Post: #76

(10-15-2015 03:01 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  Yes, Rape is a very common female sexual fantasy because they understand that it is fantasy. Descriptions of these fantasies generally focus on an alpha man - often faceless but with a mental overlay of desirable masculinity, (strong, size, controlling) - forcing her submission, (though you'll get outliers who fantasies about dominant animals or aliens 'taking' them), and although they'd be described as 'rape', there's often very little violence in them: it's about submission to power. (This is why I think feminists push the 'rape is about power' angle - they think men think like women).

However, the underlying thread I've observed between these fantasies is that they're solipsistic, which is why the perpetrator is often faceless and vaguely-defined: the fantasy isn't about being violently-taken. At the core, the fantasy is about being beautiful / attractive / sexually-desirable enough that the man is overwhelmed and discards all emotional control and thoughts of punishment to claim her.

This erotic story is a perfect illustration of all the items you mentioned, with some cuckolding added in.

There's not pictures attached to the story, but the link is still NSFW.

Post: #77

(09-18-2015 10:15 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  Last year - possibly buried in the epic Elliot Rodger thread sometime in May - I mentioned an increasing observation of Millennial Women growing awkward and uncomfortable about sex, despite guys saying sloots still seemed to be everywhere. I was talking about the current culture being shaped for sex-negative attitudes to become the mainstream: particularly-asexuality and female incels.

I did find myself referring back to the original post in this post from July last year though:

Quote:All the cultural signs seem to be pointing towards an oncoming shift by women into Neo-Victorian sexual prudery. I expect it to be one of the main theological splinters of feminism in the next few years - the pro-sex versus the anti-sex.

Smoke 'em while you got 'em.

I've also spoken of sensing an increasing need for women to be getting their incessant need for drama in their relationships with men fulfilled by online drama / social activism. Rather than flying into a fury over their man, and thrilling in their unchecked emotions - what all women crave above all else - they're flying into fury over all men.

Sexually-Awkward

Australian Feminists in the media have also been doing multiple thinkpieces onboMichelle Goldberg's article in the Nation, celebrating the message that Liberated Feminists (Third Wavers) are oppressing Dominance Feminists (Fourth Wavers, believes Dworkin and Catharine MacKinnon's theories that all sex is about male control over women) by labelling them SWERF's.

The Problem With Idolizing Sexual Liberation

Note this:

Quote:“The compulsion to appear ‘liberated’ [by other feminists] is a form of regulation of its own.”

As such, they're all coming clean with what I predicted last year, that Millennials Girls are increasingly-finding sex makes them feel 'judged' and 'awkward'.

Unfortunately, I can't find my original post on the subject, but somewhere a while back I discussed the rising trend for affecting made-up sexual identifications, each more increasingly-narrow and ridiculous than the last. My belief was it is a way of both avoiding sex and rationalising sexual-unattractiveness to others, since your sexuality is now so specific that it's almost impossible to find someone compatible.

From the article, my emphasis:

Quote:...a 23-year-old Seattle woman named Cara who is mortified by her barely existent sex life. She’s had sex on two occasions: a one-night stand and a threesome. But she is intensely self-conscious and finds the thought of being seen naked “cringe-inducing.” At one point, she decides that perhaps she is asexual, an idea she found “pretty empowering.” “This is my special classification, and it seemed like that’s something that would be more respected than just saying, ‘I don’t want to have sex with you.’”

The thinkpiece responses to this article are telling in themselves, but so are the comments from women. Basically: I'm relieved I'm not the only who is uncomfortable with sex.

The text from a sex-negative picture that is currently-doing the rounds:

Quote:Don’t be fooled. A new study claims to prove that people who watch porn are more likely to be feminists. All it really proves is that our modern definition of feminism really appeals to porn-sick men. (You can guess why).

I wrote in July last year how the rise in makeup shaming struck me as part of this coming wave.

Quote:Advocating sexual modesty and plain presentation + 'love me for my qualities other than beauty' = pioneer women (without the homemaking skills).

It's all leading to a Wave of Puritanism where heterosexual sex is A Bad Thing, hence the need to redefine as 'rape' any feeling of sexual violation - even being stared at. If you're looking to the link for why Fourth Wave Feminism defends Islam: I believe this is the answer. Wearing a hijab would actually make them feel less awkward and sexually-objectified.

