(10-08-2015 03:39 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  There is literally nothing that I see that could threaten the elite for now.

Frankly their main danger lies in people voting for one of those few interest free money anti-immigration parties in Europe. Golden Dawn has it, there is also this one that Handsome Creepy has mentioned in Croatia. But most of them are either under-funded and probably deeply subverted already (the Croatian one requires every higher party member to get a conviction fighting "for the cause" which is ridiculous and seems like one of the plans that internal saboteurs can only make up). Or the parties swerve into deep racism, anti-semitism, Nazi-worship etc - this can also be easily manipulated as we know from FBI and German police reports that practically 100% of Neo-Nazi groups have undercover cops serving there. In some instances the entire leadership consists of cops, which is really funny since they don't know each other and only find out when they come arresting someone.

So no - I don't see any organized good resistance so far. Any real resistance would have to be well-funded, totally controlled by one or a few men who cannot be corrupted and call 100% of the shots and all of them would risk their lives, the lives of their families and their fortunes. I would not recommend it for anyone creating such a party or movement in our times unless you are Superman incarnate and there is no kryptonite left on earth.

I see the US presidential election as a possible turning-point in History. If Trump is elected, it means Western people will have rejected and defeated the treacherous media and elites-backed narrative, which holds us down...

(Medium-term, Russian "Renaissance" might be threatening the globalist-elites, also, we'll see)

As to salvation from within Europe, well, we have Le Pen, maybe Farage, who could at some point rise to power...

(10-08-2015 04:30 AM)Dan Woolf Wrote:  The only Finnish party that had any sort of anti-refugees agenda just dropped from second largest party to the fifth place in the latest poll. This is the biggest drop for one party in decades:

PS is the anti-immigration party.

I'm laughing my ass off, to be honest.

Isn't this because their leader balked?

(10-07-2015 01:42 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Just listened to a talk of Molyneux and a Harvard-educated scientist who is an expert on IQ distribution.



I personally did not know that there was such a massive distribution between races - highly apparent in the US.



According to them the highest race based IQ are actually the Ashkenazi Jews - a whopping 117 average as measured in Israel and across the globe.
Then followed by East Asians of China, Hong Kong, Korea and Japan - 107.
Then followed by various countries of Caucasians which range from 98 to 106 depending on the White population.

There is a bit more to Human Biodiversity than IQ. There is also Clannishness. Northwestern Europeans are the least clannish, and this helps them build civilization in such a way that compensates for having lower IQs then say the Chinese (Chinese are a pretty clannish high IQ population and it holds them back, especially compared to the Japanese who are probably the least clannish of the northeast asians).

This is a good summary: https://jaymans.wordpress.com/2015/09/21...the-brain/

And this guy is Jamaican, English, and Chinese so one can't accuse him of bias.

Molyneux also has an interview with Charles Murray, author of the bell curve. Murray expects that, due to the pace of genetic research, these findings will be factually undeniable in the 2020s. And that the debate over them will be pretty well known.

So I see the best strategy is to prepare European people for that time, by rousing that Saxon anger.

----------------------------------------

^ question for you specifically Dan Woolf, the Finns party's decline you mentioned a few pages back. Is their loss of support due to their leader being spineless? Didn't he say closing the border is what North Korea does?

But yea, Sweden's state is probably due to having been at peace for a long time. So masculinity is devalued from lack of need.

That said, the way it's decline has manifested could ONLY have happened to a less clannish population. So the situation could be described as "genes expressed in an environment".

There is a good way to circumvent this lack of clannishness though. The thing with altruistic peoples is that, they have a mechanism to punish freeloaders. Something that would obviously come in handy. As it stands, the idea of "white privilege" is blocking this mechanism, by making them think that they are the freeloaders.

However that propaganda is falling apart. When one looks at European criticism of refugees it is not based in a notion of "they are different and inferior, get rid of them" it is "they are exploiting us." So we are seeing the mechanism for Altruistic Punishment working right now.

