The migrants are definitely acting like they are entitled to land and services that are not theirs. Ideally a man like that farmer should have the right to expel anyone that is trespassing on his land. Its not a migrant woodstock going on there.His land has not been rented out to random people from outside of the country. If I had someone squatting in my garden I'd want them out. The farmer is definitely in the right.

I don't know how these people could be educated on the fact that they are not citizens. They are migrants. There's a difference. You don't just go to a foreign land and demand that you get housing, food, etc for free and then act as if you're entitled to squat on a citizen's land.

Don't know if it was posted before, but... MSM hints at "Islamophobic murder", where in fact it's the contrary!

The story: friendly Anglo-Pakistani shopkeeper wishes (via Facebook) a "happy Easter" to his "much loved" Christian neighbors. A few hours later, he's stabbed numerous times, and stamped upon, in his shop, by a furious islamist!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...ssage.html

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/03/the...-murder-2/



"On Thursday a Muslim shopkeeper in Glasgow was brutally murdered. Forty-year-old Asad Shah was allegedly stabbed in the head with a kitchen knife and then stamped upon. Most of the UK press began by going big on this story and referring to it as an act of ‘religious hatred’, comfortably leaving readers with the distinct feeling that – post-Brussels – the Muslim shopkeeper must have been killed by an ‘Islamophobe’. Had that been the case, by now the press would be crawling over every view the killer had ever held and every Facebook connection he had ever made. They would be asking why he had done it and investigating every one of his associates.

But it then appeared that although the Asad Shah murder was being treated by police as ‘religiously motivated’ the suspected killer might in fact have been another Muslim and that, it was speculated, there might also have been a connection with a message on Facebook in which Mr Shah wished a very happy Easter to his ‘beloved Christian nation’ and suggesting people follow in ‘The Real Footstep of Beloved Holy Jesus Christ’."

(04-02-2016 07:16 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  What amuses me is the outrage those migrants have for the farmer.

It is his land you good for nothing miscreants. Seeing as how these people fled Syria (supposedly) for free money I wouldn't bet on them understanding the rights of land this farmer has over them. This is another example of the 'gimme' mentality that is taking hold over people who think they have a right to something because they're outraged.

If this happened in the UK the farmer would be arrested, the migrants given lawyers, a spokesman and full legal aid to sue the farmer, his business and claim access rights to his land.

What do you expect?

The farmer is an infidel unjustly holding land in what now amounts to an islamic caliphate.

How dare he act with such impunity against his muslim superiors.

(04-02-2016 10:52 PM)Going strong Wrote:  "On Thursday a Muslim shopkeeper in Glasgow was brutally murdered. Forty-year-old Asad Shah was allegedly stabbed in the head with a kitchen knife and then stamped upon. Most of the UK press began by going big on this story and referring to it as an act of ‘religious hatred’, comfortably leaving readers with the distinct feeling that – post-Brussels – the Muslim shopkeeper must have been killed by an ‘Islamophobe’. Had that been the case, by now the press would be crawling over every view the killer had ever held and every Facebook connection he had ever made. They would be asking why he had done it and investigating every one of his associates.

But it then appeared that although the Asad Shah murder was being treated by police as ‘religiously motivated’ the suspected killer might in fact have been another Muslim and that, it was speculated, there might also have been a connection with a message on Facebook in which Mr Shah wished a very happy Easter to his ‘beloved Christian nation’ and suggesting people follow in ‘The Real Footstep of Beloved Holy Jesus Christ’."

When they found a refugee stabbed dead in 2015, it was of course done by Neonazis or a Pegida member (similar anyway right?) and the Police of course was racist and did not investigate. Police is also right wing.
At the end, this guy was killed by an other refugee, the big left wing protest and the big media attention fade away and at his funeral, you seen less people then you would expected.
Later the reports on Neonazis that attacked refugees slow down because most of the refugees kill each other. There had be 28 deaths that are refugee related. One victim was a German, killed by a refugee. The other 27 had be refugees that are killed by an refugee.