---

The fascinating part of this, is though I've been predicting it, the truth is being revealed far more quickly and the signs are accelerating. These events have all happened in the last few days, (muchI've also spoken of sensing an increasing need for women to be getting their incessant need for drama in their relationships with men fulfilled by online drama / social activism. Rather than flying into a fury over their man, and thrilling in their unchecked emotions - what all women crave above all else - they're flying into fury over all men. like how Roosh has observed how quickly the media narrative is crumbling). There's a wave of sexual repression and censorship looming over Australia, and it'll be interesting to see what happens.

I tried to edit out as much as possible and even though I live in the U.S. This is so spot on. This is my 3rd month on Kik (first social media) and just by being myself on it as I would in real life had led to some obversation. Be careful with jokes. Either they take it as offensive or gold truth. Watch out if a girl is peddling roleplay or any dream like stuff. You listen and reply, it's a trap. Girls act like freaks and right back to prudes. Just straight up offer things and act shy if called out. Girls are possessive on it. I posted a picture just so I won' t be harassed for one. The amount of times I got called out for stop typing even though I write like I would here is priceless. It like these girls are Sirens. The drama is just like the freak and prudes thing. All that faux drama is the only way they feel they can keep attention.

Post: #78

AB, I finally read this thread, excellent post as usual.

Your post made me think of technology and Artificial Intelligence potentially being the next development in evolution. I know, it seems wild, but if you think through artificial general intelligence (that can learn how to learn, to learn how to develop better software and hardware) as being the next species, the feminist narrative of anti-sex self-loathing human-regret would align with such a development.





As said in this Joe Rogan clip with Sam Harris, a lot guys younger than us, on the Aspergers spectrum, drinking Red Bull with billions of dollars at their disposal to develop this technology...with a huge responsibility to not destroy mankind.

And let's not forget this guy:


I hope this doesn't derail your thread (if my posts simply goes by the wayside, so be it), but it is interesting how removing the biological aspect of what it means to be human is reflected in both your fourth wave feminism and the singularity.

Post: #79

^ Transhumanism has always struck me as an anti-life cult.

From the Humanity+ website:

Quote:“Transhumanism is a class of philosophies of life that seek the continuation and acceleration of the evolution of intelligent life beyond its currently human form and human limitations by means of science and technology, guided by life-promoting principles and values.”

So, who makes those principles and values?

I know guys are looking forward to Sexbots*, thinking Men will be emancipated from Female Control, but technology is always going to be the domain of the wealthy, and, with that, I expect the main adopters of Transhumanism will then be the idle, privileged children of the elite.

Therefore, I'd expect Transhumanism to be used in the name of Special Snowflake Narcissism, and with low resilient minds naturally comes Utopian Idealism, so, I'd also expect subversion of any technology in the name of Social Justice in the interests of liberating whomever the currently-fashionable 'The People' are.

I did a search for implanting, and there's multiple articles in all usual places on friggin' Zoe Quinn inserting a chip and a magnet into her own hand:



Huh, whomever would have guess the girl obsessed with self negation and exaggerated affected presentation would be into Transhumanism?

Remember, I've been alive since the 70's. Just about every major prediction about the future of how we live has been wrong - I had a book of predictions as a child that is hilarious to read now. The Nuclear Wars never happened. The Population Bomb never went off. Still no flying cars. It seems fitting that today is the day Marty McFly travelled into the future in 'Back To The Future II'.



* I see zero attraction in humping a pile of plastic and circuit boards.

Post: #80

(10-20-2015 01:39 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  Transhumanism has always struck me as an anti-life cult.

I'd also say there's an element of trying to cheat death with 'Transhumanism' for the select few.

Post: #81

Praise Playboy for hiding breasts.
Then praise a morning variety show for showing breasts...
(even if for medical purposes) :

Studio 10 executive producer on why he showed bare breasts on television

http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/tv/...7584339746

' STUDIO 10 made the bold decision to feature a topless woman giving herself a breast examination on the program this morning
in a move that has been applauded by viewers.
While overt nudity on television is often criticised by some at home, the segment was universally praised by women on social media,
with many describing the stunt as “the best TV segment” the show had ever aired. '


#FreeTheNipple; just not in Playboy et al.

