Post: #15226

< Difficult to tell, but I would say yes in the current climate.

Blacks are known to have racial advantages in terms of sheer athletic abilities - especially when it comes to speed. But soccer is a difficult sport to become a pro. You need a wide professional network of souts, clubs, sports schools to bring forward the new generation.

In the past every European country had a limit on how many foreigners were allowed. At one time it was only 2 "legionnaires" per set team. Now that is all off.

The funny part is that soccer is similar to tennis a sport where some of the best players especially in leading positions need also to be quite intelligent.

I am certain however that they are pushing non-White players for their own gains. Soccer clubs can buy cheaper an African player and some are certainly grand talents. Still - even if you are born with immense talent, you need massive discipline and resolve in your 20s when cocaine and parties are offered to you non-stop, so that you don't blow it all away prematurely never reaching your zenith.

As for the clubs themselves - most are owned by globalist lackeys or even Muslims. So of course they are going to push the diversity agendas even with their own fan clubs:





In the past soccer was a congregation of masculine men, many underclass and violent, but still masculine.

Now they are all cucked. There are some shitlord owners like Red Bull owner Mateschitz, but they are in the stark minority. Most are even ordered by the national leagues to be pro-refugee or go bust.

At least the fans in EE won't budge:



That is why the Polish clubs above get punished by the European soccer cucks.

Also as a side note - it takes a full system behind to sift through all the talents. You have large countries lik Russia or Poland who produce much less even white talented players than the Netherlands or Germany. The reason is connected with the network I mentioned above. No network, no progress, since you need to get them young and train them professionally in their teens. I always joke that the Russian or Polish Ronaldo is working at a local supermarket or is a truck driver. Even Brazil has a stronger focus on filtering all the soccer talents, because soccer is everything there and international scouts are frequenting the local clubs to get the next best thing. But no one is doing it in the EE and FSU countries despite the certainty that there are plenty of Messis or Ronaldos out there, but no one cares.

Post: #15227

Germany Bans Soldiers From Wearing Uniforms At G-20 Summit...For Their Own Protection

Quote:After Germany’s police discovered a trove of weapons while evicting protesters who had gathered in public parks in Hamburg in anticipation of this weekend’s G-20 summit, Der Spiegel reports that the country’s defense ministry has asked soldiers who are on duty this weekend not to wear their uniforms…for their own safety.

“Soldiers in uniform who are moving around the city during the announced protests could be the target of spontaneous attacks by violent left-wing extremist protesters,” according to an internal memo from the defense ministry, according to the Der Spiegel report, which was cited in a report by Russia Today.
To avoid attacks, soldiers have been ordered to appear in civilian dress in the host city from July 5 to 9 while the meetings are taking place. According to the ministry, protesters could attempt to disrupt the summit by occupying streets and logistics routes, as well as by targeting urban infrastructure and the city’s port.



Clashes occurred Tuesday night in the Neuer Pferdemarkt area, where thousands of activists have been rallying throughout the day, according to RT. At least 15,000 police officers from all of Germany’s federal states are being deployed to ensure public security at the summit.

Earlier, Germay's Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere warned that while peaceful demonstrations are welcome, violent protests will not be tolerated. Hamburg Interior Minister Andy Grote warned about violent actions during the protests, but assured the public that police are “prepared for this.”

Protests began days before the opening of the G20 summit, scheduled for Friday. Riot police used water cannon against protesters opposing the summit on Tuesday night. Thousands of activists had been rallying throughout the day on the Hamburg streets.

More than 10,000 protesters from across Europe are expected to flock to Hamburg, the report says, specifically making mention of anti-capitalist demonstrators from Greece, Spain, and Italy. It added that the protesters may target the G20 summit, as they regard it as representing capitalism.

World leaders, including US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will be attending the summit.

Post: #15228

Post: #15229

Ha! As soon as children are involved they suddenly care about the future. Taking hypocrisy to the next level.

Post: #15230

Post: #15231

(07-06-2017 04:11 AM)BelyyTigr Wrote:  I wasn't sure whether to put this here. Or in the "soccer" thread.
On Tuesday I was watching the Sky Sports TV "Transfer Centre".
It focussed on the most successful 4 English clubs of the past few years - Manc U, Manc C, Arse and Chelsea. It was on who they were all linked with signing ie the supposed "big new stars" of world football.

