Post: #51

I don't think that sex bots could come anywhere close to replacing a real woman for both sex or a relationship.

That being said, it's not surprising that women are going to try to ban them. Women have always tried to ban anything that takes male attention away from them - alcohol, video games, porn.

Post: #52

Here's the important part:
This is the woman who can't compete with robots, and wants to ban them: (I think it is, I can't watch the video, but I googled her and this popped up first, along with links to her school)




On the playlist for this video, the one "Up Next" is: 'How much exercise is too much?'

Anyways, judging from the framegrab that google showed, I ain't even gonna ask the usual question.

Post: #53

I think there's a very real chance that this will have a huge correction on western female behaviour.

When even the Omegas are naturally displaying full outcome independence towards women, when the vast supply of male thirst that has been enabling their entitlement dries up, they'll be forced to change.

They need emotional connection much more than men and due to their natural sensitivity male sexbots will be hollow comfort with their subtley unnatural movement and voices devoid of feeling.

Women can get all the cock they want and they still crave male attention and connection. The reverse isn't as common.

A sexual cold war with sexbots can only end one way and its not with men losing.

Post: #54

To be honest, having people be mindless zombies fucking sexbots, or owning a sexbots without a huge amount of eyebrows being raised in response is not a future I want to live in. We already have enough people, nerds and autists check out of real life and escape into drugs, video games and weird sexual fetishes, don't need any more of that.

Quote:A sexual cold war with sexbots can only end one way and its not with men losing.

Only getting laid by a robot is not you "winning". Might as well call jerking off with your hand "winning"

Post: #55

What do you imagine a the-best-of-the-best top of the line fembot would cost? If cars are anything to judge these by then I'd imagine a sexy C3PO would be way out of reach of an average Walmart customer. So your high t champ from some inner city ghetto will neither be able to afford one or need one. High t alphas will fuck anything that goes to trader Joe's and low t tech sector grass eaters will watch amine in 3d with their real life wifus

Post: #56

Well, maybe this is not what American men need, but what American women need. If they see sex bots as competition, then maybe they will start shaping up.
What women would admit to not being able to compete to those? Ban them so they don't feel inferior.

Post: #57

Women hate anything that diminishes their source of power, full stop.

Post: #58

(09-16-2015 09:14 AM)NO_LIMIT_CRACKA Wrote:  Only getting laid by a robot is not you "winning". Might as well call jerking off with your hand "winning"

That's not what would happen. The sexbots just provide a limit on thirst.

Men and women would still hook up, but if a woman raises the price of her pussy too high, then men are just going to walk away from that deal because they have a reasonable alternative available. Sexbots would be a viable short-term thirst quencher so guys are less tempted to put up with garbage behaviour to get laid.

Sure, many omegas would just stick with the sexbots forever, just like they do today with porn, but for other men it would just be subsistence to get them through a drought before they get their next notch.

When men stop being willing to jump through hoops to be with women, women will sweeten the deal with more feminine, less crass behaviour.

Post: #59

Quote:Only getting laid by a robot is not you "winning". Might as well call jerking off with your hand "winning"

Its winning when it's your only option and it stops making you a thirsty IG orbiter.

Post: #60

What if the sexbot was like a cyborg? You know, a machine covered with living tissue and a sense of self-awareness? So it possesses most of the attributes of a human but technically, it is not one. If you've got AMC and on demand service, go watch a few episodes of the show Humans that was out this past summer. Give me a sexbot like Mia(Gemma Chan) or Niska(Emily Berrington), and I'll swear off real women too. That or Cameron (Summer Glau) from Terminator: Sarah Connor Chronicles. Would I give up real flesh and blood pussy for a real doll with a remote control? No. But if they could make one convincing enough, I'd reconsider.

Post: #61

Sex between men and women boils down to an exchange of attention for physical contact. Sex bots to men may well end up being the counterbalance of what social media is to women. It will provide men with an unlimited source of on-demand sex, diminishing the amount of attention men are willing to give women, and in turn may well incentivize women to bring more to the table in exchange. (I predict social media sites going the way of Ashley Madison and creating fake profiles and bots to give women more attention online as a countermeasure).

However, at the end of the day, a sex bot wouldn't be any different than a rubber pocket pussy. Sure, it will be technically adept at meeting your heart's (and cock's) desires, but it will neither evoke nor reciprocate an emotional connection, and it certainly won't have the pheromones of a sexy, nubile 18 year old.

Just an expensive consolation prize for the omegas and bronies.