About fake Islamophobic or Neonazi attacks you could make a big list. Those attacks exist but mostly the truth is somewhere else.

(04-02-2016 11:17 AM)CrashBangWallop Wrote:  when the elderly land owner decided to run his plough through the hundreds of settlers.

Quote:hundreds of settlers

Quote:Settlers

Quote:Settlers

(04-02-2016 09:15 AM)CrashBangWallop Wrote:  

(04-02-2016 07:02 AM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  

(04-02-2016 04:07 AM)CrashBangWallop Wrote:  

(04-01-2016 06:24 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  [quote='CrashBangWallop' pid='1266817' dateline='1459545108']
[quote='quino_16' pid='1266756' dateline='1459539999']
Resident from London films the current Islamization of London



Birmingham, Manchester, Leicester, Bradford, Leeds, Sheffield.

All the same.

There are large populations in the cities mentioned but Bradford, Birmingham and London have populations which are much, much bigger and less viable as multicultural areas.

I've been to Sheffield, Leeds, Manchester and most northern towns and you can tell when you're in an area full of low class whites or migrants. They are nowhere near as spread out or domineering compared to the larger populations.

So when someone says "most towns and cities are overrun" I call bullshit. Hence the Chicago comparison. It has a lot of black ghetto's but they're not dominating the city and its surrounding suburbs are they?

I normally really enjoy your posts and for the record, don't think your rep count is anywhere near as high here as your contribution (which has reminded me to rep you...long overdue).

On this issue though, you are both right and wrong.

Machester for instance, has had a 100% increase in Muslims in 10 years (figures available via census although we both know full well that the number is going to be higher than the official figures).

So the absolute numbers in places like Manchester aren't as high as Birmingham, for sure. But the numbers don't tell the whole story.

I don't know how old you are, but I remember Birmingham 10 years ago because I lived there. I remember it 10 years before that for the same reason. The sheer pace of change, from majority British born to foreign and 2/3rd generation foreign born, within 20 years, is startling.

In Birmingham there are currently more Muslim children enrolled in school than Christian. That is frightening.

Manchester is simply a generation or two behind.

Muslim birthrates in the UK are at 4 per woman compared to 1.6 for white British. Coupled with an ageing white British population (that everyone is aware of...Muslims make up 1.2% of over 65s).

It doesn't take a genius to work out that we have a big problem brewing if you aren't a fan of Allah and his worshippers.

My figures are already 5 years out of date (2011 census)...things aren't going to have slowed down!

You''re mis-understanding my posts.

I know Birmingham is really skewed in regards to white British and asian/black communities and you have admitted Manchester isn't like Brum or London.

I never said they weren't going to get to that point and infact I am out and about with my job around there on the daily so I get to keep track of changes.

If you want to keep track of the consensus of the nation you should track Jewish communities. They already have guards outside their schools and patrolling the areas they reside and increasingly, especially Manchester Prestwich, the Muslim and Jewish communities are coming closer.

Jewish neighbourhoods can deal with low class white people and they prefer middle class white suburbs as buffer zones but what they cannot and will never tolerate is close proximity to Muslim communities.

I agree with you wholeheartedly on the generational change and will not dispute Birmingham but Manchester has yet to reach that point.

Jewish communities In France left because they were seeing Islamic communities converge on their position so it is only a matter of time before the same fate befalls those in select Manchester postcodes.

Can a German member confirm if this propaganda ad has hit the main stream TV in Germany? Absurd it's in English ,but fucking hell...

(04-03-2016 09:09 AM)AManLikePutin Wrote:  Can a German member confirm if this propaganda ad has hit the main stream TV in Germany? Absurd it's in English ,but fucking hell...

I am hoping this is just German humor....

Now the elites are even censoring each other!

http://www.news.com.au/world/north-ameri...1263a96672

Quote:PRESIDENT Obama is so paranoid about linking terrorists to the Muslim faith that when French President François Hollande used the phrase “Islamist terrorism” at a meeting in Washington, White House officials posted their official press video with audio of the words cut out completely.