Anyway of 15 players, TWELVE were black and just 3 were non black. (Maybe 3.5 if one player could be termed half white). Now this isn't a racism issue. Many of my favourite players are black. And I have friends and family who are black and good people. We don't actually have that many black people in Britain IF stats can be believed. Apparently 3% of Britain, and the some are "half black" ontop.
These 12 players linked tended to be from European countries eg Holland, France, Italy etc.

My main question here is, "why is this happening"? The best players in the World - Bale, Ronaldo, Messi, Suarez etc are white. But there are many black players in the next level down, most notably probably Neymar.

I wonder what the cause is. Is sports science more helpful to blacks than whites currently? (Different genetic types respond to different training). Is it that the training academies favour blacks over whites. (Lots of young British players are black, far above their percentage of the population). Are we seeing players from outside the developed nations because our training systems suppress talent?

Or is there another explanation? Is football being used as a political tool? To promote mass migration more "favourably"? There was a leaked MI5 security services report which staggeringly suggested using the British Premier League to promote mass immigration of Syrians. We regularly have homo and tranny "rights" promotion at our stadia too.

If we're going into "conspiracy" territory, you could even give certain groups performance enhancing drugs, without their knowledge and give them different treatment when it comes to testing. (As an aside I know of certain footballers who were well known cokeheads but never got caught). Its widely suggested Obama helped the "Williams brothers" in their open steroid abuse (as the hack on WADA revealed) or rather "therapeutic exemption", as part of his "black role models" campaigning. Just as Bush helped his mate Lance Armstrong.

So it comes back to the question, why are indigeneous Europeans so underrepresented, even tho millions strive to become footballers? And is there a wider agenda? If so, what?

It's simple, Africans are just cheaper.

Second, blacks develop physically faster than whites, entereting puberty up to 1 year before whites on average. As you know, the difference between a kid with just 1 year of puberty vs one who hasn't entered puberty is massive, boys vs men. With the increasing globalisation, you're going to have recruitment tourneys and training in which boys aged 10 plays against each other, one group has entered puberty, one hasn't. The one which entered puberty dominates.

It was the phenomenon with Freddy Adu, who dominated youth sports, but turned out to be a massive dissapointment once he played against adults.

Post: #15232

Quote:Life & Style has exclusively learned that George Clooney has recently made plans to move back to LA, for the safety of his family, after the latest spate of terror attacks in England.

“He doesn’t feel like Amal and the twins are safe living in the English countryside,” an insider says. “He’s determined to move his family to LA, where he feels much more secure.”

http://www.lifeandstylemag.com/posts/geo...ins-135725

While he's at it, he should donate his Lake Como house to refugees, too.

Post: #15233

Apparently, the rapefugees are almost on his doorstep in Como.

Post: #15234

No comment necessary.

Post: #15235

< Wow - the black masses of Antifa thugs are amazing. Germany is fucked and cucked.

--------------

George Clooney has to do it now as the super-rich do it - move far far away from diversity - best buy properties where only a helicopter is going on massive estates, that also need to be secured. I recently watched some Denver clan episodes and the funny thing is that many of the things this now-billionaire Carrington did in the series would be utterly impossible even in the US now. You could not have such an estate without guards and security agents for example. Today even much poorer millionaires are employing armed security guards. They would even have part of the property under surveillance. The 1980s in many areas of the US and Europe were utterly peaceful. It is amazing to see Colorado so utterly white - it looks like Poland now.

Remember when they had one rape per 2 years and one murder every 5 in Sweden? That was the 70s and 80s and now they are so enriched!

George Clooney of course has to move far away now. He plans to buy an Italian estate that will probably have an entire valley as his perimeter. Safety in the West will soon only be attained by living in central luxury high-rises or remote guarded estates. The West is going the way of South America, but with the added bonus of rape and crime Jihad. Eastern European and Asian countries will be infinitely safer at least for a while.

Post: #15236

Migrants at Lake Como.
Honestly, what's not to like...

Post: #15237

I'm planning to visit Italy soon. I better book an armored limo to make sure I don't get murdered on some country road...

Post: #15238

(07-07-2017 08:54 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  I'm planning to visit Italy soon. I better book an armored limo to make sure I don't get murdered on some country road...

Forget about the migrants in Italy. Worry more about the drivers. I am not joking. Those fuckers will tailgate you on the freeway at 150km/hr less than a meter behind you.

Post: #15239

(07-06-2017 08:07 PM)RexImperator Wrote:  

Quote:Life & Style has exclusively learned that George Clooney has recently made plans to move back to LA, for the safety of his family, after the latest spate of terror attacks in England.

