Post: #1

"Peace" = the destruction of Europe.

The destruction of Europe = The End of Western Civilization.

The End of Western Civilization = The End of All Civilizations.

My game at that point:


First the community organizer Obama, and now this.

Speculation is mounting that Angela Merkel will win this year’s Nobel Peace Prize for her handling of the European refugee crisis. The German Chancellor has emerged as the firm favourite for the 2015 peace prize, the winner of which will be announced by the Norwegian* Nobel Committee next Friday.





Nominations for the peace prize are kept secret, and the days leading up to the announcement are traditionally filled with speculation and guesses. But Kristian Berg Harpviken, an expert who publishes a shortlist of likely winners each year, named Mrs Merkel as favourite.

“Angela Merkel will get the peace prize,” Mr Harpviken, director of the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO), told reporters. “She is the one who really took moral leadership and who turned the debate on refugee issues in a European context entirely around.”

Even though the official narrative is getting more absurd every day,



if you are not laughing along,

perhaps now is the time to get some rounds in your chamber,

and be prepared.

Post: #2

Quote:“She is the one who really took moral leadership and who turned the debate on refugee issues in a European context entirely around.”

She did, but not in the way this expert thinks.

Post: #3

Get a peace prize for selling out and kissing ass?



Yep, sounds about right.

I love how they equate "moral leadership" by being the lapdog of the US. If she really was going to take "moral leadership", she would be convening a conference to stop the war in Syria. She would be putting pressure on the US, Israel, Turkey, and the Gulf states to stop backing the rebels, which is what has caused the war to drag on for 4 years.

But of course, that's outside the permissible narrative.

Post: #4

The Nobel Peace Prize has been an absolute farce for years and years now. I would expect nothing less from the selection committee.

Post: #5

It's now the Nobel Piece Prize - as in someone who's eating a piece of that narrative pie.

Dear Lord, Merkel's taken a hefty slice. Matches her figure.

G

Post: #6

This news got me like



http://www.amazon.com/Peace-They-Say-His...1594035989

Peace, They Say: A History of the Nobel Peace Prize, the Most Famous and Controversial Prize in the World

Post: #7

(10-04-2015 02:36 PM)Soma Wrote:  The Nobel Peace Prize has been an absolute farce for years and years now. I would expect nothing less from the selection committee.

I'm pretty sure the Peace prize isn't a proper Nobel prize anyway.

Complete joke.

Post: #8

Still can't one-up Obama winning it.

Post: #9

The prize has lost all credibility and it has become a political tool. Obama got it as a pet on the back for becoming the first black president without any peace-related achievements. Giving it to Merkel would be just as premature as we have not seen/are not told the true story about the immigration yet. Her last effort to control freedom of speech (Facebook and Cuckerberg) actually goes against all the things the price stand for. It has become the Oscar for socialists.

Post: #10

(10-04-2015 02:29 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  Get a peace prize for selling out and kissing ass?

Why? Hows everyone else getting them?

Post: #11

Not at all surprised. The Narrative is accelerating even as its foundations are collapsing underneath it.

Post: #12

I'll just answer it with a fitting song:







She should start speaking in Arabic, because she is certainly not representing Germans anymore.


Civil war has to be prepared and fertile ground has to created.

Violent crime in German based on original heritage of perpetrator:



https://dwdpress.wordpress.com/2013/05/2...rten-ware/

Peace it is indeed.

Post: #13

(10-04-2015 05:41 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Violent crime in German based on original heritage of perpetrator:



https://dwdpress.wordpress.com/2013/05/2...rten-ware/

To be fair, the chart says "Heritage of multiple offenders with migration background".
It´s not violent crime based on heritage, otherwise there would have to be a slice saying "German".

Post: #14

I recall something about the peace symbol being an upturned & broken Christian crucifix.
Therefore symbolic of the destruction of Christianity.
So yeah. Giving Obama & Merkel 'peace' awards, somewhat stands to reason.