The eight-minute clip was posted on the White House website and showed Hollande discussing the global terror threat at a Nuclear Security Summit meeting with Obama and advisers.
The White House’s transcript of the event shows the French leader declared at the 4:49 minute mark that “the roots of terrorism, Islamist terrorism, is in Syria and in Iraq.”

But rather than include Hollande’s remark in its entirety, the Obama administration posted footage in which his interpreter’s English translation of the words “Islamist terrorism” was missing.

The audio gap was first reported by the Media Research Centre, a US media watchdog.

After initially posting the video without the edits, the White House took it down and uploaded it again with the interpreter’s voice muted, the MRC reported.

The non-profit group reported that the White House’s official MP3 recording of the meeting was also censored, but that the transcript was not.

“Thanks, of course, Ministry of Propaganda offices at WH for going ahead and simply posting the proof!” a user wrote in a comment on the White House’s YouTube page.

Another wrote: “Nice backtracking, White House. You tried to censor Hollande and you know it.”

Obama — who has come under fire for refusing to say “radical Islam” or “Islamic terrorist” — made three mentions of terrorism throughout Thursday’s meeting, uttering the phrases “hands of terrorism,” “scourge of terrorism” and “counter-terrorism.”

A White House official said the audio gap was the result of a technical error that happened to come as Hollande was uttering the controversial words.

“Nothing was edited out,” the official told The Post. “A technical issue with the audio during the recording of President Hollande’s remarks led to a brief drop in the audio recording of the English interpretation. As soon as this was brought to our attention, we posted an updated video online with the complete audio, which is consistent with the written transcript.”

As of 6pm Friday (8am Saturday AEDT), the White House had posted footage with the words “Islamic terrorism” included.

Obama has stayed away from the phrase and others like it to avoid tying the world’s 1.6 billion Muslims to terrorism.

He has been blasted by Republicans for the practice, with one of his biggest critics being Ted Cruz, who took aim at Obama after last month’s Brussels terror attacks.

“Radical Islam is at war with us,” the Republican presidential candidate wrote on Facebook. “For over seven years we have had a president who refuses to acknowledge this reality. And the truth is, we can never hope to defeat this evil so long as we refuse to even name it.”

(04-03-2016 09:13 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  Now the elites are even censoring each other!

http://www.news.com.au/world/north-ameri...1263a96672

Quote:PRESIDENT Obama is so paranoid about linking terrorists to the Muslim faith that when French President François Hollande used the phrase “Islamist terrorism” at a meeting in Washington, White House officials posted their official press video with audio of the words cut out completely.

The eight-minute clip was posted on the White House website and showed Hollande discussing the global terror threat at a Nuclear Security Summit meeting with Obama and advisers.
The White House’s transcript of the event shows the French leader declared at the 4:49 minute mark that “the roots of terrorism, Islamist terrorism, is in Syria and in Iraq.”

But rather than include Hollande’s remark in its entirety, the Obama administration posted footage in which his interpreter’s English translation of the words “Islamist terrorism” was missing.

The audio gap was first reported by the Media Research Centre, a US media watchdog.

After initially posting the video without the edits, the White House took it down and uploaded it again with the interpreter’s voice muted, the MRC reported.

The non-profit group reported that the White House’s official MP3 recording of the meeting was also censored, but that the transcript was not.

“Thanks, of course, Ministry of Propaganda offices at WH for going ahead and simply posting the proof!” a user wrote in a comment on the White House’s YouTube page.

Another wrote: “Nice backtracking, White House. You tried to censor Hollande and you know it.”

Obama — who has come under fire for refusing to say “radical Islam” or “Islamic terrorist” — made three mentions of terrorism throughout Thursday’s meeting, uttering the phrases “hands of terrorism,” “scourge of terrorism” and “counter-terrorism.”

A White House official said the audio gap was the result of a technical error that happened to come as Hollande was uttering the controversial words.