----------------------------------------

(10-08-2015 08:56 PM)Eskhander Wrote:  

(10-07-2015 01:42 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Just listened to a talk of Molyneux and a Harvard-educated scientist who is an expert on IQ distribution.



I personally did not know that there was such a massive distribution between races - highly apparent in the US.



According to them the highest race based IQ are actually the Ashkenazi Jews - a whopping 117 average as measured in Israel and across the globe.
Then followed by East Asians of China, Hong Kong, Korea and Japan - 107.
Then followed by various countries of Caucasians which range from 98 to 106 depending on the White population.

There is a bit more to Human Biodiversity than IQ. There is also Clannishness. Northwestern Europeans are the least clannish, and this helps them build civilization in such a way that compensates for having lower IQs then say the Chinese (Chinese are a pretty clannish high IQ population and it holds them back, especially compared to the Japanese who are probably the least clannish of the northeast asians).

This is a good summary: https://jaymans.wordpress.com/2015/09/21...the-brain/

And this guy is Jamaican, English, and Chinese so one can't accuse him of bias.

I'm looking through that blog right now and this is my reaction:



Definitely something to study more in the future. Wonder if there's any "credible" studies I can refer to that has a similar thesis since peer-reviewed papers in journals is basically the modern version of holy scripture.

(10-08-2015 09:29 PM)Dan Woolf Wrote:  

(10-08-2015 09:11 PM)Eskhander Wrote:  ^ question for you specifically Dan Woolf, the Finns party's decline you mentioned a few pages back. Is their loss of support due to their leader being spineless? Didn't he say closing the border is what North Korea does?

It's mostly because they betrayed the working class and the low-income earners. They said they are on their side, but now they are cutting benefits, salaries and vacation days from them so those workers jumped back to the Social Democrats (SDP gained 3,9 and True Finns lost 4,3). Of course part of is that they, quite rightfully, can't understand the need to cut from the natives if there's an infinite magic wall for the foreigners.

It's interesting. Might be that the leader of the True Finns will be ousted. Whatever happens, new elections are a real possibility right now, the coalition is nearing the breaking point.

These national socialist parties in Scandinavia, Danish People's Party, True Finns, Sweden Democrats, they are all frauds and will sell their immigration policy for increased government.

There can be no stop to immigration and multi-culti without killing the short haired, feminazi big government. The big government is made up of the corrupt and the incompetent and the malicious intended.

The same goes for UKIP who is also a fraud since they won't work with Front National. This is the perfect test for if your 'anti-immigration' party is legit. If they will not work with Front National then they are cucks, which is DPP, True Finns, Sweden Democrats and UKIP, probably also Vlam Belang or what it's called in Belgium and that the Dutch party.

Why won't they work with Front National? Because the old man said some mean things about jews (and still had high poll results). If you're a cuck for Israel then you are not part of the solution, pretty simple.

In reality, votes would be better spent at the most fiscally outrageous party you could find, something far left wing, which will spend the welfare states into the ground within short time.

Once welfare states are beginning to die, will all the SJW types come running right to daddy.

Irony of our times.

Quote:EUROPE’S RAPE EPIDEMIC: WESTERN WOMEN WILL BE SACRIFICED AT THE ALTAR OF MASS MIGRATION

About 20 years ago I lived in the Netherlands. Amsterdam to be precise. I don’t know if it is still the same but finding decent affordable accommodation in Amsterdam is an onerous task – especially when you are on a budget, as I was. After some difficulty, I did find a fairly decent flat, but I left it, in the middle of the night, with my rucksack and all my possessions, because my landlord did not understand, nor did he want to accept, that I wasn’t interested in a sexual relationship with him.

Fast forward eight months or so, and I am living in a new flat with a female friend of mine. Late one night, while my friend and I were sitting talking in her room, someone let himself in. He immediately decided to take his trousers off and walk in to the bedroom with a stupid “entitled” grin on his face. We left the flat, there and then, with our rucksacks and all our possessions. So, twice within a year I had to leave the place I lived because of nasty little men who thought they had every right to treat women as if we owe them sex.

