Read The Forum Rules: We have a clear set of rules to keep the forum running smoothly. Click here to review them.

Post Reply 
5 People That National Review Hates More Than Admitted Pedophile Todd Nickerson
Author Message
Return Of Kings Offline
International Playboy
******

Posts: 3,837
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation: 12
Post: #1
5 People That National Review Hates More Than Admitted Pedophile Todd Nickerson
cw-cooke

This past week, the Internet exploded in justifiable rage at a Salon article titled “I’m a Pedophile, But Not a Monster” by Todd Nickerson. In the article, Nickerson claims to identify as a pedophile—though he also claims that he has never had sex with children—and argues that he deserves understanding for his sexual predilections.

Most everyone recognized Salon’s article for what it was: a leftist attempt to normalize child molestation in the same way they normalized open homosexuality, transsexuality and other sexual perversions.

Everyone, it seems, except National Review.

Long considered the standard bearer of cuckservatism, National Review has decided to stand athwart humanity yelling “FUCK YOU, DAD!” In a spectacularly tone-deaf article, token Limey Charles C.W. Cooke defended both Nickerson for writing the piece and Salon for publishing it. Even more ridiculously, Cooke invokes Christianity in his pedophile apologia. I must have missed that Beatitude in catechism class: “Blessed are the kiddie diddlers, for they shalt inherit the daycare centers.”

Given how absurd and suicidal it is for a “right-wing” publication to defend child molestation, Cooke’s piece serves as a stark reminder of how toxic National Review is to American conservatism. National Review and its founder, the mercifully deceased William Buckley, built their reputations on purging “undesirable” elements from the conservative movement to wide accolades from the left, transforming a political movement focused on preserving American culture into a clearinghouse for Zionists and corporate whores.

To this end, here are five people that National Review thinks are worse than pedophile Todd Nickerson…

1. John Derbyshire, conservative writer


john-derbyshire

John Derbyshire is a conservative columnist who wrote for National Review up until three years ago, when outrage exploded over an article he published at Taki’s Magazine (full disclosure: I have written for Takimag in the past and met Derbyshire at this year’s American Renaissance conference, but we have no connections beyond that) titled “The Talk: Nonblack Version.” In his column, Derbyshire made a number of rational arguments on how whites can cope with the very real threat of black-on-white crime in the U.S.

Derbyshire was subsequently targeted by social justice warriors, with Gawker dubbing his piece the “most racist article possible” and a bevy of left-wing publications calling for his termination from National Review. Editor Rich Lowry gave in to the lynch mob, announcing Derb’s firing via a blog post that was so spectacularly cowardly that Lowry refused to refer to Takimag by name, instead calling it a “webzine.” Derb’s termination from National Review also threatened to leave him destitute, as he was undergoing chemotherapy at the time.

2. Donald Trump, businessman and politician


Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump gestures and declares

Along with the rest of the cuckservative movement, National Review has joined the mob of nancyboys mewling for Donald Trump’s head. Most recently, Cuckmaster General Rich Lowry—the same guy who fired one of his own writers because of a left-wing lynch mob—had the audacity to go on Fox News and claim that Carly Fiorina had “cut off” Trump’s balls “with the precision of a surgeon” during the last GOP presidential debate. Lowry is so prissy that he can’t even spell out “balls” in a Tweet:

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8">

Lowry’s flailing attempts at manliness are part of a concerted effort by cuckservatives to bring down Trump by claiming that Fiorina won the last presidential debate. Not only does it show how sad the anti-Trump conservatives have become—that their new standard bearer is a woman who lost the only other political race she competed in by a 10-point margin—it doesn’t even come close to reality.

Every poll released after the debate shows Trump maintaining a comfortable lead over the other candidates; while Fiorina did receive a bump, it came primarily at the expense of Ben Carson and other minor contenders.

3. Mark Steyn, writer and free speech activist


mark-steyn

Mark Steyn is a Canadian author known for standing up for free speech in the face of leftist totalitarianism: he successfully defended himself from Canada’s nightmarish “human rights” tribunals when they tried to prosecute him for “Islamophobia,” and he was also the victim of a frivolous “defamation” lawsuit filed by global warming alarmist Michael Mann. Neither of these saved Steyn’s head from National Review’s chopping block when he made the mistake of siding with Duck Dynasty’s Phil Robertson two years ago, who was being targeted by radical leftists for his supposedly “anti-gay” remarks.

In a spectacularly screechy post, National Review managing editor Jason Lee Steorts furiously clutched his pearls in response to Steyn’s “derogatory language,” urging conservatives to show more “civility” in their arguments. Steyn was subsequently shoved out the door at National Review, leaving Steorts and his colleagues to keep writing scintillating pieces on why conservatives need to endorse gay marriage.