Post: #82

Watch the clip and it makes sense: they're celebrating it because the topless breasts in question are saggy and belong to an old, overweight woman with a flabby stomach and stretch marks whose wearing Spanx. All the tweets are talking about how 'brave' and 'real' she is. She's Dove Beauty, not Axe Body Spray and therefore the nudity supports the narrative.





Never heard of the show, but goddamn the Australian media is a magnet for losers, so just looking at the hosts, I know it's not for me.

Post: #83

^^^^

That baring of saggy breasts was supposedly to highlight breast cancer. I was informed in grave tones by my local pissbag media that "1 in 8 women in Australia will have breast cancer before the age of 85." This is a promotion by the McGrath Foundation (named for Glenn McGrath's dead wife who died of breast cancer, presumably because she didn't fondle herself enough. The foundation basically founded on a male cricketer's money. White knighting: now you don't even have to be breathing to have men spending money on you.)

Does this sound a bit raw, a bit humbug? Isn't breast cancer a horrible, horrible thing that you wouldn't want to happen to your significant sloot?

Well, if it does sound a bit raw it's only because it takes one Google search to discover that in Australia 1 in 7 men will have prostate cancer before the age of 85. I don't see any "brave" TV executives encouraging 60-year-old men to fondle their balls on morning TV in the interests of trying to prevent prostate cancer.

Post: #84

(10-20-2015 01:39 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  ^ Transhumanism has always struck me as an anti-life cult.

From the Humanity+ website:

Quote:“Transhumanism is a class of philosophies of life that seek the continuation and acceleration of the evolution of intelligent life beyond its currently human form and human limitations by means of science and technology, guided by life-promoting principles and values.”

So, who makes those principles and values?

I know guys are looking forward to Sexbots*, thinking Men will be emancipated from Female Control, but technology is always going to be the domain of the wealthy, and, with that, I expect the main adopters of Transhumanism will then be the idle, privileged children of the elite.

Therefore, I'd expect Transhumanism to be used in the name of Special Snowflake Narcissism, and with low resilient minds naturally comes Utopian Idealism, so, I'd also expect subversion of any technology in the name of Social Justice in the interests of liberating whomever the currently-fashionable 'The People' are.

I did a search for implanting, and there's multiple articles in all usual places on friggin' Zoe Quinn inserting a chip and a magnet into her own hand:



Huh, whomever would have guess the girl obsessed with self negation and exaggerated affected presentation would be into Transhumanism?

Remember, I've been alive since the 70's. Just about every major prediction about the future of how we live has been wrong - I had a book of predictions as a child that is hilarious to read now. The Nuclear Wars never happened. The Population Bomb never went off. Still no flying cars. It seems fitting that today is the day Marty McFly travelled into the future in 'Back To The Future II'.



* I see zero attraction in humping a pile of plastic and circuit boards.

First about the cartoon and forgetting about the third world people who don't have electricity etc, you don't have to go as far as the third word. Even in a city like LA you can find stark differences between people's standard of life. The same is true for transhumanism.

Also note that such changes don't happen overnight; they creep up on you. The increase in socially awkward people (smartphone zombies, sex-negatives, "catcalling" opponents ), increasing obesity(well there is a limit to the weight human body can sustain), decreased birth rates and the rise of MGTOW can all be viewed as losses for humanity. Almost all of us are now more like machines that our fathers used to be; we are wearing various sensors (GPS, GSM, G4, etc) all the time, corporates like Google, Apple, Facebook, Twitter, etc record a great deal of our activities and there are various private or state organizations who study this "big data" to be able to predict individual or collective behavior. More predictable means more machine-like.

Look at these examples:
-There are robots teaching English in South Korea.
-American military has deployed drones that can shoot on their own.
-There are men in Japan who have AI "girlfriends".
All of these are today.

Quote:I see zero attraction in humping a pile of plastic and circuit boards.

Well, you are AnonymousBosch after all, not a millennial or post-millennial who grows up with "consent training", "sex negativity", "fat acceptance", "hollaback" and "gender fluidity". Although the future is virtual reality not sexbots.

