Post: #1

Link to survey.

One of many BS articles orgasming at the thought of a rape epidemic:

Quote:About 1 in 10 female students in a massive new survey say they have experienced sexual assault involving penetration, by force or incapacitation, while in college.

The AAU survey found 11.4 percent of undergraduate women and 14.8 percent of undergrad LGBTQ students at these campuses experienced sexual assault involving penetration or oral sex due to a lack of affirmative consent.

When including other forms of sexual violence, including forced kissing, groping or nonconsensual touching of someone's genitals, the number of students experiencing the unwanted sexual contact rises to about 1 in 5.

Some of you who are better at math and statistics than I am will probably do a good job tearing this apart, but some thoughts:

-A self-reported survey with only a 19% response rate. Hmm I wonder who would be most excited to fill out this survey? Could it possible be the thousands of brainwashed feminists who are told all the time that there is a rape epidemic, and that a guy sneezing in their direction is tantamount to sexual assault?

-There are three categories of respondents: men, women, and LGBTQ. They invented a third gender, how VERY scientific.

-Results magically agree with the "1 in 5" stat feminists have been lying about for years. What a coincidence!

-Apparently 3 out of 4 women do not report sexual assaults or rapes. In spite of the massive support female victims get on college campuses, including kangaroo courts, campus police, lowered evidence standards, etc they aren't concerned enough about their own rape to report it, enabling the rapist to continue attacking other women.

-No explanation why this survey differs so radically from the Justice Department's own statistics that show only 6 out of every 1000 female students are victims.

-Women performed oral sex "without affirmative consent" and thus were sexually assaulted LOL

Post: #2

(09-21-2015 03:04 PM)AFS Wrote:  -Women performed oral sex "without affirmative consent" and thus were sexually assaulted LOL

"Yes your honor, he raped my mouth with his penis, I couldn't consent because I had his dick in my mouth. I couldn't fight back on the gagging, slobber, saliva, sticky deep throat tricks this man did to me."

-Slut who regrets sucking a guy off because she didn't want to fuck him...yet.

Post: #3

(09-21-2015 03:04 PM)AFS Wrote:  

Quote:experienced sexual assault involving penetration or oral sex due to a lack of affirmative consent.

"Affirmative consent" requires you to stop at "every step" to go over your feelings about the encounter and see if the partner is enthusiastic about proceeding.

"Let's spend a few minutes discussing the thought of us kissing"
"Let's take some time to consider our feelings about feeling your boobs"
SEVEN HOURS LATER
"Ok, finally, are you feeling positive and enthusiastic about having intercourse?"

Didn't follow every step? Touched her boob while kissing her without discussing it? Did you let her start blowing you without questioning her motives? YOU ARE A RAPIST.

They will do anything to create the illusion of a campus rape epidemic...anything. It's like many feminists have said for years - all sex is rape. Now it's all about making that insane idea the legal definition.

Post: #4

This affirmative consent thing is so detached from reality, that there is NO WAY they believe in it. Even an ardent, ugly feminist would be disgusted by a supplicating beta asking for permission at every turn. They just want the option to accuse a man of rape or assault if he does anything they disagree with (for example, not becoming her boyfriend after the encounter).

In my personal experience, every single time I asked for permission I received a no, and every time I just went in and kissed the chick she obliged. I'm kicking myself for ever doing it any other way, because I remember so many times when the girl was so turned on that asking for permission must have been like throwing a bucket of ice down her panties for her to say no.

Post: #5

The difference between seduction and rape is Salesmanship. Correction: 1 in 10 women had sex with someone and regretted it after. But that guy is a rapist in feminist eyes.

Post: #6

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grad...versities/

What a bunch of BS. These numbers are so overblown, mainly because the response rate is between 15% and 35% for most of them, which to me would mean the people most likely to respond to this are people who want to share their stories of sexual assault or play the victim. So if this survey says "30%" of undergrad women are being sexually assaulted on campus that means it's actually closer to 5% tops. But i'm sure this will constitute an epidemic for Hillary and the Dems that they need to campaign about.

Post: #7

Screaming about how their numbers are horseshit likely won't work, as the only people getting funded for this kind of nonsense are on the other side. Ugly feminist researchers make bogus surveys with leading questions that get terrible response rates, and they're all on the same side in this. It's madness.

Cut through the bullshit. As usual, game is the answer, and in this case the game principle of choice is:

Operation: AGREE and AMPLIFY
aka "YEAH! I was raped too!"

Start a campaign for college men to take these surveys and report that they were sexually assaulted. Every time a chick has banged you while you were drunk, rode your dick without asking permission, or slobbed that knob without a signature, you were raped. Even if you weren't, fuck it, it's a self-reporting survey. If the rate of sexual assault against college men by women approaches 50%, they'll have two choices that both get their panties in a twist:

1. Report that men are the predominant victims of sexual assault
2. Admit their shitty surveys have severe methodological problems

Remember: when dealing with women, game beats logic every time.