“Nothing was edited out,” the official told The Post. “A technical issue with the audio

A technical issue with the audio

Obama might not be a secret Muslim but he sure does pander to them.

(04-03-2016 09:09 AM)AManLikePutin Wrote:  Can a German member confirm if this propaganda ad has hit the main stream TV in Germany? Absurd it's in English ,but fucking hell...

Yep, and that's ZDF Neo, which means that the compulsory levy they force us to pay (17,50€/month) was used to finance it. They degrade us in every way possible.

(04-03-2016 10:05 AM)Requiem Wrote:  

(04-03-2016 09:09 AM)AManLikePutin Wrote:  Can a German member confirm if this propaganda ad has hit the main stream TV in Germany? Absurd it's in English ,but fucking hell...

Yep, and that's ZDF Neo, which means that the compulsory levy they force us to pay (17,50€/month) was used to finance it. They degrade us in every way possible.

Oh, so it's kind of like a German CBC?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_B...orporation

Is anyone able to watch that without bursting out laughing when he tells you a million bicycle helmets and birkenstocks are coming for you? I was particularly terrified at the image of the two fags kissing. <shudder>

Reagan wouldn't say "AIDS". Obama won't say "Islamic Terrorists". It's the same thing. Throw it in the leftists' faces every chance you get.

@Ghost Tiger:
Yeah, it's a public tv-station financed by tax payers

This is the video-description on YouTube:

The world is going completely nuts! Europe feels threatened by 0.3% refugees, the USA are about to elect a man, of who no one really knows who is pulling the strings under the toupee and just as if that was not bad enough, Germany of all nations has to disabuse the world of how to behave morally right. I mean GERMANY! They did not even win one single world war in history!


I'm astonished that they even dare to write something like this, at least the first comments I've read strongly oppose the content.
It's incredible that the German leaders continue to threaten security and peace within Europe

Most of their audience probably think it's funny, cool and clever.
But it's the same old scheme - they often reference to the 3rd Reich and how we're so much better now, proving it by letting everyone in and letting everyone do whatever they want. The fascists of today truly do call themselves anti-fascists. "We have learned from history?" - Really? No, you haven't. You haven't learned that fucking us over with foreigners leads to us going Reich-mode. You haven't learned that going to extremes leads to extreme backlash and extreme consequences. You haven't learned that trying to oppress the counter-narrative for too long will lead to a sudden explosive emergence of it.
These faggots think they're so clever. In the old days I'd say they've got a big surprise coming their way. Now I'm not so sure. They do have one coming, but it probably won't be caused by the opposing natives.

In the talk about the mentality of the invasion and who support it, we should not forget, the lives of people are every day at the gamble. The crimes did not stop to happen.

http://www.welt.de/regionales/hamburg/ar...haben.html

Quote:A refugee shelter in Boostedt near Neumünster a small child to have been sexually abused difficult. Like alerted the guard service police reported on Wednesday a 21 year old Afghan should have passed late on Tuesday on a four year old boy.

At the same time a 29-year-old Afghan have an eight year old boy who had witnessed threatened. The police had both men arrested, it said.

Somewhere else they report the eight year old is the brother of the four year old. Both are German kids that got catch at a playground.


http://www.derwesten.de/staedte/nachrich...74886.html

Quote:In the refugee camp at the Schlossberg in Bad Laasphe it should have come on Monday evening to a sexual assault. The police believe that a 15-year-old nursing home residents has a three year old girl sexually abused.

http://www.merkur.de/welt/fluechtlingshe...38107.html

Quote:As the "Bild" newspaper and the North German Radio report (NDR), the police are of aggravated sexual abuse of a child in the Central reception center (ZEA) for refugees in Hamburg's Bahrenfeld. According to information of "image", the police were alerted on Tuesday night shortly after 19 o'clock. It was reported that a girl (7) was a victim of gang rape.

According to radio station NDR 90.3 Information five Arabic-speaking men were arrested in the investigation into the first inventory. After interrogation, the suspects were released. Senior public prosecutor Nana From Bach told the "Bild": "We have instituted proceedings against five people so far there is no corroborating urgent suspicion Investigations continue..."