“He doesn’t feel like Amal and the twins are safe living in the English countryside,” an insider says. “He’s determined to move his family to LA, where he feels much more secure.”

http://www.lifeandstylemag.com/posts/geo...ins-135725

While he's at it, he should donate his Lake Como house to refugees, too.

Wait, I thought celebrities were suppose to LEAVE the USA when Trump won?!

Despite what he says, Clooney is revealing his true preference with his actions. Deep down he knows America is better for him and his family under Trump (dare I say, great again?).

Post: #15240

Clooney moved to Italy and the wealthy area of Lake Cuomo to be close to other high-rollers. He would also occasionally be able to take a stroll through town. His biggest nuisance until recently were only the paparazzi.

Now however there is the massive security risk of the rapefugees. Though to be fair - I don't think that either he or his wife go around that much in public without burly armed men to protect them.

So what else could be the reason for him selling his assets? Well - you see - your property value will increasingly take a hit the more of the enrichment lounges around the area and does crime, rape and other enriching activities. Even now it is possible that he won't get the 100 mio. $ back that he paid for it. Whenever a refugee center opens up in your neighborhood or you are plagued with the enriching vibrancy, then your property gets instantly devalued.

Clooney says goodbye to Lake Cuomo, because he knows that his real estate assets may drop to 50 mio. $ or less within the next years. The US so far does not have enforced vibrancy in all areas. So far, because those were the plans of Obama before - settle in welfare recipients into wealthy neighborhoods. Still - I cannot imagine this to work well in the US due to the lack of good public transport in many areas. The globalists may want to enrich the Americans the same way, but will fail due to the lack of the own structural weaknesses, which can be a strength in this case.

Post: #15241

(07-07-2017 10:55 AM)Dusty Wrote:  Wait, I thought celebrities were suppose to LEAVE the USA when Trump won?!

Despite what he says, Clooney is revealing his true preference with his actions. Deep down he knows America is better for him and his family under Trump (dare I say, great again?).

So basically he used his fame and his political connections to lobby for endless Islamic migration all across Europe. And then when the ugly consequences of his beloved globalist ideology start affecting him or his family he's getting his ass the hell out of Dodge. Fucking hypocrite and #collaborator. They should refuse his entry at the border.

We shall never ever let him forget about this. Every time when he opens his fucking mouth about human rights and unbridled migration he should be confronted about being a coward and a hypocrite.

Post: #15242

Haha Clooney didn't pay $100m for that mansion. It was $10m excluding renovations in 2001.

Post: #15243

(07-04-2017 08:00 AM)RIslander Wrote:  The idea that Islam will be destroyed, ever, is crazy. Islam is an idea. You could kill every Muslim on the planet and it would still exist... And some day would find followers again. It's a virus that will only be beaten down after the death toll hits unacceptable levels. It will still exist however, and evolve in the shadows for its next assault.

Islam will die. Islam is not an idea but a lie and misunderstanding. It may take hundreds or thousands of years but it will perish at some point because it is not true and at some point the ramblings of a particular camel herder called Muhammad will lose significance.

What will not die is the idea that you must kill those who think/believe differently then you. This idea will resurface in may religions and ideologies and brave and honorable people will be required to shut these evil religions and ideologies down again and again until end of humankind, may it never come or until perhaps (low chance) humankind will evolve out of mammalian territorial instincts that will take millions of years.

Post: #15244

(07-07-2017 01:09 PM)Lime Wrote:  Haha Clooney didn't pay $100m for that mansion. It was $10m excluding renovations in 2001.

I think they value his properties combined at 100 mio. $. He bought multiple houses in the vicinity as well. It is worth more, but in that case he won't be losing money.


--------------

Meanwhile in the now ever less touristy city of Paris:

http://www.westmonster.com/migrant-chaos...rom-italy/



Most want straight to the UK - new arrivals from Italy causing massive chaos.





Here you see how they are transported. An NGO shithead picks them up in Italy, gives them printouts with travel instructions that also work as a "ticket" for the private bus lines that get them to a bigger city. My guess is that the bus companies are reimbursed by the globalists, because they cannot afford to drive busloads of rapefugees for free. Then they enter the train system at which case no tickets are necessary. Since trains have a fixed schedule, the only ones who lose are the other passangers who paid for the tickets - also the cleaning crews. Arrived in France they are now pushing to get to the UK to join the armies of illegal immigrants - as become clear in that recent tower burning.

That is how Europe is being wiped out as commanded by the globalists. And the people still vote in the sheisters.

The agencies are now working overtime to at least prevent terrorist attacks, because otherwise the sheeple might react badly prematurely.