In both cases, the landlords were Moroccan immigrants who had not long been living in Holland. On a separate occasion, a taxi driver drove past several times while I was walking with a friend in central Amsterdam. He threw a rather grim present out the window at us. It didn’t hit us.

more...

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/10/...migration/

ibid Wrote:Much more recently, I travelled from Copenhagen to Malmo by train. Only moments after the train entered Swedish territory, I was witness to what I can only assume to be representative of the new Sweden: a young blonde woman was jogging and had the misfortune of passing a group of men (I have been heavily criticised for describing them as “Middle Eastern-looking men” but that is what they were) who proceeded immediately to harass her – blocking her way, shouting, grabbing their genitals.

(10-08-2015 10:36 PM)Wutang Wrote:  

(10-08-2015 08:56 PM)Eskhander Wrote:  

(10-07-2015 01:42 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Just listened to a talk of Molyneux and a Harvard-educated scientist who is an expert on IQ distribution.



I personally did not know that there was such a massive distribution between races - highly apparent in the US.



According to them the highest race based IQ are actually the Ashkenazi Jews - a whopping 117 average as measured in Israel and across the globe.
Then followed by East Asians of China, Hong Kong, Korea and Japan - 107.
Then followed by various countries of Caucasians which range from 98 to 106 depending on the White population.

There is a bit more to Human Biodiversity than IQ. There is also Clannishness. Northwestern Europeans are the least clannish, and this helps them build civilization in such a way that compensates for having lower IQs then say the Chinese (Chinese are a pretty clannish high IQ population and it holds them back, especially compared to the Japanese who are probably the least clannish of the northeast asians).

This is a good summary: https://jaymans.wordpress.com/2015/09/21...the-brain/

And this guy is Jamaican, English, and Chinese so one can't accuse him of bias.

I'm looking through that blog right now and this is my reaction:


Definitely something to study more in the future. Wonder if there's any "credible" studies I can refer to that has a similar thesis since peer-reviewed papers in journals is basically the modern version of holy scripture.

Try unz.com for the rest. That's like the Mecca of Human Biodiversity.

His twitter is also good (Jaymans') as he'll retweet maps that show things like "best place for X" or "Trait Y across the world" and comment on how the maps will basically be the same. So the least corrupt places to live will match up with IQ, safety, etc. Stuff like that.

He is really left wing though, however he's informed so much can be learned.

He even has a blog post on the manosphere.
https://jaymans.wordpress.com/2013/10/19...-nonsense/

It's generally positive. His only real disagreement coming from RoK's disdain for left wing policies.

Quote:Finland was in a war in 1945. Finland shielded Sweden from the Soviet Union twice, that must be one of the reasons why Swedes are more soft and more accepting of immigration than Finns.

Perhaps. But Russophobia is a different thing.

Now we can read in any media outlet that 500 "migrants" are coming over the Swedish border every day. No problem.

But try to change that to "500 Russian migrants are crossing the Eastern border now daily" and people would be in panic. Arabs seem to be totally fine but Russians are the plague.

Our Minister of Finances Alexander Stubb recently spoke in Brussels about having a warm heart and a cold head in times like these. And that Europe is all about tearing down walls, not building walls.

So, dear Alex. When will you tear down the 1000+ km fence against Russia?

Maybe the situation now is for the sake of Europe. Many people have to face the truth, no more PC ideology when you face the consequences daily. Blown away by a storm of muslim immigrants, goodbye PC.
The empty phrases face a cruel reality of mass immigration. Sometimes you have to destroy to build up something new. So open the gates.

Look how the rate of voters goes down in every election, still there are no consequences. Why? Because the welfare system work, we are all live in a happy wonderland - still. Now with an over ageing society and mass immigration the limits are shown more clear. Citizens have to face a different reality every day, when you have to face some things then you change. Its not nice sweet words of political correctness that helps when you have mass immigration in your neighbourhood and see it change in a bad way.

