Post: #26

(10-25-2015 04:36 AM)Phoenix Wrote:  OP was a subtle "copy troll", who attempted to blend in by mimicking our talking points.

And she got 27 likes by the way... Some dudes gotta work on their troll radar

Hahaha now she has 21. Some of ya'll taking likes back.

Post: #27

(10-25-2015 06:34 AM)PrimeTime32 Wrote:  Hahaha now she has 21. Some of ya'll taking likes back.

We should make a "hall of shame" list

Post: #28

(10-25-2015 05:01 AM)Hades Wrote:  Anything else I'm missing?

Excessive exclamation marks always makes me suspicious. It's as girly as dotting an 'i' with a circle or a love heart.

Quote:Thanks for the link! Everyone who can spare the cash should support this vet's recovery!

If it's used in a manner that suggests the writer thinks the statement was funny: it's a girl.

Still, I haven't seen enough of the member's posts - I only remember the Henry Miller name reference; a (good) punk song posted in one thread; and an over-complicated suggestion about re-organising the Movie Thread. What exactly revealed that this was a girl?

The 'gay' comments echo similar 'live and let live' statements made by many popular forum members and isn't outright evidence of trolling. The 'Up until 1800...' comment probably refers to Magnus Hirschfeld and the Institut für Sexualwissenschaft in early 20th century Germany [nod at /pol/], which posited gays as a 'third, naturally-effeminate sex', and that homosexuality should be decriminalised because it was innate behaviour. (This is the angle Pedos are gradually working into Progressive Discourse).

This looks like someone left themselves logged in and his girl found it when she was snooping. He should learn, they always snoop.

Post: #29

Yeah AB it was a girl just using the account of some guy, hence the first post with some snark thrown in and what self-respecting man asks "ask me how my day was"

Post: #30

(10-25-2015 05:01 AM)Hades Wrote:  We can learn a few things from this -

When women try to write like men, oftentimes they will clip their sentences very short or seek to emulate the rhetorical styles of other members.

(10-23-2015 06:52 PM)Sexus Wrote:  Gentlemen, I'm in. I read through the thread and I agree that a bit more organization is needed so that we can keep track of what the formal "movies of the month" are. Perhaps open a new thread every month with an obvious name (like "Movie Club Thread -- <MONTH> <YEAR>") with the first post being the first set of movies to be discussed. And, of course, lock down the previous month's thread so as not to cause confusion. Beyond that, a sub-forum with thread names according to movie title would be best.... then it could just go on and on as new men key into the club and catch up with the backlog.

They will seek to constantly remind everybody that the forum is populated by men, since it's clearly on their minds the entire time they're here posting.

Anything else I'm missing?

The constant need to organize shit that not one single member has a problem with.

Post: #31

(10-25-2015 02:22 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  Excessive exclamation marks always makes me suspicious. It's as girly as dotting an 'i' with a circle or a love heart.

Post: #32

Splitting an infinitive or compound word with "fucking" is also a dead giveaway for a limp-wristed liberal faggot or female.

Their delivery of language is so weak and lacking in confidence that would naturally accompany logic based arguments that they attempt to lend it authority and strength with harsh and abrasive word choice.

Post: #33

(10-24-2015 11:33 PM)iop890 Wrote:  Might as well take the chance to post one of these:

Post: #34

(10-25-2015 02:22 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  Still, I haven't seen enough of the member's posts... What exactly revealed that this was a girl?

This one here (/thread-30898...pid1135246) suggesting doing yoga if you get problems with your boner (and the rest of what's written there) is a pretty dead giveaway.

(10-22-2015 10:13 PM)Sexus Wrote:  Meditation (dare I say Yoga?) helps supremely with concentration and barreling through the walls of internal opposition...

Also, I think the phrase "dare I say" is almost exclusively used by women.

Post: #35

Guys as "realologist" I have to come clean because this thread is about real. I was going to do this on my 1000th post. But seeing as I made is this far. I'm going to admit on my 400th post to match my weight instead.

I'm a woman. And I have now pm'd my naked 400lb woman pics to all high ranking members of the forum with 50 rep. Roosh got the most nude pics for being the creator of this.

If any of you other lower ranking members would like to see the pics feel free to pm me.

Here is a teaser in my feminine garb.

Post: #36

(10-25-2015 07:05 PM)Mercenary Wrote:  Also, I think the phrase "dare I say" is almost exclusively used by women.

Good catch, mate.

Quote:but it must be kept in focus that the woman that is the target of the fuck is only a distraction and thus a wandering mind only tends to devalue the passion of the moment and how she responds to commands and her requests for additional pleasures are accepted and acted upon.

A bunch of waffle that, no matter how much I keep re-reading it, makes no sense = a chick.

Seriously, what does this mean? Wouldn't focusing on treating a woman as just a distraction devalue the passion of the moment far more than a wandering mind? By that logic, you might as well just wank off in a sock, as long as you're really concentrating on getting the job done.

If I was a chick, I'd write: I literally can't even!!!

Post: #37

I though the thread would be about this book:

Post: #38

(10-25-2015 02:22 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  Excessive exclamation marks always makes me suspicious. It's as girly as dotting an 'i' with a circle or a love heart.

.....

If it's used in a manner that suggests the writer thinks the statement was funny: it's a girl.

I like using exclamation points! I find that my writing style is often too dry, and exclamation points help me get my mood across. I suppose I should learn to write better, but for now, I use exclamation points a lot if I am excited about the topic.

I feel like I am rebelling, because everyone says you should hardly ever use them. I consider it a matter of poetic license.

Just keepin' it real!

Post: #39

I'm confused, can someone give me the tl;dr?

Post: #40

(10-26-2015 03:20 PM)The Beast1 Wrote:  I'm confused, can someone give me the tl;dr?

Possible female lurker.

Possible OP's girl found this website.

Possible OP is faggot

Post: #41

(10-26-2015 03:20 PM)The Beast1 Wrote:  I'm confused, can someone give me the tl;dr?

I'm guessing the banned member was either:

- a Female Feminist Would-Be Subversive Troll; or
- a Male Anarchist Would-Be Subversive Troll, due to the multiple Punk references; or
- a Male Big Baller Troll who left his account open and his woman found it.

Post: #42

Is it real yet?

Inquiring minds and all that....

Post: #43

(10-26-2015 03:24 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(10-26-2015 03:20 PM)The Beast1 Wrote:  I'm confused, can someone give me the tl;dr?

I'm guessing the banned member was either:

- a Female Feminist Would-Be Subversive Troll; or
- a Male Anarchist Would-Be Subversive Troll, due to the multiple Punk references; or
- a Male Big Baller Troll who left his account open and his woman found it.

Upon reading the posts further I'm guessing the third one.
While option 1 is not impossible, she would have had to have had a man's input for a few posts I have read, or cribbed extensively from somebody else. It seems like too much effort for a feminist to put in to be all that likely.

Post: #44

Here is the deal, LOL:

1. Obvious troll pretty much from the first post.
2. 95% chance it was a reincarnation of a formerly banned troll; a minor, not a major one, and I don't know nor care which one.
3. Male not female.

Post: #45

Post: #46

Did I miss the 5 o'clock free crack giveaway?!

Post: #47

Looks like I missed it.

Post: #48

Quote:Looks like I missed it.

It was real.

Post: #49

Here I was thinking this thread was gonna be all like...



Instead it was..

Post: #50

Sorry about that, guys. OP here. It was just as one of the other posters said: my girl found my account open while I was sleeping. Needless to say, she's been sidelined.