Post: #62

(09-16-2015 09:44 AM)Speculation Wrote:  

(09-16-2015 09:14 AM)NO_LIMIT_CRACKA Wrote:  Only getting laid by a robot is not you "winning". Might as well call jerking off with your hand "winning"

Men and women would still hook up, but if a woman raises the price of her pussy too high, then men are just going to walk away from that deal because they have a reasonable alternative available.

There are "reasonable" alternatives nowadays too: porn, jerking off, sex toys, fleshlights, prostitutes.... I just don't think they can honestly be called "reasonable alternatives". Same thing when the sexbots come out, it'll just be an advanced fleshlight, but not reasonable in any definition that I'd use. Remember: sex with humans is sex, everything else is just masturbation. That's like a woman proclaiming "I DON'T NEED NO MAN I GOT MY VIBRATOR!", people just look at her with pity and disgust

(09-16-2015 10:19 AM)BossOfBosses Wrote:  

Quote:Only getting laid by a robot is not you "winning". Might as well call jerking off with your hand "winning"

Its winning when it's your only option and it stops making you a thirsty IG orbiter.

so basically every nerd who hasn't been laid but has his anime waifus is a winner?


I mean don't worry, I get it, I also feel schadenfreude when women feel their power being drained and squirm in discomfort, but this forum sometimes goes waaaaay overboard on the "ahaha fuck you hamster lizards!" and ends right in the reddit incel section like supreme gentlemen

Post: #63

It is already too late. We don't need technologically superior robot pussies. There are already guys out there who are in relationships (called "synthetic love") with dolls who they know are dolls and yet treat as if they were human. Guys like this dude:



Here is a whole article on him:

http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archiv...ve/279361/

It is from 2013, and he has been in relationships with dolls since 2000. It is already on its way. You don't even have to read the article, because you can guess what it will be like, right? First he admits that he knows it's a doll, and then, as if he NEVER EVEN SAID THAT, goes on and on about the back story of what he is now calling his girlfriends, and how he met the first one, and then he was in a BBC documentary about men who have relationships with dolls:





A documentary which you don't need to watch either.

Anyway, he goes on to say his other girlfriend (doll) saw him on the documentary (She didn't. Hadn't been fabricated yet.), and contacted him and moved from Russia to be with him (He saved up money to buy her, I mean to buy it.)

Anyway, I am sure you all see where this is going and how it isn't really all that different from anything else today.

Caitlynns, Furries, SJWs, whatever.

We human beings have a remarkable flaw in our minds, one which is perfectly exploited by the internet in many guises. The flaw is this:

We only need a little bit of reality to hang a dream on.

The internet didn't invent this. It has always been this way. I can sit around fantasizing about what I will do if I ever get rich. Sad, but I can do it. If, however, I buy a lottery ticket, I have just enough reality to hang a dream on, and it is almost as if the lottery ticket is the passageway between all my idle imaginings and the real world.

We have always had a layer of abstraction between ourselves and the world, and it is called our thoughts. However until the advent of the internet, if our crazy imaginings started to go too far, they would collide with a sensible shared reality.

Like, twenty years ago, I had a family member who became obsessed with Native American spirituality and culture. He tried to find a connection to reality beyond his idle wool gathering dreams and reality. He thought,

Maybe I am secretly Native American!

So he went down to the library and searched out all the genealogy material they had, and talked to as many members of our family as he could, thinking there must be Native American blood in there somewhere, there's just got to be!

And he finally came to the conclusion that there wasn't. He was just another white guy, albeit one who really liked Indians. He was no different from the little girl who is bored by her family and begins to think that she must be a princess raised in secret by a family not her own.

The point here, is that my family member didn't have the internet, didn't have access to message boards with a bunch of psychos like him. He didn't even have access to concepts like "transracial" and was thus unable to find any reasonable, acceptable way to extend the boundaries of his delusions.

Online life has added a whole new layer of abstraction between us and the actual world we live in, and it perfectly exploits the flaw of the human soul that says:

All I need is the tiniest connection to reality to hang my dreams on.

Now that you can find a community at any moment, without ever leaving the house, that is a group of like minded individuals (And hasn't that phrase suddenly become one that will raise the hairs on the back of your neck.), there is no reason not to get a doll instead of an actual woman, and no reason not to become a campaigner for the human rights of silicone dolls (Don't call them dolls! Die sentient scum!)

This has been going on for a while, will continue to go on, and, because of attention by the media with expand its influence, just as every other weird trend takes on popularity, and forks off into separate strains that can then hate and debate with each other. (I read somewhere that among people who have fetishized balloons, there is great debate over which is better, popping or non popping.)