Rip away the lies and let the sound of drums and thunder of cultural enrichment become a reality for the hippster cultural marxist. Let their dreams come true and see its a nightmare.

I won't say "so open the gates" but they will get what they desire.

(10-08-2015 11:40 PM)Eskhander Wrote:  

(10-08-2015 10:36 PM)Wutang Wrote:  

(10-08-2015 08:56 PM)Eskhander Wrote:  

(10-07-2015 01:42 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Just listened to a talk of Molyneux and a Harvard-educated scientist who is an expert on IQ distribution.



I personally did not know that there was such a massive distribution between races - highly apparent in the US.



According to them the highest race based IQ are actually the Ashkenazi Jews - a whopping 117 average as measured in Israel and across the globe.
Then followed by East Asians of China, Hong Kong, Korea and Japan - 107.
Then followed by various countries of Caucasians which range from 98 to 106 depending on the White population.

There is a bit more to Human Biodiversity than IQ. There is also Clannishness. Northwestern Europeans are the least clannish, and this helps them build civilization in such a way that compensates for having lower IQs then say the Chinese (Chinese are a pretty clannish high IQ population and it holds them back, especially compared to the Japanese who are probably the least clannish of the northeast asians).

This is a good summary: https://jaymans.wordpress.com/2015/09/21...the-brain/

And this guy is Jamaican, English, and Chinese so one can't accuse him of bias.

I'm looking through that blog right now and this is my reaction:


Definitely something to study more in the future. Wonder if there's any "credible" studies I can refer to that has a similar thesis since peer-reviewed papers in journals is basically the modern version of holy scripture.

He is really left wing though, however he's informed so much can be learned.


It's generally positive. His only real disagreement coming from RoK's disdain for left wing policies.

That actually makes me respect him more. It's just a sign that he's truly committed to the intellectual integrity of his research and is not projecting his personal views into it. There's certain subjects where research results aren't going to prone to being twisted in order to align with the researcher's bias (the life cycle of dung beetles for example) and there's other subjects where it's near impossible since so many emotions are at stake, race is the best example of this so it's good we have a guy that most likely is not letting his views on other subjects cloud his view on the subject at hand.

Quote:(the Croatian one requires every higher party member to get a conviction fighting "for the cause" which is ridiculous and seems like one of the plans that internal saboteurs can only make up)

(10-08-2015 09:03 PM)Dan Woolf Wrote:  Zelcorpion and others, how much of this is because of natural development? Societies have cycles and this sort of thing with feminism, weak men, welfare state and immigration of barbarians has been happening all over the history. And for example, the last time Sweden was in a war was in the early 19th century and the last time Finland was in a war was in 1945. Finland shielded Sweden from the Soviet Union twice, that must be one of the reasons why Swedes are more soft and more accepting of immigration than Finns.

This question is reasonable, but like Roosh described the issue before, it also exposes the ridiculousness of modern evolutionary theory.

First we have theories that Europe is weak and soft because all of its murderous people have been executed and finally anyone with any bit of martial spirit has died in numerous wars and world wars...
...and then we say that Sweden is soft because it was shielded from war? What kind of theory is that if any answer to it is satisfactory?

(10-08-2015 09:03 PM)Dan Woolf Wrote:  Zelcorpion and others, how much of this is because of natural development? Societies have cycles and this sort of thing with feminism, weak men, welfare state and immigration of barbarians has been happening all over the history. And for example, the last time Sweden was in a war was in the early 19th century and the last time Finland was in a war was in 1945. Finland shielded Sweden from the Soviet Union twice, that must be one of the reasons why Swedes are more soft and more accepting of immigration than Finns.

That's nothing of that sort frankly. There are multiple factors, how strong the church is and their grip on the mental structure of the people, how the general economic situation looks like, how the educational system works etc.

Also - I might add - I have read in alternative books that Sweden last war where almost everyone around them declared war on them was based on the fact that they opposed the global money powers and initiated interest free money. Gustav III was even killed by Freemasons (back then the main venue of power as NGOs and corporations were not the main tools).