Post: #15

Between this and Obama...



That award has been totally discredited.

Post: #16

State leaders get rewarded for bringing death and destruction.
Media hides news instead of reporting on it.
Universities brainwash and program instead of educating.
Degeneracy is celebrated while sanity is attacked.
Citizens volunteer to destroy their race, tribe, and nation.

These are strange times.

Post: #17

(10-04-2015 08:22 PM)Roosh Wrote:  State leaders get rewarded for bringing death and destruction.
Media hides news instead of reporting on it.
Universities brainwash and program instead of educating.
Degeneracy is celebrated while sanity is attacked.
Citizens volunteer to destroy their race, tribe, and nation.

These are strange times.

The topics and personalities may change... but has it ever not been thus?

Post: #18

So which one has more prestige, the Nobel Prize for peace or the Golden Razzies?

Post: #19

(10-04-2015 08:27 PM)CrashBangWallop Wrote:  

(10-04-2015 08:22 PM)Roosh Wrote:  State leaders get rewarded for bringing death and destruction.
Media hides news instead of reporting on it.
Universities brainwash and program instead of educating.
Degeneracy is celebrated while sanity is attacked.
Citizens volunteer to destroy their race, tribe, and nation.

These are strange times.

The topics and personalities may change... but has it ever not been thus?

Many of these things do indeed follow a pattern. But I doubt it has ever been so "intellectualized" in the past. In the past I bet it was just thinly veiled venality but nobody cared. Now it's part of a victimological city on a hill mentality.

I also doubt it was ever done out of such altruistic motives. Which is what is so disturbing to me. It is obvious these ideologies persist because they purport to be altruistic, thereby proving the host population to be altruistic as well. Yet that likely never occurs to the zealots who follow these ideas since they almost invariably despise their hosts.

Post: #20

(10-04-2015 08:27 PM)CrashBangWallop Wrote:  

(10-04-2015 08:22 PM)Roosh Wrote:  State leaders get rewarded for bringing death and destruction.
Media hides news instead of reporting on it.
Universities brainwash and program instead of educating.
Degeneracy is celebrated while sanity is attacked.
Citizens volunteer to destroy their race, tribe, and nation.

These are strange times.

The topics and personalities may change... but has it ever not been thus?

I was thinking about this today. Each decade of my life seems to follow a pattern of the left sowing seeds of subversion to destroy social institutions that flower in about 10-15 years.

Always:

- equality good, merit bad.
- ugliness good, beauty bad.
- evil people are victims of society, and good, whilst good people simply uphold the structures that force the evil commit evil, and are therefore bad.

These are the seeds I noticed being sown, off the top off my head, so there are probably others:

The 70's - education (every child is special, no corporal punishment, Marxist thought is 'right on' in university); government and public service (equal pay, anti sexism and racism laws); popular music (punk's Year Zero, merit is bad); the traditional family structure (normalising divorce, marriage is an oppressive patriarchal construct, divorce welfare); homosexuality (gay men closer to the female than the masculine, masculinity is evil, be feminine or you're 'self-loathing'); and psychology (the normalisation of feels-based, women-friendly psychology).

The 80’s – movies and television (abandonment of the working class as heroes, removal of beautiful women, lessened sexual objectification of women, strong female characters, calls for diversity); criminal justice (criminals are just victims of society, focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment); policing (calls for diversity, officers must be trained in cultural and emotional sensitivity, more female representation).

The 90’s – masculinity ('toxic', meterosexuality, SNAG's: sensitive new age guys); religion ('church values need to shift to reflect community values, calls for female entryism, great focus on loving the sinner, hating the sin, tolerance for people of other faith); military (Don't ask don't tell, calls for greater female representation), national identity (tolerance, diversity, multiculturalism, embracement of globalism); gay perception (tragic victims, heroic, sexual whitewashing, 'gays are just like you and me').