Post: #15245

It's a very big problem in the UK now, particularly with the sub-Saharans. The last two times I've been to London I have been body checked and hassled by one or two of them, I presume for being well dressed and with a pretty girl. All in the last month or two. This wasn't in the nice parts of the city, per se, but in the areas around the fringes.

We're not as far gone as France though. I was in Paris in April, and when I walked out at Gare du Nord I was intimidated for the first time in my life. There must have been close to a thousand Africans of one denomination or another milling around - not waiting for anything in particular, just because this was the new normal. They were all men of fighting age, and aggressive in their manner. Of course, there is Saint Denis just behind the station, which is pretty much a no go zone for indiginous French now, which explains their substantial presence, but even still, the problem is very much larger than anyone is letting on.

Post: #15246

Let them into London, the sooner that place turns to shit the better and other towns too. These are the places where liberals and other pond life reside and eventually the nice areas will be flooded by lower income people who are fleeing their bad decisions.

There are alot of liberals living in areas where the house price is 300k-2 million. I want them to suffer for their idiocy.

I've seen an uptick in violence reported in the news where the victims are women and by violence I mean the general grab and drag to the bushes or someplace isolated and smash their head in with a rock or other weapon. All occur in towns and cities.

They describe the victim but not the attacker which is 100% confirmation on what person did it.

Post: #15247

(07-07-2017 09:11 AM)redpillage Wrote:  

(07-07-2017 08:54 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  I'm planning to visit Italy soon. I better book an armored limo to make sure I don't get murdered on some country road...

Forget about the migrants in Italy. Worry more about the drivers. I am not joking. Those fuckers will tailgate you on the freeway at 150km/hr less than a meter behind you.

Can confirm, the right hand lane is called the lane of shame over there.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #15248

I will be interested to see how the sexual marketplace and tribal dynamics start affecting the political scene over in Europe.

When everyone looks like you and you can't get laid it's inescapable that it's your own fault (or the fault of women, who in any case may not be 'corrected').

But when your lands are being flooded with foreign men and you can't get laid then you might be prone to placing the blame elsewhere (partially fair). Young incels who suddenly have a force to blame for their lonely nights may well become a very dangerous demographic.

Post: #15249

(07-07-2017 07:12 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  Let them into London, the sooner that place turns to shit the better and other towns too. These are the places where liberals and other pond life reside and eventually the nice areas will be flooded by lower income people who are fleeing their bad decisions.

There are alot of liberals living in areas where the house price is 300k-2 million. I want them to suffer for their idiocy.

I've seen an uptick in violence reported in the news where the victims are women and by violence I mean the general grab and drag to the bushes or someplace isolated and smash their head in with a rock or other weapon. All occur in towns and cities.

They describe the victim but not the attacker which is 100% confirmation on what person did it.

London is heavily subsidised by foreign investors, tax money and the financial services. There have always been bad areas and in some cases, the bad areas were a lot more grim in the 80s/90s before gentrification. But it is still remains true that vast chunks of the city are resembling the third world, in terms of local services, violent crime and general attitudes of the population which most likely reflects the demographic changes. The population is very transient including the liberals who live there. So they don't have a great deal of investment in these areas.

The city itself is liberal ground zero, all of the institutions are entrenched in it. Ironically enough, the only reason why I like the city, is due to the transient international population that converge around the centre, and sometimes stray off into the wilderness.

Due to knowing a lot of people in the field, I find the situation with law enforcement to be very interesting in the city. Firstly they are massively overstretched, quite often they can't attend calls. The combination of high levels of crime but at the same time overbearing bureaucracy, which is fuelled by 'social justice'. Basically completely ties their hands.

If you think bank a couple of weeks ago, there was a riot in East London. Due to a 'black man being beaten to death by police, says family'. as the headlines stated. It came out the day after from the mortuary report, that this man had swallowed balls of crack cocaine and decided to fight police, at which point he died from the consumption. Even black lives matter couldn't ignore that.

Point is, you have the local government, the people and the general culture of the area. Which is trying to make things worse, by pleasuring themselves with these liberal platitudes and causes. And it is completely running the city into the ground.

Post: #15250

London has already passed the point of no return but people just don't see it yet. Humans are unable to grasp something materialising in front of them, sort of like a bystander effect but looking back you'l come to the realisation that it has changed and not for the better.

The minimum wage workers live in London close to the centre but in average areas and the higher wage earners live in the nicer postcodes, along the Thames or just outside London proper. Transient liberals will not notice these changes.