In any case - I don't think that the Scandinavians are inherently soft - up until the early 20th century or even 1950/60s life was hard in most of those countries - especially Norway or Finland.

When the force of the religion or the family is not strong, then indoctrination via school, academia, media and politics can indeed work fast. I can see it even here in Poland. While most still oppose the rampant immigration there is a growing highly progressive subset of young Poles who are all pro LGBT, pro immigration, pro feminism etc. They see it as opposition to the oppressive church doctrine and the right leaning parts of society. If Poland was more economically successful, then that part of society would be much greater.

Also I might add - the more intelligent and educated a population is, the faster new sets of top-down beliefs can be poured into that society. So in contrast a stupid population relies more heavily on the mental patterns of the previous generation as can be seen in the migrants coming over. They are harder to change via media and academia.

(10-09-2015 01:08 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

Quote:(the Croatian one requires every higher party member to get a conviction fighting "for the cause" which is ridiculous and seems like one of the plans that internal saboteurs can only make up)

Yeah - well - I think that rule is stupid. Even if not raised by a saboteur, then it is dumb. Also I might add - real government agents can break the law x-times and will have their record cleared in no time, so this rule of that party of yours is nuts. And this is a shame because the program is great.

Still - I don't think that we can vote our way out of this frankly, unless you have a party that is financed and controlled by one person at the top who cannot be corrupted. But then again - he can be threatened, blackmailed and killed. And I don't see any such party in Europe or anywhere else at all.

It's even possible or likely that all far right parties might betray their people after gotten to power. But again they may stem the flow a bit.

(10-09-2015 01:24 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(10-09-2015 01:08 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

Quote:(the Croatian one requires every higher party member to get a conviction fighting "for the cause" which is ridiculous and seems like one of the plans that internal saboteurs can only make up)

Yeah - well - I think that rule is stupid. Even if not raised by a saboteur, then it is dumb. Also I might add - real government agents can break the law x-times and will have their record cleared in no time, so this rule of that party of yours is nuts. And this is a shame because the program is great.

Still - I don't think that we can vote our way out of this frankly, unless you have a party that is financed and controlled by one person at the top who cannot be corrupted. But then again - he can be threatened, blackmailed and killed. And I don't see any such party in Europe or anywhere else at all.

It's even possible or likely that all far right parties might betray their people after gotten to power. But again they may stem the flow a bit.

The rule of the Living Wall is that you need to have participated in multiple blockades of evictions, not that you need to have a conviction. Also, arrest for participation in a blockade results in a fine and temporary prison, not a permanent record like a felony.

Furthermore, the party regularly highlights the absurdity of our own government's criminality and the absurdity of our ex-PM Ivo Sanader (who stole billions) being released by the Supreme Court while at the same time they are being arrested en masse. It highlights the absurdity of our government claiming that we don't have enough police to close our borders while at the same time sending hundreds of policemen to enforce the will of foreign-owned banks.

Thanks to this party, you have practically everyone in Croatia being exposed to the entire contents of this thread: how money is created, who actually rules over us, what is the actual purpose of migrants, feminism, neonazis, partisans/ustasha and similar things, enormous anti-american, anti-EU and anti-NATO sentiment.

They are experiencing heavy censorship by our mainstream media, who have devoted less than 1% (yes, one percent!) of their politics-related space to the party that consistently wins over half of the vote in internet polls and around a fifth of the vote in polls on the ground, and are only mentioning the Living Wall in an occasional hit piece.
To give you a perspective how big The Living Wall is, they have over 100 000 fans on Facebook, while the ruling parties have less than 20 000. Of course fans on Facebook don't translate into votes automatically, but surely it is an indicator of doing something right. Old people are favorable to them too simply through word of mouth efforts, and small businesses hang Living Wall placards in their storefronts.