The 00's - private corporations (as 'ethical' rather than 'psychopathic' entities, No Logo, Culture Jamming, Occupy Wall Street, the rise of Mental Environmentalism); journalistic media (objectivity is bad, representation, good intentions should overrides ethics).

The 10's - technology (calls for female entryism, diversity, subjective ethics, regulation of the internet, control of whom you give a platform to); gaming media (diversity, female representation, strong female characters, goodthought); free speech and privacy (expectation of and right to); gender (transexuality, gender is a social construct); whiteness ('white privilege', 'you can't be racist against white people', 'all southerners are racist'); and sexuality (multiple new fluid sexual identities, normalisation of still taboo sexualities such as pedophilia and incest).

So if you want to know how we arrive at gay marriage, look for gay whitewashing during the late 90's with Will And Grace. If you're wondering why Alternative Music happened, look for 70's punk. If you want to understand Germany, look to the late 90's Globalisation and Tolerance push. If you want to understand why Leftists Millennials are simultaneously-arrogant bout their talents whilst being resoundingly-mediocre at everything, look no further than an artefact of a thoroughly-subverted Hollywood by the late 80's like, (and I shit you not), 'Troop Beverly Hills', and think about what the messages within are.



For guys who thought my irritation over the new Mad Max as subversion was over-the-top, it's because I know what it leads to in fifteen years.

Despite their beliefs not making a lick of logical sense, Leftists always win. They are very, very good at subversion and destruction, and know how to program minds to act against their own interests and self-preservation.

Post: #21

(10-05-2015 01:56 AM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(10-04-2015 08:27 PM)CrashBangWallop Wrote:  

(10-04-2015 08:22 PM)Roosh Wrote:  State leaders get rewarded for bringing death and destruction.
Media hides news instead of reporting on it.
Universities brainwash and program instead of educating.
Degeneracy is celebrated while sanity is attacked.
Citizens volunteer to destroy their race, tribe, and nation.

These are strange times.

The topics and personalities may change... but has it ever not been thus?

I was thinking about this today. Each decade of my life seems to follow a pattern of the left sowing seeds of subversion to destroy social institutions that flower in about 10-15 years.

Always:

- equality good, merit bad.
- ugliness good, beauty bad.
- evil people are victims of society, and good, whilst good people simply uphold the structures that force the evil commit evil, and are therefore bad.

These are the seeds I noticed being sown, off the top off my head, so there are probably others:

The 70's - education (every child is special, no corporal punishment, Marxist thought is 'right on' in university); government and public service (equal pay, anti sexism and racism laws); popular music (punk's Year Zero, merit is bad); the traditional family structure (normalising divorce, marriage is an oppressive patriarchal construct, divorce welfare); homosexuality (gay men closer to the female than the masculine, masculinity is evil, be feminine or you're 'self-loathing'); and psychology (the normalisation of feels-based, women-friendly psychology).

The 80’s – movies and television (abandonment of the working class as heroes, removal of beautiful women, lessened sexual objectification of women, strong female characters, calls for diversity); criminal justice (criminals are just victims of society, focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment); policing (calls for diversity, officers must be trained in cultural and emotional sensitivity, more female representation).

The 90’s – masculinity ('toxic', meterosexuality, SNAG's: sensitive new age guys); religion ('church values need to shift to reflect community values, calls for female entryism, great focus on loving the sinner, hating the sin, tolerance for people of other faith); military (Don't ask don't tell, calls for greater female representation), national identity (tolerance, diversity, multiculturalism, embracement of globalism); gay perception (tragic victims, heroic, sexual whitewashing, 'gays are just like you and me').

The 00's - private corporations (as 'ethical' rather than 'psychopathic' entities, No Logo, Culture Jamming, Occupy Wall Street, the rise of Mental Environmentalism); journalistic media (objectivity is bad, representation, good intentions should overrides ethics).