The real victims are so far not Germans, most rapes, forced prostitution and so on happen inside the camps within the refugees or on their way to Germany. But well Feminist do not really care about that.

(04-04-2016 03:17 AM)Parzival Wrote:  In the talk about the mentality of the invasion and who support it, we should not forget, the lives of people are every day at the gamble. The crimes did not stop to happen.

http://www.welt.de/regionales/hamburg/ar...haben.html

Quote:A refugee shelter in Boostedt near Neumünster a small child to have been sexually abused difficult. Like alerted the guard service police reported on Wednesday a 21 year old Afghan should have passed late on Tuesday on a four year old boy.

At the same time a 29-year-old Afghan have an eight year old boy who had witnessed threatened. The police had both men arrested, it said.

Somewhere else they report the eight year old is the brother of the four year old. Both are German kids that got catch at a playground.


http://www.derwesten.de/staedte/nachrich...74886.html

Quote:In the refugee camp at the Schlossberg in Bad Laasphe it should have come on Monday evening to a sexual assault. The police believe that a 15-year-old nursing home residents has a three year old girl sexually abused.

http://www.merkur.de/welt/fluechtlingshe...38107.html

Quote:As the "Bild" newspaper and the North German Radio report (NDR), the police are of aggravated sexual abuse of a child in the Central reception center (ZEA) for refugees in Hamburg's Bahrenfeld. According to information of "image", the police were alerted on Tuesday night shortly after 19 o'clock. It was reported that a girl (7) was a victim of gang rape.

According to radio station NDR 90.3 Information five Arabic-speaking men were arrested in the investigation into the first inventory. After interrogation, the suspects were released. Senior public prosecutor Nana From Bach told the "Bild": "We have instituted proceedings against five people so far there is no corroborating urgent suspicion Investigations continue..."

The real victims are so far not Germans, most rapes, forced prostitution and so on happen inside the camps within the refugees or on their way to Germany. But well Feminist do not really care about that.

Parzival - I say this with the most due respect and as kindly as possible as I very much appreciate your contributions here. But could you take just a little bit more time fixing up the Google translations you're posting? I personally speak Germany so I don't care but I think the rest of the crew may miss a lot of what you're posting, which of course defeats the purpose ;-)

Anyway, first link: A 21-year old Afghan is supposed to have raped a 4-year old boy. Another suspect was arrested in the context of the investigation. The article talks about 'schwer missbraucht' which roughly translates into violent rape, at minimum [anal] intercourse was probably at play.

Second link: A 15-year old cultural enricher suspected of having raped a three-year old girl. He was arrested shortly after the act. What stands out in this one is that the police does not want to release any details about the victim rapist as he's still a juvenile. Fuckers.

Keeping the best one for last: A 7 year old was gang-raped by a group of five "men" (no further description given - most likely native Germans) in a home for fugitives located in Hamburg. Get this - after being interrogated by the police all five suspects have been (wait for iiiiiittt....) released for lack of evidence. They are continuing their investigations. Yup, if you have a toddler that has been raped then please follow the brown line to room B243, pick a number and wait for to be called by officer Schmidt who will take your statement and file it int he circular file.

I don't even know what to say about shit like this - I'm literally lost for words. Let me get this right - migrants are now shifting to raping toddlers and it's business as usual in Germany? What the fuck is wrong with those people? Parzival - you still live in that teutonic hellhole - can you please offer some type of explanation why those fuckers are not hanging on lamp posts? I mean I don't expect mobs of Germans patrolling streets but after one horrible incident after the other - wouldn't one expect some type of outrage? A few months ago there was ONE report of a Russian girl being raped (which turned out to be wrong but alas) and the day later a gang of Russian heavies tore up a migration center nearby. Can any of you guys imagine this shit happening in Russia or Poland? More than once? They would be fucking expelling every damn migrant the very next day.