Yes, you never know what will happen and maybe they will be assassinated or become victims of a color revolution or simply bought off - you never know. But for now, everything points to them having a consistent record and actually being a trustworthy organization. If they weren't, they wouldn't be facing this enormous amount of censorship. They have caused an entire country and all of its surrounding countries - roughly 20 million people - to make their programme a common topic of conversation:

- taking Croatia out of the EU and NATO
- taking no more than a small number of actual refugees and strictly filtering and refusing all the rest by closing the border
- declaring all accumulated foreign debt illegal (declaring bankruptcy and refusing to pay any debts recklessly ran up by previous governments)
- taking control of the central bank and beginning to issue our own independent currency
- eliminating fractional reserve banking (by raising the reserve requirement to 100%)
- restoring the national control of vital national interests such as the energy sector, transportation, telecommunications, and banks
- impeachment and trials for judges and politicians who cucked for the outrageous abuses committed during privatisation or the reign of foreign banks in Croatia
- allowing freedom of choice regarding vaccination
- ban on GMO foods and crops
- legalization of production, sale and usage of cannabis
- eliminating "hate speech" laws and other tools made for suppressing public discourse

Zel, forgive me for saying this as I have always valued your contributions, but I am severely disappointed by your passivity. You spend your days on the forum railing against the money elite, NWO, USA, NATO and the assorted villains, yet when someone actually stands up against these things, you roll into a fetal position and start whining how it's impossible. Give me a break man. Do something for a change.

We might get disappointed later, but right now all signs point towards the Living Wall being an actual possibility.

(10-09-2015 01:53 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  - taking control of the central bank and beginning to issue our own independent currency
- eliminating fractional reserve banking (by raising the reserve requirement to 100%)
- restoring the national control of vital national interests such as the energy sector, transportation, telecommunications, and banks
- impeachment and trials for judges and politicians who cucked for the outrageous abuses committed during privatisation or the reign of foreign banks in Croatia
- allowing freedom of choice regarding vaccination
- ban on GMO foods and crops
- legalization of production, sale and usage of cannabis
- eliminating "hate speech" laws and other tools made for suppressing public discourse[/i]

Zel, forgive me for saying this as I have always valued your contributions, but I am severely disappointed by your passivity. You spend your days on the forum railing against the money elite, NWO, USA, NATO and the assorted villains, yet when someone actually stands up against these things, you roll into a fetal position and start whining how it's impossible. Give me a break man. Do something for a change.

We might get disappointed later, but right now all signs point towards the Living Wall being an actual possibility.

Well - as I said - Living Wall has a great program. The last time a sovereign power in Europe did that and issued it's own currency was in Sweden and all the surrounding nations suddenly declared war on him. Hitler did it only for 40% of the economic output.

What I do or do not do is up to me. I am raising awareness to some degree.

My personal perception about life is more of a spiritual kind and this world being always in a the flux of good and evil. I have no motivation to be part of that struggle - even if you erect utopia, then the next day some parties will be plotting on how to tear it down and how they can come up on top. That is just my personal philosophy.

Also - who said that I don't have plans on how to act on it? I do, but those plans of mine are more long-term and I will talk about them later.

Though occasionally I would risk my life and everything if I thought that it would warrant it. It is commendable that such an opportunity presents itself in Croatia. We will see how it develops - you have literally the entire world power set against it. In my opinion I am not fatalistic or defeatist, but I am quite aware of the reach and strength of the money power and I am not underestimating it. Picking my battles is my own choice.

A blonde Danish teenager who murdered her mother after watching ISIS' sickening filmed beheadings of British hostages has been jailed along with her older jihadi lover.



Lisa Borch was aged only 15 when in October last year she spent hours on YouTube watching footage of the savage decapitations of David Haines and Alan Henning. Afterwards she and her radical Muslim boyfriend Bakhtiar Mohammed Abdulla, 29, took a long-bladed kitchen knife and stabbed her mother Tina Römer Holtegaard at least 20 times at the home they shared in rural Kvissel. A court which sentenced Borch to nine years in jail heard how she became obsessed with militant Islam after falling in love with an unnamed Muslim man.