The 10's - technology (calls for female entryism, diversity, subjective ethics, regulation of the internet, control of whom you give a platform to); gaming media (diversity, female representation, strong female characters, goodthought); free speech and privacy (expectation of and right to); gender (transexuality, gender is a social construct); whiteness ('white privilege', 'you can't be racist against white people', 'all southerners are racist'); and sexuality (multiple new fluid sexual identities, normalisation of still taboo sexualities such as pedophilia and incest).

So if you want to know how we arrive at gay marriage, look for gay whitewashing during the late 90's with Will And Grace. If you're wondering why Alternative Music happened, look for 70's punk. If you want to understand Germany, look to the late 90's Globalisation and Tolerance push. If you want to understand why Leftists Millennials are simultaneously-arrogant bout their talents whilst being resoundingly-mediocre at everything, look no further than an artefact of a thoroughly-subverted Hollywood by the late 80's like, (and I shit you not), 'Troop Beverly Hills', and think about what the messages within are.



For guys who thought my irritation over the new Mad Max as subversion was over-the-top, it's because I know what it leads to in fifteen years.

Despite their beliefs not making a lick of logical sense, Leftists always win. They are very, very good at subversion and destruction, and know how to program minds to act against their own interests and self-preservation.

Knowing what you know and seeing what you've seen, what do you think is the best way for one to navigate through the modern world?

Post: #22

(10-05-2015 02:13 AM)nek Wrote:  Knowing what you know and seeing what you've seen, what do you think is the best way for one to navigate through the modern world?

You physically and mentally train yourself and wait for the inevitable societal collapse that results from such policies, and rebuild a new one on the ashes after the wide scale purge of the left, due to their lack of physical and mental resilience. No time frame for this: it could take 15 years or 50.

Or, you use their own tactics against them, and this seems to be what is starting to happen recently with the right, since it and the left have largely swapped places. Why wouldn't you go with the reliable tactics that have destroyed enduring societal institutions?

Radicalisation.





Infiltration and subversion from within.



Weakening of the power structures:



Accelerating dysfunction. Setting targets against each other. Sowing community mistrust and discord, using polarising groupthink to push a group to extreme actions that appal those outside it, understanding the mental mindset that makes people desire power and want approval and encouraging them to take actions that result in them losing both.

You get the idea. Evil or a necessary evil? Your call.

As men, we simply have to hold fast to our beliefs and take action, now or later.

Post: #23

In the early 2000's, I didn't have a specific name for the communist / progressive plan to subvert & dismantle the western world.
Then I came across Yuri Bezmenov, who titled it - "Active Measures".
Many folk online may scoff at Y.Bezmenov, yet his testimony has such a distinct correlation to today's world, it would be foolish to dismiss :

Post: #24

(10-05-2015 04:39 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Then I came across Yuri Bezmenov, who titled it - "Active Measures".
Many folk online may scoff at Y.Bezmenov, yet his testimony has such a distinct correlation to today's world, it would be foolish to dismiss :

Bezmenov's work keeps popping up in my mind too. His prediction of the cultural subversion of the West is uncannily accurate.

His suggestions of methods to resist the subversion was the identification and rejection of the false narrative and the reinforcement of community bonds.

I think its likely the only way forward is to form small bands, tribes and communities amongst like minded people and batten down for the storm to come. Relationships among trusted people are the only thing in the world really worth a damn when confronted with death and chaos anyway.

I think the masses will only understand the perils of cultural marxism once they face massive consequences in their personal lives, consequences that cannot be denied by the mainstream media propaganda any longer.

Post: #25

(10-04-2015 08:22 PM)Roosh Wrote:  State leaders get rewarded for bringing death and destruction.
Media hides news instead of reporting on it.
Universities brainwash and program instead of educating.
Degeneracy is celebrated while sanity is attacked.
Citizens volunteer to destroy their race, tribe, and nation.

These are strange times.