Where do we go from here? Is this going to be it for the next few years? Visiting this thread and continuing to read about an increasing number of monstrosities like these?

We need a Holger Danske countdown...

I will do a spelling check in future on the google translation. To much trusting for technology, but you can't trust it lol

Well nothing will happen. Germans follow the law even when its for their own disadvantage. You have two reactions, those that inform themselves and get more and more angry, and the others do not even get those stuff. Busy with work and their own live, they do not research all the time on this topic and many stuff is already just in the local newspaper. Even if they get it and feel anger, what's next? Beat up the next immigrant? Its not that the police don't investigate. Even those people get a punishment. Mostly you never hear about that, because when the court occurs its some time after the actual case occurred. The sentences happen but they are questionable.
Where should the outrage go? I'm sure many Germans feel anger but they don't know where to put it on. When you just beat up a stranger, what are the consequences for your personal life? Oh and there are more then 1000 attacks on refugee camps.

http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschlan...74448.html

Quote:The number of attacks on refugee shelters has increased fivefold in 2015, according to Federal Police BKA. The security agencies are alerted - well, because not only radical right violence attack.

Refugee shelters are increasingly become the targets of aggressive xenophobes: According to a survey from the Federal Criminal Police (BKA) there were last year 1005 attacks on asylum accommodation. Of thus have 901 a clearly right-wing background. The number has thus increased fivefold in one year in 2014 there were 199 attacks, of which 177 had such a background.
In particular, the proportion of the violence has increased: So the BKA registered last year 173 cases, while it was in 2014, only 28 are counted. Of these, it was at 92 assaults by arson in 2014 there were 6. In the current year the BKA state security have been already recorded 35 attacks on refugee homes.

(04-04-2016 05:33 AM)Parzival Wrote:  I will do a spelling check in future on the google translation. To much trusting for technology, but you can't trust it lol

Well nothing will happen. Germans follow the law even when its for their own disadvantage. You have two reactions, those that inform themselves and get more and more angry, and the others do not even get those stuff. Busy with work and their own live, they do not research all the time on this topic and many stuff is already just in the local newspaper. Even if they get it and feel anger, what's next? Beat up the next immigrant? Its not that the police don't investigate. Even those people get a punishment. Mostly you never hear about that, because when the court occurs its some time after the actual case occurred. The sentences happen but they are questionable.
Where should the outrage go? I'm sure many Germans feel anger but they don't know where to put it on. When you just beat up a stranger, what are the consequences for your personal life? Oh and there are more then 1000 attacks on refugee camps.

http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschlan...74448.html

Quote:The number of attacks on refugee shelters has increased fivefold in 2015, according to Federal Police BKA. The security agencies are alerted - well, because not only radical right violence attack.

Refugee shelters are increasingly become the targets of aggressive xenophobes: According to a survey from the Federal Criminal Police (BKA) there were last year 1005 attacks on asylum accommodation. Of thus have 901 a clearly right-wing background. The number has thus increased fivefold in one year in 2014 there were 199 attacks, of which 177 had such a background.
In particular, the proportion of the violence has increased: So the BKA registered last year 173 cases, while it was in 2014, only 28 are counted. Of these, it was at 92 assaults by arson in 2014 there were 6. In the current year the BKA state security have been already recorded 35 attacks on refugee homes.

Where should the outrage go? In dethroning Merkel as soon as possible and closing all borders!!

Of course we both know that it will never happen, the Germans have been weakened and defanged to the point where they are unable to muster any sort of civil resistance. And you rightly point out that German obedience prevails to a fault. Except that unlike during the Third Reich this time around they are exterminating each other.

Frankly I'm less worried about the Germans and more worried about the white race and European culture in general. Although I think original German heritage needs to be preserved I must recognize that your country is most likely already lost. So is France and so is Sweden. One domino after the other is falling and only a small minority is ready to take the required action. There are conservative sympathizers who might hold their nose and vote for the AfD, Front National, Swedish Democrats, etc. but the majority of them would scoff at the notion of expelling all but a small number of Muslims from Europe. The cultural enrichment has taken root and it will be almost impossible to weed out. GAME OVER.

And there you have it - I have stated this many times before. Unless Muslims return to their own cultural domain (i.e. the Middle East and parts of Asia) Europe is going to be outbred within a generation or two. Therefore there will be no great European war - the demographic change is exponential and by the time most native Europeans wake up to their new reality it will be already over as they will have to face being kicked out of their own nations or worse.

Some areas will remain, others will fail. Those that share traditional values will move to the strongholds but in general, Germany is an old country. Old people and young women welcome the invaders. The old don't care. It will show up when the few remaining German kids will be the minority. Most do underestimate the impact it has, that most of those that arrive are males below 30. The change goes slow. Its not that there is crime everywhere. Beside burglary all crimes went even down in 2015. The impact is seen slower, on the long run.

There are members here that are from Berlin, when I shared this video about the criminal migrants in certain areas, they said its not that bad. Its not a no go area. There it start. People get used to this little stuff. They accept it. Natural human behaviour, as long as you don't push to hard, people try to adapt and do their living. Such areas will spread when the masses of invaders realise, they have no real future here. Young men with no women, jobs, money. They will turn violent. We've seen this already with other immigrants.

But, the borders are close. Not in Germany, by the lead of Austria and Austria claim they want to close other routes as well. Is this good or bad? Depends. Because of the massive invasion last year, Germans woke up and there was a lot of tension. If the border would stay open, more Germans would do something. Now Merkel wins, others close the borders for her and the force of change is kind of gone. When now the invaders keep on slipping in in slow numbers, the pressure is gone. People feel less pushed against the wall and so they care less. They will deal with the little crimes and issues. Till its to late. So actual, such a huge impact of refugees like the last year, this would bring a real change. But now, its like an engine without fuel.

(04-02-2016 07:31 PM)dain_bramage Wrote:  The migrants are definitely acting like they are entitled to land and services that are not theirs. Ideally a man like that farmer should have the right to expel anyone that is trespassing on his land. Its not a migrant woodstock going on there.His land has not been rented out to random people from outside of the country. If I had someone squatting in my garden I'd want them out. The farmer is definitely in the right.

I don't know how these people could be educated on the fact that they are not citizens. They are migrants. There's a difference. You don't just go to a foreign land and demand that you get housing, food, etc for free and then act as if you're entitled to squat on a citizen's land.

Unless you are in France, which specifically stated that you have 48 hours to evict someone from your house until it basically his residents. After which, you can start a 6-month process to get your house back.

Of course most people just hire a bunch of big Russian men to just throw the fuckers out, buttttttttttttttttt he is legally entitled to sue you.....


===========================

In other news, French people couldn't care less about terrorists right now because they are busy protesting the new labour laws that supposedly "discriminate" against people under 26. The young, old, cucked and horny all pour out into the streets protesting in great numbers, even demolishing commissariats.

It's always a true fucking pity for the French, because of all the people they might eventually have the biggest potential to turn things around, if only they turn their collective efforts and hatred toward the correct target. But I suppose Muslim invaders are not as big of a threat as a the possible annullment of their can-not-be-fired-from-jobs.

Meanwhile, job unemployment in France keeps soaring because uneducated children of blacks and muslim immigrants struggle to find a job, but oh well....

Two things you will notice as time goes on.

1: The French will always strike, they will get attacked and they will surrender
2: Muslims and illegal migrants will stay on point and will not defer from their chosen path. This path being the one we have witnessed over the years.

My bets are on the Muslims and migrants. The French will need a revolution of sorts to change their fate and right now they're more interested in acquiring mistresses, cucking their husbands with illicit children, getting fat off of EU subsidies, annoying the roast beefs, agreeing with Germany on everything, drinking wine.

France has beautiful countryside and nice towns but that'll only last as long as France keeps its migrant populations to the larger towns and cities. I don't see how their economy can survive so many leeches if the EU goes bankrupt.