Post: #85

Not trying to sound like a conspiracy nutter, just throwing something out there...

People aren't going to stop fucking on their own, they're going to need some heavy persuasion. What if the government created a psy-op to scare people from having sex? They could claim they'd discovered a new virus deadlier than HIV/AIDS which could either be an actual virus they'd developed themselves (which only the elites would have the antidote to, of course) or the whole thing could just be a false flag operation where no such virus actually exists, they just claim it does. I think such a tactic would be extremely effective at helping to accomplish a depopulation agenda.

Post: #86

In this day and age of fast information, I don't think that's possible, besides, what they're doing seems to be having results, so they'll probably just keep to it.

Post: #87

I agree what they're doing is working. I was just thinking about it from the perspective of the elites possibly wanting to drop population numbers to 500 million from the current 7 billion. In order to do that, something pretty drastic would have to happen. Since most of the population isn't in a position to be able to prove whether a virus actually exists or not, we'd only have the media's word to take for it. I think we all know how "reliable" the media is.

I've heard claims feminism was funded by the U.S. government back in the 60s. I wouldn't be surprised if such claims were true, as it seems feminism has helped lower birth rates in the United States by encouraging women to enter the workforce instead of having children. Such facts certainly help arouse suspicion of a possible depopulation agenda actually existing.

Post: #88

Personal opinion is that I'm in favor of sex negativity when it comes to porn, sexualized TV entertainment, etc as opposed to traditional male/female interactions.

Don't even view it as a left/right issue on the whole, but more of a bipartisan reaction to the "consumerization" of sex in modern entertainment culture.

I think if men want sex they need to learn how to be a man, go out and pursue women (which so many young men today seem to not know how to do) rather than just surf the internet for free porn.

(I read that in some Native American cultures for example, a young man wasn't even allowed to court a girl unless he had proven himself in some courageous feat such as on a hunt or a battlefield; the incentive to have sex helped motivate men to be brave and act like men, but when men can simply beat off to naked pictures of Katy Perry all day, the incentive to actually man up vanishes).

A backlash against sex in the entertainment industry will help cut beta males off from free masturbatory outlets, offering them more incentive to either man up or die a virgin. It'll also help avoid the oversexualization of children, and the welfare generations and singe mother households that result from children being saturated with sex from a young age.

Post: #89

I don't know, wouldn't the end result of such a thing be monogamy and reestablishment of the family unit to avoid such risk?

Post: #90

Matsufubu, they'd probably offer a "vaccination" to help "protect" people from the possibility of contracting the disease (real or false flag). The vaccine would actually render its recipient infertile.

The people who already had families wouldn't be able to grow their family any larger and the people who didn't wouldn't be able to have a family at all.

Post: #91

Well, this is the path that we're on. Google the Georgia Guidestones:

Post: #92

Why even create a fake disease? Just alter the vaccine that everyone already has to take, like measles boosters or flu shot.

Post: #93

Because a lot of people are anti-vaccination. If it's something like measles boosters or the flu shot, it won't intimidate enough people into getting it. If they scare the population into believing there is a pandemic and they will likely die without a vaccination, they'll be much more likely to get it for fear of what will be hyped to be almost certain death without it. People would be much more likely to take their chances in getting measles or the flu.

Post: #94

(10-27-2015 03:58 AM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  Watch the clip and it makes sense: they're celebrating it because the topless breasts in question are saggy and belong to an old, overweight woman with a flabby stomach and stretch marks whose wearing Spanx. All the tweets are talking about how 'brave' and 'real' she is. She's Dove Beauty, not Axe Body Spray and therefore the nudity supports the narrative.





Never heard of the show, but goddamn the Australian media is a magnet for losers, so just looking at the hosts, I know it's not for me.

What the???? Did that topless cougar actually became on-air during a morning TV show when children are likely to have been around?

These feminazis are so damn degenerate and desperate to force their horrible nudity to kids...but if a hot 18-year-old stripper wants to walk in a bikini on the street, it's considered "bylaw infractions' or "indecent exposure" by these Trigglypuffs and miserable feminazis.

Post: #95

It's like watching Calhoun's Mouse Utopia in real time.