4. Ann Coulter, conservative author and spokesperson


Journalist Ann Coulter attends the Time 100 Gala, celebrating the 100 most influential people in the world, on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, in New York. (AP Photo/Peter Kramer)

Ann Coulter has managed to stay popular and relevant in our shifting media landscape by being unafraid to challenge societal taboos, including the taboos of the conservative movement. Most recently, Coulter drew fire after she criticized the excessive deference to Israel that Republican presidential candidates showed in the recent debate; half of the candidates responded to the question “What will America look like after you become president?” by mentioning Israel, a foreign country:

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8">

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"&gt;&lt;/script>

In their indefatigable fashion, National Review immediately began sharpening the knives in response to Coulter’s comments. David French shrieked that Coulter was “pander[ing]” to “white nationalists,” then after facing a backlash for his sanctimony, followed up with an article stating that calling people “cuckservative” is bad, mmmkay?

5. Donald Sterling, businessman and former NBA team owner


donald-sterling

Donald Sterling is an entrepreneur and the former owner of the L.A. Clippers basketball team. Last year, Sterling was banned from the NBA for life, fined $2.5 million, and forced to sell the Clippers after a recording of a private conversation in which he made purportedly “racist” remarks was leaked to the media by his mistress, V. Stiviano.

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"&gt;&lt;/script>

Unsurprisingly, National Review lit their torches and joined in the stampede to crucify Sterling. In a cringeworthy “me-too” piece, Deroy Murdock declared that Sterling’s comments represented “real racism” and claimed that left-wing accusations of bigotry should meet the “Sterling Standard.” How’s that working out for you, bub?

Even the most cursory glance at National Review and William Buckley’s career shows that both have been a cancer on American conservatism for decades. No better evidence of this can be found in the fact that it is the left—the people who conservatives are supposed to fight—who praise National Review for its “civility” and “sanity.” The magazine’s most enduring achievement has been shaping conservatism into controlled opposition, rolling over to the left on every issue save for Israel and corporate tax cuts.

The continuing ascent of Donald Trump in the presidential race and the ongoing meltdown of movement conservatives and GOP cucksultants shows that National Review and other, similar outlets have lost their gatekeeping power. With the rise of the alternative right and neomasculinity, countless men and women are finding an outlet for their discontent with both Western society and the impotence of its so-called defenders.

National Review’s defense of pedophilia is just another data point showing their increasing irrelevance.

Read Next: Why Do Hollywood SJWs Still Defend This Admitted Pedophile? Posted on Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:00:02 +0000 at http://www.returnofkings.com/71503/5-peo...-nickerson
Comments: http://www.returnofkings.com/71503/5-peo...n#comments

09-28-2015 07:15 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Return Of Kings's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel
Handsome Creepy Eel Online
Innovative Casanova
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 9,516
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation: 149
Post: #2
RE: 5 People That National Review Hates More Than Admitted Pedophile Todd Nickerson
Just what I needed to finally unfollow The Cuckservative Review. I'll miss trolling them, but that time can be spent better anyway.

Thumb up

Hitler reacts to Trump becoming president | Hitler reacts to Battle of Montreal | An alternative use for squid that has never crossed your mind before
(This post was last modified: 09-28-2015 07:33 AM by Handsome Creepy Eel.)
09-28-2015 07:33 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
scrambled Offline
Chubby Chaser
**

Posts: 512
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation: 6
Post: #3
RE: 5 People That National Review Hates More Than Admitted Pedophile Todd Nickerson
Old hat: Been this way since the 90's. Cancelled my subscription years ago.
(This post was last modified: 09-28-2015 11:57 AM by scrambled.)
09-28-2015 11:56 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
puckerman Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 1,598
Joined: Nov 2013
Reputation: 6
Post: #4
RE: 5 People That National Review Hates More Than Admitted Pedophile Todd Nickerson
National Review has always been a worthless publication. I think it's long been some kind of trojan horse.

Here is their scathing review of Ayn Rand's novel, Atlas Shrugged. I've always believed Buckley hated her because of sexual frustration.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/21...r-chambers

The reviewer was Whittaker Chambers. He was a communist who later found Jesus. He was even a spy. It's always been interesting the way that these conservative welcome these former communists with arms wide open.

Isabel Paterson supposedly made a great comment on this: "It is easy to imagine an ex-communist, much harder to image an ex-fool."
(This post was last modified: 10-04-2015 01:50 PM by puckerman.)
10-04-2015 01:49 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  The Decline Of National Public Radio (NPR) Return Of Kings 0 488 03-03-2017 01:15 PM
Last Post: Return Of Kings
  7 Ways “The Walking Dead” Hates Straight White Males Return Of Kings 0 2,630 12-24-2016 10:15 AM
Last Post: Return Of Kings
  NFL Player Antonio Cromartie Released After Taking A Knee During The National Anthem Return Of Kings 0 3,861 10-12-2016 07:15 PM
Last Post: Return Of Kings

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication