that it planned to send 50,000 jihadists into Europe through mass-immigration.

I watched John Kerry's French/English (let's see Hillary try that!) address on Saturday morning, and I noticed he kept referring to the Paris attackers as "Daesh." I'd never heard that term before, and figured by context he was talking about the terrorists, but wondered about this unfamiliar word.

A search of this thread indicates that its first use was by RVF'er N°6 in the post above.

Apparently, "Daesh" is a pejorative term Arabic speakers use for ISIS, and there's a call for world leaders to start using it to insult them:

https://newrepublic.com/minutes/123909/w...tate-hates

Quote:Daesh is an acronym. It stands for the Arabic name of the Islamic State: al-Dawla al-Islamiya fi al-Iraq wa al-Sham. When Jen Percy, a New Republic contributor, went to northern Iraq this year, the Assyrian Christians waging a war against ISIS were calling ISIS troops “Daesh.” In her article for our September issue, she called it “a pejorative term for ISIS in Arabic.”

Zeba Khan, writing for the Boston Globe, has explained why “Daesh” could be read as an insult: “Depending on how it is conjugated in Arabic, it can mean anything from ‘to trample down and crush’ to ‘a bigot who imposes his view on others.’”

In light of its more unsavory connotations, ISIS leaders threatened last June “to cut the tongue of anyone who publicly used the acronym Daesh, instead of referring to the group by its full name,” according to the Associated Press.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2014...story.html

This reminds me of the Gulf War, when Bush 41 refused to pronounce Saddam Hussein's name correctly. He consistently pronounced it "SAD-em" instead of "Sah-DAHM" because the former was closer to "Dog" or something dirty, just to piss him off.

^ Yes, Daesh is what ISIS is called by its Arab-speaking opponents. It is also used in the Francophone media which is why Kerry used it.

I use the term for the above reasons but also due to the deliberate confusion of the terms ISIS/ ISIL/ IS by the Anglo media which, as has been shown, is embedded with the New American Century world conquest plans of the CFR and Royal Institute for International Affairs which they are trying to achieve before Russia finally gets it act together again.

Friends from Egypt also told me that, they don't use ISIS as a word because this group is not a state and don't speak in the name of Islam. So Daesh its the name for it in the arabic world.

(11-17-2015 12:37 AM)Direct or subtle Wrote:  

(11-16-2015 10:56 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  ISIS huh!

http://www.zengardner.com/paris-shooting...e-flag-op/

Cover of The Economist (managed by a member of the Bilderberg ), beginning of 2015 :

lower right corner : A painting belonging to the Louvres museum (in Paris)

..painting, which is La Belle Ferronière, one of the most famous false (falsely attributed to da Vinci) painting, a painting having become a symbol of false-flags...

numbers that easily spell the date of the attacks: 11-13-15

steel arrows (arrows, the weapon of Cupid, angel of love) symbolizing the death by metal ... (angels of death metal)

a soccer ball, green from the game (the Germany-France soccer game under way during the attacks)

a rocket vehicle, similar to those built by Matra-Lagardere, the new owners of the Bataclan theater, which they bought on September eleven this year ...

all in all :

some of that stuff is pushing it a bit (would EODM even have announced those shows that early? the cover is from January)

Here is another article earlier in the year for comparison
http://vigilantcitizen.com/vigilantrepor...edictions/

Martin Armstrong telling the hard hitting truth as usual:

"Indeed, the Middle East, as we know it today, emerged from decisions made by the Allies during and after the World War I. It was Britain and France who took it upon themselves to transform what had been provinces of the old Ottoman Empire into the modern states we have come to know, This has created an international tinderbox that remains at the core of the current conflicts and politics in the Middle East...."

"...France hoped to maintain its centuries-old ties with the Syrian Catholics. In so doing, France looked to establish a strategic and economic base in the eastern Mediterranean. It was not oil then, but maintaining a cheap supply of cotton and silk and prevent Arab nationalism from destabilizing France’s North African empire. Therefore, it was France who held Syria in the partition process. That is coming back to haunt them to this day."...

Full article:

http://www.armstrongeconomics.com/archives/39470

Does anyone have any historical examples of false flag attacks? I'm not familiar with these.

(11-17-2015 07:25 AM)uptownguy Wrote:  Does anyone have any historical examples of false flag attacks? I'm not familiar with these.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag...ts_for_war

(11-16-2015 10:16 PM)Lucky Wrote:  One thing I don't understand: Why isn't there more outrage? I think Roosh wrote an article noting the "impotent tweeting" and lots of candlelight vigils and kumbaya.

What if 8 neo-nazis marched into an immigrant neighborhood in Paris with explosives and automatic weapons and executed 129 Muslims?

How would the response in the West differ?

For better or worse, people are starting to accept that a certain percentage of angry, poorly socialized Muslim/MENA men are prone to racism/religion based mass murder. It's sort of like shark attacks, it's in their nature.

