Post: #1

When I say young girls, most guys probably think of 18 year olds. After all, 18 generally tends to be the age of consent in a lot of countries. But the reality is that by the time most Western girls turn 18, they are already ruined by feminism and related factors.

So in order to get pure girls it is necessary to go below 18, at least in the West. How young one should go depends on several factors. Aside from the legal issue, of course the girl has to be physically and mentally mature. (Funnily enough, this last criteria rules out most Western girls below 25).

The physically mature age varies from girl to girl but right now I would put my personal limit around 16, give or take a year. Some girls hit puberty at 10 but this of course doesn't make them eligible. Likewise with a 17 year old girl who for some reason hasn't hit puberty yet. (Side note: As a citizen of my country, I can actually bang 15 year old girls in my country without breaking the law.)

Anyway.

First of all, realise that pretty much no one wants you to bang very young girls. The media, your friends, your colleagues, the girls' parents, even the fucking elevator guy don't want you to get girls who are in their prime. Remember: The world is a cockblocker. The world doesn't want you to have access to sweet 16 pussy.

Fuck that.

The mere fact that so many feminists, white knights and beta enablers don't want you to get very young pussy is motivation in itself to go after it. (As if the 16 year old pussy in it self wasn't motivation enough).

Also, throughout most of human history, most girls had probably already had at least one kid by the time they turned 16. I read somewhere that Virgin Mary might have been 13 when she got pregnant and married Joseph. That pretty much settles the debate right there. If God impregnates a 13 year old girl then I see no ethical reason whatsoever why I shouldn't be allowed to hit on very young girls. I prefer to get my ethical and moral guidelines from God and not from evil ideologies such as feminism and sexual liberalism, thank you very much.

The other day I was waking around trying to restart my very rusty (day) game and saw a very hot and very young girl. I actually wasn't sure if she was above 15 or not. She might have been a mature 14 year old but was probably somewhere between 15-17. My inner game dialogue was very crappy: What if she calls me out as an older guy? What if she screams pedophile out loud? What if her parents find out? Or someone I know? Etc.

This is my advice to myself and anyone else who listens:

Don't buy into the feminist frame that there's something wrong in being attracted to and wanting to fuck very young girls. If you get called out, just act aloof and show that you don't care. Don't back down, don't be apologetic and don't show any shame. Keep your frame and keep pursuing her. (I've already done this before so I don't know why I froze this time around). Agree and amplify could be another possible strategy.

Furthermore, any parent of a very young girl should actually be thankful that you hit on her, at least provided that your intention isn't to pump and dump her (which mine isn't). Why would they prefer their daughter riding the carousel for a decade and a half? Or ending up getting gangraped by some jihadists or something? It's much better for her to meet a a guy that offers something more stable and long term. Even if it isn't necessarily marriage.

I don't care what anyone thinks. I WILL fuck very young girls. I'll approach thousands of them if I have to. I don't care if I get completely frozen out by everyone I know. In fact, I will do it partly just to troll the feminists.

Post: #2

Was this meant for your diary?

Post: #3

I have sneaky suspicion how this will end

Post: #4

I'm going to sit down and laugh at how this thread plays out

Post: #5

Post: #6

You do realize there is an explicit rule about no discussion of minors (under 18) allowed on this forum right?

Post: #7

This is great. All we need is more feminists
Running around stating how members of this forum are looking for underage girls.

I will presume the ban will hit in under 8 hours.

Post: #8

You will also apparently post plans for illegal activity on an online forum that can easily be linked to your personal identity. Good job.

Post: #9

(09-27-2015 03:33 PM)solo Wrote:  If God impregnates a 13 year old girl then I see no ethical reason whatsoever why I shouldn't be allowed to hit on very young girls. I prefer to get my ethical and moral guidelines from God and not from evil ideologies such as feminism and sexual liberalism, thank you very much.
...
Furthermore, any parent of a very young girl should actually be thankful that you hit on her, at least provided that your intention isn't to pump and dump her (which mine isn't). Why would they prefer their daughter riding the carousel for a decade and a half? Or ending up getting gangraped by some jihadists or something? It's much better for her to meet a a guy that offers something more stable and long term. Even if it isn't necessarily marriage.

I don't care what anyone thinks. I WILL fuck very young girls. I'll approach thousands of them if I have to. I don't care if I get completely frozen out by everyone I know. In fact, I will do it partly just to troll the feminists.

Post: #10

Post: #11

I see the feminist infection has reached parts of the RVF now. It is stronger and more widespread than most people think.

Nowhere do I advocate breaking the law or having sex with minors. Perhaps you should read what I wrote again.

By the time 95-99 % of Western girls turn 18, they have already had at least one dick. Most of them many more. I say: better my dick than someone else's.

If you guys want to pass up several years of a girls' sexual peak because that's what your feminist overlords have decided for you, then be my guests.