But he jilted her when he moved back to Sweden to be with his wife and children.

Nevertheless she found a new soulmate in Iraq-born Abdulla, whom she befriended after meeting at a refugee centre near her home.

xxx

The Daily Mail scribes are obviously reading this thread for trolling inspiration

----------------------------------------

Heh - the official numbers for Sweden are in: 2000 per day confirmed!

http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/paflyk...1542605.ab

That means 60.000 / month and 720.000 by next year - that is massive for a country of 9.5 mio - smaller in population than London or New York. Also - I might add - almost all of them Muslims with the known problems in tow.

Sweden will be the first country to topple and get Israeli conditions of daily knife attacks, bombings etc. The difference of course being that Sweden invited them all.


Of course Sweden wants more of them as should anyone.

---

Also in Austria prisons are filled to the brim with smugglers and probably otherwise unnamed criminals that the officials do not wish to name:
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/europes...rs-n440741




Also a great tragedy happened in Austria as they found a truck filled with dead refugees as they suffocated in an obviously air-tight truck, which is indeed a good design there. When Merkel & co hear of this they vow to prevent such future things to happen. The video is of course pure propaganda as they show those poor poor refugees shouting "UN Help Us".

http://www.economist.com/news/europe/216...-her-limit

And another article by the Economist - Merkel at her limit, but it seems as if nothing really matters:

Quote:Mainstream society is tolerant but edgy. In a survey by German public television 51% of Germans say that they fear the refugee influx, 13 points more than in September. Approval of Mrs Merkel dropped by 9 points to her lowest level since 2011 (though it is still a respectable 54%). In two other polls Mrs Merkel slid from Germany’s most popular politician to fourth.

Quote:The backlash does not yet threaten Mrs Merkel’s hold on power. While extremist parties have become serious contenders for power in some other European countries, they remain marginal in Germany, and voters have faith that their government will restore order, says Timo Lochocki of the German Marshall Fund, a think-tank. The chancellor faces no Christian Democratic challenger. The centre-left Social Democrats are internally torn. And the leftist opposition cannot attack her for a refugee policy they themselves support.

Mrs Merkel is under pressure as never before. Yet the crisis has brought out a new style of leadership in her. For years she has been accused of following public opinion rather than guiding it. Now she has found her moral calling. “If we start having to apologise for showing a friendly face in emergencies,” she says defiantly, “then this is not my country.”

Yeah - it's more like: "What are going to do peasants? Vote for the Neonazis or anyone who speaks ill of immigrants that we label racist instantly? So you are stuck with me."



Well - it's as the green party said - they won't need the German voters in a few years, since they will be the minority. Indeed Claudia "Fatima" Roth - indeed - that might be the case in Germany, Belgium and France. I wonder how you will like living in the new multicultural paradise.



Another quote of that politician - probably militant feminist lesbian. "The Turks have rebuilt Germany after the war."
No - Germany was rebuilt completely in the 1950s to 60s. In the 70s, they became such a massive economic super-power that foreign workers from Italy, Greece, Austria or Turkey had to be pulled to deal with all the labor demands (they had a net negative employment rate).

Also a little known fact of history was that part of the reason why Germany was rebuilt so fast after war was that big German (Nazi) industrialists and ministers transferred huge assets to Switzerland before the end of the war and pulled them back to Germany to rebuild the infrastructure. The amount was much greater than the Marshall plan. That little fact is not known and will not be taught.

Anyway - of course the rebuilding of Germany was done by the highly educated, disciplined and industrious German people and not by Turks. But history is getting the PC treatment - the crusades were brutal conquests of peaceful Muslims and the hundreds of attacks in centuries, slavery and the raping and pillaging of European cities by Muslim hordes for centuries - all of it was a harmonious co-existence. It's as if a SJW is rewriting history in our times. Soon they will preach that Al-Quaeda brought peace and prosperity to Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya and the local soldiers were all evil mass-murderers.

----------------------------------------