People aren't really surprised there are murderous guys like this around. The murderous guys don't respond to outrage because they think THEY are the aggrieved ones.

(11-17-2015 07:25 AM)uptownguy Wrote:  Does anyone have any historical examples of false flag attacks? I'm not familiar with these.

There is plenty of reading you can do about it. It isn't even a recent phenomenon. Some older well-known examples are:

>Explosion on board the USS Maine in Cuba in 1898 (leading to the USA attacking Spain)
>The Gleiwitz radio station incident in 1939 (effectively leading to WWII after Germany attacked Poland)
>The Gunpowder Plot of 1605 (leading to England's years long confrontation with Spain and Portugal).

It's becoming more and more obvious with each new staged event. There are patterns. This century, the geo-politics game has intensified incalculably, starting with 9/11. Literally millions of people have been killed during the pursuit of strategic interests and the maintenance or expansion of territorial 'spheres of influence' (de facto colonies). Parts of various nations are being reduced to rubble. It seems as though modernity and democracy etc. was an inconvenient pit-stop for ruling classes, as we might as well be living in the 1500's.

Here's a chilling excerpt from 9/11 Synthetic Terror Made in the USA:

*In any political system which relies to even a small extent for its continued existence on the consent of the governed, some form of popular legitimation is necessary. But what happens if when the wars, policies and institutional changes desired by the ruling elite cannot be understood or supported by the vast majority of citizens?...Under these conditions, especially if the political and economic systems are in crisis, state sponsored terrorism may emerge...This terrorism is synthetic because it brings together the efforts of a number of disparate components: patsies, moles, professionals, media, and controllers. It is also synthetic in the sense that it is artificial: it does not grow up spontaneously out of despair and oppression, but is rather the product of an effort of organization and direction in which factions of government play an indispensable role.

-Webster Tarpley (2004)

French (and international) media have found their hero.

http://metro.co.uk/2015/11/17/you-will-n...e-5506842/

A French guy who has just lost his wife (his first love, since high school) to the terrorists. He learns of her death, goes to the mortuary institute to see her corpse, and what does he do?..

He himself explained that his first reaction was... posting on Facebook. Posting on Facebook. The very minute he comes back home, before talking to his little boy, before waking him up from his afternoon nap, he posts on Facebook.

And what does he post?

That terrorists "won't have his hate". That he will never hate them or any "muslim" or "migrant", that he will never as much as look with "a distrustful eye" at any migrant.

So he is hailed at the modern-day hero in French and European media. "You won't have my hate" is the new trend today in France...

The guy, whose picture is plastered on French media :


French and International Media loving him :
http://journalmetro.com/monde/875105/le-...-de-paris/
https://fr.news.yahoo.com/attentats-de-p...49289.html
http://www.francetvinfo.fr/faits-divers/...78873.html
in Spain : http://www.telecinco.es/informativos/int...00145.html
in the UK : http://metro.co.uk/2015/11/17/you-will-n...e-5506842/

His words below, in French : ""Alors non je ne vous ferai pas ce cadeau de vous haïr. Vous l’avez bien cherché pourtant mais répondre à la haine par la colère ce serait céder à la même ignorance qui a fait de vous ce que vous êtes. Vous voulez que j’ai peur, que je regarde mes concitoyens avec un oeil méfiant, que je sacrifie ma liberté pour la sécurité. Perdu. Même joueur joue encore".

He even makes fun of the whole situation, comparing himself to a gambler who lost one round but will keep on playing...

^ what a faggot.

(11-17-2015 07:25 AM)uptownguy Wrote:  Does anyone have any historical examples of false flag attacks? I'm not familiar with these.

Pearl Harbor.

(11-17-2015 12:00 PM)Direct or subtle Wrote:  French (and international) media have found their hero.

http://metro.co.uk/2015/11/17/you-will-n...e-5506842/

A French guy who has just lost his wife (his first love, since high school) to the terrorists. He learns of her death, goes to the mortuary institute to see her corpse, and what does he do?..

He himself explained that his first reaction was... posting on Facebook. Posting on Facebook. The very minute he comes back home, before talking to his little boy, before waking him up from his afternoon nap, he posts on Facebook.

And what does he post?

That terrorists "won't have his hate". That he will never hate them or any "muslim" or "migrant", that he will never as much as look with "a distrustful eye" at any migrant.

So he is hailed at the modern-day hero in French and European media. "You won't have my hate" is the new trend today in France...

The guy, whose picture is plastered on French media :


French and International Media loving him :
http://journalmetro.com/monde/875105/le-...-de-paris/
https://fr.news.yahoo.com/attentats-de-p...49289.html
http://www.francetvinfo.fr/faits-divers/...78873.html
in Spain : http://www.telecinco.es/informativos/int...00145.html
in the UK : http://metro.co.uk/2015/11/17/you-will-n...e-5506842/

His words below, in French : ""Alors non je ne vous ferai pas ce cadeau de vous haïr. Vous l’avez bien cherché pourtant mais répondre à la haine par la colère ce serait céder à la même ignorance qui a fait de vous ce que vous êtes. Vous voulez que j’ai peur, que je regarde mes concitoyens avec un oeil méfiant, que je sacrifie ma liberté pour la sécurité. Perdu. Même joueur joue encore".

He even makes fun of the whole situation, comparing himself to a gambler who lost one round but will keep on playing...

"The flowers and candles will protect us" - Another example of the media's agenda pushing.

(11-17-2015 12:45 PM)Fortis Wrote:  ^ what a faggot.

What a cuck. Sees his wife and mother of his children killed by Outsiders and he is blase about it.

(11-17-2015 01:06 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

(11-17-2015 12:45 PM)Fortis Wrote:  ^ what a faggot.

What a cuck. Sees his wife and mother of his children killed by Outsiders and he is blase about it.

His girlfriend was killed, so now to get a new one he is status whoring on facebook with all the other left-wing sluts by showing how tolerant and progressive he is. He'll probably get a new girl from this.

(11-17-2015 03:08 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  Martin Armstrong telling the hard hitting truth as usual:

"Indeed, the Middle East, as we know it today, emerged from decisions made by the Allies during and after the World War I. It was Britain and France who took it upon themselves to transform what had been provinces of the old Ottoman Empire into the modern states we have come to know, This has created an international tinderbox that remains at the core of the current conflicts and politics in the Middle East...."

"...France hoped to maintain its centuries-old ties with the Syrian Catholics. In so doing, France looked to establish a strategic and economic base in the eastern Mediterranean. It was not oil then, but maintaining a cheap supply of cotton and silk and prevent Arab nationalism from destabilizing France’s North African empire. Therefore, it was France who held Syria in the partition process. That is coming back to haunt them to this day."...

Full article:

http://www.armstrongeconomics.com/archives/39470

We have spent the last century undoing stupid decisions made at the end of WWI.

If you have the time and the patience read this book.
Paris 1919: Six Months That Changed the World
http://www.amazon.com/Paris-1919-Months-...0375760520

A decent of the portion of the book goes through the aftermath over the decades.

(11-17-2015 01:11 PM)Samseau Wrote:  His girlfriend was killed, so now to get a new one he is status whoring on facebook with all the other left-wing sluts by showing how tolerant and progressive he is. He'll probably get a new girl from this.

Progressivism is a Religion, and social media is their Church.

It seems default human nature is a tedious desire to status signal via dreary sanctimony, even in the professed absence of belief.

Since the introduction of Facebook, almost every person I know has devolved from a complex, shaded personality into a pearl-clutching, lemon-sucking, finger-wagging moral crusader, despite being the most immoral people imaginable.

I'm throwing my hat into the ring with the Mental Environmentalists: technology stops people being their authentic selves. As such, Silicon Valley needs all the diversity we can throw at it.

Mock these people. Mock them mercilessly. Pretend to be an even more hardline progressive: one can't claim to believe in equality whilst constantly status signalling to raise their own personal power above others. Use their own language against them: it's judgmental, it's problematic, especially: it's Christian.

I've started a little dialogue on Facebook with a self-righteous Obamatron friend who is wailing about states refusing to take in refugees. I usually don't bother because I have better things to do with my time than Facebook. He's already bringing up his multicult bonafides, but I'm matching rhetoric with rhetoric. Should be interesting to see where it ends. I hate flame wars, nothing good comes from them and people look like assholes in the end.

Hannover Stadium was just evacuated due to a "concrete threat". It was Germany vs Holland.

(11-17-2015 01:55 PM)ColSpanker Wrote:  I've started a little dialogue on Facebook with a self-righteous Obamatron friend who is wailing about states refusing to take in refugees. I usually don't bother because I have better things to do with my time than Facebook. He's already bringing up his multicult bonafides, but I'm matching rhetoric with rhetoric. Should be interesting to see where it ends. I hate flame wars, nothing good comes from them and people look like assholes in the end.

I just realized KorbanDallas was the first man on the forum to predict these attacks as a result of the invasion:

Proof:

https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-51333.html

He even predicted Merkel's reaction.

Great job mate.

(11-17-2015 12:19 AM)Dusty Wrote:  

(11-17-2015 12:16 AM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  

(11-17-2015 12:12 AM)Dusty Wrote:  Goyim fucking snipped

Zionist shill asking other nations to bear the economic (and military) burden for the middle east.

Gee why am I not surprised here?

The brazenness, the eh..chutzpah, still shocks me.

I wonder what #Blacklivesmatter thinks about Israel locking up African "refugees" in detention camps and/or shipping them back. I would love to see that Twitter war.