Post: #12

........ OP didn't think the consequences through before pressing post

Post: #13

Strong words. You're now in my signature so I can reflect.

Post: #14

Is this a meltdown in disguise?

Post: #15

(09-27-2015 04:34 PM)solo Wrote:  I see the feminist infection has reached parts of the RVF now. It is stronger and more widespread than most people think.

Nowhere do I advocate breaking the law or having sex with minors. Perhaps you should read what I wrote again.

By the time 95-99 % of Western girls turn 18, they have already had at least one dick. Most of them many more. I say: better my dick than someone else's.

If you guys want to pass up several years of a girls' sexual peak because that's what your feminist overlords have decided for you, then be my guests.

You've been here 4 years, and yet you've missed the no under-18 talk rule, and that fact that the rules are actually enforced?

And you're using the 'excluded middle' fallacy. Either we want to bang 15 year olds or we're feminists...

You're also not being morally consistent. You want to fuck 'very young girls', or do you want to marry one? If you say you don't 'necessarily want them for marriage', then you just want to get girls on the carousel early. You want to be a man who breaks innocence. Distaste for this isn't reserved just to feminists at all.

(09-27-2015 04:00 PM)Pyrrhic victory Wrote:  This is great. All we need is more feminists running ar...

Who cares. Who cares what they think of anything.

Post: #16

You guys can't be serious.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_co...ted_States

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Europe

Your own nationality may be an additional factor.

I will say this though: Sorry if I broke some forum rule I was unaware of. If I'm banned then so be it. But in any case, any governmental or other agency should not hold the moderators responsible for what I write on a forum that anyone can register and post on. I am not a US citizen.

Post: #17

(09-27-2015 04:51 PM)Phoenix Wrote:  And you're using the 'excluded middle' fallacy. Either we want to bang 15 year olds or we're feminists...

Not sure if I should counter that by arguing that you're the one using a logical fallacy here (straw man). Or by arguing that anyone who defends feminist opinions is a feminist (at least partly).

(09-27-2015 04:51 PM)Phoenix Wrote:  You're also not being morally consistent. You want to fuck 'very young girls', or do you want to marry one? If you say you don't 'necessarily want them for marriage', then you just want to get girls on the carousel early. You want to be a man who breaks innocence. Distaste for this isn't reserved just to feminists at all.

"If you say you don't 'necessarily want them for marriage', then you just want to get girls on the carousel early"

So if I don't want to marry a girl, I necessarily want to get her on the carousel early? What was that you said about middle ground again?

(09-27-2015 04:51 PM)Phoenix Wrote:  

(09-27-2015 04:00 PM)Pyrrhic victory Wrote:  This is great. All we need is more feminists running ar...

Who cares. Who cares what they think of anything.

Exactly. Well said. If we let them, they'll just continue to narrow the scope of acceptable opinions we can hold. It's just like a shit test.

Post: #18

Hmm. I wonder what will happen next?

It's been fun, solo.

Post: #19

(09-27-2015 04:52 PM)solo Wrote:  You guys can't be serious.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_co...ted_States

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Europe

Your own nationality may be an additional factor.

I will say this though: Sorry if I broke some forum rule I was unaware of. If I'm banned then so be it. But in any case, any governmental or other agency should not hold the moderators responsible for what I write on a forum that anyone can register and post on. I am not a US citizen.

You may have missed the memo solo, but you can't discuss that here. Same for Merenguero below.

Quote:9. No jailbait/illegal threads. Do not talk about where to find girls under 18 or how to have sex with them, even if it's legal in the location being discussed. Also do not post sexy pictures of girls that are confirmed to be under 18.

Post: #20

I really don't know what will happen here. O.P. has been here for over four years and has contributed some value, so he is in no way the typical troll. My advice: go to New Jersey where sixteen is legal and make sure you don't give them alcohol. You may still leave your nose open to a false rape accusation, but that can happen anywhere.

Post: #21

(09-27-2015 05:03 PM)solo Wrote:  Not sure if I should counter that by arguing that you're the one using a logical fallacy here (straw man). Or by arguing that anyone who defends feminist opinions is a feminist (at least partly).

I think you're confused. You post your spiel about banging 13,14,15 year olds etc, and then claim "we can't because of feminists". We all express disdain. You then say: "I see the feminist infection has reached parts of the RVF now". No straw men involved, just summarizing your speech.

(09-27-2015 05:03 PM)solo Wrote:  "If you say you don't 'necessarily want them for marriage', then you just want to get girls on the carousel early"

So if I don't want to marry a girl, I necessarily want to get her on the carousel early? What was that you said about middle ground again?

Fair enough, perhaps then "you just want to LTR them", until they turn 18.

Post: #22

Solo rules are rules, hopefully you get a warning or temp ban... but regardless of how you feel about it, this forum makes it clear that this is not the place for discussing anything about underage girls.

Post: #23

7 day ban. This forum has a longstanding rule against discussing girls under 18, even if it's legal.