Yeah. This will be a trend. In the seventies, the loveless sexless guy either absorbed the ridicule or pretended to have a girlfriend at another high school.

Now guys will not only have doll girlfriends, but will demand the right to marry them and you know how it will go. Only limited by the imagination.

It's like a guy who drinks instant coffee one day puts way too much of it in his cup and convinces himself he is drinking espresso.

Just enough reality to hang a dream on.

Play us out, Mills Brothers:

Post: #64

2:40
"when I'm in bed with her, not actually having sex but just, like, lying next to her and appreciating her…"
as he's rubbing her feet. LOL.

It takes a special kind of beta to be friend zoned by a fuck doll.

Post: #65

Milo wrote on the subject yesterday: Sexbots: Why Women Should Panic
And he gets great exposure via Breitbart - 2,500 comments already.

Post: #66

(09-16-2015 05:31 PM)Sgt Wrote:  Milo wrote on the subject yesterday: Sexbots: Why Women Should Panic
And he gets great exposure via Breitbart - 2,500 comments already.

A few quotes from the article:

Milo Wrote:The truth is, men get along okay without women, unlike women, who become shrieking, neurotic messes if they’re still single in their 30s.

...

I mean, look, I don’t mean to be rude, but most of the reason I went gay is so I didn’t have to deal with nutty broads.

...

We’ll have it even worse here in the West, because Japan is still patriarchal. As a result, society functions.

Post: #67

@Nero · 10h
Oh, you want to ban sex robots? Sure. Right after you give up your vibrators.

Post: #68

Never mind

"at first it was just sex sex sex, then it tapered off"

He actually got dead bedroomed by a fuck doll, I don't know which is worse. LOLZOLZOL

Post: #69

I think a lot of the replies in this thread are in response to the shit that's out right now ie dolls. When, and I truly believe it's when, not IF we have actual realistic robots that are able to convince the average person that they aren't a robot then it's a completely different story all together. If these robots become reasonably affordable for the average person then there are a whole hell of a lot of things to consider.

What will make a woman more valuable than a 10 that never ages, never bitches, cooks 3 times daily every day, fucks like no one you've had before, can have philosophical conversations like no other, essentially the perfect being you've wanted.

As a man, what are you going to provide that a 10/10 thundercock that reads poetry, cooks dinner, has a 10in cock, and never needs Viagra going to do if you want a real women in this futuristic society?

These dolls are a joke. The people that fuck them, are essentially fucking even weirder versions of blow up dolls. But when we get to a point to where we don't know if that doll is a doll or a person, things are going to be wild.

Like I said on page 1, give me Alicia vikandor that acts like a sweet feminine women that knows how to cook and have fun and I'd never fuck an American women again.

Post: #70

(09-16-2015 09:38 AM)Virtus Wrote:  What do you imagine a the-best-of-the-best top of the line fembot would cost? If cars are anything to judge these by then I'd imagine a sexy C3PO would be way out of reach of an average Walmart customer. So your high t champ from some inner city ghetto will neither be able to afford one or need one. High t alphas will fuck anything that goes to trader Joe's and low t tech sector grass eaters will watch amine in 3d with their real life wifus

They'll be like cars. Monthly leases with the option to change at any point.

Post: #71

I really would not want a second hand sex robot. Not even sure I would want a first hand one.

Post: #72

(09-17-2015 05:10 AM)eradicator Wrote:  I really would not want a second hand sex robot. Not even sure I would want a first hand one.

We've all had plenty of second hand sex robots already.

Post: #73

I wouldn't get hyped without seeing some consumer data first. How many sex bots have been sale? Whats the sale rate like? Prices? Consumer profile?

The argument that it will correct thirst and women's attitude doesn't hold sway. The same was said for prostitution, but look at Germany where it is legal.

The truth is sex bot users are still marginals and weird people, this wont change in the very near future.

Still, the fact that people (feminists and fugly women) are trying to ban this just reeks of insecurity and misery.

Post: #74

Some women stand to make a good deal of coin out of sex bots if licensed swappable face plates are sold(of actresses,models,etc). The same with licensed VR sex programs featuring them.

Post: #75

(09-15-2015 08:49 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Hang on..., has this Kathleen Richardson just basically & indirectly admitted her SMV is so low,
men would still prefer to do it with a robot instead of her.


Heh. I'll just leave this here :

Compared to her, R2D2 is smoking hot!